PDA

View Full Version : Canucks into danger zone



memphiz
09-21-2004, 01:43 PM
OUR SOLDIERS READY TO TAKE ON AFGHAN WARLORDS


Prime Minister Paul Martin is expected to answer a call today to send Canadian troops into Afghanistan's badlands. Martin will meet privately today with Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai in New York at the opening of the UN's General Assembly to discuss Canada's contribution to a provincial reconstruction team.

A senior federal official said Martin will discuss creating the team in an effort to boost security in the war-torn border regions of Afghanistan, where warlords and Taliban factions continue to fight for control.

"And I think that we will likely end up with a provincial reconstruction team sometime in the next several months," the senior official said.

That could see some of the 700 troops from CFB Petawawa, set to replace the existing Canadian contingent in Kabul this February, head into rural Afghanistan. In the past, Martin has adamantly rejected sending soldiers into the badlands until a plan was put in place for emergency evacuations.

RECONSTRUCTION TEAMS

Martin has kept Canadians in Kabul working as a part of the NATO-led force providing security in the capital.

So far only the United States and New Zealand have deployed reconstruction teams. They are made up of civilians tasked to rebuild rural Afghanistan's infrastructure, justice and education systems, and of soldiers who protect them and area residents.

Ashraf Hidari, spokesman for Afghanistan's embassy in Washington, D.C., said that a commitment from Canada is expected to cause European nations to follow suit.

Karzai sees the provincial teams as key to the ongoing campaign to win the hearts and minds of Afghanis.

Hidari said Karzai will also ask for more financial aid and would "appreciate further assistance from Canada."

The Canadian contingent in Kabul was cut from 2,000 to roughly 700 in August to give the army a break from deployments.

A defence department spokesman said the military is considering "all options" for the February deployment but no decision has yet been made.

Falco
09-21-2004, 02:45 PM
Your not a mod p-)

Good article

scm77
09-21-2004, 03:28 PM
Get Some! woot

memphiz
09-21-2004, 04:58 PM
Your not a mod p-)

Good article
Your so banned

I know Im not p-)

TarwarWarrior
09-21-2004, 05:43 PM
Please, PLEASE commit our troops to a more combat oriented role where we can really contribute on a much larger scale to ridding the world of this filth!

-TW, out!-

scm77
09-21-2004, 05:55 PM
We could do that but then they may have to kill people. The government doesn't want the public to think our army would actually kill people. :roll:

Brozozo
09-22-2004, 03:37 PM
Please, PLEASE commit our troops to a more combat oriented role where we can really contribute on a much larger scale to ridding the world of this filth!

-TW, out!-

Hoo-ahh. As good as it is for PR, I don't like this peacekeeper image of the CF.

Germaine
09-22-2004, 10:13 PM
Please, PLEASE commit our troops to a more combat oriented role where we can really contribute on a much larger scale to ridding the world of this filth!

-TW, out!-

As if the gov would ever let us go into cbt again (at least with the liberals)
We havent sent trps back to A-stan to help the Americans (ISAF doesnt count, didnt send cbt trps to replace 3VP) and same as Iraq, and it looks like we wont be sending trps to Sudan to help out.
so dont count on it for awhile