PDA

View Full Version : Iranians Mark 1979 U.S. Embassy Seizure



Vance
11-04-2003, 11:26 PM
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20031105/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iran_us_anniversary_4


TEHRAN, Iran - Thousands of Iranians marked the 24th anniversary of the takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran by chanting anti-American slogans and burning U.S. and Israeli flags.

Tuesday's turnout was larger than that of previous years, reflecting tensions over President Bush (news - web sites)'s allegations that Iran supports terrorism and is trying to build nuclear weapons.

Hard-line cleric Ali Akbar Nateq Nouri told the crowd that the Washington is once again meddling in Iran's internal affairs. Many Iranians blame American interference for the events of 1979.

"Assuming that Iran's new youth generation does not remember the 1979 revolution and will not support the Islamic establishment, the Americans have been encouraging riots with their final aim being regime change," Nateq Nouri said.

He was referring to student-led protests in June in which protesters called for the overthrow of the ruling Islamic establishment. Authorities arrested 4,000 people, some of them students, and unleashed hard-line vigilantes to silence the protesters. Almost all the detainees have been freed.

"This establishment will not collapse if a number of foolish people take to the streets," said Nateq Nouri, a top adviser to Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.

Tuesday's protesters chanted "Death to America" and "Death to Israel" — while burning an effigy of President Bush. Most were militant students, like those who stormed the embassy in 1979, holding 52 Americans hostage for more than a year.

International pressure on Iran to come clean on its nuclear program has angered hard-liners, who organized demonstrations in past weeks rejecting demands for greater cooperation with U.N. inspectors.

Faced with the possibility of U.N. sanctions, Iran relented in late October, agreeing to unfettered inspections of its nuclear facilities and giving the U.N. atomic watchdog a report on its activities.

Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who is seen a leader of the hard-liners, said Sunday he approved that step but warned that "excessive demands" would prompt Iran to stop cooperation.

Unelected hard-liners control the levers of power in Iran and have blocked most attempts by the elected government to reform the country's Islamic regime. Khamenei has final say in all matters.

The 1979 embassy takeover was a protest against Washington's decision to give refuge to deposed Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, whom the revolutionary government wanted to stand trial in Iran.

Many Iranians, including reformists, still resent the U.S. government for its role in a coup that toppled the populist Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadeq in 1953 and its support of Pahlavi during the 1979 Islamic revolution.

Durandal
11-05-2003, 12:19 AM
Yeah, right, we are meddling in their affairs. Try the students man. They can taste democracy and capitalism.

jdbjdb
11-05-2003, 12:35 AM
introduce ****, hookers, drugs, and college football, what would they think of us then?

One?
11-05-2003, 12:59 AM
introduce ****, hookers, drugs, and college football, what would they think of us then?


That was already there and because of it the revolution started.....

Guttorm
11-05-2003, 02:05 AM
Just introduce beer and music... Think that will suffice...

jdbjdb
11-05-2003, 03:52 AM
How about sending Death/Heavy metal and Satanic music groups on a tour of the arab world, and terrorize The Kingdom rofl
oh....Yoko Ono can tag along with them. rofl

Nizark
11-05-2003, 05:01 AM
Hell yeah, a little Metallica for the students and we'd have them singing 'Seek and Destroy' while running towards the clerics to whoops their ass~ :fork:

ßå$tĮТHÏ¿ð
11-05-2003, 05:28 AM
Well personally american pop culture has gotten to the younger generation there. They just want to live normal lives and I imagine are quite pissed off about religion being tangled and twisted in everything. If Iraq and Afghanistan are handled properly we can introduce a different way of life to that part of the world. Ironic how the younger generation doesnt have there heads up there ass.

martinexsquaddie
11-05-2003, 05:49 AM
well maybe if the west had'nt forced the shah into power back in 1953 Iran might have been a proper democracy already. Not defending the iraninan goverment but anyone planning a change of goverment ought to tread very care fully past historys not really onthe side of the west :|

mocking_loudly_died
11-05-2003, 06:32 AM
Bah! martin, we don't need to learn from the lessons of the past.

Thats crazy commie talk. :lol:

Durandal
11-05-2003, 08:11 AM
well maybe if the west had'nt forced the shah into power back in 1953 Iran might have been a proper democracy already.

Yeah, because there are plenty of historical examples where non-U.S. involvement has led to democracies in the Gulf. The problems in Iran started before 1953, the Shah, if anything held things together a bit longer.

I do not like the Shah, nor do I enjoy having to defend Americ's support of dictators, but I think it is silly to think that Iran would be some flower of deocracy surrounded by kingdoms that treat their people like second class citizens.