PDA

View Full Version : Insurgents seize 5 towns near Syria



pistol
09-27-2005, 03:42 PM
Insurgents seize 5 towns near Syria
Militants loyal to al-Zarqawi tell residents in 'death letters' to abandon their homes

Camp al Qaim, Iraq -- A senior U.S. Marine commander said Monday that insurgents loyal to militant leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi had taken over at least five key western Iraqi towns on the border with Syria and were forcing local residents to flee.

In an interview with The Chronicle, Lt. Col. Julian Alford, commander of the 3rd Battalion, 6th Marines Regiment stationed outside the western Iraqi town of al Qaim, said insurgents in the area had been distributing flyers they called "death letters," in which they ordered residents of this western corner of volatile Anbar province to leave -- or face death.

"Basically, the insurgents say if they don't leave they will ... behead them," said Alford, who took command this month of about 1,000 Marines stationed in the dusty desert area populated by roughly 100,000 Sunni Arabs.

"It appears that al Qaeda in Iraq is kicking out local people from a lot of these towns out there," he said. Alford said he did not know why the insurgents were forcing townspeople to leave, but he estimated that as many as 100 families per day were passing through a Marine checkpoint just east of the troubled area, their cars packed with their belongings as they flee east alongside the Euphrates River on the ancient Silk Road.

Two weeks ago, Marine spokesmen denied initial reports that insurgents had taken control of the area and were enforcing strict Islamic law, whipping men accused of drinking alcohol, burning a beauty parlor and shops that sold CDs and executing government workers for collaboration with the Iraqi government.

But Alford told The Chronicle that fighters linked to al-Zarqawi had been in complete control of these ancient smuggling communities for at least the past month, and that neither U.S. nor Iraqi forces held any sway over the swath of land that abuts Iraq's desolate, porous 450-mile border with Syria. Washington has repeatedly accused Syria of providing a safe transit route for foreign fighters headed for Iraq.

He estimated that between 300 and 400 insurgents were operating in the area. Most of them, he said, are foreign fighters who have crossed into Iraq through the border with Syria.

"For the time being, they run these towns," Alford said.

He said he could not confirm reports that insurgents had been executing suspected American sympathizers.

"We have seen a number of extra graves when we fly over in a helicopter, usually after we have killed" insurgents, he said.

Marine units stationed outside al Qaim and four neighboring towns perched along the Euphrates River -- Dulaym al Husayba, Karabila, Sada to the west of al Qaim, and Al Ubaydi to the northeast -- do not venture into these towns, Alford said. Insurgents open fire at any Marine patrol that approaches the town lines. No Iraqi soldiers or police officers operate inside the towns.

Marine units patrolling close to town limits "have seen a lot of guys in black pajamas and black ski masks and with weapons, and we've killed a number of them," Alford said.

Insurgent forces have in the past controlled major towns in Iraq, especially in the so-called Sunni triangle north and west of Baghdad, including Fallujah, Ramadi and, most recently, Haditha.

Alford believes that intensive attacks by U.S. forces on their strongholds in Ramadi and Fallujah, two Euphrates River cities, respectively, 120 and 140 miles downstream from al Qaim, has pushed fighters west toward the border with Syria. In the border area surrounding al Qaim, he said, "they found their last foothold."

Alford said he was expecting to launch a joint offensive against the insurgents holed up in al Qaim and the surrounding towns after the arrival of about 3,000 Iraqi soldiers in the area. He did not say when the Iraqi troops were scheduled to arrive, saying only that it would be "soon."

"They're dangerous, and they're extremely adaptive, but they can't beat us and the Iraqi army," he said.

Alford said he wanted to make the area safe enough to set up polling stations ahead of the Oct. 15 referendum on the new Iraqi constitution.

Also, he said, insurgents have posted signs across the area warning residents not to participate in the referendum. Having areas where insurgents intimidate thousands of people against voting in the referendum significantly undermines the desperate attempts by the United States to engage Iraq's disenfranchised Sunni Arabs in the nation's political process.


http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/09/27/MNG99EUI391.DTL

What is going on here? Why is ANY part of Iraq being allowed to live in a Taliban style Islamic theocracy even for a day?

Laworkerbee
09-27-2005, 03:54 PM
insurgents in the area had been distributing flyers they called "death letters," in which they ordered residents of this western corner of volatile Anbar province to leave -- or face death.

"Basically, the insurgents say if they don't leave they will ... behead them," said Alford, who took command this month of about 1,000 Marines stationed in the dusty desert area populated by roughly 100,000 Sunni Arabs.

"It appears that al Qaeda in Iraq is kicking out local people from a lot of these towns out there," he said. Alford said he did not know why the insurgents were forcing townspeople to leave, but he estimated that as many as 100 families per day were passing through a Marine checkpoint just east of the troubled area.

Someone seriously retarted just took command of the insurgents in that sector, now they are basically giving coalition forces a free fire zone now that the insurgents cannot hide amoung the local population. coalition troops and aircraft can engage any target without fear of hitting civilians.

Now maybe they are doing this because they don't trust the locals and are afraid they will be sold out?....good news for the coalition.

What is going on here? Why is ANY part of Iraq being allowed to live in a Taliban style Islamic theocracy even for a day?

Not enough troops in country but you already knew that.

NicNZ
09-27-2005, 03:58 PM
What is going on here? Why is ANY part of Iraq being allowed to live in a Taliban style Islamic theocracy even for a day?

Apart from the obvious lack of manpower and equipment needed to patrol (occupy?) the entire country, the problem is made worse by the fact that large tracts of Iraq are unfriendly or ambivalent to the US-led coalition and its goals. This reduces the challenge for the various insurgent factions and increases the challenge for the US-led coalition.

LibertyUnites
09-27-2005, 06:54 PM
He is right though, forcing residents to flee greatly reduces the number of people US Soldiers need to worry about killing accidentally. If the US goes in 100%... it does not bode well for the insurgents / terrorists.

Telnyashka
09-27-2005, 06:59 PM
He is right though, forcing residents to flee greatly reduces the number of people US Soldiers need to worry about killing accidentally. If the US goes in 100%... it does not bode well for the insurgents / terrorists.

They could simply be reducing the number of people unloyal to their cause...

LibertyUnites
09-27-2005, 07:17 PM
i get that, all im saying is there are two options here. (1) Leave the civilians there as defense against outright leveling the area. Afterall, unwilling hostages make more convincing bartering pieces once the media gets wind of it. If the civilains are not loyal to the insurgents then they run the risk of being informed on but that, IMO is better than (2) Be the only ones in a deserted city in which it would be just as easy if not easier to locate the insurgents.

my guess is, IF this is even really happening, there is a smaller than reported group of refugees leaving because they realize whats about to go down