PDA

View Full Version : 200 Bank Failures Expected in 2010



chauncy republicans
01-18-2010, 06:32 PM
http://www.moneyandmarkets.com/200-bank-failures-expected-in-2010-5-37392


by Martin D. Weiss, Ph.D. (http://www.moneyandmarkets.com/topic/experts/martin-d-weiss-phd) 01-18-10
Washington has so thoroughly botched its supervision of the banking industry that 200 banks are likely to fail this year — easily surpassing last year’s 140 bank failures … inevitably involving the greatest bank losses in history … and already costing the FDIC ten times more than the great S&L and banking crisis of the 1980s did. I am not basing these conclusions on conjecture. They come straight from official sources. Specifically …
In her testimony before the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission on Thursday (http://www.fdic.gov/news/news/speeches/chairman/spjan1410.html), FDIC Chairman Blair attacked the Fed under Greenspan for causing the housing bubble and subsequent debt crisis with its highly stimulative, low interest rate policy of the 2000s.
She slammed virtually all of Washington for allowing banks to establish a huge, high-risk “shadow banking system.”
And she made it abundantly clear that, without sweeping, far-reaching reforms, we risk another devastating debt crisis.
Each of her conclusions is abundantly obvious and thoroughly documented. What she did not mention, however, are the following equally obvious facts:
Obvious fact #1. The Fed under Bernanke is now pursuing an even more stimulative, lower interest rate policy than it did under Greenspan, threatening to create even larger bubbles and more devastating busts …
Obvious fact #2. In just the last two years, between bank bailouts and easy money, Washington has done more to encourage the growth of the shadow banking system than in all previous years combined, and …
Obvious fact #3. Despite all the talk and testimony, the nation’s powerful banking lobby virtually guarantees that, in the absence of another Wall Street meltdown, the chance of sweeping reforms is virtually nil.
So here’s America’s financial dilemma in a nutshell:
Without sweeping reforms, the nation is doomed to repeat history with another debt disaster. But without another debt disaster, the nation’s political will for sweeping reforms is dead or dying.
In the meantime, the aftershocks of the 2008 debt crisis are getting worse, as the latest news clearly illustrates …
171 actual total failures: In addition to the 140 banks and S&Ls that failed in 2009, 31 credit unions went under, bringing the total tally to 171.
Worse than the 1980s: If you’re among those who think today’s banking crisis isn’t nearly as bad as the great S&L and banking crisis of the 1980s, think again. The average bank failing today is six times larger than it was back then, producing far greater losses. Moreover, each bank failure is costing the FDIC about TEN times more than it did in the 1980s crisis, according to the Meridian Group of Seattle. As a result …
Worst FDIC losses of all time: The FDIC lost more money in bank failures ($36 billion) than it lost in the ENTIRE five-year banking crisis from 1987 through 1992 ($29.6 billion). And in 2010, with the number of failures likely to increase, the losses will be even larger.
Big banks still losing billions with consumers: Until last week, the consensus opinion on Wall Street was that the troubles at the BIG banks were over; that to close this chapter in history, the only task remaining was a mop-up operation at smaller regional and community banks around the country.
That theory was shattered on Friday when JPMorgan Chase revealed it was forced to add $1.5 billion to its consumer loan loss reserves. The big problem: When it took over Washington Mutual last year, the biggest failed S&L of all time, it inherited a cesspool of mortgages that are now going bad at an accelerating pace. Other big consumer banks — like Citigroup and Bank of America — likely face similar woes.
The trading profits of big investment banks are a bubble: What most Wall Street bank analysts still don’t seem to recognize is that the giant trading profits they’ve been so enthusiastic about are generated by the same low-interest Fed policy that created the housing bubble — and is now in the process of creating MORE bubbles.
Without the Fed’s largesse, without the low-cost financing, and without the big risk appetite it generates, most of the big bank trading profits would have been impossible. More to the point: Just as soon as the Fed finally executes an exit plan, the bulk of those profits are likely to turn to losses.
What To Do
First and foremost, do not let up your guard when it comes to keeping your money safe. Yes, I know. With all the talk of the “end” to the crisis and Treasury bills paying virtually nothing, it’s tempting to venture away from safe harbors.
But how much more yield can you get by doing so? If you switch from Treasury bills to bank CDs, for example, the most you can gain is a small fraction of a percent. And if you switch from bank CDs to low-rated corporate debt, the extra yield you get is even less attractive.
In sum …
At this early stage so soon after the worst debt crisis since the Great Depression, the TRUE RISK of putting your money in higher yielding savings vehicles is still very high. Nevertheless, banks and other borrowers are asking you to take that risk WITHOUT paying you more than pennies for it.
My recommendation: Tell them to go fly a kite!
For your keep-safe funds, use strictly short-term Treasuries or equivalent.
Second, if you do other business with a bank or if you still want to keep some part of your savings in bank CDs … at least be sure to avoid the banks most likely to fail and stick with the ones most likely to survive. (For the latest Weiss Lists of the weakest banks and S&Ls, click here (http://images.moneyandmarkets.com/1604/weakest-banks.pdf). For the strongest, click here (http://images.moneyandmarkets.com/1604/strongest-banks.pdf).)
Third, bear in mind that, when it comes to your investment decision-making, TIMING is everything.
Last year, the stepped-up pace of bank failures did not derail the weak-but-continuing recovery in the U.S. economy. And for now, that’s bound to remain the case. As soon as we see signs that’s about to change, we’ll do our best to alert you. Until then, we stick with our current posture: Continue to invest, but do so with great caution.
Good luck and God bless!
Martin

skyeye
01-18-2010, 06:52 PM
If I had any money, I'd be worried.

Nano
01-18-2010, 08:02 PM
200? just 200 expected? Wow that's a relief they only expect 200 bank failures. I thought it would something serious like 201 bank failures. Banks should fail if they fail at their core business. Failure is a good thing it teaches us what works and what does not. Just like social security,medicare and government mandated health insurance will teach us just as the USSR that a centrally planned economy is doomed to epic failure. Yeah I'd keep my money with me for the most part if I had much of it.

Flagg
01-18-2010, 10:05 PM
Hopefully it's not going to be a bad year...but if the trend of bank failures continues on the trajectory of bank failures over the last several years it could be pretty rough still for the banking industry.....I'd be thinking more along the lines of a nice round number of 1000 before it's all over(not 1000 in 2010, but in total over a 3-5 year span).

One of the BIG problems for small banks in their commercial property lending.

There's LOTS of properties with outstanding loans FAR in excess of their actual market value in breach of their loan agreements, but with tenants/landlords still making payments no one wants to rock the boat too much......banks that foreclose on underwater Commercial RE will see some pretty big hits to their capital base knocking them into insolvency and the arms of the FDIC.

Interesting times in banking over the next few years.

Universal_Soldier
01-18-2010, 10:08 PM
Just 200? sounds like good news to me.

gaijinsamurai
01-18-2010, 10:38 PM
One of my best friends works for a local credit union that's about to go under. He's trying to jump ship right now.

HK in AK
01-18-2010, 10:44 PM
If the bank does not have a substantial investment operation, they most likely will have some major losses from their loan portfolio. Just look at JP Morgan, they reported record earnings but all that came from their investment operations. The banks loan portfolio is full of mounting losses. The major banks - CITI, JP Morgan, Bank of America, etc., made so much money from operations because they were borrowing it from the Federal Reserve for almost zero percent and turning that money over the investment operations to pump up the stock market. In 2010, the major hits will be coming from all the commercial real estate loans that will be going under. The more the building is empty the worse the cash flow.

SBL
01-18-2010, 10:44 PM
One of my best friends works for a local credit union that's about to go under. He's trying to jump ship right now.
Maybe he can get you a job fending off the angry, panicked customers.

vryhpyammoadded
01-19-2010, 03:51 PM
Flagg’s spot on again but could be low balling the number a little. My buddies over at the state banking and finance department are all betting somewhere between 1000-2000 over the same time period for the exact commercial real-estate reasons.

Nano
01-20-2010, 09:44 AM
Flagg’s spot on again but could be low balling the number a little. My buddies over at the state banking and finance department are all betting somewhere between 1000-2000 over the same time period for the exact commercial real-estate reasons.
It's all good the more the merrier as they say.

Gat0r
01-22-2010, 12:30 AM
Not only commercial banks but the FDIC as well they are for all intents and purposes insolvent. Looks like they'll have to tap the treasurey's line of credit to keep going, more bailouts yay! The Fed is going to start buying up more mortgage loans after already purchasing $1.25 Trillion, they need to order some more printing presses so they can buy up the commercial loans too. What a disaster

vryhpyammoadded
01-22-2010, 01:41 PM
Not only commercial banks but the FDIC as well they are for all intents and purposes insolvent. Looks like they'll have to tap the treasurey's line of credit to keep going, more bailouts yay! The Fed is going to start buying up more mortgage loans after already purchasing $1.25 Trillion, they need to order some more printing presses so they can buy up the commercial loans too. What a disaster
What do you think about another visit to China for Hillary or even Obama? My guess is they’ve tapped that avenue out and, added how Congress failed to meet certain assurances the Chinese trade commission requested last year, I expect a So Solly, bye bye with resultant greenback printing in mass.

I just don’t see anywhere else for the Federal government to turn. Anyone else got any ideas what games they will play in DC to keep the con going or is it all over for them with this event? Will the damage be so impossible to hide that even the below average Joe will understand what’s been going on?

Kaplanr
01-22-2010, 04:36 PM
And given the Supreme Court's decision yesterday, you don't suppose all those banks are going to support candidates who are for banking finance reform.

Ordie
01-22-2010, 04:42 PM
It's a painless process.

As soon as the bank closes for business on a Friday evening, the Feds comes in and informs the employees.
During the weekend, the Feds would have lined up a buyer, and facilitate the transistion.
So by Monday a new bank emerges, with a new logo but same employees.

This way they prevent a panic bank run.

Gat0r
01-23-2010, 08:51 PM
The Dems keep upping the debt ceiling as well, man they are really delusional. Bernanke might not get re-appointed as Fed chairman, but what difference will that make because the Fed is a money printer and without it inflating the system would go through a massive correction with rising interest rates. China as well as India have been accumulating large amounts of gold, and for the first time in a long time central banks as a whole are net buyers of it. There really isn't anywhere else for them go to but to try to kick the can further down the road. Politicians follow the path of least resistance, that would be currency debasement. it shall be interesting to see how insane and totalitarian their ideas get as things begin to really slip away from them.