PDA

View Full Version : General Says Letter Reveals 'Terrified' Enemy in Iraq



Uncle Sam
02-11-2004, 11:35 AM
http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Feb2004/n02102004_200402103.html


By John D. Banusiewicz
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, Feb. 10, 2004 -- A 17-page letter seized in the capture of an al Qaeda courier last month reveals an enemy "terrified" that Iraq is on the road to freedom and self-government, a coalition military official said at a Baghdad news conference today.

Analysts have concluded the letter was written by Abu Musab al-Zarqawi -- a suspect in numerous terrorist bombings in Iraq and long believed to have al Qaeda ties – and was intended for the terror organization's top leadership, perhaps even for Osama bin Laden himself. The letter, coalition officials have said, seeks al Qaeda's help in instigating ethnic violence to derail progress toward a free and stable Iraq.

Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt, deputy operations director for Combined Joint Task Force 7, said the letter is evidence that Zarqawi's biggest fear is that the coalition's strategy in Iraq is working. Kimmitt and Dan Senor, the coalition's senior spokesman, first commented on the letter at a Feb. 9 Baghdad briefing.

"He is terrified of the coalition's will," Kimmitt said today. "He's terrified of the coalition's military capabilities. He is terrified of the fact that we are building (an) Iraqi security structure that prevents him from establishing a base inside this country. And he is terrified of a country that, rather than bowing to terrorism, is moving toward democracy."

The general said the letter confirms the coalition's current strategy is the correct one. "And as we continue to work – the coalition and the people of Iraq together – to hunting down Zarqawi and those of his ilk, that is the best strategy we have to ensure that we limit his capability to operate inside Iraq."

Senor said today the letter makes it clear Zarqawi is frustrated by the increasing difficulty he's having in trying to hide in Iraq. The country's geography, combined with an ever-dwindling number of Iraqis willing to help or harbor terrorists, are working against Zarqawi, Senor said.

Coalition administrator Ambassador L. Paul Bremer III is sharing the letter with key Iraqi leaders, Senor said, to generate some publicity to aid in intelligence gathering, and so Iraqi leaders will recognize efforts at creating ethnic strife for what they are, so they can protect against the ethnic warfare that is Zarqawi's aim.

"So if there is an attack against Shiia leadership, or there is an attack against a Shiia holy site, the various ethnic leaders won't be easily drawn into reprisals, because that's exactly what Zarqawi and al Qaeda are trying to provoke in this country," Senor said. "They're trying to tear this country apart with ethnic bloodshed."

Another reason for sharing the letter with Iraqi leaders, Senor said, is to emphasize what it means about the combined efforts of the coalition and the Iraqi people.

"It's important when we say the strategy of building up the Iraqi security services is working," he said. "It's important when the Iraqi Governing Council leaders say that the building up of Iraqi security forces is working.

"But nothing is more important," he emphasized, "than when the enemies of Iraq say that the building up of Iraqi security services is working."

Senor noted that more than 150,000 Iraqis work in security services and are protecting their country – more than the number of Americans in Iraq. He said it's important for Iraqis to see that the efforts of the coalition and the Iraqi people are working.

Senor said the letter will be released in full in the near future. "We intend for every Iraqi to take a close look at it to see what the foreign terrorists who are coming to this country have planned for Iraq," he said, "and how we can protect against it together."

Rantanplan
02-11-2004, 11:42 AM
Hmm, sounds like nonsense

Falco
02-11-2004, 12:47 PM
Let's just wait to see if it is going to be verified by other sources.

Sixgun Symphony
02-11-2004, 03:25 PM
Good news in Iraq is bad news for the anti-Americans.

Royal
02-11-2004, 03:28 PM
Good news in Iraq is bad news for the anti-Americans.

Does that include me and the rest of the pinko liberal Brits who have, do or will serve there? ;)

usa320
02-11-2004, 03:31 PM
woot

Good News is Good news.

Terrorist and insurgent networks having low morale and losing the will to blow up some more civilians is definately good news.

Sixgun Symphony
02-11-2004, 03:34 PM
I never said that all Brits were pinko's.

As far as servicemen, I doubt many want to go into a war that is not theirs. Kind of puts a spotlight on why politicians demand that wars are fought multilateral rather than unilateral these days. It seems that NATO and the UN has to be dragged into everything.

Mr Gently Benevolent
02-11-2004, 03:44 PM
woot

Good News is Good news.

Terrorist and insurgent networks having low morale and losing the will to blow up some more civilians is definately good news. Seen the news, dream on. :(

Royal
02-11-2004, 03:45 PM
I never said that all Brits were pinko's.

No, but you said I was.


As far as servicemen, I doubt many want to go into a war that is not theirs. Kind of puts a spotlight on why politicians demand that wars are fought multilateral rather than unilateral these days. It seems that NATO and the UN has to be dragged into everything.

Bit like the US had to be dragged into the Balkans or had to have 9/11 before it stopped harbouring, financing and glorifying terrorists fighting against it's alleged closest ally.

Argyll
02-11-2004, 03:48 PM
I never said that all Brits were pinko's.

As far as servicemen, I doubt many want to go into a war that is not theirs. Kind of puts a spotlight on why politicians demand that wars are fought multilateral rather than unilateral these days. It seems that NATO and the UN has to be dragged into everything.

So how come you're not wearing a uniform overseas on the frontline,fighting for your country?...................................Loser :fork:

Sixgun Symphony
02-11-2004, 03:53 PM
Royal,

It was Clinton that got US into the Balkans, the bastard.

Are you saying that the US gov't supported the IRA? If so then you are wrong.


------------------------------------------

Argyll,

I did my time in the Navy, so STFU.

Royal
02-11-2004, 04:34 PM
Royal,

It was Clinton that got US into the Balkans, the bastard.

Are you saying that the US gov't supported the IRA? If so then you are wrong.

I am?

Why did they give political asylum and/or reject the extradition of convicted terrorists?

Why did they allow the collection of arms, ammunition and funds for terrorist organisations?

Argyll
02-11-2004, 06:53 PM
Royal,

It was Clinton that got US into the Balkans, the bastard.

Are you saying that the US gov't supported the IRA? If so then you are wrong.


------------------------------------------

Argyll,

I did my time in the Navy, so STFU.


Glad to hear it,so how about showing some respect to those who have also served,instead of behaving like a Jack off?Cause you sure as hell do not act like a BTDT!

Anyway reason AQ's ****ting their pants is that they just heard The Argyll's are in Iraq !! ;)

usa320
02-11-2004, 07:02 PM
Comparing Al Queda to the IRA is like Comparing The Republican Guard to the SAS.

SFontaine
02-11-2004, 07:10 PM
Hmm, sounds like nonsense

Wow you completely showed everyone up. The entire post is null and void now.

Royal
02-12-2004, 02:59 AM
Comparing Al Queda to the IRA is like Comparing The Republican Guard to the SAS.

Say what, dip****?

Murder thousands of innocent men, women and children - ring any bells?

wreck
02-12-2004, 03:06 AM
regarding the first post:
"Mmm. nothing beats the smell of propaganda in the morning" rofl

Argyll
02-12-2004, 04:08 PM
Comparing Al Queda to the IRA is like Comparing The Republican Guard to the SAS.

What a fooking clueless asshole,It seems like you have a serious bowel problem as the **** is coming from your stupid tiny brain! :fork: :bash: :bash:
You the same guy who is constantly saying a terrorist is a terrorist no matter what...............Quit bull****ing us about a leg injury making out your a victim ,you're a fuc*ing coward too scared to pull a uniform on.....another of lifes losers!

ßå$tĮТHÏ¿ð
02-12-2004, 04:28 PM
Comparing Al Queda to the IRA is like Comparing The Republican Guard to the SAS.

What a fooking clueless asshole,It seems like you have a serious bowel problem as the **** is coming from your stupid tiny brain! :fork: :bash: :bash:
You the same guy who is constantly saying a terrorist is a terrorist no matter what...............Quit bull****ing us about a leg injury making out your a victim ,you're a fuc*ing coward too scared to pull a uniform on.....another of lifes losers!

That was a lil harsh Argyll but you definately got your point across. There was alot of support for the IRA from the Boston area so there was definately funding coming from the US to the IRA (feel free to correct me if I am wrong).

p.s. nobody compares to the SAS ;)

Argyll
02-12-2004, 04:37 PM
Gloves are off tonight,fuc* this diplomatic ****e!
When you have guys who have never pulled a Uniform on and stood there on the frontline,and took the incoming,been spat on ,shat on ,pissed on,had dogs set on you,had coffee jar bombs thrown at you ,had telly dropped from High rise flats on,had 5 year old kids run out their gates and leather you across the legs with an iron bar,all due to terrorism,tell me there is a difference between them,it makes me extremely pissed,you try telling that to the kids,who'se parents you've just shovelled into a bin bag,that their terrorists are different terrorists,man it makes me want to puke...............the only difference is that there is no Suicide Bombers that's all,but there have been plenty PIRA scum who've died when their bombs went off prematurely woot ,but a Terrorist is a terrorist no matter where he is!

Uncle Sam
02-12-2004, 04:42 PM
Gloves are off tonight,fuc* this diplomatic ****e!
When you have guys who have never pulled a Uniform on and stood there on the frontline,and took the incoming,been spat on ,shat on ,pissed on,had dogs set on you,had coffee jar bombs thrown at you ,had telly dropped from High rise flats on,had 5 year old kids run out their gates and leather you across the legs with an iron bar,all due to terrorism,tell me there is a difference between them,it makes me extremely pissed,you try telling that to the kids,who'se parents you've just shovelled into a bin bag,that their terrorists are different terrorists,man it makes me want to puke...............the only difference is that there is no Suicide Bombers that's all,but there have been plenty PIRA scum who've died when their bombs went off prematurely woot ,but a Terrorist is a terrorist no matter where he is!

Don't hold back Argyll... :D

Argyll
02-12-2004, 04:54 PM
woot

I hate fokin hasbeens mate who are clueless about being in a war on terror,clowns like USA 320 seem to forget we been fighting it since 1969.




What the hell is happening to this site ,with all these Right Wing White Supremist sphincter boys posting all their crap?

ßå$tĮТHÏ¿ð
02-12-2004, 06:13 PM
woot

I hate fokin hasbeens mate who are clueless about being in a war on terror,clowns like USA 320 seem to forget we been fighting it since 1969.




What the hell is happening to this site ,with all these Right Wing White Supremist sphincter boys posting all their crap?

The gloves are off :P

I think every nation on the planet at one point has delt with some form of terrorism (even Canada..FLQ), and its been going on for awhile. Certainly long before 9-11.

mocking_loudly_died
02-12-2004, 06:20 PM
Hell hath no fury like angry scots.

Hairy ones too.