PDA

View Full Version : ID this AT missile



Nickel1106
07-08-2005, 07:13 AM
URL http://media2.dumpalink.com/media/TaXuY7enQFhD/gcHUJ6CLni2Z.wmv
:roll:

Frost
07-08-2005, 07:18 AM
URL http://media2.dumpalink.com/media/TaXuY7enQFhD/gcHUJ6CLni2Z.wmv
:roll:

Javalin. Used by the US military. The vid is a fake though. The tank was rigged with fuel and explosives to make it blow up easily. Normally the dammge would be MUCH less, but would still destroy the tanks and anyone in it, though.

tenda
07-08-2005, 07:18 AM
javelin...easy.... ;)

Nickel1106
07-08-2005, 07:22 AM
thx woot

Nickel1106
07-08-2005, 07:25 AM
URL http://media2.dumpalink.com/media/TaXuY7enQFhD/M4kjbjEBenjV.wmv
check this out dude :D

ranger75bn
07-08-2005, 07:29 AM
rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl

tenda
07-08-2005, 07:35 AM
thx woot
...you're welcome,.... ;)

Frost
07-08-2005, 07:43 AM
URL http://media2.dumpalink.com/media/TaXuY7enQFhD/M4kjbjEBenjV.wmv
check this out dude :D

rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl
those guys are nuts!! rofl :lol:

tenda
07-08-2005, 07:48 AM
URL http://media2.dumpalink.com/media/TaXuY7enQFhD/M4kjbjEBenjV.wmv
check this out dude :D

rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl rofl
those guys are nuts!! rofl :lol:
...yeah x2.... rofl rofl rofl

futurepilot2004
07-08-2005, 08:27 AM
URL http://media2.dumpalink.com/media/TaXuY7enQFhD/gcHUJ6CLni2Z.wmv
:roll:

Javalin. Used by the US military. .

And a load of of other militarys. Hell, even we(Ireland) have it.

Mailman
07-08-2005, 10:14 AM
URL http://media2.dumpalink.com/media/TaXuY7enQFhD/gcHUJ6CLni2Z.wmv
:roll:

Javalin. Used by the US military. The vid is a fake though. The tank was rigged with fuel and explosives to make it blow up easily. Normally the dammge would be MUCH less, but would still destroy the tanks and anyone in it, though.

The video isnt faked...its a real explosion from a real javelin striking a real tank (that may just happen to be full of several tons of avgas and lots of explosives:))

Regards

Mailman

CG51
07-08-2005, 11:32 AM
URL http://media2.dumpalink.com/media/TaXuY7enQFhD/M4kjbjEBenjV.wmv
check this out dude :D

:lol: i remeber doing that as a kid, foolish now that i look back at it...

Nickel1106
07-08-2005, 11:39 AM
then what kind of tank in that BUN video show,buddies?thx

arachne
07-08-2005, 11:55 AM
http://media2.dumpalink.com/media/TaXuY7enQFhD/M4kjbjEBenjV.wmv


got to try this rofl

caridon
07-08-2005, 05:31 PM
now this is how a AT missile should behave.

http://products.saab.se/PDBWeb/ShowProduct.aspx?ProductCategoryId=270&ProductGroupId=288&ProductId=636

Click links in lower left side for video.

This is also the only AT missile that totaly ignores reactive armor.

/C

Azide
07-08-2005, 07:57 PM
"ID this AT missile'
URL http://media2.dumpalink.com/media/TaXuY7enQFhD/gcHUJ6CLni2Z.wmv
:roll:

you ****en tool, did you even look at the title of the stream?! "javelin live fire vs russian t72"!

nagant_m44
07-09-2005, 12:13 AM
now this is how a AT missile should behave.

http://products.saab.se/PDBWeb/ShowProduct.aspx?ProductCategoryId=270&ProductGroupId=288&ProductId=636

Click links in lower left side for video.

This is also the only AT missile that totaly ignores reactive armor.

/C

No, it goes over the protection envelope of the ARENA system. If reactive armor was on top, then it would stop it.

Kingcoma
07-09-2005, 04:53 AM
URL http://media2.dumpalink.com/media/TaXuY7enQFhD/gcHUJ6CLni2Z.wmv
:roll:

Javalin. Used by the US military. The vid is a fake though. The tank was rigged with fuel and explosives to make it blow up easily. Normally the dammge would be MUCH less, but would still destroy the tanks and anyone in it, though.

Im confused! Im seen this clip many times but under an other title
"Americans testing swedish rocket launcher" ?? Bill 2?

FozzieBear
07-09-2005, 06:50 AM
now this is how a AT missile should behave.

http://products.saab.se/PDBWeb/ShowProduct.aspx?ProductCategoryId=270&ProductGroupId=288&ProductId=636

Click links in lower left side for video.

This is also the only AT missile that totaly ignores reactive armor.

/C

No, it goes over the protection envelope of the ARENA system. If reactive armor was on top, then it would stop it.no, the BILL2 flies just above the line of the tank before hitting it then drops in to score a top hit hence the arena would stop it unless it was flying an over path to the sides rear or front of the tank missing it, now the javelin is a true overflying missile, ARENA has no effect on the javelin.

Hydro
07-09-2005, 09:31 AM
now this is how a AT missile should behave.

http://products.saab.se/PDBWeb/ShowProduct.aspx?ProductCategoryId=270&ProductGroupId=288&ProductId=636

Click links in lower left side for video.

This is also the only AT missile that totaly ignores reactive armor.

/C

No, it goes over the protection envelope of the ARENA system. If reactive armor was on top, then it would stop it.no, the BILL2 flies just above the line of the tank before hitting it then drops in to score a top hit hence the arena would stop it unless it was flying an over path to the sides rear or front of the tank missing it, now the javelin is a true overflying missile, ARENA has no effect on the javelin.

BILL 2 flies about a metre over the top of the tank, and fires a shaped charge DOWNWARDS, rather than the actual missile dropping in to punch through.

nagant_m44
07-09-2005, 10:16 AM
now this is how a AT missile should behave.

http://products.saab.se/PDBWeb/ShowProduct.aspx?ProductCategoryId=270&ProductGroupId=288&ProductId=636

Click links in lower left side for video.

This is also the only AT missile that totaly ignores reactive armor.

/C

No, it goes over the protection envelope of the ARENA system. If reactive armor was on top, then it would stop it.no, the BILL2 flies just above the line of the tank before hitting it then drops in to score a top hit hence the arena would stop it unless it was flying an over path to the sides rear or front of the tank missing it, now the javelin is a true overflying missile, ARENA has no effect on the javelin.

Yes, and the missile in the video was a javelin. No one is talking about the Bill 2...

Nickel1106
07-09-2005, 11:42 AM
"ID this AT missile'
URL http://media2.dumpalink.com/media/TaXuY7enQFhD/gcHUJ6CLni2Z.wmv
:roll:

you f*** tool, did you even look at the title of the stream?! "javelin live fire vs russian t72"!

be cool,man.WOW,that's mean T-72 seems like a peanut againest Javalin,isn't it?

caridon
07-09-2005, 12:41 PM
now this is how a AT missile should behave.

http://products.saab.se/PDBWeb/ShowProduct.aspx?ProductCategoryId=270&ProductGroupId=288&ProductId=636

Click links in lower left side for video.

This is also the only AT missile that totaly ignores reactive armor.

/C

No, it goes over the protection envelope of the ARENA system. If reactive armor was on top, then it would stop it.

*BEEEEP* Wrong anwer but thanx for joining uss anyway. :)

What you describe is BILL (1)
This is BILL2

It has 2 warheads aimed donwards from the missiles flightpath. The first smaller one strikes the armor and detonates the reactive armor. The second one strikes the same point miliseconds later and breaches the underlying armor.

swedish ingenuety (spelling?) att it's best.
:P

/C

USMC8541
07-09-2005, 01:08 PM
URL http://media2.dumpalink.com/media/TaXuY7enQFhD/gcHUJ6CLni2Z.wmv
:roll:

Javalin. Used by the US military. The vid is a fake though. The tank was rigged with fuel and explosives to make it blow up easily. Normally the dammge would be MUCH less, but would still destroy the tanks and anyone in it, though.

WRONG

The tank was not "rigged". It was fitted with a full combat load as per typical Soviet Armor doctrine in order to simulate a direct hit by the missle on a fully combat loaded tank instead of an empty hull.

Burncycle
07-09-2005, 01:24 PM
WRONG

The tank was not "rigged". It was fitted with a full combat load as per typical Soviet Armor doctrine in order to simulate a direct hit by the missle on a fully combat loaded tank instead of an empty hull.

Nope, it was absolutely rigged.

nagant_m44
07-09-2005, 03:10 PM
now this is how a AT missile should behave.

http://products.saab.se/PDBWeb/ShowProduct.aspx?ProductCategoryId=270&ProductGroupId=288&ProductId=636

Click links in lower left side for video.

This is also the only AT missile that totaly ignores reactive armor.

/C

No, it goes over the protection envelope of the ARENA system. If reactive armor was on top, then it would stop it.

*BEEEEP* Wrong anwer but thanx for joining uss anyway. :)

What you describe is BILL (1)
This is BILL2

It has 2 warheads aimed donwards from the missiles flightpath. The first smaller one strikes the armor and detonates the reactive armor. The second one strikes the same point miliseconds later and breaches the underlying armor.

swedish ingenuety (spelling?) att it's best.
:P

/C

i was talking about the missile in the vid in the first post of this topic.

CG51
07-09-2005, 04:16 PM
WRONG

The tank was not "rigged". It was fitted with a full combat load as per typical Soviet Armor doctrine in order to simulate a direct hit by the missle on a fully combat loaded tank instead of an empty hull.

Nope, it was absolutely rigged.

source?

Burncycle
07-09-2005, 05:49 PM
source?

Common sense?

FozzieBear
07-09-2005, 06:05 PM
the thing is with the javelin video it was rigged to be an accurate combat loaded tank, except they used high explosive and petrol instead of HEAT and APFSDS(spelling? lol) rounds and diesel

nagant_m44
07-09-2005, 07:40 PM
the thing is with the javelin video it was rigged to be an accurate combat loaded tank, except they used high explosive and petrol instead of HEAT and APFSDS(spelling? lol) rounds and diesel

whatever it was, it was a waste of a nice tank...

caridon
07-10-2005, 07:49 PM
now this is how a AT missile should behave.

http://products.saab.se/PDBWeb/ShowProduct.aspx?ProductCategoryId=270&ProductGroupId=288&ProductId=636

Click links in lower left side for video.

This is also the only AT missile that totaly ignores reactive armor.

/C

No, it goes over the protection envelope of the ARENA system. If reactive armor was on top, then it would stop it.

*BEEEEP* Wrong anwer but thanx for joining uss anyway. :)

What you describe is BILL (1)
This is BILL2

It has 2 warheads aimed donwards from the missiles flightpath. The first smaller one strikes the armor and detonates the reactive armor. The second one strikes the same point miliseconds later and breaches the underlying armor.

swedish ingenuety (spelling?) att it's best.
:P

/C

i was talking about the missile in the vid in the first post of this topic.
then why were you replying to my post that was clearly !!!! talking about the Bill missile, not the inferiour :) javelin ?
*dons asbestos overal*

/C