PDA

View Full Version : Israel's SAS prepares to snatch Arafat



budanski
09-14-2003, 10:52 AM
Israel's SAS prepares to snatch Arafat
Sunday Times (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/login.php?grid=15&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.timesonline.co.uk%2Farticle%2F0%2C%2C2089-815776%2C00.html%3Fgavalidate&gareason=login)
Uzi Mahnaimi

AT a military base east of Tel Aviv, some of the Israeli army’s most highly skilled soldiers are in final training for an operation to storm Yasser Arafat’s headquarters, capture the Palestinian leader and expel him.

Israel’s security cabinet decided last week to “remove” Arafat, but did not say when. The decision prompted criticism from America and the United Nations Security Council, which warned that expulsion would be “unhelpful”.

Ariel Sharon, the Israeli prime minister, is nevertheless expected to fly this week to the Kfar Sirkin base of Unit 767, Israel’s most secretive commando brigade, to watch a rehearsal.

Unit 767, the equivalent of Britain’s SAS, has not been involved in operations during the past three years to kill Palestinian terrorists. Its members have concentrated instead on intelligence gathering deep inside Arab countries.

Given the delicacy of the Arafat mission, however, Sharon believes that he needs the expertise of the unit that rescued 103 hostages in 1976 from a hijacked French airliner in Entebbe, Uganda.

During the first Palestinian intifada, or uprising, in 1988 the commandos were sent to assassinate Khalil al-Wazir, Arafat’s deputy, at his villa in Tunis. This time their mission would be to capture Arafat unharmed, killing him only if he resisted.

A former officer who took part in the Entebbe raid said speed would be vital to any attempt to snatch Arafat from his compound in the West Bank town of Ramallah.

“You need to finish it in less than five minutes from the moment you storm the place,” he said.

Military sources believe the operation would begin with a diversion — perhaps landing paratroopers far from Arafat’s headquarters, a converted former British fort, to distract the guards.

A maximum of 20 commandos, in another building 300 yards away, would then approach the compound silently. They would storm it by using explosives to blast a hole in a wall or, more likely, by blowing their way directly into the first-floor room where Arafat spends almost 20 hours a day.

The Israelis want to avoid a bloodbath and would have to exercise great care not to kill Arafat, who is accompanied at all times by one or two bodyguards with handguns and has said he would rather die than leave. His other 20 or more bodyguards are thought to be elsewhere on the same floor of the building.

“The potential of things going wrong, especially when everyone is expecting the attack, is very high,” said a source. “That’s why they chose the best soldiers.”

Arafat and two of his closest aides would be likely to be taken by car to a CH-53 helicopter and flown into exile in an Arab country such as Tunisia or Sudan. How Israel would deal with any violent Palestinian reaction remains unknown.

Amid growing international concern over the expulsion plans, Arafat yesterday accused the Israelis of planning to end limited self-rule granted to the Palestinians in the Oslo peace accords.

“The danger here concerns Israel’s determination to cancel the Palestinian Authority and the Palestinians as a partner,” he said during a meeting with diplomats to mark the 10th anniversary of the agreements.

“No one can deport me from my homeland, and that homeland of my fathers and forefathers.”

In a further sign of worsening tension, it emerged that Israel is planning a large-scale call-up of reserves for a possible invasion of the Gaza Strip to destroy the infrastructure of Hamas, the Islamic terrorist group. “We’ve got to a stage where pinpointed helicopter and jet attacks are no longer effective,” said a senior Israeli army source. “We’ll have to go in, the same way we did last year in the West Bank.”

According to the attack plan, the Gaza Strip would be divided into three parts, each of which will be invaded and controlled by an Israeli division. A total of 45,000 troops — most of them reserve soldiers — are likely to be involved.

The precise timing of any operation could depend on the Jewish holidays this month. If there are more suicide attacks this week, troops could move in before the Jewish new year on September 27. If the coming days are relatively peaceful, they would be more likely to wait until after the holidays.

Police sources said a suicide attack appeared to have been prevented after three belts of explosives were discovered in a district of Jerusalem. Security forces nevertheless remained on high alert.

Herrmannek
09-14-2003, 10:57 AM
Let's bet who win!

Haiw
09-14-2003, 10:59 AM
*cough* OPSEC *cough*

Jooglae
09-14-2003, 11:07 AM
Well, it seems that the old man's days are numbered......

But Israel wouldn't dare do that, unless they want a full-scale war with the Palestinians....

hendrix33
09-14-2003, 11:11 AM
....unless they want a full-scale war with the Palestinians....

Eh... and how would you define the present situation? Moderate peace?

Anyway, I don't think exilling or disposing of arafat would cause any good. Not that he does not deserve it, but because it has a potential to cause greater damage.

Aussie2093
09-14-2003, 11:49 AM
The current situation is certainly no war. The only Palestinians taking part in direct action against Israel are the fanatic martyr types. Most Palestinians will not take up arms against Israel because such sudden unification will be immediately suppressed by the IDF. Israel isn't going to let Palestine form a structured resistance spare the terrorist organisations who have little structure themselves. If Israel decided to do something even more rash than their current actions, the Palestinians will most likely unite against the Israelis, regardless of the ramifications, and everyone to wives to 12 year old kids who throw stones will be armed with AKs and whatnot. Then it will be an all out revolution (if you can call it that) against the occupying Israelis, and that my friend, will show you that the Palestinians have not even begun to fight yet.

citizen-k
09-14-2003, 11:52 AM
Israel's SAS prepares to snatch Arafat
Sunday Times (http://www.timesonline.co.uk/login.php?grid=15&uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.timesonline.co.uk%2Farticle%2F0%2C%2C2089-815776%2C00.html%3Fgavalidate&gareason=login)
Uzi Mahnaimi

AT a military base east of Tel Aviv, some of the Israeli army’s most highly skilled soldiers are in final training for an operation to storm Yasser Arafat’s headquarters, capture the Palestinian leader and expel him.

Israel’s security cabinet decided last week to “remove” Arafat, but did not say when. The decision prompted criticism from America and the United Nations Security Council, which warned that expulsion would be “unhelpful”.

Ariel Sharon, the Israeli prime minister, is nevertheless expected to fly this week to the Kfar Sirkin base of Unit 767, Israel’s most secretive commando brigade, to watch a rehearsal.

Unit 767, the equivalent of Britain’s SAS, has not been involved in operations during the past three years to kill Palestinian terrorists. Its members have concentrated instead on intelligence gathering deep inside Arab countries.

Given the delicacy of the Arafat mission, however, Sharon believes that he needs the expertise of the unit that rescued 103 hostages in 1976 from a hijacked French airliner in Entebbe, Uganda.

During the first Palestinian intifada, or uprising, in 1988 the commandos were sent to assassinate Khalil al-Wazir, Arafat’s deputy, at his villa in Tunis. This time their mission would be to capture Arafat unharmed, killing him only if he resisted.

A former officer who took part in the Entebbe raid said speed would be vital to any attempt to snatch Arafat from his compound in the West Bank town of Ramallah.

“You need to finish it in less than five minutes from the moment you storm the place,” he said.

Military sources believe the operation would begin with a diversion — perhaps landing paratroopers far from Arafat’s headquarters, a converted former British fort, to distract the guards.

A maximum of 20 commandos, in another building 300 yards away, would then approach the compound silently. They would storm it by using explosives to blast a hole in a wall or, more likely, by blowing their way directly into the first-floor room where Arafat spends almost 20 hours a day.

The Israelis want to avoid a bloodbath and would have to exercise great care not to kill Arafat, who is accompanied at all times by one or two bodyguards with handguns and has said he would rather die than leave. His other 20 or more bodyguards are thought to be elsewhere on the same floor of the building.

“The potential of things going wrong, especially when everyone is expecting the attack, is very high,” said a source. “That’s why they chose the best soldiers.”

Arafat and two of his closest aides would be likely to be taken by car to a CH-53 helicopter and flown into exile in an Arab country such as Tunisia or Sudan. How Israel would deal with any violent Palestinian reaction remains unknown.

Amid growing international concern over the expulsion plans, Arafat yesterday accused the Israelis of planning to end limited self-rule granted to the Palestinians in the Oslo peace accords.

“The danger here concerns Israel’s determination to cancel the Palestinian Authority and the Palestinians as a partner,” he said during a meeting with diplomats to mark the 10th anniversary of the agreements.

“No one can deport me from my homeland, and that homeland of my fathers and forefathers.”

In a further sign of worsening tension, it emerged that Israel is planning a large-scale call-up of reserves for a possible invasion of the Gaza Strip to destroy the infrastructure of Hamas, the Islamic terrorist group. “We’ve got to a stage where pinpointed helicopter and jet attacks are no longer effective,” said a senior Israeli army source. “We’ll have to go in, the same way we did last year in the West Bank.”

According to the attack plan, the Gaza Strip would be divided into three parts, each of which will be invaded and controlled by an Israeli division. A total of 45,000 troops — most of them reserve soldiers — are likely to be involved.

The precise timing of any operation could depend on the Jewish holidays this month. If there are more suicide attacks this week, troops could move in before the Jewish new year on September 27. If the coming days are relatively peaceful, they would be more likely to wait until after the holidays.

Police sources said a suicide attack appeared to have been prevented after three belts of explosives were discovered in a district of Jerusalem. Security forces nevertheless remained on high alert.

Unit 767 from Sirkin?!?! rofl

Christkiller
09-14-2003, 07:11 PM
Budansky is right. Like the Americans tried to in Vietnam, by killing every Vietnamese person, we Israelis must kill Arafat, and replace him with a robot who is secretly loyal to Israel. The Americans never succeeded in killing Ho Chi Minh and that is too bad. All these 3rd world types are incapable of making complex decisions, and need to be lead by mad dictator type. Arafat is this person. Once we kill Arafat, and march through Palestine with his head on a stick, then we can start loading the Arabs on trains and send them to fun "camps" where perhaps we could burn their skin for oil or something to help our economy. I saw a movie once where they had people pushing big oars, and it moved a ship, so maybe the Arabs could be put in our car engines and move our cars like in the Flintstones. Anyway, my father the rabbi is about to give a sermon on peace, and I plan on bringing my uzi, and the ear of an Arab we caught in our back yard for show and tell today. Ok, glad to see a lot of people on this board agree with me, good bunch of people!!!

mocking_loudly
09-14-2003, 07:49 PM
Man, it's good to know that we all have the mission plan.

What a joke.

ogukuo72
09-14-2003, 11:23 PM
It's the worst idea in the history of bad ideas. Come on seriously, it's a lose-lose situation for everybody, whether Arafat is killed or kicked out. Should have left him as it was - fading away into irrelevance.

He219
09-14-2003, 11:28 PM
I totally agree. Perhaps it will qualify under "Greatests" Military Blunders (http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=3246)....

;)

Andyman
09-14-2003, 11:58 PM
Christkiller are you Jewish for real. Cause if you are I feel sorry for you and your comment. Of all the people on earth it is Jews who should now the horror of ideas like that. Keep those comments out!! :backhand:

StarvingStudent47
09-15-2003, 03:25 AM
Christkiller are you Jewish for real. Cause if you are I feel sorry for you and your comment. Of all the people on earth it is Jews who should now the horror of ideas like that. Keep those comments out!! :backhand:

Christkiller is NOT Jewish. He was a Jew-hater impersonating a Jew in an attempt to make us look bad. His name gives it away even if his over-the-top posts don't.

StarvingStudent47
09-15-2003, 03:35 AM
Man, it's good to know that we all have the mission plan.

What a joke.

I think I realized what's going on here. This is a very savvy political move by Sharon. And a savvy move to save the peace process toward a two-state system, no less.

Publicizing intent to capture or kill Arafat is a terrible idea if you're actually going to try it. You lose the initiative. But I'd lay money that Israel won't actually follow through with these plans. Instead, it's using this as a bargaining chip with the current moderator of the conflict, the USA. Israel's position is "the Palestinians will get an independent state when we know that we'll be safe from terrorist attacks." There are two ways which this could happen:

1) Palestinian terrorists stop attempting to attack, either through voluntary disarmament or through Palestinian Authority police action.

2) The border between Israel and a new Palestinian State is adequately fortified so that insurgents couldn't slip through (think DMZ between North and South Korea).

Until now, the "Roadmap" was aimed at option #1. I think Abbas's resignation and the events surrounding it proved that option #1 was an idealistic pipe-dream. But in order to implement option #2, Israel needs the United States to drop its objection to the security fence. And I think this is the bargaining chip that Sharon is going to use to achieve that.

No, a fortified border between Israel and the new Palestinian State is not ideal. But it's better than continued Israeli incursions into the West Bank. And it's better than Israel just opening its arms, play Ghandi, and let its women and children be mass-murdered in the name of radical Islam. Utopia ain't possible here, at least in this century. We're just looking for the lesser evil.

Does anyone else agree with my explanation of Israel's "openness" with these plans?

ArmoredDov_D9
09-15-2003, 03:52 AM
Israel is now impleting the 2nd option and build a fence (only 8 kilometers near Qalqilyia are a concrete wall and thaat's because Palestinian terrorist shot from there on Israeli cars. Such shooting attack killed 7-years old Noam Leibovich).

After the fence is finished Israel will have to worry about missile threats and every rational man would prefer Hamas dismantled good - with fence or without.