Popularity ban

[Haiw]

What are your opinions about making an exception and having a vote about banning a person? I mean, so far all he has produced is irritation, anger, bull**** and total ignorance. What use is it to keep such a person on the forums? Anyway, so my question is; what are your opinions about voting for a ban?

[cut]

huh, you dutch are a little to obseced with big brother

[California Joe]

Quit talking about me

[mocking_loudly_died]

Who are we banning?

[Haiw]

Tommy SixGunn Sympathy.

[California Joe]

That wasn't in the title

[Haiw]

Well I thought it was fairly obvious... sorry if I caused any confusion. Normally I'm not much for banning, but this guy is single-handedly steering the general discussion part of the forum into the gutter.

[Operation Ivy]

Joe do u have a beard?

[mocking_loudly_died]

Is it one person under two names?

Hmmm, I was against banning morty so it would be very hypocritical of me to huff and puff over these people.

I think the moderators should have a PM to them about the level of anti-Muslim orientated posts.
Inciting hate isn't a pleasant reading experience.

Debating religous political issues is fine with me – but the objective of the posters seems to be more of subversive demonisation – creating fear to twist peoples minds to their own view point.

[California Joe]

Joe do u have a beard?

Nope. Why?

[Haiw]

Is it one person under two names?
Not sure, but they have exactely the same rediculous views, and Tommy Gunn started posting when Sixgun stopped posting.
Anyway, both are up for banning.

BTW I know what you mean, normally I'm the last person to say 'ban', but this guy is... a special case. :roll:

[Operation Ivy]

Joe do u have a beard?

Nope. Why?

I just keep thinking you look like your avatar :)

[California Joe]

I agree with you Mocking, it is tedious as hell especially since their diatribes are not converting anyone to their twisted world view anyway. Frankly they're an embarassment.

[Haiw]

I just keep thinking you look like your avatar :)
He'd wish :D

[memphiz]

Tommy SixGunn Sympathy.
man they've been pissing me off

at first i thought this was about me

[EvanL]

Is it one person under two names?

Hmmm, I was against banning morty so it would be very hypocritical of me to huff and puff over these people.

I think the moderators should have a PM to them about the level of anti-Muslim orientated posts.
Inciting hate isn't a pleasant reading experience.

Debating religous political issues is fine with me – but the objective of the posters seems to be more of subversive demonisation – creating fear to twist peoples minds to their own view point.
Woah that was way too smart for me.
*head explodes*

[Haiw]

lol....
Why would I want to ban you? :hug:

There's a big difference between killing a person and his family for a sandwich and banning someone. ;)

[California Joe]

Joe do u have a beard?

Nope. Why?

I just keep thinking you look like your avatar :)

I do, I'm just shorter.

[memphiz]

lol....
Why would I want to ban you? :hug:

There's a big difference between killing a person and his family for a sandwich and banning someone. ;)
:D :hug: HAHA, ill share half of whats left off my sandwich with you now

[Operation Ivy]

Joe do u have a beard?

Nope. Why?

I just keep thinking you look like your avatar :)

I do, I'm just shorter.

shorter in what kinda way :P

[California Joe]

facial hair way.

[Operation Ivy]

O :(

j/k ;)

[memphiz]

O :(

j/k ;)
:|

[EvanL]

facial hair way.Short curly dark hairs. ;)

[Trigger]

Is it one person under two names?
Not sure, but they have exactely the same rediculous views, and Tommy Gunn started posting when Sixgun stopped posting.
Anyway, both are up for banning.

BTW I know what you mean, normally I'm the last person to say 'ban', but this guy is... a special case. :roll:

Whoa, whoa, whoa...

People screamed bloody murder when others wanted to ban Mortimer, or ducimus19 or adambalhetchet and a few others.

They posted outlandish or extreme or even idiotic things and were duly hammered for it.

Now a few guys on the opposite side of the spectrum show up and you want 'em gone?

Why? What happened to embracing or accepting their freedom of speech?
Oh I forgot, we're only supposed to hear one side of things.

Let me be clear: I'm not defending their posts. They are big boys and are capable of defending themselves (or not). But to call for a ban at this point is the height of hypocricy.

If you don't like what they say, flame the f**k out of 'em or just ignore them.

It's all degenerated into a pissing contest anyway... :(

[Jack Mehoff]

Is it one person under two names?
Not sure, but they have exactely the same rediculous views, and Tommy Gunn started posting when Sixgun stopped posting.
Anyway, both are up for banning.

BTW I know what you mean, normally I'm the last person to say 'ban', but this guy is... a special case. :roll:

We had a few polls in the past to ban ducimus19. As much as I DON'T like ducimus19, i voted "no"

[Seoulstriker]

the forums should be completely open to anyone. the only people who should get banned are those whom Hood deem worthy of being banned. who was that guy who got banned for constantly posting pictures of dead american soldiers? was it mortimer?

[Jack Mehoff]

the forums should be completely open to anyone. the only people who should get banned are those whom Hood deem worthy of being banned. who was that guy who got banned for constantly posting pictures of dead american soldiers? was it mortimer?

Spier actually. I reported that to Hood and Spier was ban

[NcDeuce]

Is it one person under two names?
Not sure, but they have exactely the same rediculous views, and Tommy Gunn started posting when Sixgun stopped posting.
Anyway, both are up for banning.

BTW I know what you mean, normally I'm the last person to say 'ban', but this guy is... a special case. :roll:

Whoa, whoa, whoa...

People screamed bloody murder when others wanted to ban Mortimer, or ducimus19 or adambalhetchet and a few others.

They posted outlandish or extreme or even idiotic things and were duly hammered for it.

Now a few guys on the opposite side of the spectrum show up and you want 'em gone?

Why? What happened to embracing or accepting their freedom of speech?
Oh I forgot, we're only supposed to hear one side of things.

Let me be clear: I'm not defending their posts. They are big boys and are capable of defending themselves (or not). But to call for a ban at this point is the height of hypocricy.

If you don't like what they say, flame the f**k out of 'em or just ignore them.

It's all degenerated into a pissing contest anyway... :(


the forums should be completely open to anyone. the only people who should get banned are those whom Hood deem worthy of being banned. who was that guy who got banned for constantly posting pictures of dead american soldiers? was it mortimer?

^ WordS

[Skaman]

They posted outlandish or extreme or even idiotic things and were duly hammered for it

Whatever helps you sleep at night bud. :petting:

[Haiw]

Whoa, whoa, whoa...

People screamed bloody murder when others wanted to ban Mortimer, or ducimus19 or adambalhetchet and a few others.

They posted outlandish or extreme or even idiotic things and were duly hammered for it.

Now a few guys on the opposite side of the spectrum show up and you want 'em gone?

Why? What happened to embracing or accepting their freedom of speech?
Oh I forgot, we're only supposed to hear one side of things.

Let me be clear: I'm not defending their posts. They are big boys and are capable of defending themselves (or not). But to call for a ban at this point is the height of hypocricy.

If you don't like what they say, flame the f**k out of 'em or just ignore them.

It's all degenerated into a pissing contest anyway... :(
I know this was going to come up, but whenever duci or Mortimer or whoever was trolling or whatsoever there was at least a grain of sanity in it. Besides, there's a difference between somewhat ignorant ultra leftie crap and well...plain KKK and Nazi views. At least they had views that weren't really aimed at hurting or screwing anyone or anything up. So far the views of the person we're talking about here are....all about starting hate.
This guy is like the US version of Jihad.. :roll:

I couldn't care less if he was 'just another stupid guy'. But this is just...too much.

[ßå$tĮТHÏ¿ð]

lol....
Why would I want to ban you? :hug:

There's a big difference between killing a person and his family for a sandwich and banning someone. ;)
:D :hug: HAHA, ill share half of whats left off my sandwich with you now

Hey were did my half go? :lol:

Spreading hate and racial remarks arnt permitted anywere around my part of the woods, so I fail to see why the same rules dont apply here.
Sometimes even I let my emotions get the best of me, but theres no excuse for racism/constant negative comments about other beliefs. To the point of starting multiple threads covering the same topic basically, none of which is either productive or informative in any way.

Treat others the way you want to be treated. Otherwise go fawk yourself dry and go post on another forum because quite frankly I'm sick of these people ruining my experience of this website.

I'm 19 years old.....what the fawk is your excuse?

[citizen-k]

Whoa, whoa, whoa...

People screamed bloody murder when others wanted to ban Mortimer, or ducimus19 or adambalhetchet and a few others.

They posted outlandish or extreme or even idiotic things and were duly hammered for it.

Now a few guys on the opposite side of the spectrum show up and you want 'em gone?

Why? What happened to embracing or accepting their freedom of speech?
Oh I forgot, we're only supposed to hear one side of things.

Let me be clear: I'm not defending their posts. They are big boys and are capable of defending themselves (or not). But to call for a ban at this point is the height of hypocricy.

If you don't like what they say, flame the f**k out of 'em or just ignore them.

It's all degenerated into a pissing contest anyway... :(
I know this was going to come up, but whenever duci or Mortimer or whoever was trolling or whatsoever there was at least a grain of sanity in it. Besides, there's a difference between somewhat ignorant ultra leftie crap and well...plain KKK and Nazi views. At least they had views that weren't really aimed at hurting or screwing anyone or anything up. So far the views of the person we're talking about here are....all about starting hate.
This guy is like the US version of Jihad.. :roll:

I couldn't care less if he was 'just another stupid guy'. But this is just...too much.

Can you post an example?

[Herrmannek]

What happened to Morty?

[Kriz]

Forum rules should be excercised in this case, if they use racial or religous slurs....

Just like forum rules should be aplied to anyone

[hank]

Ain't skeered!

Kick 'em off? Why? That would make us worse than them. Ignore them if they bother you. I like to argue with them 'cause they always run and hide or quote some idiot.

Relax, the best way to keep up with idiots is to be exposed to them on a daily basis.

Besides, half the time what they post is funny as hell. ;)

hank

[Haiw]

Can you post an example?
Just open his profile and click 'view all posts by this member'.

Herrmannek, Morty simply left because he was getting tired of the same arguments over and over again.

[Haiw]

Ain't skeered!

Kick 'em off? Why? That would make us worse than them. Ignore them if they bother you. I like to argue with them 'cause they always run and hide or quote some idiot.

Relax, the best way to keep up with idiots is to be exposed to them on a daily basis.

Besides, half the time what they post is funny as hell. ;)

hank
Yea, but if a bunch of Neo-Nazi's are in front of your door all the time... wouldn't you like ot have them leave?

[hank]

Personally, no. Unless it gets violent or something. Different opinions don't offend me, bu that is just me. I love to argue and disagree. I always fell like I know better where I stand on stuff when I hear the other side and try to refute it. Especially when the other side is sixpense cephaly and the like.

hank

[Fargin]

Everyone who wears wodden shoes, eats tulips and live in a windmill should automaticly get banned, two times!

[Haiw]

I second that.

[hank]

Its a quorum, later haiw. I'll miss you. By the way, can I borrow your wooden shoes? Those are cool!

hank

[Haiw]

Hey, no one said I fitted the specifications of Mr. Legoman :P

[Jack Mehoff]

Can you post an example?
Just open his profile and click 'view all posts by this member'.

Herrmannek, Morty simply left because he was getting tired of the same arguments over and over again.

Just open ducimus19 and click 'view all posts by this member'.

[hank]

C'mon?! I know you got a pair and as soon as Hood finds out you're a gonner. You won't need them so what is the harm? Look what happend to Tommy Boy.

hank

[Haiw]

Haha, seriously...the only wooden shoes we got are in tourist places :)

[hank]

Whatever helps you sleep at night. Wooden shoe wearer!

hank

[Haiw]

Overweight yank!

[NcDeuce]

Everyone who wears wodden shoes, eats tulips and live in a windmill should automaticly get banned, two times!

:lol:

[2Sheds_Jackson]

I don't think we should ban anybody just for expressing their opinion -that's what this place is for. Hell, this place wouldn't even be worth visiting if was a love-fest. But if they violate forum rules, that's another story...

[WARPIG]

This may be a military forum, but Hood welcomes all. His choice is to allow all who have a voice, to use it. If we want to exist here, we have to put up with the noise.
“The price of freedom of religion, or of speech, or of the press, is that we must put up with a good deal of rubbish.” ~ Robert Jackson
I personally enjoy the opposition. The conflict forces you to exercise thought rather than simply having a view. (For some)
“At times one remains faithful to a cause only because its opponents do not cease to be insipid.” ~ Friedrich Nietzsche
Even the most ignorant of views or most preposterous rhetoric may hold some truths that should come to light. Maybe the reason or context that it is presented is ridiculous but the view is still one that should be considered. As much of a mental midget as some of the more biased and hate filled people are here, don’t simply dismiss their ramblings. Take the time to see from their perspective, analyze the sources, reasons, and facts, then consider whether it has any credibility. Once you have done that… then you have ammo for the insult that is sure to follow. After all, Don’t we all enjoy insulting each other?
“A dwarf standing on the shoulders of a giant may see farther than a giant himself." ~ Robert Burton

[Ichhabe]

I'm against banning unless you really do something bad, very bad.

So far they haven't in my eyes.

[memphiz]

lol....
Why would I want to ban you? :hug:

There's a big difference between killing a person and his family for a sandwich and banning someone. ;)
:D :hug: HAHA, ill share half of whats left off my sandwich with you now

Hey were did my half go? :lol:

ok ok ok ill throw half into the air and you and Haiw can fight for it ;)



back to the NAZI Mr.tommy gunn- he said the the US should take all muslums out of the country and ship them back to their native land.
Man i HATE this guy

[Seoulstriker]

Everyone who wears wodden shoes, eats tulips and live in a windmill should automaticly get banned, two times!


I ban you two time, all night for two dollar.

[memphiz]

Everyone who wears wodden shoes, eats tulips and live in a windmill should automaticly get banned, two times!


I bang you two time, all night for two dollar.
:| geez Seoul

[Seoulstriker]

i clearly wrote ban in my original statement. :)

[Falco]

It would be a good idea in certain cases but we would have to set up mesures to make sure we don't abuse of this new found power.

[memphiz]

i clearly wrote ban in my original statement. :)

oh suuuure you did :roll: it clearly says bang geeez...
:D

[California Joe]

Ban me, I'm a witch.

[memphiz]

Ban me, I'm a witch.
*british voice*
"BURN HIM, 'ES A WEETCH"

[cut]

Ban me, I'm a witch.
*british voice*
"BURN HIM, 'ES A WEETCH"

why british?

[memphiz]

i thought it was the british that burned accused witches?

if not who was it, ill change

[California Joe]

Monty Python. Duh.

[memphiz]

wait a sec, i was right about it being british, everyone back then was british-"the sun never sets on the british empire"
-check and mate

[cut]

Monty Python. Duh.

I'll accept that answer, and now for 3 bonus points, tell me the name of the actor who said it.

[California Joe]

Terry Gilliam

[cut]

final answer?

[California Joe]

Yeah, Sir Bedevere. Final answer.

[cut]

sure? you've got two lifelines left. :D

[farmgirl]

Ban me, I'm a witch.


are you made of wood?

[California Joe]

I dunno, Hmmmmmmm....John Cleese....Lancelot.....Eric Idle...Michael Palin.....Castle Anthrax......Shrubbery.......I'd like to call my friend Royal...

[mocking_loudly_died]

I just watched the entire witch burning scene.

Half the bloody cast is yelling out to burn the chick.

[California Joe]

Yes they are. You're right. That's not the point now is it.

[farmgirl]

Yes they are. You're right. That's not the point now is it.


who are you so wise in the ways of science?

[Roger Rabbit]

Zeut sister(blonde young attractive female): oh dear, naughty naughty zeut, bad bad naughty zeut, oh wicked zeut, she must be punished and we all know the punishment for lighting the grail shaped beacon in castle anthrax. Yes she must be spanked, a good spanking, and then, then spank me.

All the blonde young attractive females on chorus:Oh yes spank all of us

Zeut sister:Yes you must give us all a good spanking and then the oral ***

Knight:Well i suppose i could stay for a bit longer



Anyone seen "And now for something completely different?"

[mustamato]

Seems a bit Orwellian. One good thing with this forum is that no one have
to lick the moderators ass and always agree with them. It isn´t always the
scapegoat that did it.

[hank]

We don't? HOOOOOOOD!

hank