PDA

View Full Version : EU Will Seek to Impose Sanctions on U.S.



Jeremiah
03-31-2005, 01:04 PM
By RAF CASERT, Associated Press Writer

BRUSSELS, Belgium - The European Union head office said Thursday it will seek to impose additional sanctions of up to 15 percent on U.S. products to punish Washington for failing to repeal an antidumping law ruled illegal by the World Trade Organization.

The European Commission said its action would be joined soon by seven other nations, including Japan, South Korea and Brazil, which had all requested the WTO authorize retaliation.

The EU's move would slap additional duties of up to 15 percent as of May 1 on such U.S. products as paper, textiles, machinery and farm produce. The European Commission's proposal still needs to be approved by the EU member states.

Targeted items ran from writing pads to sweetcorn, tablecloth and sports footwear.

The EU said that according to the latest information, the level of retaliation would amount to slightly less than $28 million.

The agency said it took its latest step "in light of the continuing failure of the United States to bring its legislation in conformity with its international obligations."

The 25-nation EU has long asked for Washington to repeal the 3-year-old legislation and the Bush administration has been working with Congress to bring it into line with its obligations. Yet the EU executive Commission said it was time to bring further action.

The Geneva-based WTO first ruled the U.S. legislation illegal in 2002 and gave the United States until the end of 2003 to conform. When it didn't, the eight complainants were given the option late last year to impose sanctions.

"The EU understands that Canada will be announcing retaliatory measures against certain products from the United States and expects that other co-complainants will soon join it in applying retaliation," the EU head office said.

The other complainants are Brazil, Chile, India, Japan, South Korea and Mexico.

The law, known as the Byrd amendment, allows American companies to receive proceeds from antidumping duties levied on foreign rivals.

It was approved in 2000 and in four annual distributions, over $1 billion has been distributed to such industries as steel and metal producers and food and household items.

The European Commission said there were no negotiating meetings with U.S. officials planned ahead of the May 1 deadline.

http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20050331/ap_on_bi_ge/eu_us_trade_sanctions_11

formerLT
03-31-2005, 01:32 PM
The Geneva-based WTO first ruled the U.S. legislation illegal in 2002

WTO?


Fact is I voted for and elected my congressional reps who were involved in that legislation, and I didn't vote for anyone in the WTO. As far as I know they are appointed. They should have no sovereignty over anyone.

wholagun
03-31-2005, 01:50 PM
The Geneva-based WTO first ruled the U.S. legislation illegal in 2002

WTO?


Fact is I voted for and elected my congressional reps who were involved in that legislation, and I didn't vote for anyone in the WTO. As far as I know they are appointed. They should have no sovereignty over anyone.

I talked about this awhile back but everyone thought I was crazy. As i stated before, WTO's principles and treaty was passed in congress, and acts like a supra constitution. by joining these international orgnization you lose soveregnty - everyone knows that.

Commie
03-31-2005, 01:52 PM
I hardly think the EU does this just because WTO tells them to. There is some kind of hidden agenda. Ill browse around for a while and check if i find something.

BigBaribal
03-31-2005, 01:54 PM
I just love how the USA is liberal when it's an advantage for itself, but protectionist when it's good for its industry (metallurgy for instance). :roll:

wholagun
03-31-2005, 02:19 PM
I hardly think the EU does this just because WTO tells them to. There is some kind of hidden agenda. Ill browse around for a while and check if i find something.


WTO telling EU to impose sanctions?? HUH???? Where did you read that?

The EU asks the WTO to impose sanctions, when the WTO gives the EU premission, only then can EU impose sanctions. The EU US trade agreement is founded on WTO rules, which means both sides agree to the same rules governing thier trade along with the other WTO member states. When states break the rules as in the case of US, other countries can plead their case(s) to the WTO. If the WTO pannel rules in favour of sanctions the other countries can then go ahead.

Commie
03-31-2005, 05:24 PM
hupp, sorry a mistake from my side.

wholagun
03-31-2005, 05:46 PM
hupp, sorry a mistake from my side.

hey man no one is perfect no need to appologize. Even my US foreign policy prof claims he's wrong on an hourly basis.

chauncy republicans
03-31-2005, 05:56 PM
The Geneva-based WTO first ruled the U.S. legislation illegal in 2002

WTO?


Fact is I voted for and elected my congressional reps who were involved in that legislation, and I didn't vote for anyone in the WTO. As far as I know they are appointed. They should have no sovereignty over anyone.

I talked about this awhile back but everyone thought I was crazy. As i stated before, WTO's principles and treaty was passed in congress, and acts like a supra constitution. by joining these international orgnization you lose soveregnty - everyone knows that.
That is 100% correct.
Too bad more people don't take notice.

Buckeye67
03-31-2005, 05:59 PM
I just love how the USA is liberal when it's an advantage for itself, but protectionist when it's good for its industry (metallurgy for instance). :roll:

Yeah, and every other country in the world is a pillar of altruistic virtue when it comes to trade. :roll: