PDA

View Full Version : F-111 Cancer Risk ?



Kilgor
07-19-2004, 12:46 AM
Up to 900 Australian workers were at risk of getting cancer from working on F-111 fuel tanks over the past 30 years, a study has found.

The Australian Defence Force has released the findings of a study by Doctor John Attia into the F-111 re-seal/de-seal fuel tank maintenance program near Brisbane.

The study follows a report two years ago which found 400 workers at the Amberley Air Force Base near Brisbane were exposed to chemical, making them sick.

Dr Attia has now confirmed he believes there is a link between the fuel tank program and cancer.

"Basically what the study found was that there appears to be a 50 per cent increase in the incidence of cancer among the people who worked on de-seal/re-seal," Dr Attia told ABC Radio."

"Certainly this study does support there is some evidence there for their claims.

"We obviously can't be 100 per cent certain, all we can actually say now is there does appear to be an association but we can't pinpoint what the positive factor was."

A health report is due out by the ADF later this year, with the Department of Veteran Affairs expected to consider compensation and ongoing care for victims.

Brisbane lawyer Simon Harrison, who represents several maintenance workers, said the study "nailed" the federal government on liability for cancer sufferers.

"It means that at long last they (the workers) have actually been vindicated," Mr Harrison told ABC radio.

He said he hoped the federal government fully accepted the recommendations of the study.

Copyright AAP 2004

Pooga
07-19-2004, 12:59 AM
That's crap. :(

AFG
07-19-2004, 01:02 AM
everything gives u cancer these days.

Hellman109
07-19-2004, 08:06 AM
I saw the origional report of 2 years ago, they were pretty convinced, but as they say above, justa bout everything causes cancer these days.

I heard PHPBB's give you cancer.....

2RHPZ
07-19-2004, 08:22 AM
Well, my post seems to be off-topic but I decided to put it here.

Just found this:


Beazley is reported in the Heraldsun today, as stating that Australia is in an Arms race and that Labour will expand the Army and keep the F-111s flying. Go to Herald (http://www.heraldsun.com.au/) and then click on the National news section. The Beazley story is down the bottom headed "Beazley wary of Arms Race".


Firstly keeping F111 is bad for to reasons: 1- wastes money on a capability we don't need and 2- as he states, "Mr Beazley told a defence inquiry last month that the F-111 was critical to the "psychological dominance" Australia enjoys in the region.

"The F-111 has been Australia's standard bearer, it has guaranteed that we are an effective power in the region," Mr Beazley said."

This is a good reason why we need to get rid of it, while the F111 is around we can largely ignore the plight of the rest of the ADF by just relying on the F111, remove it and we have to get a little more serious.


Another F-111 rant http://www.headsup.com.au/files/hu_313.pdf

Hellman109
07-19-2004, 09:44 AM
God Im usually with Labour... but that last quote is STUPID! :fork:

Basically he is saying: "The F111 is what makes us dominant, we better get rid of it"... how the **** can you justify that?

We have F35's coming when they evetually do, which we can switch to (although that is a fair few years off, it's hardly worth doing more then upgrading the existing planes till then).

If the rest of the ADF is so screwed why didnt he mention them? (It's far from perfect, but far from screwed).

We have new M1A1 MBT's coming, which will boost our ground troops allot, 2 new amphibious landing craft to take out new attack choppers and troops, F35 coming. It's looking a helluva lot more up then it is down.

We really do need an Aircraft carrier, one for when our F35's arrive would basically make us dominant militarily over the entire region along with the landing craft, but I dont see any real plans apart from "yeah we should but too expensive for now".

Were also supposedly getting AEGIS cruisers as part of the "missle shield" program too, which would work excellently (were the only major US ally in the region that could support them, perhaps NZ are the only other ones, and if our region was missing you have a huge area to put ICBM's through).

ARG you bloody retard Beazley, it's the F111 that is our main workhorse cause there so damn good, and you cant drive a tank on all that watery wet stuff around us.

Hellman109
07-19-2004, 09:44 AM
EDIT: SORRY! my bloody browser is going nuts....

Hellman109
07-19-2004, 09:46 AM
Id keel it if it wasnt so good...