PDA

View Full Version : New shell dressings for troops in Iraq



digrar
11-25-2004, 05:00 AM
http://www.defence.gov.au/news/armynews/editions/1110/topstories/story09.htm




Rapid acquisition
New shell dressings for troops in Iraq


By Pte John Wellfare

AUSTRALIAN ground forces serving in Iraq have been issued a new US-made bandage designed to quickly seal wounds and prevent significant blood loss.

While the current shell dressing relies on compression to control bleeding, the Hemcon bandage uses a natural material that becomes extremely adhesive when in contact with blood or moisture. It’s designed to seal the injured area without blocking blood vessels and control arterial bleeding within three-to-four minutes, improving the survival chances of a casualty.

The bandage has been in use by US forces in Iraq, and attracted the attention of CDF Gen Peter Cosgrove and CA Lt-Gen Peter Leahy, who initiated efforts to acquire the bandage for Australians. The Army was given the lead to ensure that ADF personnel in Iraq received the unique bandage in the shortest possible timeframe.

AHQ Equipment Management Officer Lt-Col Nick Stanton said the new bandages, manufactured exclusively by a US corporation, had been difficult to acquire commercially.

“The company’s whole production run is taken up with US Defence orders – we couldn’t even get our orders in for at least a year,” he said.

Lt-Gen Leahy directed staff at the joint task force headquarters in Iraq to acquire the bandages in-theatre, a bid that was readily supported by the US forces there.

Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration has not yet approved the bandage, but after receiving advice from Defence Health Services Branch, it was decided that increasing the chance of survival in the event of a casualty was important enough to justify immediate issue.

“In light of the current threat, the Army conducted a risk assessment and decided to accept the risk of early introduction,” Lt-Col Stanton said.

“The CA’s position was very clear – someone could bleed to death while we are debating this.”

For more information visit the Hemcon website at www.hemcon.com (http://www.hemcon.com)

Sabre
11-25-2004, 06:57 AM
This reminds me of 'Quick Clot', a powder-like substance that rapidly coagulates blood. Perhaps this dressing incorporates this material?

I heard about it when doing a medics course, we saw a video where they anaesthetised a pig and then cut it's femoral artery (or piggy equivalent). The quick clot supposedly stopped the bleeding and saved the pig. I'm sure there were concerns over its use though. Can't remember the drawbacks that were thought to exist, but there were a few.

Royal
11-28-2004, 02:47 AM
Can't remember the drawbacks that were thought to exist, but there were a few.

Cost?

Good ol' MoD.

Seriously though, it's availabale through the system (for Ops) if your Q bloke is switched on enough - try the "do you want to be cited in the BOE for refusing to demand life saveing equipment, or do you want that MBE so badly?" approach.

Sabre
11-28-2004, 06:49 AM
Cost is the usual limiting factor.

There was definately some medical aprehension about it though. I'll have to check my notes from the course (have to find them first!) but there were some concerns about it, I'm sure.

Sabre
11-28-2004, 07:03 AM
Just checked my notes.

I obviously must have been 'listening intently' during that bit, as I haven't written a thing down. ;)

I did find some info about a new-style field dressing being trialled at the moment. I don't think it contains any 'active' material, but apparently it's much better. It's supposed to have two dressing pads (for entry and exit wounds) and the bandage is replaced by elasticated material. The idea is it quickly covers both entry and exit wounds on limbs while the elastic applies instant pressure. The pads can be moved around on the elastic to be positioned correctly. I assume it can be used for torsos too, I don't know as I haven't seen one.

Anything would be an improvement to the old FFD, I don't think It's changed much since WW2.

Herrmannek
11-28-2004, 07:46 AM
This reminds me of 'Quick Clot', a powder-like substance that rapidly coagulates blood. Perhaps this dressing incorporates this material?

I heard about it when doing a medics course, we saw a video where they anaesthetised a pig and then cut it's femoral artery (or piggy equivalent). The quick clot supposedly stopped the bleeding and saved the pig. I'm sure there were concerns over its use though. Can't remember the drawbacks that were thought to exist, but there were a few.

Quick Clot doesn't have anything chemicaly active in it its just water absorbing powder that make blood to coagulate instantly and stops the leak.. And as far i know its nothing "ex*****ve" in terms of material and technology...

yiorgo
11-28-2004, 08:14 AM
the thing with the quick clot is that they were saying alot of people were sensitive to the granules used and when poured in ...they felt a very bad burning sensation....that is the only negative i ever saw on write ups

4fox
11-29-2004, 03:58 AM
there has been some instances of chemical burns with the use of quickclot
If you use it properly, there shouldn't be an issue

JTAR7242
11-29-2004, 04:10 AM
I know that between an intense burning sensation and the slow death of bleeding out... well let's just say I think I've got my choice already made. :D

digrar
11-29-2004, 05:34 AM
^ That's what I was thinking. If it was a bandaid with quick clot and it caused a burning sensation, I might think twice, but not with a shell dressing.

This bandage probably doesn't contain quick clot though.


Manufactured from a natural product called chitosan.
The HemCon® Bandage is safe, durable, highly effective, and does not contain human proteins or clotting factors.

Royal
11-30-2004, 03:37 AM
Anything would be an improvement to the old FFD, I don't think It's changed much since WW2.

More like WWI ;)

Sabre
11-30-2004, 06:39 AM
Come to think of it, the Romans had it better with their moss. Cheap, widely available and antiseptic too! ;)