PDA

View Full Version : Assault Weapon System Packs Awesome Punch



Redux
09-30-2004, 07:29 PM
Assault Weapon System Packs Awesome Punch

Story and photo by Spc. David Foley/The Bayonet

FORT BENNING, Ga. (TRADOC News Service, Sept. 27, 2004) – The Army has developed a prototype of a vehicle that may change the future battlefield.

The Assault Weapon System, an experimental turret-mounted, multifunctional weapon system attached to a humvee, may put the firepower of an entire heavy-weapons platoon into one vehicle.

The system is the brainchild of Training and Doctrine Command, Raytheon and TRADOC System Manager-Close Combat Weapon Systems, and features an MK-19 grenade launcher, .50-caliber machine gun and two TOW missile-firing platforms.

All three of the weapon systems are connected to a central Improved Target Acquisition System that gives the gunner the option of firing each weapon with the flick of a switch and automatically gauges the range of the target by using an eye-safe laser range finder.

When the gunner flips a switch on the control panel and charges the weapon of choice, the display will change for the particular weapon and will show the sights for that weapon.

In older systems, the gunner would have to “walk in” the grenades when firing the MK-19, which means it would take several shots to hit the target. However, the ballistics for each weapon are already integrated into the ITAS, which gives the gunner better accuracy.

“This is probably the most flexible fire-support system to the day,” said Sgt. 1st Class Charles McCartney, Company A, 511th Infantry Regiment, Fort Bragg, N.C., who was showing the vehicle during the infantry conference Sept. 20-23. “The best part about it is its flexibility, the fact you can select the weapon you want to use.”

The system also features a networked, persistent, all-weather, extended range surveillance and target-acquisition capabilities for increased survivability and situational awareness.

The key to the improved communication is a system called Force XXI Command Battalion Brigade and Below, which provides a connection among all the elements on the battlefield. FBCB2 combines Global Positioning System technology with a long-range laser targeting system that keeps everyone on the battlefield connected using real-time audio video and text messages.

In essence, the unit’s operations center can watch the battle through the gunner’s sights and, if air support is needed, the position of the target will already be narrowed down to within 10 meters.

McCartney said it currently takes several vehicles and nearly a whole platoon to match the AWS’s versatility, and if the system is approved, it can greatly increase the Army’s fighting capabilities.

“We can have one vehicle doing the job of three, or we can have three vehicles doing three times as much,” he said.

The vehicle on display was a watered-down version of the tactical vehicle that is still in the construction phase.

Plans for the tactical version include a smaller, collapsible turret, removable composite armor plating, undercarriage protection from mines, a smaller targeting screen, and the gunner’s seat may be moved to the rear of the vehicle to allow for another team member and lower the distractions for both the gunner and the commander, said Wayne Spate, AWS program manager.

“We are already working on the tactical version because, if it gets approved, we will already have it and we can put it on the battlefield quicker,” he said.

http://www.tradoc.army.mil/pao/TNSarchives/September04/AssaultHumvee1.jpg

source: http://www.tradoc.army.mil/pao/TNSarchives/September04/093204.htm

scm77
09-30-2004, 07:33 PM
woot woot woot woot

Midtown
09-30-2004, 07:34 PM
F'n a dude.

usa320
09-30-2004, 07:35 PM
BADASS!

I read a thing somewhere else that said they wanted to combine that with that sniper detection system so it could automatically engage snipers.

szr
09-30-2004, 07:53 PM
If that HMMWV was a chick, I'd nail it. *drool*

Brozozo
09-30-2004, 07:56 PM
Trully BADASS!

Kilgor
09-30-2004, 08:20 PM
I can imagine ah-nold driving that to work ! :D

PJ
09-30-2004, 08:39 PM
Wow, thats some crazy lookin equipment.

Uncle Sam
09-30-2004, 09:06 PM
Yeah, that's a sweet vehicle...


...Until it gets hit from a roadside bomb, blows up the stowed TOW's in the back there, and is rendered usless, killing
who knows how many people.



...C'mon, they need to move away from the HMMWV as some sort of specialized attack vehicle, which it isn't!

Even the "up" armored ones suck.

combat jack
09-30-2004, 09:13 PM
It would look better on an armored humvee.

DE_Six
09-30-2004, 09:22 PM
It would look better on an armored humvee.

Or better yet, on a Stryker.

Aussie E
09-30-2004, 09:30 PM
OHH YEAH, I'm ordering two now the assualt weapon ban has expired! p-)

James
09-30-2004, 10:02 PM
It seems a bit much for a utility truck, but that's just me...

Hullebullen
09-30-2004, 10:06 PM
Hell, why not mount a 120mm smoothbore cannon while they're at it...

Delta Niner
09-30-2004, 10:45 PM
It would look better on an armored humvee.

I agree with this, more armor means more protection for the gun crew and driver. plus the added firepower is awesome.

mi35d
09-30-2004, 10:54 PM
Uh, read the article. This new wonder turret isn't going to be mounted on a HUMVEE. It will be mounted on a new tactical vehicle under construction.

Johnnyringo
09-30-2004, 11:12 PM
Give me a MK-19 on the roof, a 240G on second, and a couple of AT-4's (on a humvee) and I'd be a happy grunt anyday... why waste the time on a system like this???

mr.x
10-01-2004, 12:19 AM
Holy Crap!
I need one of those for work! :P

ZaakM433
10-01-2004, 12:39 AM
Give me a MK-19 on the roof, a 240G on second, and a couple of AT-4's (on a humvee) and I'd be a happy grunt anyday... why waste the time on a system like this???

Becuase happy grunts isnt what its about.

James
10-01-2004, 01:46 AM
Give me a MK-19 on the roof, a 240G on second, and a couple of AT-4's (on a humvee) and I'd be a happy grunt anyday... why waste the time on a system like this???

Amen.

All that firepower, and you don't have to hump it! :D

Midav
10-01-2004, 01:49 AM
*throws some vaseline into thread*

Ohh, I see what you mean, James. Yeah, it can be heavy :P

username
10-01-2004, 02:25 AM
i dunno, more guns means more ammo and more to carry. What about not putting all your eggs in once basket. a decentralised organization is hard to crack. This seems to be going in the wrong direction.............but what do i know

Johnnyringo
10-03-2004, 01:17 AM
I like the way username thinks... but what does he know...

PALADIN
10-03-2004, 01:31 AM
It's only a matter of time till they mount a naval gun on a HMWWV.
*Remembers Sturmtiger*

MapleLeafInfantry
10-03-2004, 01:52 AM
BADASS!

I read a thing somewhere else that said they wanted to combine that with that sniper detection system so it could automatically engage snipers.

hrmmmmmmmmm friendly fire possibilities endless

Mongrel
10-03-2004, 04:14 PM
I read a thing somewhere else that said they wanted to combine that with that sniper detection system so it could automatically engage snipers.

Sounds like marketing BS to get a military contract, I don't expect much from such a system, and in fact think it is more Urban myth.

But if it was real it would prob' be expensive, heavy, and obsolete against a trained sniper...who will simply adapt.

As cools as this Veehickle sounds it looks too much like RPG bait to me.
And in a War of attrition*all you have to do is take out these expensive toys with much cheaper more plentyful weapons...eggs in one basket for sure.

Personaly I like the idea of cheap unmanned robotics, but thats for another topic.

Cheers!
M.

Pooga
10-03-2004, 04:37 PM
Holy Guacamole. What's the rollover rate on that thang?