PDA

View Full Version : N.Korea Berates Rumsfeld as Worse Than Hitler



Seraphim
11-22-2003, 12:55 PM
:cantbeli:

http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=578&ncid=578&e=7&u=/nm/20031122/ts_nm/korea_north_rumsfeld_dc



SEOUL (*******) - North Korea (news - web sites) issued a blistering attack on Donald Rumsfeld on Saturday, saying the U.S. defense secretary was worse than Adolf Hitler.


The official KCNA news agency also said Rumsfeld's criticism of North Korea this week -- he called it an evil regime -- made Pyongyang doubt the prospects of talks to resolve the North's nuclear crisis.


"It is nothing surprising that Rumsfeld talked such nonsense as he put Hitler into the shade in man-killing and war hysteria. But we can never pardon him for malignantly slandering our dignified and inviolable political system whether he is a political dwarf, human scum or hysteric," the agency said.


"If his vituperation represents the stance of the Bush administration, it can not but cast a doubt about the prospect of the six-way talks," it said.


The United States held nuclear talks involving the two Koreas, China, Russia and Japan in Beijing in August and is trying to convene another round next month.


Rumsfeld said in a speech to U.S. troops at an American air base in South Korea (news - web sites) on Tuesday that "people in the North, repressed people to be sure, watch their children waste away, eat bark, as that evil regime spends huge sums on weapons."


As many as one million of North Korea's 22 million people are estimated by experts to have died from famine over the past decade. Dependent on outside food aid, the North spends about 30 percent of gross domestic product on its military, the world's fifth largest.


KCNA said Rumsfeld's remarks showed the North was right to seek nuclear arms and "reinforces the conviction that there is no other way but to stand in confrontation with the U.S. to the end."

DixieDude
11-22-2003, 02:18 PM
I don't think they are ever going to shut down their nuclear program. It will all come down to war.

N.K. is just too cocky...and Rumsfeld is right, NK is an evil regime.

Sh*t, We should have gone after NK before Iraq.

kinghk
11-22-2003, 02:43 PM
I don't think they are ever going to shut down their nuclear program. It will all come down to war.

N.K. is just too cocky...and Rumsfeld is right, NK is an evil regime.

Sh*t, We should have gone after NK before Iraq.

You never thought that perhaps NK started their nuclear program because of the american foreign policy?

Ratamacue
11-22-2003, 02:51 PM
No, North Korea stared their nuclear program because they're cocky fools with the determination of a retard running into a wall.

NcDeuce
11-22-2003, 02:55 PM
Our hands are too full to be concerned about a major conflict in Asia.

jdbjdb
11-22-2003, 03:12 PM
Our hands are too full to be concerned about a major conflict in Asia.

Yes our hands are full, but it doesn't matter, North Korea is to big of a threat to look the other way, do you realize how much firepower that the North has targeted on Seoul?

Ratamacue
11-22-2003, 03:22 PM
No one's looking the other way. But we still can't spend the troops right now, nor the funding.

kinghk
11-22-2003, 03:25 PM
Yes our hands are full, but it doesn't matter, North Korea is to big of a threat to look the other way, do you realize how much firepower that the North has targeted on Seoul?

Do you realize how much firepower that the Russians has targeted on USA?

duck
11-22-2003, 03:28 PM
China might invade sooner or later because of the ongoing stream of refugees. I'm quite sure they have their agents within the PRK military leadership.

jdbjdb
11-22-2003, 03:30 PM
No one's looking the other way. But we still can't spend the troops right now, nor the funding
That is no excuse when you have a madman with nukes(sooner or later) pointed at the south, you are looking at 300,000 dead.

Ratamacue
11-22-2003, 04:03 PM
You really don't get it dude. It would be impossible to enter a war with NK. We do not have the funding nor the manpower when we have some 150,000 troops in Iraq as well as men in Afghanistan.

ST4
11-22-2003, 04:08 PM
Stupid North Korea. King Jong II is a little fariy with his hair sticking up like a ***. I heard that when Operation Iraqi Freedom started, he sent 40 days in a bunker because he thought he was going to be next. There will be no war with North Korea cause the military is strenched out right now.


How can Rumsfeld be worse than Hitler? :cantbeli: Has he killed over 6 million Jews?

How many people has Kim Jong II regime killed?

California Joe
11-22-2003, 05:00 PM
You ever read the profiles on that twisted little fat bastard with the bad Elvis hair? Loves American Westerns, thinks he's a movie director, especially likes to bang tall blond Swedish whores, bad teeth, extreme paranoia, luxury armored train....He's a piece of work.

Him comparing anyone to Hitler is like Liberace calling you a fag. Please.

The Walrus
11-22-2003, 05:11 PM
This is why I seriously doubt that the US went to Iraq because of it's international threat, you just have to look at NK which not only has NUKES but actually brags about it, as far as Kim Jong II is concerned, he has stared down the US and probably feels invincible. He's done it many times before, chances are he's not going to stop starving and suffocation his people and developing more weapons, regime change is the only option here.
The situation in NK is just so much more serious than Iraq ever was, in terms of both regime brutality, dictator madness level and WMD's.
If there ever is such a thing as 'a rogue state that is holding the world hostage' as Dubya puts it, it is definetaly NK not Iraq.

duck
11-22-2003, 05:14 PM
Korean guys, just out of their gut, have told me they expect parts of the ROK army to join an armed revolt against US troops in case of an attack on PRK.

California Joe
11-22-2003, 05:16 PM
I agree with you. I'll bring it up at the next Cabinet meeting.