PDA

View Full Version : U.S. to Ask U.N. for Wider Role in Iraq



Seraphim
09-02-2003, 09:30 PM
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20030903/ap_on_re_mi_ea/us_un_iraq_4

http://us.news2.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/p/ap/20030902/capt.1062531511.iraq_us_msr102.jpg

U.S. Army Spc. Chad Anderson of South Dakota from the 14th Engineering Battalion of the 4th Infantry Division patrols the Tigris River on a military boat near one of ousted Iraqi President Saddam Hussein (news - web sites)'s palaces, now a U.S. Army base, in Tikrit, about 110 miles, 180 kilometers, northwest of Baghdad, Iraq (news - web sites), Tuesday Sept. 2, 2003. (AP Photo/Murad Sezer)


By GEORGE GEDDA, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration is preparing to ask the United Nations (news - web sites) to transform the U.S.-led force in Iraq (news - web sites) to a multinational force and to play a leading role in forming an Iraqi government.


President Bush (news - web sites) and Secretary of State Colin Powell (news - web sites) met on the issue Tuesday and agreed to move forward with a new U.N. resolution, an effort to attract more foreign contributions to postwar Iraq, three senior administration officials said on condition of anonymity.


Powell and his aides will begin talking about the new resolution in coming days with key members of the Security Council whose support is critical — close ally Britain, as well as France and Russia, two countries that opposed the U.S.-led war.


The United States hopes that expanding the U.N. role in postwar Iraq will attract badly needed troop contributions from additional countries to help stabilize Iraq and more money to help rebuild the country.


Five months after the United States was forced to drop a U.N. resolution seeking authority to attack Iraq, administration officials say they do not want a repeat of that brawl. They say they expect the United States to engage in quiet, behind-the-scenes negotiations on the text of the resolution, to ensure it would be agreeable to the veto-wielding permanent members and the rest of the Security Council, and to project a unanimous, internationally backed stand on what happens next on Iraq.


According to the senior official, the Bush administration plans to begin talking to other nations within days about the new Security Council resolution.


Diplomats say placing reconstruction under U.N. auspices will make it easier to garner contributions from nations that opposed the war, notably France and Germany. Belgium, too, said last week that it may be willing to donate money — if the United Nations was "playing a central role" in reconstruction.


The United States has also struggled to persuade other countries to contribute troops without a new U.N. mandate.


But the administration is optimistic it can attract peacekeeping troops for Iraq from at least India, Pakistan and Turkey by placing the operation under the U.N. flag. Tentative drafts of a U.N. Security Council resolution circulated Friday among administration officials, but the State Department had yet to attract a consensus among them for expanding the U.N. role in Iraq.


Tuesday evening, officials said they had reached agreement between American government agencies on how to proceed.


France, Russia and several other countries said they were not willing to go along unless the United States went beyond simply putting the operation under U.N. sponsorship. Both France and Russia, along with United States, Britain and China, have veto power on the U.N. Security Council.


Last week, Deputy Secretary Richard Armitage said Washington was considering the creation of a multinational force under U.N. leadership — but with an American commander — in an attempt to persuade reluctant nations to send troops to boost security in Iraq.


But some in the administration consider the United Nations incapable of commanding or managing combat operations in Iraq and might even send in incompetent troops to provide a multinational look.


The administration would not consider putting the operation under U.N. control, said one official, speaking on condition of anonymity.


___


Associated Press reporters Scott Lindlaw in Washington and Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations contributed to this report.

budanski
09-02-2003, 10:28 PM
President Bush (news - web sites) and Secretary of State Colin Powell (news - web sites) met on the issue Tuesday and agreed to move forward with a new U.N. resolution, an effort to attract more foreign contributions to postwar Iraq, three senior administration officials said on condition of anonymity.

The Associated Press can't reveal their sources because they have none.

Why would the UN come in now? They cleary had found no violation of 1441. We went in without the support of France or the Russians with the "International coalition" (I.e Brits, Aussies, Poles) and we think the UN is going to shoulder the burden? Who are we kidding. Don't hold your breath.

I see this as a planted trial balloon by members of the State Dept.

martinexsquaddie
09-03-2003, 01:44 AM
well the spetics screwed it up royally . So the case is iraq needs to be be sorted now

ibstolidude
09-03-2003, 04:08 PM
India sending troops will go over like a fart in church..

usa320
09-03-2003, 04:10 PM
rofl rofl rofl rofl

I think Pakistan or Germany should join in...theyve done excellent peacekeeping work elsewhere.

Turkey wants in, but taht too will go over like fart in a house of worship.

martinexsquaddie
09-04-2003, 04:06 AM
Personally I blame Rumsfield Fight Light approach. Cause the coalition would win but with less troops than Gulf war One the occupation would always be a problem. I don't think thw wonks around the whitehouse figured out what happens next too well

grendel
09-04-2003, 06:24 AM
The big question is:

After months of criticising the UN as ineffective...
the UN is relevant again?

:bash:

oldsoak
09-04-2003, 09:38 AM
The UN can make itself relevant. Currently it is in the same position as the league of nations in the run up to WWII - it professes good intent, but does not seem to be achieveing pole postion. Its like a ball game, if you want to dictate the game, you have to be a position to get the ball. Here is an opportunity to get close to the ball. If it doesnt, it will be sidelined, and the weaker states will keep aligning themselves behing the stronger, because all that will matter is how strong your allies are. The US is a powerful ally that the UN could make use of in places like Liberia and despite all the lofty talk, a lot of the business in the UN is on a scratch my back and I'll scratch yours basis. This is a situation that could be a win-win. Lets hope it happens.
rgds