Abu Mousab al-Zarqawi letter

[StealthMode]

Full story here:http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1101040223-590685,00.html?cnn=yes


the U.S. won't leave Iraq "no matter how many wounds it sustains,"


"our enemy is growing stronger day after day, and its intelligence information increases." He laments, "By God, this is suffocation!"


"We are racing against time," he says. Once democracy is in place, "we will have no pretexts," he argues. "If, God forbid, the [new Iraqi] government is successful and takes control of the country, we will just have to pack up and go somewhere else again."


Well, does that look like progress? They can keep packing up and going somewhere else, but I think they might run out of "somewhere else" eventually.

So I pose this question: Regardless of WMD, does the "foothold of democracy" seem to be valuable enough to legitamize the war after FACT of its effect like in this letter? It does for me. What is your opinion?

[George W. Bush]

We can beat these backwards Wahhabi ****s

The reason to war with Iraq was that Hussein harbored Al Qaida terrorists and WMD. It was not to bring democracy to the region. It was a him or me type-a thing.

[StealthMode]

Basically I am saying..... regardless of the reason, true or not.... it will be a benifit to mankind that we have began the process of democracy in that region. Regardless of the True/untrue reasons we went.

I really dont care at all if no WMD are found, or if Bush had a vendetta with Saddam because of his dad.

It is a FACT Saddam was brutal, but I dont blame him you would have to be in a society with Islamic law, that doesnt mix well with modern society's structure of law and order. It however, is not an excuse to allow him to continue that required "law and order" in modern times.

My stance is, regardless of reason, in the LONG RUN, it will be one of the most positive moves in history. So..Bush stepped on some toes in the process, caused some changes in the world.... it will benifit future genrations and progress.