PDA

View Full Version : M1A2 SEP destroyed by IED 27.10.2003 (Photos)



REMOV
11-07-2003, 08:28 AM
Source: http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/2003/031029-m1-abrams.htm

Agence France Presse October 29, 2003

M1 Abrams tank disabled by Iraq roadside explosion

In-Depth Coverage
By Jim Mannion

An M1 Abrams tank was disabled in Iraq by a roadside explosion for the first time in an incident that killed two crew members and wounded a third, US military spokesmen said Wednesday.

Little information was available on the extent of damage or the type of explosive device used in the attack late Tuesday about 40 kilometers (25 miles) northeast of the town of Balad.

But it was another sign of the growing effectiveness of the attacks against even the most heavily armored US forces.

"Two soldiers from the 4th Infantry Division were killed and one was wounded when their tank hit an unidentified explosive device," the US military said in a statement.

One of the dead was identified as Sergeant Michael Paul Barrera, 26, of Von Ormy, Texas. He was with the division's 3rd Battalion, 67th Armor Regiment.

Military spokesmen in Washington and Baghdad said it was the first time the army's main battle tank had been disabled by a roadside explosion since Iraqi opposition forces have begun targeting US convoys and patrols with so-called improvised explosive devices.

A US defense official, who asked not to be identified, said an improvised explosive device detonated as the tank rolled over it.

The force of the blast caused the behemoth to roll over an embankment, which is what killed and injured those inside, the official said.

The 4th Infantry Division has the latest model of the tank, the M1A2 SEP, which weighs 69.5 tonnes, is armed with a 120mm main cannon and is equipped for digitized communications.

"It is the most heavily equipped, and heavily armored main battle tank that the US has ever put out in the field, and supposedly can protect those inside fairly well," said Patrick Garrett, an analyst with GlobalSecurity.Org, a private research group.

"If it is true that a tank was damaged to this sort of extent resulting in fatalities by a simple roadside bomb, depending on whatever size it was, that does not bode well for the future of the occupation," he said.

"That really does prove there is no safe place for American soldiers," he said.

The incident also raises questions for the Stryker, the new wheeled armored vehicle that the army has made the centerpiece of its efforts to make its armored forces lighter and more rapidly deployable.

The Stryker has been scored by critics as too lightly armored to withstand rocket-propelled grenade fire. Its advocates say it makes up for it with advanced communications, greater mobility and precision firepower.

The army plans to deploy its first Stryker brigade to Iraq in the spring.

Photos:
http://www.militech.sownet.gliwice.pl/inne/Irak/M1_1.jpg
http://www.militech.sownet.gliwice.pl/inne/Irak/M1_2.jpg
http://www.militech.sownet.gliwice.pl/inne/Irak/M1_3.jpg
http://www.militech.sownet.gliwice.pl/inne/Irak/M1_4.jpg
http://www.militech.sownet.gliwice.pl/inne/Irak/M1_5.jpg

Images by courtesy of M. Buslik.

Erik
11-07-2003, 08:35 AM
Whoa!

That must've been a huge explosion, the turret came off and everything.

Guttorm
11-07-2003, 08:36 AM
Thats one HELLUVA exposive load if it can tip 70 tons of armour over...

UoUo
11-07-2003, 08:43 AM
100 kilos....will do the job.

He219
11-07-2003, 08:50 AM
:(


Didn't the Hamas guys do that to some Merkava Tanks using similar techniques, also causing the turrets to blow off? The Abrams is even bigger, I think....


Nuts!

UoUo
11-07-2003, 09:20 AM
Exactly...they did that about 3 times...but 1 of the tank was m60 not Merkava.

96B
11-07-2003, 09:48 AM
My heart goes out to the crew that must have been horrible...

radon
11-07-2003, 11:24 AM
Dont think the crew really had a chance to notice what is happening to them...

Well everyone has always know that not even tons of armor guarantee protection.

Claymore
11-07-2003, 01:49 PM
My heart goes out to the crew that must have been horrible...

As horrible as what happened to Iraqi tank crews earlier. =\

Operation Ivy
11-07-2003, 02:56 PM
RIP guys...... :oops: :(

khukuri
11-07-2003, 02:57 PM
maybe the learn to do just like the chechens, take unexploded bombs, disarm and then rearm then and blow em up.

Butt 100 kilos sound a bit stupid and unpracticle, everybody cant arm a 100 kilo bomb and blow anything up, have in mind that an antitank mine have only 10 kilo charge, and i know, its a hollow charge but still.
But again, as murphy says, If its stupid and works, its not stupid.

Me thinking philosophcly
---------



<offtopic>
Somebody that know more that I do in the area may well correct, cause i have though of that in a long time. May the reason to why the iraki restistance dont use unexploded american bombs be that american bombfuses are more advanced and accurate that russian bombs? or may it be the simple reason that it wasent so many bombs dropped?
</offtopic>

SILENT SCOPE
11-07-2003, 06:22 PM
I'm so f***ing sick of hearing about more US soldiers dieing in this ****hole of a country called Iraq. This has to be the first incident in which US soldiers were killed while inside an Abrams tank. Such f***ing bull****...

UoUo
11-07-2003, 06:25 PM
The sad thing is that the teror almost always geting smarter....today is A tank...tommorow is F-15 :(

Seoulstriker
11-07-2003, 06:26 PM
The force of the blast caused the behemoth to roll over an embankment, which is what killed and injured those inside, the official said.


the explosion didn't kill the tank but the rolling over did?

Argyll
11-07-2003, 06:54 PM
I wish people would stop categorising all the attacks in Iraq as those of terrorists,you all seem to forget that Saddam had his own SF,who are probably behind a lot of what's going on,they have the skill and the know how to carry out such attacks!!
The attacks are getting more daring and sophisticated as the days go by,they see results so they have thier own beliefs that they can defeat the Westerners.
For sure ther have been terrorist attacks,on civilian targets,by the suicide bombers,but the attacks on Military targets are Guerilla tactics,using the words terrorist and terrorism to describe what's currently going on is incorrect,you've got to remember that some of these Iraqi's still see the Western Forces as Invaders of their lands,not liberators as other do!
This "Sunni Triangle " is a hotbed at the moment,but it will be dealt with!

khukuri
11-07-2003, 08:11 PM
I wish people would stop categorising all the attacks in Iraq as those of terrorists,you all seem to forget that Saddam had his own SF,who are probably behind a lot of what's going on,they have the skill and the know how to carry out such attacks!!
The attacks are getting more daring and sophisticated as the days go by,they see results so they have thier own beliefs that they can defeat the Westerners.
For sure ther have been terrorist attacks,on civilian targets,by the suicide bombers,but the attacks on Military targets are Guerilla tactics,using the words terrorist and terrorism to describe what's currently going on is incorrect,you've got to remember that some of these Iraqi's still see the Western Forces as Invaders of their lands,not liberators as other do!
This "Sunni Triangle " is a hotbed at the moment,but it will be dealt with!


WOW, gotta say iam impressed, some american guy who fore once know how to clear out things. Not cause I support any of theese fractions, but theyre not terrorists as many people hear refer to them.

Argyll
11-07-2003, 09:21 PM
I'm not American,I'm Scottish!!

It just seems to be the answer to everything thes days,it was a terrorist act against us,hey wake up here there's a good number of Iraqi's especially the Sunni's who don't want to be Westernised,and they will die trying to defend their homeland,as you and I would if there was an act of aggresion against it!
There are plenty of Iraqi's who simply never knew what all the Western World fuss was about,then we bomb their country ,kill their families,smash their homes,remove their economy and Infrastructure,including Policing and Judicial services,and hey they're supposed to be greatful are they not?

Granted there are lots of Iraqi's who are overjoyed at being liberated,but they're restricted in movement,under curfew,and with the threat of being killed by loyalists for showing their support ,it's not as rosy as the USG/DOD would make it out to be!

Kingpin
11-10-2003, 12:33 AM
Agree with Argyll - attack on army unit is not an act of terrorism. Just usual diversion.

Blast near Red Cross building - this is terrorism.