PDA

View Full Version : U.S. Halliburton Wins Gas Contract in Iran Despite Sanctions



J-10
01-12-2005, 12:51 AM
U.S. Halliburton Wins Gas Contract in Iran Despite Sanctions
January 10, 2005

TEHRAN - Iran said Monday that U.S. oil giant Halliburton had won a major contract to drill for gas, despite U.S. sanctions against foreign investment in the country's energy industry.

"Halliburton and Oriental Kish (an Iranian company) are the final winners of the tender for drilling South Pars phases 9 and 10," Pars Oil and Gas Company managing director Akbar Torkan said, according to state television.

An unnamed Pars company board member said the deal for the gas fields in
the Gulf off the south coast of Iran was worth about $310 million.

He said Halliburton had not directly signed the contract but that it had offered its services via Oriental Kish.

Under a law introduced in 1996, the United States threatens sanctions on both American and foreign companies investing more than $40 million in Iran's petroleum industry.

Halliburton, once chaired by U.S. Vice President **** Cheney, has come under investigation in the United States for its dealings with Iran through a Cayman Islands subsidiary.

Washington broke diplomatic ties with Tehran after Iranian university students stormed its mission in Tehran in 1980 and took diplomats hostage for 444 days.

The United States also accuses Iran of covertly trying to develop nuclear weapons, a charge vehemently denied by Tehran.

Iran, which is OPEC's second largest oil exporter, also has the world's second largest gas reserves.

Phases 9 and 10 of South Pars, operated jointly by South Korean and Iranian companies, are expected to produce 50 million cubic meters (1.8 billion cubic feet)of natural gas, 80,000 barrels of condensates and 400 tons of sulfur a day.

In addition, the phases are expected to produce each year one million tonnes of ethane for petrochemical feedstock and 1.05 million tons of liquefied petroleum gas for export.

Iran hopes to boost gas output from 110 billion cubic meters a year in 2000 to 292 billion cubic meters in 2010. Gas accounts for about one third of Iran's domestic energy consumption. http://www.hispanicbusiness.com/news/newsbyid.asp?id=20054

ElHombre
01-12-2005, 01:48 PM
let's all give a warm thanks to halliburton for helping a terrorist-supporting country to increase its revenues. i'm sure the iranians will do nothing but good with the new money they'll be able to make.

2Sheds_Jackson
01-12-2005, 02:12 PM
No no, you're looking at it all wrong. See, the Iranians have said they need the nuke plant because they don't have enough energy. With all this new gas, they won't need it! It all works out.

And whaddya mean Iran supports terrorists? I thought they were just another friendly brother Muslim brother nation, not a member of some... I don't know some kind of axis. Yes, they'd belong to an axis of ...badness, or something.

bison3255
01-12-2005, 02:58 PM
Iranian support is mainly to Hezbollah, which occasionally makes annoying noises or crashes small UAV's onto Israeli waters, and occasionally shells an outpost or two, but basically does jack****...

-=P=-
01-12-2005, 03:06 PM
Damn that’s really bad, maybe Halliburton has some nice technology Iran would need but Bush should stop that immediately ! Really !

@2Sheds_Jackson

LoL go to the other thread you talked about burning gas for energy... at 1000MW that is completely uneconomically and crazy, a really dumb argument...

Pille1234
01-12-2005, 03:21 PM
The iranians are very clever. They know that Bush will never order to bomb Halliburton facilities rofl

usa320
01-12-2005, 03:45 PM
Anyone ever think that perhaps the oil facilities we build there could be used as a bargaining chip against teh iranians?

;)

sorta do the opposite of what the NK's did to us.

kineret
01-12-2005, 04:05 PM
thats ****ed up. there really is no way to defend these actions. thats ****ed up. why havent i heard about this on the news?

priccobe
01-12-2005, 05:10 PM
http://www.rferl.org/featuresarticle/2005/01/e0a0a332-1150-42d1-b235-9e7198c82059.html


The involvement of the U.S. company Halliburton in a project to develop oil fields in Iran could be part of the larger effort to convince Iran to abandon any nuclear-weapons program it might have. That's the opinion of analysts looking at a new and controversial deal involving Halliburton and Iranian companies. U.S. law generally prohibits U.S. companies from operating in Iran, but exceptions are written into the law to allow such deals if they serve greater diplomatic ends. RFE/RL spoke to analysts to see what may be going on behind the scenes.

Washington, 11 January 2005 (RFE/RL) -- Details of the agreement are sketchy, but it likely involves a Halliburton subsidiary based outside of the United States and the Iranian companies Oriental Kish and Pars Oil and Gas.

Halliburton spokeswoman Wendy Hall yesterday appeared to distance the company from the deal. She was quoted as saying Oriental, not Halliburton, signed the main contract. Halliburton, in turn, would likely provide subcontracting services.

Such an arrangement would not necessarily contradict U.S. law. The United States has tough rules against companies doing business in Iran, which it accuses of sponsoring terrorism. But companies are permitted to deal through their subsidiaries as long as the work is kept separate from the parent company.

Analysts say the agreement may be more than just business and part of a larger diplomatic effort to convince Iran to abandon plans it may have to develop nuclear weapons.

2Sheds_Jackson
01-12-2005, 05:55 PM
thats f*** up. there really is no way to defend these actions. thats f*** up. why havent i heard about this on the news?

There are laws in place that deal with doing business with Iran...but as I understand it, they involve the type of business, and exceeding a dollar amount ($40 million?). As long as they're within the law, I don't have a problem with it. If they're not - string 'em up. If the law does't go far enough..change it. :|

PatricVadec
01-16-2005, 09:16 PM
Anybody please let me know...Is Halliburton made an illegal ? and what will happen next with Halliburton ...?

CG51
01-16-2005, 10:41 PM
their not illegal, their just corrupt...

MEGR
01-16-2005, 10:46 PM
Haliburton gets alot of bad rap. My dad worked for them and thinks that a lot of the critism is unfounded and partisan.

Mr Gently Benevolent
01-17-2005, 09:39 AM
thats f*** up. there really is no way to defend these actions. thats f*** up. why havent i heard about this on the news?

There are laws in place that deal with doing business with Iran...but as I understand it, they involve the type of business, and exceeding a dollar amount ($40 million?). As long as they're within the law, I don't have a problem with it. If they're not - string 'em up. If the law does't go far enough..change it. :|
Yes thats why Hallibuton and their ilk set up lots of little brass plate companies in far off islands, its really simple to get round these rules most companies have been doing it for years and getting away with it.

Stolly
01-17-2005, 09:45 AM
This might not be against the letter of the sanctions but it would seem to be against the spirit.