PDA

View Full Version : Quote of the day from the UK



martinexsquaddie
07-07-2005, 03:49 PM
and from a soapdodgers website too:

www.indymedia.org.uk/e...17160.html



"What the fu_ck do you think you're doing? This is London. We've dealt with your sort before. You don't try and pull this on us. Do you have any idea how many times our city has been attacked? Whatever you're trying to do, it's not going to work.
All you've done is end some of our lives, and ruin some more. How is that going to help you? You don't get rewarded for this kind of crap. And if, as your MO indicates, you're an al-Qaeda group, then you're out of your tiny minds. Because if this is a message to Tony Blair, we've got news for you. We don't much like our government ourselves, or what they do in our name. But, listen very clearly. We'll deal with that ourselves. We're London, and we've got our own way of doing things, and it doesn't involve tossing bombs around where innocent people are going about their lives. And that's because we're better than you. Everyone is better than you.

Our city works. We rather like it. And we're going to go about our lives. We're going to take care of the lives you ruined. And then we're going to work. And we're going down the pub. So you can pack up your bombs, put them in your arseholes, and get the fu_ck out of our city."

not exactly Churchill but it will do


:)

Digital Marine
07-07-2005, 03:52 PM
Good quote

wiking
07-07-2005, 03:57 PM
:lol: Good, very good.

I must say, as of today Londoners are my favorite people. Sinverely doubt ANYONE could be expected to react so well in such a situation.

EvanL
07-07-2005, 04:01 PM
very nice, and well put :D

EffJi
07-07-2005, 05:11 PM
I'm still wating for someone to be interviewed to go:
"I hope you people won't be too bummed out when the SAS cuts your throats off in the middle of the night."

I was really expecting a guy that they interviewed to say something like that, but he didn't.

Midav
07-07-2005, 05:16 PM
Very well said!!

platform389
07-07-2005, 05:26 PM
Until you get rid of this...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v414/h18w777/MuslimTrash.jpg

...the death and destruction will continue.

http://instagiber.net/smiliesdotcom/contrib/aahmed/sad.gif

SavikLion
07-07-2005, 05:35 PM
Until you get rid of this...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v414/h18w777/MuslimTrash.jpg

...the death and destruction will continue.

http://instagiber.net/smiliesdotcom/contrib/aahmed/sad.gif

This is reality, this is what the goal of islam is. The radicals just are more vocal about it.

frogfoot
07-07-2005, 05:36 PM
My second thought after heard the attack is Churchill's speech:
"We shall go on to the end.
We shall fight in France
We shall fightover the seas and oceans,
we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strenght in the air.
We shall defend our island whatever the cost may be
we shall fight on beaches,we shall fight on the landing grounds,
we shall fight in the fields and in the streets,
we shall fight on the hills.
We shall never surrender."
(I love history and this is my "picture"of British peoples.)

abncougar
07-07-2005, 05:47 PM
x2...definetly a great quote,

wulfstan
07-07-2005, 05:47 PM
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v414/h18w777/MuslimTrash.jpg

OMG! That is Bury Park Road in Luton. I was an Asylum Unit Project Worker in that town. The shop behind them is a Halal food shop called Hassans, or possibly Nasons. The owner had this 'agreement' with the council that he would provide food for the poor Muslim asylum seekers (that's all of them) and then send us the bill. Meaning he had carte blanche to send a monthly phantom bill, which was totally unvarifiable!
Biggest scam ever. And that's not London, just a small town in England...

Brentmeister
07-07-2005, 05:48 PM
What the fu_ck do you think you're doing? This is London. We've dealt with your sort before

Hollow words my friend. The fact of the matter is this. Misguided Blair has deliberately flooded Britains shores with immigrants. At minimum 500,000 are illegal immigrants and therefore unknown to the authorities. If these unknowns wish to cause harm to society there is nothing you or i can do about it. This bravado is all very well but fools no one, not least the terrorists, whom i might add are most probably mocking your heartfelt sentiments.

Sadly for Britain, the damage has now been done. Blair will surely answer for his naive stupidity. New Labours social experiment has seriously put Britain in jeapardy. IMO only internment policies will now repair this mess Blair's New Labour has created. Just be grateful this attack was not a chemical attack, because that is what is next, make no mistake. Millions could die in a WMD attack. I suspect only then will something be done about this Islamic cancer now eating into the fabric of our once great society.

Laworkerbee
07-07-2005, 05:50 PM
Thats sad Wulf

I dearly hope this PC **** ends soon before it dooms us all

abncougar
07-07-2005, 05:52 PM
What the fu_ck do you think you're doing? This is London. We've dealt with your sort before

Hollow words my friend. The fact of the matter is this. Misguided Blair has deliberately flooded Britains shores with immigrants. At minimum 500,000 are illegal immigrants and therefore unknown to the authorities. If these unknowns wish to cause harm to society there is nothing you or i can do about it. This bravado is all very well but fools no one, not least the terrorists, whom i might add are most probably mocking your heartfelt sentiments.

Sadly for Britain, the damage has now been done. Blair will surely answer for his naive stupidity. New Labours social experiment has seriously put Britain in jeapardy. IMO only internment policies will now repair this mess Blair's New Labour has created. Just be grateful this attack was not a chemical attack, because that is what is next, make no mistake. Millions could die in a WMD attack. I suspect only then will something be done about this Islamic cancer now eating into the fabric of our once great society.

Very true. Not until TOO many have perished will those who claim it is America and Israels fault waver from their strong critical platforms.

wulfstan
07-07-2005, 05:55 PM
Those guys are called Al Majaroun (spelling is incorrect) and they are a feature of the town, cos they have daily stalls in the town centre with placards etc and start shouting their views thru bullhorns, like you see animal cruelty groups doing sometimes.

Brentmeister
07-07-2005, 08:45 PM
I was an Asylum Unit Project Worker...

What the hell is that? Sounds like an ad from the Guardian Jobs section. Yet more evidence of Blairs massaging of the unemployment figures.

Oddbod
07-07-2005, 08:59 PM
Brentmeister; will you PLEASE think before posting, as your off the cuff condemnations of Blair & several people here, merely serve to destroy the valid points you make at other times.
Extremism from our side will only serve to make things worse.
Let's USE the LAWS of this land to remove the undesirables

Michael RVR
07-07-2005, 09:21 PM
Al-Qaeda really needs to work on their strategic vision, this wont help them a bit ;)

Good quote i reckon p-)

Aerosoul
07-07-2005, 11:57 PM
Al-Qaeda really needs to work on their strategic vision, this wont help them a bit ;)

Good quote i reckon p-)

I'm a bit skeptical they did this.

martinexsquaddie
07-08-2005, 04:32 AM
al maj and there mates are a tiny tiny fraction of the muslim community.
about as popular and mainstream as "christian voice".
yes they make a lot of noise and have kuntish views thats why they get on TV and in the sun :(.
while personally giving them a hardtime I've no problem with.
the idea the majority of muslims are all suicide bombers is barking same as all christians want to bomb abortation clinics :roll:
theres a tiny minority of muslim youth who want to be the mujahadian same as white kids become chavs or black youths gangstas
anyone with some demo traing would have put together much more lethal devices :(

cmdrfire
07-08-2005, 07:04 AM
al maj and there mates are a tiny tiny fraction of the muslim community.
about as popular and mainstream as "christian voice".
yes they make a lot of noise and have kuntish views thats why they get on TV and in the sun :(.
while personally giving them a hardtime I've no problem with.
the idea the majority of muslims are all suicide bombers is barking same as all christians want to bomb abortation clinics :roll:
theres a tiny minority of muslim youth who want to be the mujahadian same as white kids become chavs or black youths gangstas
anyone with some demo traing would have put together much more lethal devices :(

x2

thanks for a voice of some sensibility martinexsquaddie

Para
07-08-2005, 07:15 AM
Hitler did not win by bombing London as hard as he tried, the IRA tried for thirty years to bomb London into giving way with out any success, so just how do Al-Qaeda think that they will succeed when all the others have failed.

Brentmeister
07-08-2005, 07:22 AM
Hitler did not win by bombing London as hard as he tried, the IRA tried for thirty years to bomb London into giving way with out any success, so just how do Al-Qaeda think that they will succeed when all the others have failed.

In a conventional sense the old enemies enemy were somewhat blighted by the English Channel. With Al Qaeda, they are already amongst us. Do they have chemical and biological agents. Yes, and they are planning to use them. Preemptive action is now needed to prevent such a tragedy. I agree with your sentiments Para, however i suspect a reality check is needed here. No disrespect.

Mailman
07-08-2005, 07:36 AM
Until you get rid of this...

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v414/h18w777/MuslimTrash.jpg

...the death and destruction will continue.

http://instagiber.net/smiliesdotcom/contrib/aahmed/sad.gif

Haha...like to see them try those placards on now here in London! rofl

They would get their arses handed to them :)

Mailman

Sabre
07-08-2005, 08:01 AM
My second thought after heard the attack is Churchill's speech:
"We shall go on to the end.
We shall fight in France
We shall fightover the seas and oceans,
we shall fight with growing confidence and growing strenght in the air.
We shall defend our island whatever the cost may be
we shall fight on beaches,we shall fight on the landing grounds,
we shall fight in the fields and in the streets,
we shall fight on the hills.
We shall never surrender."
(I love history and this is my "picture"of British peoples.)

Shame it wasn't actually Churchill that said it, it was an actor. Churchill's words were something to the effect of "I'm too busy, get an actor or someone to do it".

Churchill was a tool. Not that it is relevant to the debate, just my 2p.



al maj and there mates are a tiny tiny fraction of the muslim community.
about as popular and mainstream as "christian voice".
yes they make a lot of noise and have kuntish views thats why they get on TV and in the sun.
while personally giving them a hardtime I've no problem with.
the idea the majority of muslims are all suicide bombers is barking same as all christians want to bomb abortation clinics
theres a tiny minority of muslim youth who want to be the mujahadian same as white kids become chavs or black youths gangstas
anyone with some demo traing would have put together much more lethal devices

Good post mate.

Reactionism is just what people like AQ and al maj want. They want a big religious conflict and they want it to start with us 'picking on' muslims in our countries. Balls to them. I'm not going to let some jumped up koran-basher p*ss me off. They're just the same as the hot-head white guys who join the BNP/NF etc. They're ignorant, unintelligent fools who are caught up in a 'cause' that lifts them out of their ****ty little lives. Any of those with intelligence amongst them are there becuse they think they can bring about a 'better world' through direct action faster than through measured debate, and that they've found a 'one-stop-shop' that tells them how to do it. All people like that are the same, whether they be Islamo-fascists, white supremacist fascists, animal rights extremists, anarchists, anti-globalisation extremists, anti-abortion extremists whatever....They are all the minority at the extremes of a group. The group may have reasonable ideas and contribute to the wider debate, but these people believe in their cuse so much that they are willing to take life in order to further it. It's the extremists that need targetting, not the rest of the group.

Brentmeister
07-08-2005, 09:01 AM
Shame it wasn't actually Churchill that said it, it was an actor. Churchill's words were something to the effect of "I'm too busy, get an actor or someone to do it". Churchill was a tool. Not that it is relevant to the debate, just my 2p

At least have the decency to tell the whole story. Your comments are a gross distortion of historical fact. Why would you wish to discredit the memory of a truly great leader?

For those interested, the speech in question was made by Winston Churchill in the House of Commons on June 4th, 1940 in front of an audience from both sides of the house. During the war the house of Commons was not wired up for sound as is today. The actor you speak of is one Norman Shelley a BBC actor who, it is alleged, had agreed to mimic the speech as Churchill who refused to repeat the speech over the microphone, according to Shelley, Churchill was too busy to come into a studio to record his words and so agreed that, as long as he had final approval of the voice, an actor might take his place. The mythology has since developed and prospered. Its origins came from David Irving in his Churchill's War, Volume I, published in 1987, p. 313

I suspect you are most probably another left wing appeaser from the pro Palestine, anti-British lobby. Your propaganda has failed and challenge you to provide the information that proves Churchill was a tool. Tool to whom? Please provide factual evidence. Not the usual conspiratorial myths.

ogukuo72
07-08-2005, 09:14 AM
al maj and there mates are a tiny tiny fraction of the muslim community.
about as popular and mainstream as "christian voice".
yes they make a lot of noise and have kuntish views thats why they get on TV and in the sun :(.
while personally giving them a hardtime I've no problem with.
the idea the majority of muslims are all suicide bombers is barking same as all christians want to bomb abortation clinics :roll:
theres a tiny minority of muslim youth who want to be the mujahadian same as white kids become chavs or black youths gangstas
anyone with some demo traing would have put together much more lethal devices :(

Well said!

Sabre
07-08-2005, 09:44 AM
Shame it wasn't actually Churchill that said it, it was an actor. Churchill's words were something to the effect of "I'm too busy, get an actor or someone to do it". Churchill was a tool. Not that it is relevant to the debate, just my 2p

At least have the decency to tell the whole story. Your comments are a gross distortion of historical fact. Why would you wish to discredit the memory of a truly great leader?

For those interested, the speech in question was made by Winston Churchill in the House of Commons on June 4th, 1940 in front of an audience from both sides of the house. During the war the house of Commons was not wired up for sound as is today. The actor you speak of is one Norman Shelley a BBC actor who had agreed to mimic the speech as Churchill who refused to repeat the speech over the microphone, according to Shelley, Churchill was too busy to come into a studio to record his words and so agreed that, as long as he had final approval of the voice, an actor might take his place. The mythology has since developed and prospered. Its origins came from David Irving in his Churchill's War, Volume I, published in 1987, p. 313

I suspect you are most probably another left wing appeaser from the pro Palestine, anti-British lobby. Your propaganda has failed and challenge you to provide the information that proves Churchill was a tool. Tool to whom? Please provide factual evidence. Not the usual conspiratorial myths.

He called out troops against the Welsh Miners. He advocated the bombing of civillian targets in Iraq to supress the uprisings, which led to 9,000 deaths. When that didn't worked he pushed for the use of chemical weapons on the population, saying: "I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes to spread a lively terror".

Churchill was responsible for the failure at Gallipoli. It was his plan and he rushed it through. Although he wasn't the only one at fault in the matter, he certainly played an important role in its failure. He also pushed for the raid on Dieppe with its disastrous results and minimal purpose and for trying to bolster the defence of Greece in spite of the war in the desert.

Anyone can be a great war leader if they have a bit of attitude, are seen by the people and talk tough to the enemy. Where he tred to take a hand in the running of the war, thousands of servicemen died needlessly. After the war he was dumped by the british people like a hot potato.

If I were anti-British, why would I hold a British passport, live in this country and serve in our armed forces?

WARPIG
07-08-2005, 09:52 AM
Hitler did not win by bombing London as hard as he tried, the IRA tried for thirty years to bomb London into giving way with out any success, so just how do Al-Qaeda think that they will succeed when all the others have failed.

In a conventional sense the old enemies enemy were somewhat blighted by the English Channel. With Al Qaeda, they are already amongst us. Do they have chemical and biological agents. Yes, and they are planning to use them. Preemptive action is now needed to prevent such a tragedy. I agree with your sentiments Para, however i suspect a reality check is needed here. No disrespect.

A reality check? Are these chem agents the same WMD's that never existed when the CIA said they did? That would explain the pre-emptive action you are calling for. If my memory serves me right.. foolish Tony Blair backed the last pre-emptive action that the US planned.

I don't think pushing all the immigrant out, closing the borders and looking out for number one is a good idea for the US or UK.

platform389
07-08-2005, 09:59 AM
http://cagle.slate.msn.com/working/050707/ramsey.gif

Brentmeister
07-08-2005, 10:18 AM
He called out troops against the Welsh Miners. He advocated the bombing of civillian targets in Iraq to supress the uprisings, which led to 9,000 deaths. When that didn't worked he pushed for the use of chemical weapons on the population, saying: "I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes to spread a lively terror".

Churchill was responsible for the failure at Gallipoli. It was his plan and he rushed it through. Although he wasn't the only one at fault in the matter, he certainly played an important role in its failure. He also pushed for the raid on Dieppe with its disastrous results and minimal purpose and for trying to bolster the defence of Greece in spite of the war in the desert.

Anyone can be a great war leader if they have a bit of attitude, are seen by the people and talk tough to the enemy. Where he tred to take a hand in the running of the war, thousands of servicemen died needlessly. After the war he was dumped by the british people like a hot potato.

If I were anti-British, why would I hold a British passport, live in this country and serve in our armed forces?

Same old rhetoric avoiding the question. I do not wish to turn this thread into a history lesson and will therefore not comment on your findings. War is war and some hard decisions need to be made in order to win that war. My question to you was in reference to your "Churchill is a tool" remark. That comment suggests Churchill was merely a puppet to an unknown hierarchy. I merely asked you to provide some evidence to prove this theory of yours, not to cherry pick historical events in order to besmirch and character assassinate a leader held in such high esteem as Winston Churchill. Your nonchalant remark is regrettable. Once again i ask the question to whom was Churchill a "tool"?

BTW just because you hold a British passport and serve in the army does not make you a patriot. Sounds like you are anything but.

rjbhutton
07-08-2005, 10:26 AM
Brentmeister... you're from Bournmouth? Surely you know that the term "tool" is often used to mean "****head"... as in "He's a right tool" or "He's a right ****head", and doesn't always have its literal meaning, or the expanded meaning that you are interpreting ("Puppet" or tool of some other agent). I think he just meant that "Churchill was a ****head". That's his opinion. I'd like to see him lead a nation through a world war...

Werewolf01
07-08-2005, 10:28 AM
Brentmeister... you're from Bournmouth? Surely you know that the term "tool" is often used to mean "****head"... as in "He's a right tool" or "He's a right ****head", and doesn't always have its literal meaning, or the expanded meaning that you are interpreting ("Puppet" or tool of some other agent). I think he just meant that "Churchill was a ****head". That's his opinion. I'd like to see him lead a nation through a world war...

....and fight in Sudan, and be the head of Admiraly in a World War, and .....need I go on?

gc
07-08-2005, 10:31 AM
Always thought that brits are the toughest bunch of people around. No use at all attacking them, they will grind u to dust, outlast you cos they have more tenacity and determination than anybody. They have fought a war that lasted 100 years, defeated terrorism and insurgency in Malaya, Oman, Yemen and Northern Ireland, fought and won both World Wars and has never been invaded since 1066. The biggest mistake for the bloody Qaedas can make. The warrior race will make them look like damned fools. :fork:

Sabre
07-08-2005, 10:45 AM
That comment suggests Churchill was merely a puppet to an unknown hierarchy.

:cantbeli: ohh, I didn't realise you misunderstood my use of the word 'tool'. I don't use that word normally, only on this site it seems. Must be the predominance of americanisms I'm exposed to.

No, he wasn't a puppet, I just don't think he's as great as everyone says he was. Yes he did a lot in his life. He was a driven individual, as all politicains must be in order to get to such a high position. That doesn't mean he made good decisions or should be respected for it. If anything, it means he is more open to criticism than other people.


BTW just because you hold a British passport and serve in the army does not make you a patriot. Sounds like you are anything but.

I hope it doesn't make me a patriot. That's a horrible term. I would never call myself a patriot. It suggests an unquestioningly servile allegience to an idea of national pride.


That's his opinion. I'd like to see him lead a nation through a world war...


....and fight in Sudan, and be the head of Admiraly in a World War, and .....need I go on?

And I'd like to have seen Churchill on the ground on one of his ops. I have no intention of going into politics, but I'm going to be damned closer to any world war to come than most people on this site.

Anyway, I don't want to get into arguments here.

Brentmeister
07-08-2005, 10:53 AM
ohh, I didn't realise you misunderstood my use of the word 'tool'. No, he wasn't a puppet, I just don't think he's as great as everyone says he was

I appreciate your clarification. Next time i would suggest you call a spade a spade. The word tool may be the new trendy "in word" however in the context in which you put smacks of ambiguity.

rjbhutton
07-08-2005, 10:53 AM
Sabre: point taken. As I thought about the little I know about Churchill, "tool" does come to mind for some of his behaviors. However, I still respect those who stand up for what they believe, take responsbility, and see something through to the end. He did put himself on the line, as a soldier (Boer War) and a leader. Churchill was a bulldog and lead Britain through a desperate time, despite his shortcomings and some bad decisions. But at least he made decisions. when you are a leader you make a lot of decisions, and not all of them will be right.. but someone needs to make them. No disrespect meant to you, Sabre, or Brentmeister (who I thought was from Slough!!). :hug:

Sabre
07-08-2005, 10:57 AM
No worries lads.

You're never going to popular when you slate such a well known figure as Churchill. It's just my viewpoint.

cheers.

Brentmeister
07-08-2005, 11:13 AM
You're never going to popular when you slate such a well known figure as Churchill

Slating is one thing, misrepresenting historical facts to further an agenda is another. Winston Churchill may in certain circles be held responsible for certain dubious military tactics in WW2 i.e. the bombing of Dresden and the subsequent issues on Palestine , however attacking and besmirching ones character needs further clarity. In a free society you have every right to voice your opinion, however you should be more aware of propagating such misinformation on such a highly esteemed national hero.

wiking
07-08-2005, 12:30 PM
Brentmeister... you're from Bournmouth? Surely you know that the term "tool" is often used to mean "****head"... as in "He's a right tool" or "He's a right ****head", and doesn't always have its literal meaning, or the expanded meaning that you are interpreting ("Puppet" or tool of some other agent). I think he just meant that "Churchill was a ****head". That's his opinion. I'd like to see him lead a nation through a world war...

....and fight in Sudan, and be the head of Admiraly in a World War, and .....need I go on?

Or fight in India, or his rather amazing escape from a Boer POW camp.

Para
07-08-2005, 01:51 PM
Brentmeister.........You reckon I need a reality check then, for saying that we had seen it all before. Well as one that lived in London during WW2, and worked along side the Police although 70/80 & 90's I saw my fair share of IRA bombing and it's aftermath, with far larger bombs than the ones used on Thursday, yet life went on as normal. Now from that far flung out post of Britain known as Gods Waiting Room [Bournemouth] just what is your first hand experience of war or bombing in the British Isle or any else come to that. Is that any thats disagrees with what think must have screw lose you are just what every one needs at the moment another armchair warrior.

SeanAshi
07-08-2005, 03:05 PM
I'm some what confused but doesn't Indymedia usualy support Palestinian militant groups?

Brentmeister
07-08-2005, 05:58 PM
Brentmeister.........You reckon I need a reality check then, for saying that we had seen it all before. Well as one that lived in London during WW2, and worked along side the Police although 70/80 & 90's I saw my fair share of IRA bombing and it's aftermath, with far larger bombs than the ones used on Thursday, yet life went on as normal. Now from that far flung out post of Britain known as Gods Waiting Room [Bournemouth] just what is your first hand experience of war or bombing in the British Isle or any else come to that. Is that any thats disagrees with what think must have screw lose you are just what every one needs at the moment another armchair warrior.

With respect you really need to chill out. Your experiences in WW2 and subsequent dealings with the IRA is to be commended. I was merely addressing the latest terrorist attack in London which is believed to be the work of Islamic neo fascists. This happens to be my field of expertise and respectfully suggested your understanding of Islamic terrorism may be somewhat credulous. No offense was intended.

Mr Gently Benevolent
07-08-2005, 06:15 PM
I was merely addressing the latest terrorist attack in London which is believed to be the work of Islamic neo fascists. This happens to be my field of expertise and respectfully suggested your understanding of Islamic terrorism may be somewhat credulous. No offense was intended.One of many of your fields of expertise from what I can gather from your posts. Where do you find the time. ;)

Para
07-08-2005, 06:21 PM
Brentmeister...........Okay I will agree that you are an expert on these matters, but aren't we all experts. Did you get your expertise through the Military, or through the newspapers, or may be you took the subject at college. Now I am always a bit of doubting Thomas on a lot of things that people say, but I am just waiting for you to say "If tell you I will have to kill you".

<Gypsum Fantastic>
07-08-2005, 06:26 PM
Brentmeister...........Okay I will agree that you are an expert on these matters, but aren't we all experts. Did you get your expertise through the Military, or through the newspapers, or may be you took the subject at college. Now I am always a bit of doubting Thomas on a lot of things that people say, but I am just waiting for you to say "If tell you I will have to kill you".

:lol:

Just accept that your tiny mind cannot comprehend the educational colossus of Bournemouth.

Brentmeister
07-08-2005, 07:12 PM
Did you get your expertise through the Military, or through the newspapers

Sadly my friend that information is classified, If i told you i would have to kill you. Your ill chosen comments on what is the English Riviera and educational colossus has been noted.

California Joe
07-08-2005, 07:24 PM
Brent, we've had this conversation already. If you act like an assclown towards Para and Sabre then I will have to assume that your agenda takes precedence over common sense. And the whole "it's classified" thing is bull****. I continue to have a higher clearance than most people here. And when it runs out in a year I won't care.....But I know these other posters to be honorable and vetted individuals deserving of respect. You are just a guy with a good grasp of the language and a homoerotic avatar.

EvanL
07-08-2005, 07:26 PM
Did you get your expertise through the Military, or through the newspapers

Sadly my friend that information is classified, If i told you i would have to kill you. Your ill chosen comments on what is the English Riviera and educational colossus has been noted.
Have you been reading miss money pennys reports again?

Brentmeister
07-08-2005, 07:48 PM
homoerotic avatar

CJ...I'm not gay...I can honestly say i have never come over a little queer. Does the AV still trouble you?

Anyone reading this thread will observe i have not disrespected Para or Sabre. My comments "it's classified" and "i will have to kill you" was a sarcastic response to Paras previous post and presume your comments were used in a similar vein. If your comment was not used in jest i respectfully suggest you come clean and administer a straight forward bollocking. I can take it, i am a trained killer.

Para
07-09-2005, 07:42 AM
Brentmeister......A trained killer, and what do you kill, I have some insect repellent if you need to do some more killing. You are not the chap that failed his P Course are you....

luke`
07-09-2005, 07:58 AM
Brentmeister; will you PLEASE think before posting, as your off the cuff condemnations of Blair & several people here, merely serve to destroy the valid points you make at other times.
Extremism from our side will only serve to make things worse.
Let's USE the LAWS of this land to remove the undesirables

Couldn't agree more, extremism is not the answer to extremism, calm heads and firm appropriate action are.

wiking
07-09-2005, 08:31 AM
Brentmeister......A trained killer, and what do you kill, I have some insect repellent if you need to do some more killing. You are not the chap that failed his P Course are you....


Sperm most likely p-)

Apogee
07-09-2005, 09:32 AM
Brent, we've had this conversation already. If you act like an assclown towards Para and Sabre then I will have to assume that your agenda takes precedence over common sense. And the whole "it's classified" thing is bull****. I continue to have a higher clearance than most people here. And when it runs out in a year I won't care.....But I know these other posters to be honorable and vetted individuals deserving of respect. You are just a guy with a good grasp of the language and a homoerotic avatar.

Then I'll FINALLY be better than you!