liberals are really stupid

[Zach R.]

If you watched Hannity and Colmes tonight on the Fox News channel,you probably saw the New York congressman who was too stupid to answer a Yes or No question.The question was asked by Sean Hannity, 'Is it good that in 27 days,with light casualties,we have freed 24,000,000 people?".He continually changed the subject to keep from answering the question.Which goes to prove just how sick and twisted these people are.i believe with all the anti-Bush comments that have been overflowing from the liberal's mouths,they have sealed thier own fate and will probably never succeed in another presidential election.I'm not talking about all democrats,just the anti-Bush asses who have probably been infected with a brain destroying virus,that is growing less and less as each day goes by.maybe someday there will be no liberals in existence.

[FallenAngel]

Was this congressman happen to be Hillary Clinton? :D

[Zach R.]

No it was a Black guy,I think it was Meeds or something.He had a conservative on too but I forgot his name.They were the ones on before Al Sharpton was interviewed.Besides,Hillary is too much of a coward to go on Fox News and face Sean Hannity.

[Ratamacue]

Hillary Clinton is a Senator, not a Congresswoman.

[budanski]

Is he the same NY councilman that said he wanted to slap/choke/spit at every white man?

[Seiyuuki]

Both the Senate and the House are in Congress...so a Senator, member of the Senate, hence a Congressman/woman...isn't that right?

[Seiyuuki]

For all the bashing the Democrat does...they haven't really offer any clear decisive alternative to any issue.

[front]

Now 'Zach R.' let's get to grips here about why you posted and who the hell bothered to reply.

Posting "liberals are stupid" pushes threads, much more worthy of discussion, off this main current forum page and into the archives. We all know why you decide to vent your horror at "liberals" but I say to you now. We're just a bunch of guys looking at military photos... now:

Take a break. Take it easy... and then don't forget to to post on:

http://www.navyseals.com/community/forums/discussions.cfm?forumid=11&topicid=9115

with this phrase

"how do i join the seals!!!"

And if those 'son-of-a-guns' on that forum give you any grief why just point them to this thread here on this board and then head over to this forum:

http://www.socnetcentral.com/vb/

and vent like a race car in the red! Don't worry if the pinnipeds on that board give you a hard time... give them a roasting! Bunch of "liberals"... throw in a comment about that well-known 'liberal' Kerrey into the mix and get them going.



(Sorry... it had to be... sorry... sorry... I'll get me coat... and be on my way) :-)

cheers

front

[Zach R.]

This post has to everything to do with the military and the war.I was gonna post it on Hannity.com but since mostly everyone there is conservative,I wouldn't be able to get a good arguement.With the liberal opposition to the war on terror,I thought it would be a good subject.

[JohnJohn]

Is he the same NY councilman that said he wanted to slap/choke/spit at every white man?

I'd like to let him try to do any of that on me, and I'm an immigrant to the United States of America :fork:

I really hate that guy, as much as I think hate is a really bad thing, I think it applies perfectly to this idiot.

[Duke]

The Representative is Charles Rangel, D-NY, Harlem District, Korean War Vet, USA, Bronze Star. I dont know the district number. Before the war in an interview he claimed that the military wanted this war for their careers and "money". I wanted to post that article here and on Socnet, but couldnt find it on line--just too many hits to peruse.
H and C love having him on for his outrageous views and commentary. Should someone give him a lozenge???

[XASA]

What I enjoy about this forum is discussing military operations, tactics and weaponry. I'm disappointed to read opinions based on talk show appearances by politicians. It's also disappointing to read Budanski asserting that a politician said he wants to "slap/choke/spit at every white man" without quoting a source. JohnJohn's reaction to the quote as if it was factual is even more disappointing. I think Front is on the money when he says such comments aren't appropriate for this Forum. Can we keep the spirit of our conversations focused on the great job our boys and girls accomplished in Iraq and Afganistan without reverting to pointing fingers and name calling, even if it is fashionable to do so? I spent six years in what was then known as the Army Security Agency and PSYOPS and if memory serves me right, Democrats and Republicans as well as Independents managed to work and fight together regardless of their political beliefs.

[JohnJohn]

sorry, but this guy really said these things. He really means it as well, he deserves no respect from anyone.

[Zach R.]

Johnjohn is right.i saw it about 3 weeks ago.Sean brought this guy in to diguss the comments made by a senator(forgot his name) that was made the night before.I mean,this guy was sick.He looked like he was high or something.But,the reason I posted this was because of the liberal opposition to the war on terror.I'm not just saying Iraq,but the intire operation against all terrorists around the world.The reason for this is,the liberals do not want to see another victory by the Conservatives.We first saw this when the Soviet Union fell when Reagan was president.Were it not for Reagan building up our military in Europe in the 1980s,Europe probably wouldn't even exist right now.And in Bush Sr.'s presidency,Noriega was defeated,and Saddam was defeated in Kuwait.And even in Somalia(Before Clinton),George H. Bush sent in 20,000 Marines to MAKE sure food got to the people.Unfortunatly,when Clinton beat Bush out in the election,he sent only somewhere around 400 servicemen into Somalia.WITH NO SUPPORT!We had I believe around 10 Helos from the 160th SOAR,1 company of Rangers,and 1 platoon of Delta operators.No tanks,no air support.And after the loss of 19 men in the daring raid the capture 2 tier one personel,pulled for fear of more deaths.And the people of Somalia are still starving,still dieing.The list goes on of Clintons losses and stupid desisions,but it would take up the whole page and more.And now,with George W. in office.has already won two VERY successfull campaigns.The first in Afghanistan,and the second only resently,Iraq.And with the third likely to be against Syria.And if he wins a second term.North Korea,although it would be a smart idea to try and resolve that peacefully.
Because N. Korea has one of the strongest Armys in the world.And with a Drunken little man running n Korea, you'll never know what might happen.
So if you don't like what I say,don't read it.I have another post titled "Questions about the PEQ-2".Go there.

[Duke]

Its tough when your CINC, a Democrat, never addresses his "loathing" of the military
http://vikingphoenix.com/politics/Election2000/Issues2000/NationalSecurity/lister11.htm

Its tough when your SecDef, a retired Democratic Congressman, refuses to authorize armor or air cover for policy reasons, not military ones. http://www.netnomad.com/f-intervention/powell.html

When a Congressman asserts on a TV show that the military is intentionally "killing women and children", then does an about face by issuing this pathetic press release http://www.netnomad.com/f-intervention/powell.html

"We dont talk to soliders around here!!" a Democratic White House Official to Gen. McCaffery. pg581 My American Journey Colin Powell

I could go on and on about the historic Democratic tendancies to decrease the US military stragtegic force and antimilitary views. Criticising Democrats for their overall military record is fair game.

[budanski]

It's also disappointing to read Budanski asserting that a politician said he wants to "slap/choke/spit at every white man" without quoting a source.

piss off. I don't need to quote a source. I'm assuming anyone here that watches Hannity and Colmes knows who I'm talking about, I just can't remember his name, but I'm positive it wasnt Rangel. If not, too bad, this is a discussion board and my discussion was with Zach's original posting.

[Duke]

You guys are so negative!! I'm getting vaclempt. (pats hair, then hand on chest) The Holy Roman Empire was neither holy nor roman...DISCUSS amongst yourselves. I'm on this site too damn much!

[Zach R.]

What does that have to do with anything?

[warchild1/27scout]

xasa-if you don't like the guys thread make your own.call it WHEN THE DEMOCRATS DEFEATED COMMUNISM,or WHEN BILL CLINTON DEFEATED BIN LADEN AND THE TALIBAN,or WHEN AL GORE AND THE FRENCH WON THE WAR ON TERROR.if you think that would or will ever happen drink some more koolaid.freakin sore losers!

[XASA]

I appreciate JohnJohn, Duke and Zach R's comments. Even though I disagree with them on some issues, they do make a good argument for their position. Budanski's response, on the other hand, speaks for itself.

[budanski]

What? that you may be a little too sensitive to our discussions on this board? Perhaps i can suggest you go elsewhere like www.oxygen.com.
I'm sure you'll find like-minded folks there. :roll:

[XASA]

Gee, Budanski, now you've gone and hurt my feelings :cry: Perhaps you can give me some tips on how to be a real man like you?


"The louder the bark, the smaller the dog," John Wayne

[Ratamacue]

Both of you really should shut up. Can't you just agree to hate each other and end it there?