PDA

View Full Version : Post here your CQB/MOUT photos!



MAGNUM
12-25-2003, 01:21 PM
Post here your CQB/MOUT photos!
[/img]

Javehn
12-25-2003, 01:54 PM
Well , take those , dude

First picture have nothing to do with CQB , it's just my former platoon-you can find me , and mr bigisraeli here somewhere in this picture ...

http://www.hevre.co.il/images/photos/753237_189286.JPG

And , here you have some CQB. It's not CQB training , but pretty much close to it ... Sorry , i know you wanted to see some special forces guys jumping here from window to window ...

http://www.hevre.co.il/images/photos/570121_106987.JPG

How about that apple ? Again , not exactly what you had in mind , ha?

http://www.hevre.co.il/images/photos/207213_143518.JPG

Yea , that one is defenetly good one ...
http://www.hevre.co.il/images/photos/278916_92898.JPG

MAGNUM
12-25-2003, 03:04 PM
Well...is not my idea of CQB/MOUT images but is nice material.

A question: what is the reason to install a Browning on the top of the Merkava's gun?
Has the tank no coaxial machineguns?

NcDeuce
12-25-2003, 03:49 PM
Urban Warfare Training @ Ft. Polk, LA

http://media.militaryphotos.net/photos/albums/album02/101_2.jpg

http://media.militaryphotos.net/photos/albums/album02/101_3.jpg

http://media.militaryphotos.net/photos/albums/album02/101_4.jpg

http://media.militaryphotos.net/photos/albums/album02/101_1.jpg

NcDeuce
12-25-2003, 03:55 PM
Urban Warfare Training (Special Forces, 75th Ranger Regiment, & 160th SOAR)

http://media.militaryphotos.net/photos/albums/ussocom_training/z_sft03.jpg

http://media.militaryphotos.net/photos/albums/ussocom_training/d_sft02.jpg

http://media.militaryphotos.net/photos/albums/ussocom_training/e_sft01.jpg

http://media.militaryphotos.net/photos/albums/ussocom_training/d_sft03.jpg

http://media.militaryphotos.net/photos/albums/ussocom_training/a_sft01.jpg

http://media.militaryphotos.net/photos/albums/ussocom_training/20a15.jpg

http://media.militaryphotos.net/photos/albums/ussocom_training/19a14.jpg

http://media.militaryphotos.net/photos/albums/ussocom_training/23a.jpg

pretorian669
12-25-2003, 06:24 PM
http://www2.freepichosting.com/Images/39492/3.jpg
http://www2.freepichosting.com/Images/39492/4.jpg
http://www2.freepichosting.com/Images/39492/5.jpg
http://www2.freepichosting.com/Images/39492/6.jpg
http://www2.freepichosting.com/Images/105387/3.jpg

pretorian669
12-25-2003, 06:49 PM
http://www2.freepichosting.com/Images/125107/6.jpg
http://www2.freepichosting.com/Images/125107/5.jpg
http://www2.freepichosting.com/Images/125107/4.jpg
http://www2.freepichosting.com/Images/125107/0.jpg
http://www2.freepichosting.com/Images/125107/2.jpg
http://www2.freepichosting.com/Images/125107/3.jpg

dez000
12-25-2003, 08:11 PM
What does this have to do with CQB/MOUT? :bash:

*ok ;) *

fred_engles
12-25-2003, 11:16 PM
What does this have to do with CQB/MOUT? It's the end result =)

[Seriously, DeZzErX is right, in that graphic images should be linked, not displayed inline, and should have an appropriate warning.]

ChuckThunder
12-25-2003, 11:27 PM
[img]http://www2.freepichosting.com/Images/125107/1.jpg

What does this have to do with CQB/MOUT? :bash:

(Arms crossed) It means they made sure he doesn't have any weapons on him, SOP for all types of operations. At least thats what we do in the U.S.

NcDeuce
12-25-2003, 11:39 PM
What does this have to do with CQB/MOUT? It's the end result =)

[Seriously, DeZzErX is right, in that graphic images should be linked, not displayed inline, and should have an appropriate warning.]

Yes please remove that image and place a URL with warning.

pretorian669
12-26-2003, 12:25 AM
Sorry . My bad. :oops:
Pic removed.

pretorian669
12-28-2003, 07:44 AM
It was a GOOD day!!!!! :bash: woot ;)


http://www.imagestation.com/album/?id=4288202643
http://www.imagestation.com/picture/sraid95/p72f6b0f247467c9da70c6623a747339a/fa2a9f29.jpg.orig.jpg

JunglistSoldier
12-28-2003, 09:17 AM
Well...is not my idea of CQB/MOUT images but is nice material.

A question: what is the reason to install a Browning on the top of the Merkava's gun?
Has the tank no coaxial machineguns?

that is MOUT for sure.

Javehn
12-28-2003, 02:50 PM
Mr. Pretorian , you are out of of picture service , man !
And for the tank pictures , yea , that's a MOUT for shizle reazle . Infantry are toasted without tanks in large scale MOUT . That offcorse goes all the way around - Tanks are tost without infantry in MOUT. Why tanks have Brouning on them ? Because Brouning is the best - it can do all the things that Mag's can't do , and without any collathoral damage of 120mm gun

Take those :

http://www.hevre.co.il/images/photos/253539_101127.JPG

http://www.hevre.co.il/images/photos/253539_101124.JPG

http://www.hevre.co.il/images/photos/105777_64178.JPG

reverence
12-30-2003, 09:07 PM
If the helos are gonna hover eight feet off the roof with no rotor obstructions why doesn't it just land and get the boys out quicker or hover 2 feet off the deck. Ive been in this situation often and you feel like an idiot when as soon as you grab the rope you're feet hit the deck.

Javehn
12-31-2003, 08:52 AM
If the helos are gonna hover eight feet off the roof with no rotor obstructions why doesn't it just land and get the boys out quicker or hover 2 feet off the deck. Ive been in this situation often and you feel like an idiot when as soon as you grab the rope you're feet hit the deck.

That's a good point , dude ! Very good point , sence as i know , the rope landing is a big NO NO in a Urban territories and CQB combat ( simple reason is while the helicopter drifting in one place , it can be shot down without even any small problem whatsoever ) .

Here you have couple of more pictures -

http://images1.fotki.com/v3/photos/6/6059/100084/62022-vi.jpg

http://images1.fotki.com/v9/photos/6/6059/149972/1649563.cecenija_4-vi.jpg

http://images1.fotki.com/v8/photos/6/6059/149972/1798004.6475-vi.jpg

http://images1.fotki.com/v9/photos/6/6059/149972/Russians_0094-vi.jpg

http://images1.fotki.com/v9/photos/6/6059/149972/Russians_0159-vi.jpg

http://images1.fotki.com/v4/photos/6/6059/104417/capt.1018109903-vi.jpg

Macs.
12-31-2003, 09:34 AM
http://images1.fotki.com/v9/photos/6/6059/149972/Russians_0159-vi.jpg


Ouhh, nice shoes ! That must be russian soldiers in chechnya.

usa320
12-31-2003, 07:09 PM
the helos are gonna hover eight feet off the roof with no rotor obstructions why doesn't it just land and get the boys out quicker or hover 2 feet off the deck. Ive been in this situation often and you feel like an idiot when as soon as you grab the rope you're feet hit the deck.


The fast rope method is used in case the chopper comes under fire from small arms or RPG's it will have better chances of safely manuevering or exiting the area quickly.

Same reason that durring the vietnam war the planes never stopped at the bases to drop of supplies, they would just fly over the runway at like 2 feet and slide the pallets out the back door.

Leaves the aircraft in the line of fire for a shorter amount of time.

mustamato
12-31-2003, 07:50 PM
http://www.ing2.mil.se/images/local/liq_5_head.jpg
http://www.ing2.mil.se/images/local/liq_1.jpg
http://www.ing2.mil.se/images/local/liq_2.jpg
http://www.ing2.mil.se/images/local/liq_3.jpg
http://www.ing2.mil.se/images/local/liq_4.jpg
http://www.ing2.mil.se/images/local/liq_7.jpg
http://www.ing2.mil.se/images/local/liq_8.jpg

George W. Bush
12-31-2003, 08:32 PM
The infrared image is funny because I thought it said "Why not?"

I thought, "Yes. Why not?" also.

ChuckThunder
12-31-2003, 10:16 PM
The infrared image is funny because I thought it said "Why not?"

I thought, "Yes. Why not?" also.

Its "WHT HOT" for White Hot.

Chris1
01-01-2004, 09:26 AM
http://news.mod.uk/img/pressdatabase/images/supportingImages/large/fibua02_tn.jpg

Sergeant Davis, 1/508th Parachute Infantry, US Army, rushes a "casualty" into cover
http://news.mod.uk/img/pressdatabase/images/supportingImages/large/fibua01_tn.jpg

Captain Geens, Belgian Army, briefs his section at the start of an exercise at Copehill Down

Roger Rabbit
01-01-2004, 11:40 AM
The British Army's Urban Operations Wing hosted a successful two-week training course for NATO infantry instructors at its Fighting In Built Up Areas facility - FIBUA - at Copehill Down on Salisbury Plain.

The Copehill Down FIBUA is a sophisticated mock urban area allowing troops to conduct realistic training in one of the most challenging of all infantry operations. The importance of peacekeeping operations in the modern world place an even higher premium on the skills which can be developed there. The Urban Operations Wing runs the course for NATO FIBUA instructors, ensuring a commonality of standards and techniques across the Alliance. The course also offers the opportunity for new techniques developed by one nation to be shared with others.

The training is conducted using the Small Arms Weapons Effects Simulator, which adds a particular degree of realism to exercises; the handling of casualties is an important element of the training.




I saw the two photos above and wondered why they were using British equipment, anyway i found out so with a copy and paste you can all see as well.

usa320
01-01-2004, 01:02 PM
Nice pics. Mustamatos stand out as being some of the best so far IMHO...

mustamato
01-01-2004, 02:19 PM
Nice pics. Mustamatos stand out as being some of the best so far IMHO...

Actually I found it on the homepage of a swedish guardplatoon. Every swedish regiment has one or two of those and they do exactly what their name says. They guard the others, the regiment and the military facilities outside the regiment, and they also escort people/transports etc etc, you could call them something like "the military police"- the light version, since they donīt learn that much juridics and law and so forth as the real military police do. The other swedish conscripts usually consider them as the laziest and most useless of all soldiers in the regiment that canīt do anything. But I think the pictures shows that they are good at something atleast, CQB is trained a lot in these units obviously. Their wartime task would be close protection to the regiment staff and so forth.

More pictures from swedish guardplatoons

http://www.ing2.mil.se/images/local/1komp_skjvidinsats.jpg
Instinctive shooting (a pain in the ass with the SUSAT)

http://www.k4.mil.se/images/local/inbrytning_rum.jpg

http://www.k4.mil.se/images/local/inbrytning_fonster.jpg

http://www.k4.mil.se/images/local/passage_tunnel.jpg

http://www.k4.mil.se/images/local/inbrytning.jpg

http://www.k4.mil.se/images/local/inpasseringskontroll.jpg
And the reason to why they are disliked by everyone else :)

Javehn
01-01-2004, 02:51 PM
Nice pics. Mustamatos stand out as being some of the best so far IMHO...

:(

To Mustamato : Man , for lazy bastards they shure do have good equipment , man , i wish i had half of that equipment . :)

mustamato
01-01-2004, 03:10 PM
To Mustamato : Man , for lazy bastards they shure do have good equipment , man , i wish i had half of that equipment . :)

Most of it is just the standard issue equipment, but with some few exceptions.

http://www.soldf.com/images/s_ak5_vapenlampa2.jpg

Air Force (wings in the hat) base guard with Sure-Fire on the handguards. That is sure one strong light, if you in the dark get it in your eyes you will become temporarily blinded. This guy also has some other kind of lighter vest on him (the standard issue bullet-proof vest with plates weighs 13 kg). Probably bought and used only by their unit. It stands "Skyddsvakt" on it, which in rough translation means "protection guard".

reverence
01-13-2004, 01:12 AM
Its nearly always quicker to hover a couple of feet of the deck and deplane or even touch down for 10 seconds and leave than to fast rope in. Fast roping was developed to insert troops into areas or on buildings where the helos may have rotor strike(trees/antennas etc) or the ground(slope/obstacles etc)is unsuitable. A helo hovering 60 feet off the deck is more of a target than one that is at ground /roof level. Ive always been taught that the air land is the preferable option. Anyone else got any thoughts??