PDA

View Full Version : Bush/Powell family tree


sethen
02-22-2004, 08:13 PM
http://msn.ancestry.com/landing/msn/strange/bush3/tree.htm
Falco
02-22-2004, 08:38 PM
Cool, is this a joke or what?
Lone Predator
02-22-2004, 08:39 PM
I wonder if thats true.

Rather interesting that they are 'related' let alone by royal blood.
California Joe
02-22-2004, 08:45 PM
It's weird. The link takes you to Ancestry.com. As far as I know it's a very reputable geneological research site.
scm77
02-22-2004, 08:47 PM
Even if it is true...big deal. OMG! Bush and Powell are 6th cousins 14 times removed!!! woot
sethen
02-22-2004, 08:51 PM
SCM77>>>The point ISN'T that Bush and Powell are cousins...it's that they are related to English Royalty! Go tothe link about the Bush family drug dynasty and go to chapter 7 for further info!!!!!!
California Joe
02-22-2004, 08:52 PM
At the Library of Congress they have George Washington traced back to Richard the Lionheart. I think geneology is interesting. Course everyone thinks they come from impotant people, not horse thieves. ;)
budanski
02-22-2004, 09:05 PM
I was traced back to mongolian horse thieves on the silk roads...
California Joe
02-22-2004, 09:09 PM
That's cool. I always wanted pirate ancestors or guys who fought at Waterloo or Culloden or some highwayman that was hanged.
ibstolidude
02-22-2004, 09:31 PM
At the Library of Congress they have George Washington traced back to Richard the Lionheart. I think geneology is interesting. Course everyone thinks they come from impotant people, not horse thieves. ;)
I'd be proud to come from whores thieves...

ohh you horse thieves.
ibstolidude
02-22-2004, 09:32 PM
I was traced back to mongolian horse thieves on the silk roads... I have been traced back to my dad's *****...beyond that; only the Shadow knows.
farmgirl
02-22-2004, 09:53 PM
Can I post here without being accused of "following" joe? ;)

My mother's side of the family claims to be able to trace their roots back to the Stuart kings..... so I have a legitimate claim to be called the queen. ;)
IronHeart_26
02-22-2004, 10:12 PM
At the Library of Congress they have George Washington traced back to Richard the Lionheart. I think geneology is interesting. Course everyone thinks they come from impotant people, not horse thieves. ;)

Bruce is one of my surnames.
IronHeart_26
02-22-2004, 10:15 PM
At the Library of Congress they have George Washington traced back to Richard the Lionheart. I think geneology is interesting. Course everyone thinks they come from impotant people, not horse thieves. ;)

Bruce is one of my surnames.

Is it possible to come from an "impotant" person?? Just asking...
California Joe
02-22-2004, 10:17 PM
You know................I saw that and was too lazy to go back an edit it. My bad ;)
ibstolidude
02-23-2004, 02:25 AM
Can I post here without being accused of "following" joe? ;)

My mother's side of the family claims to be able to trace their roots back to the Stuart kings..... so I have a legitimate claim to be called the queen. ;)
ahh the British Royalty, as opposed to the French Stewart, but then one could still be called a queen.
http://i.imdb.com/Photos/Ss/0188863/AU24_1_76.jpg
Ichhabe
02-23-2004, 04:08 AM
It is not difficult to be of royal blood. Specially British. With all respect to our Subjects of the Queen: The British royalties shagged all over the place. Many of the nobelities that came around in the 18th. century is a result of Royal shagging that had comed out of controle.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the House of Marlborough a product of a bastard son?