PDA

View Full Version : India’s Great Power Plans



Ordie
03-31-2010, 02:03 AM
India’s Great Power Plans

March 29, 2010
By N.V. Subramanian
India has long had a strategy for great power status, says N.V. Subramanian. But recent developments mean it can finally happen.


Photo Credit: Swapnil Gaikar

Although India doesn’t have a formalised plan for acquiring great power status, the outlines of a consistent grand strategy have been clear for some time—strategic autonomy through interlocking networks of interests with world powers, and the building of military capabilities based on growing economic prowess.

This intuitive two-****ged approach, enunciated by the nation’s first prime minister, Jawaharlal Nehru, is likely to be in place at least until 2050, when India is expected by some projections to be vying with the United States for the position of world’s second-largest economy after China.

Nehru introduced the principle of strategic autonomy so that India wouldn’t be sucked into or trapped by the opposing ideologies of an intensifying Cold War. Understanding that India’s stance would be unappreciated unless it built a vehicle for its position, Nehru mooted the Non-Aligned Movement, a bloc scorned by both Cold War powers (although both sides were privately grateful for Nehru’s brokering efforts in the Korean War).

Yet the bloc survives today—toothless it may be, but it still occasionally provides India with a moral compass. Meanwhile, India has kept up its studiedly ‘neutral’ position, contributing unflinchingly to UN peacekeeping efforts, while staying out of non-UN-sanctioned endeavours such as Iraq, and ensuring its contribution to Afghanistan has been purely humanitarian and developmental.

The limited brokering success of the Korean War prompted some Indian commentators to suggest a bridging role for India between rival great powers as a key component of its grand strategy—back then the United States and Soviet Union, and now the US and China. Yet India’s own strategic competition with China makes such a role far-fetched, and India anyway has no great taste for, nor skill at, brokering, a reality that has apparently solidified its strategic autonomy policy

Continued: http://the-diplomat.com/2010/03/29/india’s-great-power-plans/

JBH22
03-31-2010, 10:26 AM
^NOT likely lack of a true leader (preferably a hardliner) and also much of the indian armed forces is tied in India itself.

IconOfEvi
03-31-2010, 08:47 PM
Some would call India's role in the Cold War 'cynical' instead of 'neutral'. Same with the Long War right now. They are ones with the most to lose from this, and yet they were opponents of the actions we took.

While I don't doubt India's possible rise to great power-ness, the institutions and vehicles that should be there to accompany the rise are not. In 50 years, maybe. But the beliefs are not there either, just aspirations. In 50 years, maybe. But I doubt it. Great Power, yes. Superpower, no.

arphee
04-01-2010, 11:03 PM
They alway say that here is a possible superpower,there is a possible suerpower,like India Russia China and used to Japan(mabe weak at politic)...while the most world is really controlled by US and the established brand capitalist countries in Europe...what will they do?
And these new possible superpowers would be impotent when they meet with a "Waterloo" on the economic/politic/military/XXX front...so I hate these rampant articles,the authors just want to earn more remuneration.
I can do that,replace India by China,and there is a fresh point.
What the world will be after 50 years?Who knows,maybe by the time the planet will have crumbled by Martian.