PDA

View Full Version : The Sad Story of Private Eddie Slovik



hist2004
08-08-2004, 08:30 AM
Of all the U.S. soldiers charged with desertion during World War II, only one was executed--Private Edward "Eddie" Donald Slovik. It happened just after the Battle of the Bulge.

by Uzal W. Ent


Only in a technical sense was Eddie Slovik a member of the 28th Infantry Division, and that was for just one day. It would seem then that his story should not really be regarded as part of the history of a proud division that suffered a total of 26,286 battle casualties--2,146 of whom were killed in action or died of battle wounds. Unfortunately, however, Private Slovik and the 28th Infantry Division figure together in the overall picture of the war in Europe.

Eddie Slovik was born in 1920 in a poor neighborhood of Detroit. He quit school in the ninth grade at age 15. He had several brushes with the law, the first in 1932, when 12-year-old Eddie and some friends broke into a foundry to steal some brass. Between 1932 and 1937, he was arrested several more times for crimes such as petty theft, breaking and entering and disturbing the peace. He was never a leader, but he was apparently a willing accomplice. Slovik first went to jail in October 1937, for stealing candy, chewing gum, cigarettes and change from a drugstore where he was working. He was paroled in September 1938, but in January 1939 he and two buddies got drunk, stole a car and accidentally wrecked it. Slovik was sentenced to 2 1/2 to seven years in prison but was paroled again, this time in April 1942. His prison record led him to be classified 4-F in the draft.

Two good things happened to Slovik when he was released from prison. First, he got a job in Dearborn, and second, he met and married Antoinette Wisniewski. Slovik was a personable, good-looking young man, but he needed a strong person to help and guide him. To those who knew the couple, it seemed that person was Antoinette.

The meat grinder of war eventually forced American draft officials to lower their standards in order to meet demands for replacement troops. As a result, Slovik's draft classification was changed to 1-A in November 1943. He was drafted into the infantry in January 1944.

During training, Slovik earned the reputation of being a good-natured buddy and learned to fire a rifle (which he hated) and other weapons. He arrived in France on August 20, 1944. Five days later he was assigned to Company G, 109th Infantry Regiment, 28th Infantry Division.

En route to the front, when his group of replacements was fired on, they stopped and dug in. Somehow Slovik and a friend became separated from the others, who moved on in the night. The two men soon came upon the encampment of the Canadian 13th Provost Corps and "joined" it, staying until October 5. Slovik finally joined Company G on October 8, but he deserted about an hour later, ignoring the pleas of a friend not to leave.

A day later, Slovik voluntarily surrendered to an officer of the 28th Infantry Division, handing him a signed confession of desertion. He went on to state in that document that he would run away again if he had "to go out their [sic]." The officer warned the private that his written confession was damaging evidence and advised him to take it back and destroy it. When Slovik refused to do so, he was confined in the division stockade.

On October 26, the division judge advocate, Lt. Col. Henry P. Sommer, offered Slovik a deal under which the court-martial action would be dropped if he would go back to his unit. Slovik refused. As a result, on November 11, 1944, he was tried and convicted of desertion, although he pleaded not guilty at the trial.

Because of the seriousness of the charge, the court voted by secret ballot three different times. The sentence of death was voted unanimously each time. It is important to note that Slovik's police record could not have influenced the court, which did not have that information.

Slovik wrote a letter to General Dwight D. Eisenhower on December 9 pleading for clemency, but no basis for clemency was found. On December 23, in the midst of the Battle of the Bulge, Eisenhower confirmed the death sentence. One month later, he ordered Slovik to be executed by a firing squad from the 109th Infantry Regiment.

A few officers were concerned that some members of the firing squad might be repulsed by this onerous duty. They need not have been concerned. The sentence was carried out at 10:04 a.m. on January 31, 1945. Not one member of the firing squad flinched. At the end, Eddie Slovik was braver in facing the rifles of the firing squad than he had been in facing the Germans.

No doubt influenced by "guardhouse lawyers" (other military prison inmates), Slovik had apparently believed that he would not be executed but rather imprisoned until some time after the war ended--when he would be able to return to his beloved Antoinette. Three key factors influenced the decision to execute him. One was that his police record was included in the clemency deliberations, and it counted against him. Another was that desertion had become a problem for the U.S. Army in the European theater. General Eisenhower and other commanders felt something had to be done about it. Finally, Slovik's case reached the point when it had to be reviewed and acted on by Eisenhower's headquarters just as the U.S. Army was heavily engaged in its bitterest and bloodiest campaign of the war in Europe--the Battle of the Bulge.

Two members of the firing squad later summarized what many front-line soldiers thought about the execution of Eddie Slovik. One reportedly declared: "I got no sympathy for the sonofabitch! He deserted us, didn't he? He didn't give a damn how many of us got the hell shot out of us, why should we care for him?" The other soldier said, "I personally figured that Slovik was a no-good, and that what he had done was as bad as murder."

Slovik's widow spent the rest of her life pleading with the U.S. Army and the federal government to pardon her husband. She died a few years ago, having failed in her lifelong struggle to erase the shame from her husband's memory.

It was, and is, a very sad tale.

Regards,
Hist2004

CRAZY MERC
08-08-2004, 02:31 PM
Were there other cases of desertion in US Army during WWII?

hist2004
08-08-2004, 04:31 PM
Were there other cases of desertion in US Army during WWII?

Desertion was a serious problem in ETO, partly because it was relatively easy to do in Europe (there were no desertions on the Pacific islands), partly because of the never-ending nature of the combat, partly because the Army tried to get deserters back to their outfits and give them a second chance, meaning deserters could figure there wouldn't be any punishment if they were caught.

Regards,
Hist2004

CRAZY MERC
08-08-2004, 04:57 PM
Thanks Hist.
Do you know any websites where I can read more about it? I remember movie Red Thin Line showed couple US guys who were hiding on one of the Pacific islands. Was it a true story?

DE_Six
08-08-2004, 06:11 PM
They made a movie about this soldier: The Execution of Private Slovik

Not bad, a young Martin Sheen played Slovik.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0071477/

hist2004
08-08-2004, 08:00 PM
The Thin Red Line was an adaptation of James Jones' autobiographical 1962 novel, focusing on the conflict at Guadalcanal during the second World War. During World War II, 21,049 American military personel were convicted of desertion, 49 were sentenced to death, but only Pvt. Slovik paid the ultimate price.

Regards,
Hist2004

KB
08-09-2004, 01:16 PM
I read in a book on the Battle of the Bulge (either Toland's account or John Eisenhower's The Bitter Woods) that the US Army estimated over 50,000 soldiers were AWOL during December of 1944; many were apparently in Paris.

By comparison with the other Allied forces in Europe, the US Army was considered extremely lax in its treatment of desertion. As indicated, Slovik was executed to serve as an example. During the Battle of the Bulge many US Army units simply ran away without firing a round. Ironically the pexecution, together with publicity surrounding the Malmedy Massacre was felt to have "stiffened the resolve" of American troops.

Zapp Brannigan
08-09-2004, 09:10 PM
The Thin Red Line was an adaptation of James Jones' autobiographical 1962 novel, focusing on the conflict at Guadalcanal during the second World War. During World War II, 21,049 American military personel were convicted of desertion, 49 were sentenced to death, but only Pvt. Slovik paid the ultimate price.

Regards,
Hist2004
For a little more context, as of December 31, 1941, the US Army had a total strength of 1,686,403. From 1942 through 1945, 9,468,311 were enlisted or were drafted into the Army. Thus the desertion conviction rate was approximately 0.19%. During World War One, 4,057,101 soldiers served in the Army and 2,657 were convicted of desertion. This rate was approximately 0.06%. These are for convictions. The actual desertion rate also includes those who accepted non-judicial punishment and those who were returned to their units (and I suppose those who were summarily executed). Courts-martial will reflect around one in three, so a WW2 desertion rate of around 0.6% (6 out of a thousand) seems likely.

In the Spanish-American War, the desertion rate was 1.37% (14 per thousand soldiers). American Civil War desertion rates for both sides were around 7-8%. The rate from 1901-1910 was 5.68%, but dropped to 3.16% between 1911 and 1916. The rates generally dropped, but rose during Vietnam to a peak of 7.35% in 1971. By 1982, it was 1.1%. In 2001, the rate rose to 1.3%, falling to 1.1% in 2002 and 0.6% in 2003.

The AWOL rate usually floats anywhere from 3-4 times the desertion rate.

Navy desertion rates until World War One were usually much higher than Army rates. They lowered and are now roughly the same. Marine desertion rates are also similar to Army rates.

As for other countries, in World War One, the British Army desertion rate was higher in the first two years - 2.07% (20.7 per thousand soldiers) - but fell as the war progressed, averaging about 0.8% (8 per thousand) for the rest of the war. In World War Two, the rate peaked in 1941 at 1% (10.05 per thousand), but fell to 0.85% in 1942, 0.59% in 1943 and 0.62% in 1944 and 1945, roughly the same as the US rate estimated above.

I know of no accurate complete statistics for the German Army, but some 35,000 were convicted of desertion (with 22,750 death sentences, of which an unknown number were carried out). Summary executions and other punishments for deserters were more common, especially toward the end of the war when the SS and GFP were executing many accused deserters on the spot. The World War One rate may have been the same; I have seen a statistic of 130,000 to 150,000 desertion and AWOL convictions for the Imperial Army.

I know of no good desertion statistics for the French Army. Reputedly, the Foreign Legion has always had a high desertion rate, higher than the regular army. The famous mutiny of 1917 was not a desertion, as the soldiers stayed with their units and were willing to defend the trenches. They were not willing to be sacrificed in futile attacks on German trenches. There, the number of mutineers was estimated at 100,000 out of a 4 million man army, or 2.5%, and 3,427 were convicted of mutiny. The WW1 French Army's desertion rate was lower and probably close to the British rate of about 1%.

BTW, regarding Slovik's "very sad tale": In the Battle of the Huertgen Forest in October-November 1944, while Slovik was on trial, the 109th Infantry Regiment, 28th Infantry Division took 1,367 casualties. While Slovik was awaiting word of his fate from Ike, the regiment was absorbing replacements. In the first three days of the Battle of the Bulge, the regiment, facing the brunt of the German attack, took 500 casualties. The December total would be 1,174 and the 28th Infantry Division earned its nickname "Bloody Bucket" in this battle. The regiment was again pulled out of the line and replenished. While Slovik was being executed, the regiment was preparing to go into the Colmar Pocket, which would prove to be its last major action of the war. I await the sad tales of those who didn't abandon their brothers but who paid the ultimate sacrifice that others might live free.

hist2004
08-09-2004, 10:32 PM
For clarity, I didn't name the title of the article. The author Uzal W. Ent
chose those words.

Regards,
Hist2004

CRAZY MERC
08-10-2004, 02:16 PM
Thanks Hist

Michael RVR
08-11-2004, 10:51 PM
why is it a sad tale ?

bottom line, he wanted to get out of duty, and would do anything to do it.

:bash:

1Cie GevGn
08-12-2004, 12:54 AM
why is it a sad tale ?

bottom line, he wanted to get out of duty, and would do anything to do it.

:bash:

True

East
08-12-2004, 11:51 PM
why is it a sad tale ?

bottom line, he wanted to get out of duty, and would do anything to do it.

:bash:

True
He turned his back on a noble cause, his country, and his fellow soldiers. I don't know how it is an injustice for this to have happened, maybe I am not seeing the whole picture?