PDA

View Full Version : Tokyo teacher embattled over war history



J-10
11-26-2005, 07:38 AM
http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/1122/p01s04-woap.html
Tokyo teacher embattled over war history
from the November 22, 2005 edition
City official said Japan never invaded Korea. Teacher demurs.
By Robert Marquand | Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor

TOKYO – Miyako Masuda is a 23-year veteran of public schools here. Like many Japanese history teachers of her generation, she dislikes new textbooks that frame Japan as the victim in World War II. It bothers her that books claiming America caused the war are now adopted by an entire city ward. In fact, Masuda disapproves of the whole nationalist direction of Tokyo public schools.

Yet until last year, Masuda, who calls herself "pretty ordinary," rarely went out of her way to disagree. Few teachers do.

But when a Tokyo city councilman in an official meeting said "Japan never invaded Korea," her history class sent an apology to Korean President Roh Moo-hyan - an action that sparked her removal from her classroom.

The war history dispute in Asia is now so front-and-center that appears it was cited by South Korea as a reason to avoid an upcoming December visit to Japan by Mr. Roh. Alongside the diplomatic row, the Masuda case shows how nationalist policies are creeping into the minutiae of daily life in Japan's capital city.

Masuda, who says her two sons have Korean friends, got censured after her class did a study group on Japan's occupation of Korea. Her social studies class wrote a letter of apology to Roh, and sent it to the Korean Embassy in Toyko. In a cover letter, Masuda said that councilman Koga Toshiaki's remarks were "a disgrace" by objective historical standards, but "regrettably [they] can be presented proudly as a triumph in the assembly of Tokyo, the capital of this country."

The class never heard from the Korean consul. But Masuda did hear from the Tokyo Board of Education. Her letter was discovered by a Yasukuni shrine support group and they complained to city officials. Masuda was told that while Mr. Koga did speak in public, it was "inappropriate" for Masuda to repeat his name in a letter that was not private, and a violation of city employee codes.

Masuda is now ordered to spend her days in a small room studying public servant regulations, a serious humiliation she says. She in turn is trying to fight in court.

Masuda's experience shows the growing power of Japanese nationalists, and their grass-roots influence in Tokyo, analysts say.

For example, last month Japanese leader Junichiro Koizumi positioned his ultranationalist protégé Shinzo Abe to be his successor, after Mr. Koizumi steps down in September. Mr. Abe, like Tokyo's hugely popular Mayor Ishihara, is a fan of the Tsukuru-Kai history textbooks that seek to restore a proud Japan by rewriting the past. Mr. Ishihara, for his part, directly appoints all six Tokyo school board members.

Tokyo schools reflect nationalist views: children pledging allegiance to the emperor as in the 1930s, school board members supporting Yasakuni shrine visits, and curriculums failing to mention Japan's invasion of Korea or China.

Masuda, for her part, insists it is wrong to teach untruths to students, for any reason.

"I feel it is my job to tell the truth, it is what I spend my life doing," she told the Monitor. "When something looks crooked I don't like it. I feel I want to make it straight. If you are straight it is better for everyone.

"I explain and teach the past. But I am now suspended as a history teacher for doing that, even though they say it is for administrative discipline."

In an interview, Masuda reads out the words of the Tokyo city council member from the official transcript: "It is not proper to describe a war of aggression by Japan. Where and when in the world did Japan ever invade? I'd like to ask, once and for all, when where and which country...."

At the APEC summit in South Korea last week, it was unclear whether Koizumi and Roh would even meet on the sidelines. The Korean president told Mr. Koizumi outright that his visits to the Yasakuni shrine, and the Tsukuru-Kai texts, were "provocative." Koizumi tried to say his visits to the shrine, where the remains of Class A war criminals are housed, symbolized the idea of never going to war again. Roh, according to Asahi Shimbun, told Koizumi, "No matter how positively we interpret your feelings, the people of South Korea will never accept it."

Masuda says some fellow teachers supported her at first in her current ordeal, but have since stopped. They fear of their own status in the school. Masuda now must report to the Tokyo Metropolitan School Personnel In-service Training Center, a place she describes in Kafkaesque terms.

Masuda seems a little stubborn, a little leftist, but a stickler for details in the way of junior high teachers around the world. She brightens immediately when the subject turns to teaching. She is proud her classes are not rote memory exercises typical in Japanese public schools. She requires "Discussion Papers" where students have to show how they arrive at conclusions. Papers deal with topics like Hiroshima and Iraq. Last year she showed her class a television documentary put out by Japanese national TV on Korean comfort women- how the Japanese government in the war had sent orders for brothels to be built in China with women dragooned to work there from all over Asia.

Currently, teachers that stress Japan's responsibility for wartime aggression are increasingly framed in Tokyo as "Marxists" living in the past.

Masuda's case has been picked up as a case of simple slander by the Tokyo media. A Japanese journalist with extensive experience points out that the Tokyo Asahi ran an item saying that Masuda was suspended for slandering the government officials and the publisher of the textbook.

The Asahi reporter sourced the story to the Tokyo Board of Education. Masuda's friends and fellow teachers protested to the Asahi reporter. They said the story was inaccurate, and that Masuda should have been talked to for balance.

So the Asahi reporter went back to the Board of Education and asked if his story was correct. They told him yes, his story was correct.

2Sheds_Jackson
11-26-2005, 07:15 PM
Y'know, Japan was very unusual in it's post war years. Rather than dwelling upon what it had done in the run-up to the war, and it's defeat, they went into a sort of denial - putting themselves hard at work at the task at hand (i.e. rebuilding a country that was pretty much reduced to ashes).

The denial served a purpose, as Japan's post-war economy showed. But as their economy has cooled and hard times have started popping up here and there, they have turned the denial into revisionism. That is extremely dangerous - they now have several generations of people who either have no clue about the war or an entirely incorrect perspective on it. And those people are voting and making policy that effects other nations who do have a correct picture of history.

The understandable pushback from nations like Korea, China, and to some extent the US, will cause escalating nationalist pressures inside Japan, as those building political careers will capitalize on that sentiment to get into power. The result could be very ugly. I would suggest that somebody with their head screwed on straight buy Japan some textbooks that were written by somebody with a History degree from outside Japan, instead of by a political committee inside Japan.

evanfitz
11-26-2005, 10:15 PM
Y'know, Japan was very unusual in it's post war years. Rather than dwelling upon what it had done in the run-up to the war, and it's defeat, they went into a sort of denial - putting themselves hard at work at the task at hand (i.e. rebuilding a country that was pretty much reduced to ashes).

The denial served a purpose, as Japan's post-war economy showed. But as their economy has cooled and hard times have started popping up here and there, they have turned the denial into revisionism. That is extremely dangerous - they now have several generations of people who either have no clue about the war or an entirely incorrect perspective on it. And those people are voting and making policy that effects other nations who do have a correct picture of history.

The understandable pushback from nations like Korea, China, and to some extent the US, will cause escalating nationalist pressures inside Japan, as those building political careers will capitalize on that sentiment to get into power. The result could be very ugly. I would suggest that somebody with their head screwed on straight buy Japan some textbooks that were written by somebody with a History degree from outside Japan, instead of by a political committee inside Japan.


well written, I have been rather upset on post war Japanese education system.

ENSIGN FOREVER
11-27-2005, 01:22 AM
Japan sort of reminds me of those old stubbon mules in the cowboy movies. The mule does not want to go in the direction it is given, it sort of fights the command, but after a couple of good kicks in the rear, it slowly works its way to where you want it to go.

A little patience with Japan will work wonders.

Alas the Chicoms may not have the necessary patience, but so what.

As my man Mick sang: "You can't always get what you want!"

Hawaii_Light
11-27-2005, 04:05 AM
"well written, I have been rather upset on post war Japanese education system."

because you know it so well right?

I always find it funny when people like to think they know every single thing after reading a few books, the mindset of the Japanese is nothing like that of any other group in the world. Psychologically speaking, the fact that Japan is a completely homogenous nation (of course many Okinowians would disagree, even though there roots are traced to the same groups that the main population has come from. and for main fact: there is one very small indiginous group called the Anui from Hokkido, but there numbers are so small that there is no exact figure of their population, but its guessed around 2,000, probably less (this includes half).

anyways this homogenuity has kept Japan in almost a constant state of predujice so everything in Japan is basicly what many anti immigration americans want for their country. (of course Japan is not as radical as those racist white supremists, at least not these days)

anyways so now that you basicly know how the main body of Japanese minds work, you have to realise the fact that:

EVERYONE ELSE WAS THE SAME WAY DURING WORLD WAR 2

The United States was making it almost impossible for Japanese to immigrate, they shut down trade, created embargos ect.

Great Britian did the same


so here the formula:


J= Racist Japan
A=Racist America
B=Racist Britian

E=Embargos
R=Imigration ristriction


J+A+B+E+R= WAR

so technically America and Great Britian along with others started the chain reaction that set Japan off, Japans racist mindset caused major atrocities,ect. nobodys innocent!!

anyways the books are only limited to Mently Challenged schools and is not exactly and ultra nationalistic textbook, all it does is understates the atrocities the Japan comitted, which is a bad thing, but you have to remeber that these kids that read it are mently challenged, and most wouldn't be able to comprehend the atrocities, because i can barely comprehend them. anyways I have been to one of the schools and saw the book, of course i couldn't read it but, i have seen this famous book!

Hawaii_Light
11-27-2005, 04:06 AM
And ensign is a perfect example of the pre world war 2 american mindset.

thank you for being so closed minded and contributing to my post ensign.

Kilgor
11-27-2005, 04:14 AM
Yes, we were "forced" to go on a orgy of plunder and resource rape.

:roll:

JoaMei
11-27-2005, 08:41 AM
Y'know, Japan was very unusual in it's post war years. Rather than dwelling upon what it had done in the run-up to the war, and it's defeat, they went into a sort of denial - putting themselves hard at work at the task at hand (i.e. rebuilding a country that was pretty much reduced to ashes).

The denial served a purpose, as Japan's post-war economy showed. But as their economy has cooled and hard times have started popping up here and there, they have turned the denial into revisionism. That is extremely dangerous - they now have several generations of people who either have no clue about the war or an entirely incorrect perspective on it. And those people are voting and making policy that effects other nations who do have a correct picture of history.

The understandable pushback from nations like Korea, China, and to some extent the US, will cause escalating nationalist pressures inside Japan, as those building political careers will capitalize on that sentiment to get into power. The result could be very ugly. I would suggest that somebody with their head screwed on straight buy Japan some textbooks that were written by somebody with a History degree from outside Japan, instead of by a political committee inside Japan.

Japan wasnt destroyed that much, most of the country remained intact.

Wodan
11-27-2005, 09:22 AM
Hell,

till this article, I were totally pro-Japan on that issue, but now it sounds very odd, what japanese officials do..

Playtime
11-27-2005, 09:39 AM
If one were to compare Japan's postwar actions/non-actions with Germany, it will look amazingly unbelivable.
Imagine Germany saying:
The holocaust was only an "alleged indicent".
The Nazi war was justified.
Schools teaching that Nazi Germany was "liberating" Europe.
People dressed as Nazi soldiers going on parades.
Politicians paying homage to Hitlers monument.

Germany would never get away with it, but somehow, Japan manages to.

Hawaii_Light
11-28-2005, 03:10 AM
If one were to compare Japan's postwar actions/non-actions with Germany, it will look amazingly unbelivable.
Imagine Germany saying:
The holocaust was only an "alleged indicent".
The Nazi war was justified.
Schools teaching that Nazi Germany was "liberating" Europe.
People dressed as Nazi soldiers going on parades.
Politicians paying homage to Hitlers monument.

Germany would never get away with it, but somehow, Japan manages to.

and the greatest part about that, is that its not true.

the war memorial goes back for centuries, and world war 2 is barely honored there, in fact Japanese WW2 vets were thought of dishonorably to this date, not only that but you have to remeber that they arn't teaching that they liberated, they are just leaving out facts because: They are ashamed of what they did, its not a good reason, but its not like they still believe they won or some ****.

so before speaking out of your ass, maybe you should research.

the shrine is for the most part dedicated to the Sino-Russia War i know this because i have been there.

Playtime
11-28-2005, 05:02 AM
and the greatest part about that, is that its not true.

the war memorial goes back for centuries, and world war 2 is barely honored there, in fact Japanese WW2 vets were thought of dishonorably to this date, not only that but you have to remeber that they arn't teaching that they liberated, they are just leaving out facts because: They are ashamed of what they did, its not a good reason, but its not like they still believe they won or some ****.

so before speaking out of your ass, maybe you should research.

the shrine is for the most part dedicated to the Sino-Russia War i know this because i have been there.


Err... you are a japanese veteran? Why the venom there?
of course you could be right... but like i said, if the germans practised selective amnesia plus a monument to nazis, they'll never get away with it.

Hawaii_Light
11-28-2005, 07:07 AM
sorry about the venom, awhile back there was alot of really annoying comments made about japan and they have always made me agressive when discussing japanese politics, i apologize. I think the main difference between the Nazis and the Imperial Japanese was the fact that the Nazi's wanted to exterminate because of a certain religon, ****** prefrence, and color.

while the Japanese where trying to build an Empire and didn't nesscairly base their agenda on destroying a certain ethnic population, im not saying they didn't murder them, and treated them badly because they weren't japanese, im just saying that the ethnic murder and mistreatment was based more on a personal level by soldiers and officers rather then the main political Agenda and the "asian co-prosperity sphere".

2Sheds_Jackson
11-28-2005, 11:47 AM
Japan wasnt destroyed that much, most of the country remained intact.

I can agree that Japan didn't suffer damage to the extent that Europe did (after all, the Allies never invaded Japan) - but many of their cities were reduced to rubble (Tokyo, Nagoya, Kobe, Osaka, Hiroshima, Nagasaki etc.)

I've always wanted to visit Japan - I find it fascinating. I do think that change is afoot. This movement is bigger than just some historically convenient textbooks given to special needs students. Part and parcel of the rise of nationalist sentiment is the rejection of article 9;


"Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as a means of settling international disputes. In order to accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained. The right to belligerency of the state will not be recognized."
Perhaps as a way to facilitate the removal/revision of article 9, the past is being recast in a more favorable light - i.e. "it's unreasonable to restrict ourselves like this because there's really no reason to". Japan has been under the US umbrella of protection - and as she emerges to "do her own thing" - they can hardly have an official declaration that they won't back up their national policy with force - it's just not do-able.

They are a democracy and can do what they want. I really don't see it as being unreasonable - it's just that the means they are employing to get where they are going makes me a bit nervous, since their neighbors are not so easy going. Just my .02 - hopefully some day I can visit there. I put Japan on my dream sheet back it the day - but wound up in HI instead (yeah, like I can complain about that)

Belrick
11-28-2005, 03:28 PM
Some countries require two beatings before extreme nationalism is burned off for good...

duck
11-28-2005, 04:09 PM
Some countries require two beatings before extreme nationalism is burned off for good...

Can you name one country in Asia where "extreme nationalism" and thoughts of racial superiority are not viewed with enthusiatism?

usa320
11-28-2005, 04:26 PM
Yes, we were "forced" to go on a orgy of plunder and resource rape.

:roll:


i think pillage is an equally suitable word.

LazerLordz
11-28-2005, 04:32 PM
They need more people like this teacher.

South East Asia never forgets.