PDA

View Full Version : Army cont. building an aircraft- size of a football field



Bluezoo
09-20-2005, 11:06 AM
The Walrus: the US Army contemplates building an aircraft the size of a football field


http://www.gizmag.co.uk/pictures/hero/4538_6090533123.jpg

September 6, 2005 Moving an elephant atom by atom costs a lot more than moving the elephant in one pre-assembled lump. And that is what the US Army’s Project Walrus is about – putting together an entire action unit of war machinery, with all the wiring and plumbing preinstalled, and placing it in the most strategic place. Whilst this would completely rewrite the way that war is conducted, the Walrus - a massive lozenge-shaped blimp the size of a football field capable of transporting 500 tons at a time - could offer solutions to myriad peacetime problems, opening land-locked countries to trade, enabling heavy construction materials to be delivered into urban centres with minimum disruption, freeing our highways of high volume, heavy loads, offering a more robust and agile air transportation network capable of absorbing disruptions due to weather or attack. Indeed, business logistics could again be completely rethought and streamlined because many physical transportation limits would no longer apply once a fleet of commercial walruses became available. The walrus does not require an airstrip and can land on water or on open ground.

The military offers society many innovations –unlimited budgets buy cubic brainpower to dissolve massive problems – this is the good that comes from such intensive endeavours as war. This is the positive to the negative known as collateral damage. Call it collateral betterment … spontaneous transformation of the way we do things. Before September 11, the US military budget was in the vicinity of US$500 billion, and it’s now a LOT more.

And with a few years of very high budget requirements under the American public’s belt, and no end in sight, everybody is looking for a better, more efficient, way of running its own “virtual nation” of soldiers in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere.

Lots more money is required and the US Military is seeking the most effective and judicious uses of its budget. One of the biggest, most complex and most costly aspects of the wars in far off countries is logistics. America has 140,000 soldiers on the ground in Iraq and 10,000 in Afghanistan and needs to police around 171,599 square miles, (444,439 square kilometers) of Iraq and 251,825 square miles (652,225 square kilometers) of Afghanistan. Not only did it move that number of troops from American soil to the respective countries, it also needed to take its entire military-strength infrastructure with it.

The American Military is a travelling nation – it needs not just to transport the nation’s citizens (the soldiers), but hundreds of small towns and a few cities – almost exactly the same number as there are towns or cities in Iraq. Including the fabled Baghdad.

It must also supply its own air, water and ground transportation infrastructure, its own Mercedes class of customer service and spare parts network for the transportation, and its own town amenities (water, power, sewerage, food), and housing, security, administration … to a military, mess-it-up-and-people-will-die standard in the most hostile environment possible.

For the full report, go to:
http://www.gizmag.co.uk/go/4538/

Bluezoo
09-20-2005, 11:17 AM
edit :oops:

Lance_Colonel
09-20-2005, 11:45 AM
Problem I see with this concept, is housing so many resources together 1000 ft above the ground that could be brought down a SAM?

PS. I have a hard time reading your posts because of your avatar. That girl is hot.

Luno
09-20-2005, 11:50 AM
Hmmm I wouldn’t call that thing a aircraft its an enormous blimp with wings
But nerveless its an interesting machine . but I am a bit worried how hard can it be to shot down a thing like that ? its to big in my opinion

rocket13
09-20-2005, 12:45 PM
Cool idea


But how do you miss a target that large, easy target for sure!

big_les
09-20-2005, 12:58 PM
Hmmm I wouldn’t call that thing a aircraft its an enormous blimp with wings
But nerveless its an interesting machine . but I am a bit worried how hard can it be to shot down a thing like that ? its to big in my opinion

An enormous blimp with wings is still an aircraft, but I agree.. more a target than anything else. The SOP for it would have to be watertight! Give it an AWACS and a couple of Raptors maybe?

Hell, as we're making this up as we go, why not have the squaddies can nip down using their jet-powered rocket-pants?

Para
09-20-2005, 01:41 PM
As a number of other people have said" It would make a great target" okay it might take a lot of hits do much damage, but there again if it gets hit in the wrong place, well who knows.

joshfox0
09-20-2005, 02:04 PM
i think if its used in a peacetime context its all well and good. however as people have said before me it would be pretty horrfic in terms of defense.

JoaMei
09-20-2005, 02:32 PM
Cool idea


But how do you miss a target that large, easy target for sure!

Its a strategic transport, not tactical. A C-5 Galaxy plane is nearly as big and vulnerable. The point is all these are used in safe areas not on the frontline where they can be damaged.

Remember, how many strategic transport planes have been shot down in the last 15 years?

Answer: 0

Hellfish
09-20-2005, 04:13 PM
Exactly, JoaMei. Nobody would be stupid enough to send this thing into contested airspace, so the threat of it being shot down by SAMs is almost nil (Manpads are always a consideration no matter where you are, though).

This is the kind of thing that would transport troops or supplies to forward bases for further deployment and distribution by helicopters or trucks. And if the threat level is low enough, these could probably be used to transport units and equipment in combat zones - I think you'd probably be able to fly one of these around Iraq or Afghanistan pretty safely right now.

jetsetter
09-20-2005, 08:23 PM
You also have to realize, you could shoot a thousand rounds in this thing and it still would not go down. Blimps and airships take alot to take down. I missile may not even explode if it hits the air holding protion. It may go right through.

Will Clark
09-21-2005, 01:40 AM
Looks like a prime candidate for some kind of laser defense, big enough to hold the cooling systems and still be wortha****...man that sounded like it came from a gaming nerd.

Asheren
09-21-2005, 05:25 AM
You know bigger it is more defense systems you can fit. I think it is large enough to have some sort of aegis system.