PDA

View Full Version : Kerry Supporters Believe That...



scm77
09-10-2004, 08:04 PM
John Kerry Supporters Believe That

Submitted by J, L, CR & TJ MORRISON

John Kerry Supporters Believe That:

A man, honorably discharged from his military obligations, is beyond reproach and that his service should never be questioned.
A man, honorably discharged from his military obligations, must be required to prove, beyond any reasonable doubt, that a slanderous allegation, presented without supporting evidence, is false.
***
A Senator’s voting record is the single most important factor in determining if that Senator should be reelected or elected to higher office.
An attack on a sitting US Senator’s voting record, during a campaign is a slanderous attack on that man’s patriotism and is to be strongly condemned.
***
5.6% unemployment under Clinton represents the strongest economy in fifty years.
5.8% unemployment under Bush represents the worst economy in fifty years.
***
Nancy Pelosi represents mainstream political thinking today.
Bush/Cheney represent a vast right wing conspiracy, which is an assault on all that Americans hold dear.
***
A man who missed 29 of 38 meetings, as a member of the Senate Intelligence committee, is best suited to solve today’s intelligence problems.
A man, who has overseen the elimination of the Taliban, the deposement of Sadaam Hussein, the disintegration of the Al-Qaeda organization and prevented any further terrorist attacks in the USA, is not qualified to further these efforts.
***
A Senator, having served, with honors, in Vietnam for four months, has the unique qualifications to make him highly qualified to be the President.
Vietnam, and any actions taken to avoid the draft and military service during those turbulent times, is ancient history and that bringing up old wounds will not serve the nations needs today.
***
A multi BILLIONAIRE, whose hatred for George Bush is so strong that he has spent tens of millions of dollars in support of extremist organizations, has done so without consultations of high ranking Democrats, purely out of his altruistic desires to help his adopted country.
A man, who is a moderately wealthy Republican from Texas, and who has donated about $200,000 in support of a veteran’s organization, is proof positive that the Republicans have joined in an illegal campaign aimed at destroying John Kerry.
***
Moveon.org, an organization formed by two little known people from Berkeley based solely on their hate and contempt for Republicans and whose hate filled, profanity laced verbal attacks against a sitting President are so shameful that the DNC refuses to release their tapes, is a grass roots organization that is simply expressing their First Amendment rights.
SwiftBoat Veterans for truth, an organization of dozens of decorated Veterans who served with honor and distinction, is a group that has charged John Kerry with libelously false charges and has entered into an illegal conspiracy to destroy a man they served with.
***
A President, who inherited a recession, then presided over almost ten years of the worse economic crisis in US history, including double digit unemployment, is one of the greatest Presidents, ever.
A President, who inherited a recession and the worse terrorist attack in world history, one whose economic stewardship brought the nation out of recession and into recovery mode in less the 30 months, is one unqualified to hold the office.
***
The current President is one who lacks the intellectual capacity to grasp the complex nuances of international relationships to such a degree that the he is commonly referred to as an ‘idiot’.
The current President was the leader of a vast conspiracy that succeeded in the largest political theft in US history and thwarted the best efforts of the most intelligent Lawyers available today to attain his office via illegal methods.
Dennis D. Lund August 30,2004

http://strangecosmos.com/content/item/102196.html
---------------------------
Some very good points.

xwar
09-10-2004, 11:49 PM
Finally a reply to that stupid 'Bush Resume'

SeanAshi
09-10-2004, 11:54 PM
The current President is one who lacks the intellectual capacity to grasp the complex nuances of international relationships to such a degree that the he is commonly referred to as an ‘idiot’.
Rubbish! :bash:

Pep's Bandit
09-11-2004, 12:22 AM
If I could vote, I'd vote for Kerry in a second over bush, and I hate kerry.

Romulus
09-11-2004, 12:26 AM
If I could vote, I'd vote for Kerry in a second over bush, and I hate kerry.

Thats sweet.

budanski
09-11-2004, 01:37 AM
http://img8.exs.cx/img8/1932/kerrysail.jpg

Virus
09-11-2004, 02:55 AM
ok, we all know that the real issue at hand is....

http://www.krohm.net/bernd.htm



:roll:



btw go bush

scm77
09-11-2004, 08:00 PM
http://img8.exs.cx/img8/1932/kerrysail.jpg

rofl Good One.

Howitz
09-11-2004, 10:10 PM
http://www.krohm.net/bernd.htm

rofl hahahah wtf? how the hell did you come across that?

budanski
09-11-2004, 11:55 PM
So the Kerry camp isnt privy with flag protocols...

http://msnbcmedia.msn.com/j/msnbc/Components/Photos/040910/040910_kerry_hmed_6a.h2.jpg

...old habits are hard to break for ole Kerry.

Virus
09-12-2004, 03:31 AM
howitz:just on one of the gaming forums i frequent :) funny, and i think its true :/

Geezah
09-12-2004, 01:58 PM
A multi BILLIONAIRE, whose hatred for George Bush is so strong that he has spent tens of millions of dollars in support of extremist organizations, has done so without consultations of high ranking Democrats, purely out of his altruistic desires to help his adopted country.



George Soros
Contributions to 527 Committees
2004 Election Cycle


Recipient Total Contributions

America Coming Together $5,000,000

Joint Victory Campaign 2004 $4,550,000

MoveOn.org $2,500,000

Campaign for America's Future $300,000

Democracy for America $250,000

Main Street Individual Fund $0

NOTE: This data is based on records released by the Internal Revenue Service on Sunday, September 12, 2004. Federal law prohibits the use of contributor information for the purpose of soliciting contributions or for any commercial purpose.

Falco
09-12-2004, 01:58 PM
eh eh :lol:

Geezah
09-12-2004, 02:00 PM
If I could vote, I'd vote for Kerry in a second over bush, and I hate kerry.

Well, it's a good job you can't vote then :P

You would much rather vote for a traitor than someone that has made it his goal to make sure all American's are safer.
As far as what the rest of the World thinks about Bush, I have one thing to say Mind Your Business

BlackRain
09-12-2004, 07:15 PM
5.8% unemployment under Bush represents the worst economy in fifty years.

The US National unemployment rate currently: Unemployment Rate:
5.4% in Aug 2004 from US Bureau of Labor Stats.

The US National unemployment rate in 1996 when Bill Clinton was running for his second term: 5.4% from US Bureau of Labor Stats.

Kerry surely cannot run on the economy being horrible under Georg Bush. If he does he would be insulting Clinton's legacy because the employment numbers are the same!

BlackRain
09-13-2004, 07:49 AM
http://www.cnsnews.com/cartoon/nowakimages/2004/reelection.jpg

supercontra
09-13-2004, 10:00 AM
There is quite a bit more to national economy than unemployment rate.
Ever heard of
National debt.
Inflation.
Interest Rates.
Value of Currency
bla.
bla.
bla.

Huge and complex issue.
It's only stupid to point at one figure as the whole thing.

chauncy republicans
09-13-2004, 11:17 AM
5.8% unemployment under Bush represents the worst economy in fifty years.

The US National unemployment rate currently: Unemployment Rate:
5.4% in Aug 2004 from US Bureau of Labor Stats.

The US National unemployment rate in 1996 when Bill Clinton was running for his second term: 5.4% from US Bureau of Labor Stats.

Kerry surely cannot run on the economy being horrible under Georg Bush. If he does he would be insulting Clinton's legacy because the employment numbers are the same!
I see your trying to insinuate...again, that the econmoy now is just as good or better than it was in the Clinton era. I'd like to see you try and make such an argument to a southern textile worker or a mid-west manufacturer.(sp?) You would probably get hurt pretty bad, little boy.

priccobe
09-13-2004, 11:35 AM
Laid off manufacturers are part of the everchanging landscape of modernization. They need to be retrained and reinserted into the workforce in other capacities. They can't simply blame Bush, they have to ultimately take responsibility for themselves and their families and do whatever it takes to support their families and selves.

Additionally, don't you think that the unions of all these laid off textile workers and manufacturer that take money from them for years and years, then tell them who to vote for, should at least have some job training and placement programs in place for the laid off workers? Where does the union's responsibility end?

I don't think the economy is going to be an issue this election. Overall, it's pretty good and more people are (rightfully) worried about terrorism than the economy.

chauncy republicans
09-13-2004, 11:47 AM
Laid off manufacturers are part of the everchanging landscape of modernization. They need to be retrained and reinserted into the workforce in other capacities. Manufacturing is what make nations strong, look at WWII our manufacturing/production lines where a key factor in defeating the Germans. Would we have been able to do it without our massive manufacturing capacity? What would happen if we faced a similar situation, but with seriously decreased manufacturing capabilitys? Sounds like this landscape of modernization could be quite dangerous.

priccobe
09-13-2004, 12:02 PM
Manufacturing is what make nations strong, look at WWII our manufacturing/production lines where a key factor in defeating the Germans. Would we have been able to do it without our massive manufacturing capacity? What would happen if we faced a similar situation, but with seriously decreased manufacturing capabilitys? Sounds like this landscape of modernization could be quite dangerous.

Replace modernization with automation then. If you can automate a manufacturing process that can increase efficiency and triple your production, allowing you to compete wih other manufacturers but requires you to lay off 50 people in response, do you

A) increase your efficiency and production but lay off the 50 people, or
B) keep the status quo, lose market share and possibly long term go bankrupt

Most responsible companies would do A. At this point, the unions and the company should be helping the 50 workers get retrained and recertified and assist them in finding a new job

If not, the 50 employees must do it themselves. It sounds harsh but how many here have had a job handed to them?