PDA

View Full Version : Britain, France, Germany Back Annan; Bush Waivers



J-10
12-02-2004, 09:05 PM
Britain, France, Germany Back Annan; Bush Waivers
Thu Dec 2, 4:03 PM ET
By Evelyn Leopold

UNITED NATIONS (*******) - Britain, Germany, France, Russia, and China rallied around U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan on Thursday, but President Bush refused to explicitly endorse the U.N. chief under fire over suspected corruption in an Iraqi-oil sales program.

"Mr. Annan is doing an excellent job as secretary-general," said Foreign Minister Jack Straw of Britain, a major U.S. ally on Iraq, said in a statement released in New York as other major powers and U.N. members showed support for Annan.

The moves came a day after U.S. Sen. Norm Coleman (news, bio, voting record), a Minnesota Republican who chairs a committee investigating mismanagement in the U.N. oil-for-food program called on Annan to resign.

Coleman, who chairs the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, said Annan should resign because he had to be held "accountable for the U.N.'s utter failure to detect or stop Saddam's abuses."

The plan, administered by the U.N. secretariat and supervised by the 15-member Security Council which includes the United States, allowed Saddam Hussein's Iraq to sell oil to buy civilian goods in an effort to ease the impact of U.N. sanctions, imposed in mid-1990.

Asked by a reporter whether Annan should resign, Bush did not answer directly. "I look forward to the full disclosure of the facts, get an honest appraisal of that which went on. And it's important for the integrity of the organization to have a full and open disclosure of all that took place with the oil-for-food program," he said.

U.S. officials told ******* the administration was in no hurry to defend Annan because of differences on Iraq, especially his reluctance to field more election staff.

Annan, a Ghanaian, who won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2001, was easily elected to second five-year term as U.N. secretary-general, which ends on December 31, 2006. He had been Washington's choice after the Clinton administration refused to endorse Egyptian Boutros Boutros-Ghali for a second term.

Since Saddam's fall, there have been widespread allegations of corruption and violations of U.N. sanctions, many connected to the U.N. program but others involving oil deals with governments directly.

Charles Duelfer, a former U.N. arms inspector, who did a detailed survey on Iraq in September, said Saddam earned $3 billion by cheating the $64 billion oil-for-food program and another $7.5 billion outside of the program. Coleman's committee, using Duelfer's data, has doubled this amount.

On Thursday, President Jacques Chirac of France and Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder of Germany voiced strong support for Annan after their meeting in Luebeck, Germany.

The two leaders telephoned Annan to send him "a message of friendship and support for his work in the service of peace, development and United Nations reform," a Chirac aide said.


SUPPORT FOR ANNAN

Support for Annan was unanimous among the Security Council's permanent members other than the United States.

Britain's U.N. ambassador, Emyr Jones Parry, told ******* there was no question the United Nations could do a better job in many areas. But he said "The United Nations is doing a good job. Ask those people who need it most in west Africa, for example, or in south Asia."

Annan's inquiry into the oil-for-food program should be "full and transparent," Straw said. "We await the results of this inquiry."

China's U.N. ambassador, Wang Guangya told reporters that Annan enjoyed strong support among U.N. members. "He has done a good job."

Russia's deputy foreign minister, Yuri Fedotov, told the Interfax news agency that the "surge of criticism" of Annan "is groundless in our opinion."

The current president of the Security Council, Algeria's ambassador, Abdallah Baali, told a news conference that there was no discussion among U.N. members about whether Annan should resign. "As far as we are concerned, Algeria and the other members of the United Nations, the secretary-general has been elected for five years," Baali said.

Baali attended a meeting with Annan on Wednesday, along with the ambassadors of Argentina, Colombia, Egypt, Italy, Mexico, Morocco, Pakistan, South Korea, Spain and Turkey, all of whom voice support for Annan, participants said. From (http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/nm/20041202/ts_nm/iraq_un_annan_dc_4)

cut
12-03-2004, 01:20 PM
The republican crusade against Annan looks more and more to be petty vengeance for the events leading up to the War in Iraq.

Laworkerbee
12-03-2004, 03:21 PM
Ya nevermind he's corrupt, and his son is using influence for cash. that he refuses to call Darfur genocide, etc. etc.

Ya nevermind those things

Laworkerbee
12-03-2004, 03:22 PM
Ya nevermind he's corrupt, and his son is using influence for cash. that he refuses to call Darfur genocide, etc. etc.

Ya nevermind those things.

cut
12-03-2004, 03:56 PM
you'd rather another U Thant?

BlackRain
12-03-2004, 04:02 PM
Ya nevermind he's corrupt, and his son is using influence for cash. that he refuses to call Darfur genocide, etc. etc.

Ya nevermind those things.

Hey, you forgot the support that the United Nations has provided the citizens of Ukraine in this recent electoral crisis. Anan sure has been active.

The United States has had the pleasure of United Nations poll watchers during the last election, but they can't seem to do the same for the Ukraine.

Where Jimmy Carter when you need him?

Anan tried but failed to influence the US elections by declaring that the war in Iraq was illegal just before the vote. Many will not forget that.

Hmmm....

cut
12-03-2004, 04:07 PM
Ya nevermind he's corrupt, and his son is using influence for cash. that he refuses to call Darfur genocide, etc. etc.

Ya nevermind those things.

Hey, you forgot the support that the United Nations has provided the citizens of Ukraine in this recent electoral crisis. Anan sure has been active.

The United States has had the pleasure of United Nations poll watchers during the last election, but they can't seem to do the same for the Ukraine.

Where Jimmy Carter when you need him?

Hmmm....


There's always at least some UN poll watchers, except when they are banned, which is a sure sign of the election is rigged anyway.