PDA

View Full Version : The U.S. Soldier Is Time Person of Year



NcDeuce
12-21-2003, 11:06 AM
The U.S. Soldier Is Time Person of Year

By SARA KUGLER
Associated Press Writer

NEW YORK (AP) -- The American soldier, who bears the duty of "living with and dying for a country's most fateful decisions," was named Sunday as Time magazine's Person of the Year.

The magazine's editors chose the nameless soldier to represent the 1.4 million men and women who make up the U.S. military, which led the invasion of Iraq nine months ago and a week ago captured deposed leader Saddam Hussein.

About 130,000 U.S. soldiers remain in Iraq, with others deployed in Afghanistan, South Korea and elsewhere.

Soldiers were singled out as the top newsmakers of the year because "the very messy aftermath of the war made it clear that the mission had changed, that the mission had not been completed and that this would be a story that would be with us for months, if not years, to come," Time Managing Editor Jim Kelly said.

The selection echoes 1950, the year the Korean War began, when editors picked the American GI for the cover, writing that "it was not a role the American had sought, either as an individual or as a nation. The U.S. fighting-man was not civilization's crusader, but destiny's draftee."

The 2003 Person of the Year package, which hits newsstands Monday, focuses on a 12-person artillery survey unit stationed in Iraq to tell the story of the American soldier. Two Time journalists embedded with the platoon were injured in a grenade attack this month.

Three soldiers with the unit - Marquette Whiteside, Billie Grimes and Ronald Buxton - are shown on the cover.

The magazine glorifies soldiers but not the Bush administration for putting them in Iraq, calling troops "the bright sharp instrument of a blunt policy," and leaving it to scholars to debate "whether the Bush doctrine is the most muscular expression of national interest in a half-century."

The justification for a U.S. military presence in Iraq has been widely questioned, as coalition forces have found no weapons of mass destruction, which President Bush had argued Saddam was stockpiling.

Guerrilla attacks against U.S. and allied forces stationed there have escalated over the months since May 1 when the president declared an end to major combat. More coalition troops died in November than in any other month: 104, including 79 Americans.

"A force intensively trained for its mission finds itself improvising at every turn, required to exercise exquisite judgment in extreme circumstances," the magazine said. "They complain less about the danger than the uncertainty - they are told they're going home in two weeks, and then two months later they have not moved."

The Pentagon has said it expects to reduce the number of American troops in Iraq to just over 100,000 by May.

Time magazine knows the risks first hand. On the evening of Dec. 10, Time writer Michael Weisskopf's right hand was blown off and photographer James Nachtwey was hit with shrapnel when a grenade landed on their humvee as the platoon was stuck in Baghdad traffic.

Weisskopf is recovering at Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C., and Nachtwey is in New York.

In 2001, when then-New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani was picked as Time's Person of the Year for leading the city's response to the Sept. 11 terror attacks, critics suggested Osama bin Laden should have been featured as the top newsmaker.

Kelly said Saddam was not considered this year because "he was on the losing side of this conflict," and it was unclear how much he was leading the insurgency.

Last year, Time editors selected Coleen Rowley, the FBI agent who wrote a scathing memo on FBI intelligence failures, and Cynthia Cooper and Sherron Watkins, who blew the whistle on corruption at corporate giants Enron and WorldCom.

http://customwire.ap.org/photos/NY10712211322-big.jpg
Time Magazine's cover for the Dec. 29- Jan. 5 issue shows three American military personnel representing the "Anonymous American Soldier" chosen by Time to be the magazine's 2003 Person of the Year. The American soldier, who bears the duty of ``living with and dying for a country's most fateful decisions,'' was named Sunday, Dec. 21, 2003 as Time's Person of the Year. The magazine's editors chose the nameless soldier to represent the 1.4 million men and women who make up the U.S. military, which led the invasion of Iraq nine months ago and scored big this month with the capture of deposed leader Saddam Hussein.

woot woot woot

Deuterium
12-21-2003, 11:11 AM
AAARRRRGGGGHHHHHH!!!!!!!!! Get your Fuc*ing finger off the trigger!!!!!! Do pushups junior.

Dmitri
12-21-2003, 11:14 AM
LOL

Vance
12-21-2003, 11:27 AM
THERE'S ALREADY BEEN A THREAD POSTED ABOUT THIS YOU MAGGOT!

Falco
12-21-2003, 01:05 PM
Hey at least the press in the US acknowledge the great work done by the troops abroad. This is some thing that rarely happens in Canada.

Vance
12-21-2003, 02:03 PM
Rock on guys.

budanski
12-21-2003, 02:46 PM
http://www.dribbleglass.com/subpages/strange/hell-freezes.jpg

Kudos to the troops. but.....

It was their only possible way to avoid choosing George W. Bush. It parallels exactly with the liberal policy of "supporting the troops, but not the mission."

TIME, will not under any circumstances, give credit to a Republican, if it can possibly avoid it. I still never got over Time giving the Man of the Decade (for the '80's) to Gorbachev and not Reagan.

California Joe
12-21-2003, 03:03 PM
Gawd, Top is right. Is that a chick in front?

budanski
12-21-2003, 03:12 PM
Yeah, they seemed to go a bit overboard with Political Correctness (White male soldier, white female soldier, black soldier). rofl

Kinda reminds me of last week in the Kitty Hawk re-inactment. Two pilots were "representing" Wilbur and Orville Wright. I was confused who the lady pilot was portraying, Wilbur or Orville?

http://www.cox-internet.com/tomguy/BB4/121703-11.jpg

California Joe
12-21-2003, 03:18 PM
Yeah, they seemed to go a bit overboard with Political Correctness (White male soldier, white female soldier, black soldier). rofl

Kinda reminds me of last week in the Kitty Hawk re-inactment. Two pilots were "representing" Wilbur and Orville Wright. I was confused who the lady pilot was portraying, Wilbur or Orville?

Where's the asian guy or the hispanic guy or the American Indian woman...

budanski
12-21-2003, 03:23 PM
I know the asian guy was still busy with the railroads. ;)

IDFM203
12-21-2003, 09:26 PM
http://www.dribbleglass.com/subpages/strange/hell-freezes.jpg

Kudos to the troops. but.....

It was their only possible way to avoid choosing George W. Bush. It parallels exactly with the liberal policy of "supporting the troops, but not the mission."

TIME, will not under any circumstances, give credit to a Republican, if it can possibly avoid it. I still never got over Time giving the Man of the Decade (for the '80's) to Gorbachev and not Reagan. excellent post!! (btw, I never knew about that decade thing……..interesting)


Yeah time’s liberal political correctness is appalling!!

I mean first these three soldiers (please understand clearly that I absolutely mean no disrespect to these soldiers!!) and last year with those three women.

The man of the year should be about a singular individual who had the most impact, be it good or bad.

The fact is that whether you agree with him or not. President Bush defiantly fits my above description for there is no doubt that he as an individual had the most (my opinion, positive) impact this past year.

I mean their political correctness takes away from the credibility that they might have had as being a serious and intellectual magazine

I know this might rankle some people But I actually believe that time should have named Osoma bin lauden as the man of the year in 2001 for this is not recognition of good or bad or that the man of the year has to be positive or negative, No its which individual that year had the most impact and Osama that year certainly had as a individual more impact than anyone else.

Shalom :D

California Joe
12-21-2003, 09:29 PM
That's why Hitler won it before. You're right. It wasn't originally an honor just a declarative statement.

IDFM203
12-21-2003, 09:31 PM
That's why Hitler won it before. You're right. It wasn't originally an honor just a declarative statement. yes and your right (boy its great to agree on something ;) ) for yes before Time was doing it correctly but now it has become a award or a honour and its all about political correctness……….(as I explained above)

Shalom :D

Jack Mehoff
12-21-2003, 09:34 PM
One of them is a chick, so which one in the picture is a chick

http://customwire.ap.org/photos/NY10712211322-big.jpg

California Joe
12-21-2003, 09:39 PM
That's why Hitler won it before. You're right. It wasn't originally an honor just a declarative statement. yes and your right (boy its great to agree on something ;) ) for yes before Time was doing it correctly but now it has become a award or a honour and its all about political correctness……….(as I explained above)

Shalom :D

Time puts Osama on the cover Time sells no magazines.

I think the one with her finger on the trigger Jack. Jessie Lynch must have been unavailable.

Vance
12-21-2003, 09:46 PM
One of them is a chick, so which one in the picture is a chick

http://customwire.ap.org/photos/NY10712211322-big.jpg
The one in the front. Look at her nails.

the_spec
12-21-2003, 09:51 PM
Well, whatever that is standing in front, it sure as hell doesn't look convincing on either side of the gender wall.

James
12-22-2003, 12:34 AM
I'm glad they picked the American soldier. Any one of them deserves it more than anyone else in America. We should all thank them.

ArmedPacifist
12-22-2003, 12:43 AM
I think the one with her finger on the trigger Jack. Jessie Lynch must have been unavailable.

rofl

SOG
12-22-2003, 12:55 AM
One of them is a chick, so which one in the picture is a chick

http://customwire.ap.org/photos/NY10712211322-big.jpg

obviously the one on the right is the fairest woman of them all.......errr

semi ballsy of time for doing this even though our servicemen are easily deserving and even though bush has done a decent job overall with most of this hes too much of a goof as many of our presidents have been on the flip side to be taken wholly seriously for this "honor". its nice to see the media meeting the war effort half way and acknowledging accomplishments instead of saying they support our troops then seeing them picket all the local bases showing thier true colors and trashing the soldiers efforts everytime they see em on the news..

Guttorm
12-22-2003, 01:01 AM
http://www.dribbleglass.com/subpages/strange/hell-freezes.jpg

Kudos to the troops. but.....

It was their only possible way to avoid choosing George W. Bush. It parallels exactly with the liberal policy of "supporting the troops, but not the mission."

TIME, will not under any circumstances, give credit to a Republican, if it can possibly avoid it. I still never got over Time giving the Man of the Decade (for the '80's) to Gorbachev and not Reagan.

Actually,.. theres a place in norway called hell. :) And theres an airbase there too...

The us and UK pilots LOVe he patch that say's "Hell arbase" :)

GODDARD
12-22-2003, 07:30 AM
cool a place called hell i wounder if my mother in law came frm there i should ask her.

:bash:

The Walrus
12-22-2003, 07:31 AM
I think that Gorbachov did fully deserve to be 'man of the decade', he (perhaps inadvertedly) knocked down the first domino in the dis-assembling of the Soviet Union with Perestroika, which gave way to nationalism in the sattelite countries, which led to the Warsaw Pact countries becoming independent, the fall of the wall, the Baltics independence, Yeltsins rise and so on.
People tend to forget that the USSR was bought down on the inside rather than the outside, and that it very easily could have not happened if Gorbachov would have made more out of the successful approval vote for continuation of Communism (this was after the Warsaw pact was dissolved), or if the coup would have succeeded.

Vance
12-22-2003, 08:55 AM
cool a place called hell i wounder if my mother in law came frm there i should ask her.

:bash:
LOL

garyfanclub
12-22-2003, 10:32 AM
Boy George should have been Transvestite of the Decade. He was even more convincing than Gobachev!

Uncle Sam
12-22-2003, 10:54 AM
And it should be !!

Uncle Sam
12-22-2003, 10:54 AM
**DELETE**

George W. Bush
12-22-2003, 11:21 AM
Boy George should have been Transvestite of the Decade. He was even more convincing than Gobachev!

:cantbeli: