PDA

View Full Version : US Marines refine small unit operations (with some help from the UK Royal Marines)



BoyElroy
03-01-2006, 02:59 AM
8 February 2006 JDW

USMC refines small unit plan

Joshua Kucera JDW Staff Reporter

Washington, DC

The US Marine Corps (USMC) is refining its concept about how small units will fight in the future and is planning to spend about USD500 million over the next two years to better equip those units.

The 'distributed operations' concept, which was first announced two years ago, initially called for marines to fight primarily in very small units far apart from each other but tightly networked.

The idea now is that marines will continue to operate in their traditional units but they will have better equipment at the platoon and squad level, while squad leaders will have more training so they can make more decisions on their own.

In particular, each squad will have a marine trained to call in close air support. That is a large change from the way the service currently does air support: now there are only three marines per battalion who can call in artillery and air strikes, and they are all officers. Initial studies have shown that enlisted marines can conduct these operations just as effectively, said Vince Goulding, the director of Sea Viking, the USMC's major continuing experimental exercise.

In addition, distributed operations platoons are organised differently: they have two command groups instead of one, and the second is led by the platoon sergeant.

This enables 24-hour operations, with each command group in charge for 12 hours. While the size of the platoon will remain at 44 men, the squads will each lose one marine to the second command group, reducing the size from 13 to 12 men.

The service is also using the reorganisation to lobby for more funds for basic infantry equipment. The focus is on day/night rifle sights and on integrated communications gear, including a personal role radio or, integrated intra-squad radio for every squad leader.

The service is currently honing its requirements for a new radio and should have a formal requirement by the middle of 2006, said Lieutenant Colonel Paul Martin of the UK Royal Marines, who is helping the USMC develop the communications suite for distributed operations units.

Col Martin is one of several British marines working on distributed operations; Goulding said their experience with highly trained enlisted men is something that the US wants to emulate.

The service estimates that equipping the distributed operations units will cost about USD19 million per battalion. It would like to convert 25 of the 35 combat battalions in the service to achieve the upgrades by Fiscal Year 2008. The remaining 10 would be equipped over the following two years, Goulding said.

The service is working to get the money included in the next war supplemental funding appropriation from Congress. Top-level marines leaders are lobbying members of Congress to convince them of the necessity of the programme and the potential short-term utility in Iraq and Afghanistan, he added.

The first platoon set up under this concept completed experimentation last year and is now in Afghanistan with the 1st Battalion, 3rd Marines. The second iteration of the experiment, with another infantry platoon, has started and will culminate in a ship-to-objective manoeuvre in an already existing USMC exercise in the Philippines in October.

Further experiments will look at how to integrate distributed operations into non-infantry units and on logistics and sustainment

Royal
03-01-2006, 03:00 AM
Welcome to the Commando 21 concept.

BoyElroy
03-01-2006, 03:03 AM
Hey Royal-

What's Commando 21? I've never heard of it before.

Royal
03-01-2006, 03:23 AM
A reorganisation of the 3 commando's to reflect the increased C4ISR and fire support needed for commando operations - basically 2 heavy (manouvre support companies) and 2 lighter companies in each comamndo - new equipment like the Haaglunds Viking, .50 browning, Argocats, WMIKs etc etc.

It's a fantastic idea (we just need enough people to man it) ;)

BoyElroy
03-01-2006, 03:32 AM
Thanks, Royal. Time for me to do some reading up.

James
03-01-2006, 04:22 AM
That article said that only 3 marines per battalion, all officers, are the only ones trained to call CAS or Arty. I've been out for a while, but I learned how to do that when I was a Lance Corporal. Many other youngsters learned too. Every officer in a rifle company knew how, and I suspect in Weapons Co. too.

Regardless, I think it's a good idea.

CMNot
03-01-2006, 07:36 AM
The service is currently honing its requirements for a new radio and should have a formal requirement by the middle of 2006, said Lieutenant Colonel Paul Martin of the UK Royal Marines

Royal, have Royal finished the BOWMAN conversion? Wondering if this is something similar to what is being referred to above...

Royal
03-01-2006, 07:47 AM
Royal, have Royal finished the BOWMAN conversion? Wondering if this is something similar to what is being referred to above...

Largely yes. But Bowman was to bring us up to where the Yanks were a few years ago. I havn't had much to do with it, but I'm not impressed. We could have bought a better system off the shelf for a lot less money.

I think the USMCs aim is to get PRRs down to individual riflemen as per the current UK SOPs and to further integrate the data management set up at pl/tp level and below.

CMNot
03-01-2006, 07:54 AM
Cheers mate.

KB
03-01-2006, 09:28 AM
That article said that only 3 marines per battalion, all officers, are the only ones trained to call CAS or Arty. I've been out for a while, but I learned how to do that when I was a Lance Corporal. Many other youngsters learned too. Every officer in a rifle company knew how, and I suspect in Weapons Co. too.

Regardless, I think it's a good idea.

I've been out a long time too, and if only 3 guys per battalion have these competencies the USMC has taken several steps backward. Nevertheless its long overdue; the "Stingray" concept pioneered in Vietnam has been there all along waiting to be exploited with better technology and training.

It will be interesting to see how this concept gets implemented in the USMC; the RMs enlistment period is much longer, so its easier to make the training investment when a guy is committed to a 9 year contract. It's tough to provide equivalent training to a young US Marine who is going to basically be available for about 3 years, once he's completed basic training, follow on MOS training, as well as this new stuff; not a long payback period. 75% of USMC first term enlistees don't re-up.

Scrim
03-01-2006, 02:42 PM
That article said that only 3 marines per battalion, all officers, are the only ones trained to call CAS or Arty. I've been out for a while, but I learned how to do that when I was a Lance Corporal. Many other youngsters learned too. Every officer in a rifle company knew how, and I suspect in Weapons Co. too.

Regardless, I think it's a good idea.

I was thinking the same thing. Thats BS. I think "school" trained is what he means.

szr
03-01-2006, 11:21 PM
ALMAR 028/03
CMC on non-aviator JTACs:

....

1. THIS IS A POLICY MEMORANDUM. READ IN ITS ENTIRETY.

2. HISTORICALLY, MARINE CORPS OPERATING FORCES HAVE NOT HAD

ENOUGH FORWARD AIR CONTROLLERS TO MEET THEIR OPERATIONAL

REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPANY-SIZED MANEUVER ELEMENTS, RECONNAISSANCE

ELEMENTS AND MARINE LIAISON ELEMENTS/ANGLICO. AS THE GEOMETRY

OF THE MODERN BATTLEFIELD HAS INCREASED IN SIZE, COMPLEXITY AND

OPERATIONAL TEMPO, THE GCE'S ABILITY TO PROVIDE TERMINAL CONTROL

COVERAGE TO MANEUVER UNITS THROUGHOUT THE BATTLE SPACE HAS

BECOME AN OPERATIONAL LIMITATION DUE TO THE FINITE NUMBERS OF

QUALIFIED FACS. AS YOU ARE WELL AWARE, OUR CURRENT POLICY

RESTRICTS NON-AVIATORS FROM TERMINALLY CONTROLLING CLOSE AIR

SUPPORT (CAS) EVEN IF THEY HAVE COMPLETED THE REQUISITE TRAINING

AND MET OTHER SPECIFIC CRITERIA. EVEN THEN, THEY CAN ONLY

CONTROL CAS IN A COMBAT SITUATION.

3. THIS POLICY MEMORANDUM ALLOWS SELECTED GROUND COMBAT ARMS

OFFICERS AND ENLISTED MARINES, WHO HAVE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED A

REQUISITE TRAINING PROGRAM, TO BE DESIGNATED AS JOINT TERMINAL

ATTACK CONTROLLERS. A JOINT TERMINAL ATTACK CONTROLLER WILL BE

AUTHORIZED TO CONTROL CAS IN BOTH TRAINING AND OPERATIONAL

ENVIRONMENTS. ADDITIONALLY, THIS POLICY MEMORANDUM ALSO ALLOWS

OTHER SELECTED GROUND COMBAT ARMS OFFICERS AND ENLISTED MARINES,

WHO HAVE SUCCESSFULLY COMPLETED A SEPARATE REQUISITE TRAINING

PROGRAM, TO BE DESIGNATED AS UNIVERSAL GROUND SPOTTERS.

UNIVERSAL GROUND SPOTTERS WILL BE AUTHORIZED TO TERMINALLY

CONTROL AIR DELIVERED FIRES, IN BOTH TRAINING AND OPERATIONAL

ENVIRONMENTS. UPON COMPLETION OF THE TRAINING PROGRAM, THERE

WILL BE NO RESTRICTIONS ON CAS AND TERMINAL CONTROL OF AIR

DELIVERED FIRES TRAINING OPPORTUNITIES SOLELY BASED ON

NON-AVIATOR STATUS.

4. THIS POLICY CHANGE FURTHER DIRECTS THAT THE JOINT TERMINAL

ATTACK CONTROLLER AND UNIVERSAL GROUND SPOTTER CAPABILITY WITHIN

A UNIT WILL BE ADDITIVE AND WILL NOT CHANGE THE CURRENT POLICY

WRT ASSIGNMENT OF NAVAL AVIATORS/NAVAL FLIGHT OFFICER FORWARD

AIR CONTROLLERS AND AIR OFFICERS TO ANY UNIT IN THE MAGTF.

5. TO MEET MY INTENT, CG, MCCDC WILL DETERMINE THE PREREQUISITE

QUALIFICATIONS AND THE REQUIRED TRAINING PROGRAM FOR SPECIFIC

BILLETS AND MOS'S. DC, AVN, WILL DETERMINE AVIATION'S ABILITY

TO SUPPORT ANY INCREASED SORTIE REQUIREMENTS TO SUPPORT THE

TRAINING. DC, PP&O WILL DETERMINE THE NUMBER OF JOINT TERMINAL

ATTACK CONTROLLERS AND UNIVERSAL GROUND SPOTTERS REQUIRED AND

THE GCE'S ABILITY TO SUPPORT INCREASES IN NON-COMBAT EXPENDITURE

ALLOWANCE FOR FIRE SUPPORT.

6. SEMPER FIDELIS, MICHAEL W. HAGEE, GENERAL, COMMANDANT OF THE

MARINE CORPS.

KB
03-02-2006, 02:09 PM
In the early '80s 2d ANGLICO trained all of its FCT team members to handle CAS and NGF. Officers (both ground types and aviators) attended TACP School at LFTCLant/Pac to complete the formal schooling; many ground types also attended Aerial Observer School at New River MCAS. Ground types weren't awarded the secondary FAC MOS since the aviators insisted only pilots/NFOs were qualified to rate it.

The Universal Spotter concept then being pioneered was to be rolled out to the rest of the FMF.

Surprising to see 25 years later they're still getting around to implementing the concept.