PDA

View Full Version : Iraq deadlier than Vietnam



jdbjdb
11-14-2003, 04:59 AM
More US troops have been killed during the war on Iraq than were killed during the first three years of the Vietnam war.

According to US Defence Department statistics, there have been more US casualties in almost seven months than were killed in Vietnam from 1962-64.

An analysis of the statistics shows that the Vietnam War produced 392 fatal casualties from 1962-64, when American troop levels stood at around 17,000.

By comparison, 397 Americans have died since the US launched its invasion of Iraq in April.

There are 130,000 US troops currently in Iraq - the same number reached in Vietnam by October 1965.

The casualty count for Iraq apparently surpassed the Vietnam figure last Sunday, when a US soldier killed in a rocket-propelled grenade attack became the conflict's 393rd American casualty.

AMERICAN CASUALTIES

Larger still is the number of American casualties from the broader US "war on terrorism", which has produced 488 military deaths in Iraq, Afghanistan, the Philippines, Southwest Asia and other locations.

Statistics from battle zones outside Iraq show that 91 soldiers have died since 7 October, 2001, as part of Operation Enduring Freedom.

Declining popularity

US President George Bush launched the offensive by first attacking Afghanistan's former Taliban regime in November 2001.

However, the Bush administration has rejected comparisons between Iraq and Vietnam, which traumatised Americans with a procession of body bags and television footage of grim wartime cruelty.

More than 58,000 US military personnel died in Vietnam before the war ended in the mid-1970s.

Recent opinion polls show public support for the president eroding as he heads toward the 2004 election, partly because of public concern over the deadly cycle of guerrilla attacks and bombings in Iraq.

Flagg
11-14-2003, 05:53 AM
Sniff Sniff...smells like troll

Other than the fact Vietnam will forever be etched on the psyche of several US generations...I don't see the relevancy of Vietnam to Iraq?

I don't believe an analogy can be made between the two....

Trident-za
11-14-2003, 05:55 AM
Interesting.... I doubt, though, that the Iraqi situation will result in as many KIAs as Vietnam

Mark Sman
11-14-2003, 06:15 AM
"According to US Defence Department statistics, there have been more US casualties in

almost seven months than were killed in Vietnam from 1962-64."

Troop levels 62-64
1962 11300
1963 16300
1964 23300
All of which were "advisers." Of course advisors saw action and were KIA WIA MIA. First

US combat troops didn't arrive in Vietnam until March 1965. But the point is we have

combat units in Iraq directly engaging the enemy. A more analogus situation betweeen Iraq

and Vietnam would be the 1968 Tet Offensive

1968 TET
US Forces - 1,536 KIA, 7,764WIA, 11 MIA
ARVN - 2,788 KIA, 8,299 WIA, 587 MIA


"There are 130,000 US troops currently in Iraq - the same number reached in Vietnam by

October 1965."
By 1965 we had 1,864 KIA in Vietnam.

http://www.vietnamwall.org/casualty.html
http://www.usmcvta.org/icorps/index.shtml