PDA

View Full Version : China Expanding Censorship to Text Messages



MaNiC
01-20-2010, 08:45 PM
Jeremy A. Kaplan - FOXNews.com - January 20, 2010

China Expanding Censorship to Text Messages

China's already repressive regime is moving to increase censorship, adding text messages to the list of filtered communications.


China's already repressive regime is moving to increase censorship, ordering carriers in the world's largest cell phone market to filter the billions of messages sent in the country every day.

According to the state news agency Xinhua, if the government identifies one of 13 different types of vulgar content -- including ****** content, inappropriate pictures and provocative headlines -- cell phone companies like China Mobile and China Unicorn will disable a user's text-messaging services.

Preventing the spread of ****ography is a common thread in China's censorship, explains Abbe E. Foreman, a professor with the computer and information science department at Temple University's College of Science and Tech.

"They've been doing this type of censorship for some time," she said, adding that "5,000 people in China were arrested on ****ography charges last year. I'm guessing they found them all through some sort of censorship program."

But many believe the government is looking for more than ****ography. Kan Kaili, a professor of telecommunications at Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunication, told The New York Times that the new measures appeared broader, more intrusive and more punitive than previous limitations.

"They are doing wide-ranging checks, checking anything and everything, even if it is between a husband and wife," he told the newspaper. "I don't think people will be very happy about this."

It's unclear whether the lockdown on text messages is a new regulation, or merely the expansion of a current system that automatically monitors messages and suspends a user's account if it detects illegal content. The Wall Street Journal tried to clear up the confusion, noting that Xinhua's latest report said text messaging services would be suspended only for users who've had multiple complaints filed against them for sending ****ographic mass-text messages.

China certainly has the technical ability to carry out such filtering, even on the scale of billions of text message per day, says Sal Stolfo, professor of computer science at Columbia University. With access to the network provider's infrastructure, he says, it's relatively easy to inspect messages as they flow by.

"They're undoubtedly doing keyword searches," Stolfo said, "and somebody obviously has to choose which keywords those are. But it's technically very easy to do, and scalable to billions of messages a day."

Foreman said she worries that the nature of this type of censorship makes the program easily and quickly transformable. While the government may be searching for ****ographic content today, keywords are readily changed to allow the government to ferret out dissent tomorrow.

"Once you open that door, and you're looking at e-mails and text message, what's to stop someone from changing the keyword from '***' to 'bomb' or 'government'?" she asked. "They can use any keyword they want."

The crackdown on text messaging is just the latest attack on privacy in China, and whether the government actually implements the filters is almost irrelevant. "Just knowing it's possible reminds people who's in control, and it will have a chilling effect. People will probably avoid certain language just knowing about this," says Stolfo. "It's an intrusion of government forces into the private lives of citizens, and it's shameful."

China may be limiting texting in light of its widening spat with Google, which recently announced that it would refuse to comply with Chinese demands for censorship. Google says it is willing to leave the Chinese market entirely rather than comply.

"The challenge that the government has is to keep control. Google, an American company, is publicly challenging them. Do they have much choice? They can whimper and walk away or they can fight back," explains Stolfo.

Following Google's announcement of plans to withdraw, other companies were quick to take positions with regard to China. Microsoft notably announced that its search engine Bing, would remain in the country and would continue to comply with censorship demands.

"Microsoft will continue to engage in the Chinese market, offering Bing and other Microsoft software and services to Chinese customers," a Microsoft spokesman told FoxNews.com.

Stolfo said that was horrifying news.

"Google's strategy is don't be evil, and Microsoft came out and said, we're still evil. "

Source: FOXNews.com (http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2010/01/20/china-expanding-censorship-text-messages/)

Sound off.

wildcat
01-20-2010, 08:48 PM
wow, the technology to do that is mind blowing, but i would not expect less from china.

Ordie
01-20-2010, 08:51 PM
If the Communist are against ****ography, why do they allow it at state owned hotels?

This is an excuse for greater repression and control.

Clockwinder
01-20-2010, 08:58 PM
Google needs to just walk away. They have announced they're reconsidering Android in the Chinese market http://www.phonemag.com/google-postpones-android-phones-in-china-motoroi-set-for-march-in-us-verizon-internal-site-shows-pre-plus-and-pixi-plus-0110874.php


BEIJING — The Chinese government is taking a cautious approach to the dispute with Google (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/news/business/companies/google_inc/index.html?inline=nyt-org), treating the conflict as a business dispute that requires commercial negotiations and not a political matter that could affect relations with the United States.http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/21/world/asia/21china.html

Smiling_Wolf
01-20-2010, 09:04 PM
Wait a second... Fox News?

Maybe you should find another news source.

dttk0009
01-20-2010, 09:06 PM
Good thing I don't live in China, though I wouldn't be shocked if something like this were implemented here too.
This is stupid.

dttk0009
01-20-2010, 09:08 PM
Wait a second... Fox News?

Maybe you should find another news source.
Is Fox news unreliable and inaccurate? I thought it was just heavily biased.

MaNiC
01-20-2010, 09:11 PM
Wait a second... Fox News?

Maybe you should find another news source.

If you actually read the entire article you will have realized that it is actually based on a report by the state news agency Xinhua (link available @ FOXNews.com--click the "Source" link) and it has been corroborated by The Wall Street Journal.

nighthawk936
01-20-2010, 11:36 PM
Is Fox news unreliable and inaccurate? I thought it was just heavily biased.

fox news is one worst source of news network
it's all the combination of what u've said.
in fact people shouldnt trust news about china from fox or any western mainstream media at all


but anyways i think if this is true, i think it's ridiculous. it's very stupid. also i think the banning of **** is more an excuse against piracy and illegal downloading. but still, i dlslike such internet censorship

Confuse
01-20-2010, 11:48 PM
the sad thing is that hardliners are becoming more powerful and the reforms are losing out to them in the race to control the direction of the country, this is a result of the riots in the west of china and the reaction of western based dissident groups and governments afterwards giving more power to the old hardline hawks..working with china constructively would have better results as there would be a push towards reform and not have the hardliners take two steps back in reaction.

In the end what is the end goal of the "West" in regards to the government of the PRC ? reform ? , does this type of reform mean the death of the communist party ?? .. in such a case the communist party doesn't trust others having control of it's media in the same way the the US didn't trust aljazerra during the iraq war, in the end the media is being used as tool on both sides

MaNiC
01-21-2010, 01:21 AM
fox news is one worst source of news network
it's all the combination of what u've said.
in fact people shouldnt trust news about china from fox or any western mainstream media at all

One more time for everybody who can't read:

Xinhua State News Agency Article on Text Message Censorship (http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2010-01/19/c_13142421.htm)

nighthawk936
01-21-2010, 01:37 AM
One more time for everybody who can't read:

Xinhua State News Agency Article on Text Message Censorship (http://news.xinhuanet.com/english2010/china/2010-01/19/c_13142421.htm)

one more time for everybody who doesn't understand:

im not tackling a specific case, but generally

nighthawk936
01-21-2010, 01:43 AM
the sad thing is that hardliners are becoming more powerful and the reforms are losing out to them in the race to control the direction of the country, this is a result of the riots in the west of china and the reaction of western based dissident groups and governments afterwards giving more power to the old hardline hawks..working with china constructively would have better results as there would be a push towards reform and not have the hardliners take two steps back in reaction.

In the end what is the end goal of the "West" in regards to the government of the PRC ? reform ? , does this type of reform mean the death of the communist party ?? .. in such a case the communist party doesn't trust others having control of it's media in the same way the the US didn't trust aljazerra during the iraq war, in the end the media is being used as tool on both sides
well said
media's a tool. and whoever believes in the wrong media becomes a tool. so wts the best course of action? do your own research. anyways, i think it's all about how people dont understand a nation and puts generalizations. for this reason, i usually avoid treading topics im not knowledgeable in to avoid looking ignorant and embarrass myself.
anyways i think too many people in the west don't understand how china works and simply gets the image cpc = evil, rival, threatening.in terms of reforms or whatever, i think they just wanna see that communist party gone and enters a democratic one. THEN they might think china is on the good side too. weird stuff. not a bad thought, but if such change occurred before the country is ripe for it, the government will simply become a useless weakling.

MaNiC
01-21-2010, 01:52 AM
one more time for everybody who doesn't understand:

im not tackling a specific case, but generally

So we shouldn't trust western sources on China except in the cases that they're right? Nice try at generalizing.

tsoom
01-21-2010, 06:12 AM
Um... Do the whole world assume the dissident groups in China will send the "key words" directly in message?

As to both sides, I think the medias are kind of responsible to their national interest. Generally, I wont believe them all.

BTW, it is said CIA also has some censorships to messages or e-mails.

tsoom
01-21-2010, 06:30 AM
If the Communist are against ****ography, why do they allow it at state owned hotels?



Obama lived in those hotels when visting China. His wife was not with him ...

Oh, damn! Something mush have happened! :D

nighthawk936
01-21-2010, 06:59 AM
So we shouldn't trust western sources on China except in the cases that they're right? Nice try at generalizing.
if in doubt, do your own research
and yes you can say, believe when they're right. and for that, you'll find out they're mostly wrong :)

http://chineseinvancouver.blogspot.com/2008/03/evidence-of-western-media-bias.html

http://chineseinvancouver.blogspot.com/2008/03/western-media-all-chinese.html

http://chineseinvancouver.blogspot.com/2008/03/on-sinophobia.html

http://chineseinvancouver.blogspot.com/2008/03/mainstream-media-bias-against-china-is.html

interesting reads. it contains both the good and bad.

171KUL
01-21-2010, 09:00 AM
aaaah.....freedom in China is the BEST