PDA

View Full Version : China Media Against "Hukou System"



Ordie
03-02-2010, 01:48 AM
China Editorial Urges Sweeping Change to Household Registration
By SKY CANAVES

BEIJING—Thirteen local Chinese newspapers published an editorial urging authorities to reform the system of household registration that divides China's rural and urban residents, in a bold call for reform days ahead of the start of the country's annual legislative session.

Monday's editorial represents a rare coordinated effort by Chinese media to speak out on a sensitive matter of major domestic importance. The piece describes the hukou household-registration system, adopted in the late 1950s to control population movement, in scathing terms as a source of injustice and a breeding ground for corruption. The system limits rural migrant workers' access to city services and restricts their ability to settle permanently in urban areas.

"China has endured the bitterness of its household registration system for so long!" the editorial says. "We hold that individuals are born free, possessing the right to move freely!"

The editorial highlights growing public unhappiness with a system that officials have failed to change as rapidly as China's population. Controls have been loosened to allow for a massive migration of labor from the countryside to cities over the three decades since China's economic reforms started. But established urban residents continue to enjoy preferential access to subsidized education, health care and housing in the cities in which they are registered. Migrants face restrictions and often have to pay much more for benefits available to those with urban residency status.

Although not carried by leading state-run media outlets, Monday's editorial was featured in several influential publications such as the Southern Metropolis Daily and the Economic Observer, and in newspapers with broad geographic coverage, from Inner Mongolia in the north to Yunnan province in the southwest. The editorial also was widely republished on Chinese Internet news portals.

The editorial contrasts the division perpetuated by the hukou system with China's constitutional guarantees of equality for citizens. "For how many more generations will this division persist?" it asks.

Critics of the system have been calling for reform for years. But so far, only fairly superficial changes have been made, and it remains nearly impossible for low-income migrant workers to shift their household registrations to the any of the country's sizable cities.

Still, the hukou system has been getting greater public attention lately, and reforming it is expected to be a topic of discussion at the National People's Congress, the annual full session of the legislature that starts Friday. The authors of Monday's article appealed to the NPC's nearly 3,000 delegates, and those of a government advisory body that also convenes this week, to hasten the pace of reform.

Premier Wen Jiabao highlighted the need for further reform of the system in a public Internet chat session Saturday in response to a question about government efforts to improve the lot of rural migrants. The government is trying to encourage migrants to settle in smaller cities, but that effort is likely to fail unless such cities can manage to rival the employment opportunities found in the large urban areas favored by most migrants.

Authorities also are studying how to delink hukou status from the provision of social services as a way of boosting domestic consumption. If migrant workers and their families were able to enjoy benefits in the cities where they live and work on par with urban hukou holders, the thinking goes, they would focus less on saving and sending money back home and more on spending their increased disposable income. But so far, piecemeal measures implemented by local governments have resulted in wide disparity in conditions.

Source:http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703429304575095153343091306.html?mod=fox_australian#printMode

Eventine
03-02-2010, 02:12 AM
The best course of action would be to extend the urban benefits to the countryside, rather than to abolish the hukou system without addressing the disparity, which would simply result in urban overcrowding, which is already a problem. Building new cities in rural areas is a possibility but there are limits to how many commercial centers a country can have. Ultimately it's a matter of wealth distribution and it will be interesting to see whether a party that calls itself "Communist" will be able to negotiate between class interests.

HVU
03-02-2010, 02:55 AM
The background for the hukou system is that major cities as Shanghai doesn't want to take the responsibility of some millions of migrant workers and pay for their welfare. In smaller cities some restrictions have been lifted, and in other cities abolished. The largest cities still keep it. Somewhat understandable but nowadays the system needs to be more flexible. And the trend is clearly stated in this article.

hskywalker
03-02-2010, 07:58 AM
The best course of action would be to extend the urban benefits to the countryside, rather than to abolish the hukou system without addressing the disparity, which would simply result in urban overcrowding, which is already a problem. Building new cities in rural areas is a possibility but there are limits to how many commercial centers a country can have. Ultimately it's a matter of wealth distribution and it will be interesting to see whether a party that calls itself "Communist" will be able to negotiate between class interests.
It is now under experiment in some regions. When social security is established, hukou will have less use.

Another problem is family planning, and the resulted surplus underground population who don't have a ID... I am against family planning, but the government has different ideas.

The current hot topic about property tax, it may also be based on hukou... I support flat property tax based on property value, again some people have totally different ideas.

And education, the recuiting is currently based on hukou. I hope it get privatized, the hukou will be of no use. But not every person agrees with it, some people believe privatization of education will create social inequalty. I believe the opposite, privatization of education will not stop poor talented students being recuited, public educationi based on hukou will. This topic certainly is debatable...

It's impossible to abolish hukou without some structural change. Only hope I had the power...

The background for the hukou system is that major cities as Shanghai doesn't want to take the responsibility of some millions of migrant workers and pay for their welfare. In smaller cities some restrictions have been lifted, and in other cities abolished. The largest cities still keep it. Somewhat understandable but nowadays the system needs to be more flexible. And the trend is clearly stated in this article.
It has changed, now welfare can be transfered across the country. Effective from the january 2010. A big progress.

Confuse
03-02-2010, 08:12 AM
state welfare needs to be rebuilt...or more accurately restarted since it's virtual total removal in the 1980's reforms...there needs to be a state universal health care with private insurance covering the more expensive stuff (other than life or death emergencies that the government should pay for...the population policy and social funding policy should be geared to a area's population density, with poorer and low population areas getting more state help to push populations to move and invest in sparsely populated areas and not all crush into the east coast region..couple this with new policies (ones that work) to benefit the native majority populations against feelings of being crushed by new comers (in the case of west china in the tibet and xinjiang regions)

Ordie
03-02-2010, 08:46 AM
I've read that the Hook system is being circumvented already. Rural municipalities are setting up branch offices, schools, medical offices in the major cities to offer the basic goods and services for their migrant communities.

In Beijing, I've seen how migrants live in containerized housing on job site segregated from the local population. That was beginning to change. Much of the new construction is focused on gentrifying the Houtongs (Traditional Beijing Alley Neighborhoods). It is here where migrants are interacting with the locals more often and breaking barriers between the urban and rural attitudes.

There is another reason why a change is needed. Many of the rural factory workers have left due to the drop in exports last year. The Chinese stimulus has been focused on infrastructure in the interior of the country. Now that domestic demand for factory goods are up, coastal factories have a hard time in calling back their old workers since job opportunities exist back home. The shortage of labor in the factories spurred the recruitment of Uighur s into coastal factories, which in turn caused racial riots.

By lifting the Hukou system, it may allow labor flexibility.

Confuse
03-02-2010, 09:47 AM
this will either led to moving industrial investment inland or moving to more automated production lines or a mix of both, in either case the coastal area will turn into the R&D, service, tech centers while production invests in cheaper areas, this while at least start to address to massive income gap between coast and inland. I hope that in 2012 or 2014 when the new faction comes into power that it would just concentrate on the coast and continue trying to address to more poor and rural areas problems.. there are many factions in PRC politics, hardliner vs. reformers, socialists vs. liberalists, supports of rural vs. coastal... while the hu-wen era are about rural reforms the jiang era was about coastal priority the "princeling" faction current generation (next president from this faction) views are relatively unknown at this point

Smiling_Wolf
03-02-2010, 04:56 PM
Wow, I'm surprised the media was allowed to make this report at all - it could easily be interpreted as criticism of the state.

Anyway, it's circulated, but whether the article will be taken seriously or not only time will tell.

Synthe
03-02-2010, 05:09 PM
"The best course of action would be to extend the urban benefits to the countryside, "
Why are urban areas richer then the countryside???

"disparity"
Read 1st statement

"wealth distribution "
This is really intresting, i'd never thought i'd hear capitalists support communist ideas for the purpose of going against capitalism because it's in another country.

"pay for their welfare"
The average chinese income is barely above 4000.

"state universal health care with private insurance covering the more expensive stuff"
And who's going to pay for this???

"Hook system""Houtongs"
:Facepalm:

"breaking barriers"
whatever this means.

"shortage of labor"
Geez, even the china hater's can't get their facts right. If you read the news, the government wanted to give uighurs some employment in coastal areas where most of industry was located.