View Full Version : Marine with AK-47
Dakota435
03-10-2006, 12:03 AM
Interesting pic. Made me wonder if he was actually sporting the AK as his personal weapon, or if he'd just confiscated it from the guy.
Dakota435
03-10-2006, 12:04 AM
What do you have to do to get the pic to appear right in the post??
Aerosoul
03-10-2006, 12:10 AM
close the spaces between [IMG] and the url on both sides.
there are several pics out there from Iraq and A-stan with US troops and AKs. In this photo, it does not appear to me that he confiscated it from anyone in the photo...
it looks like he has another rifle across his chest, presumably his issue rifle.
charge_8
03-10-2006, 03:07 AM
He could be part of a Marine Liaison team working with ISF or Afghan army. Or the weapon could belong to the home owners, The Marine may be checking out the ownership papers. As a rule, we are not allowed to have personal weapons. However battlefield conditions may dictate differently.
arachne
03-10-2006, 03:32 AM
There are American soldiers in Iraq carrying ak-47 and even ppsh-41 alongside m-4/16 for use as a close combat weapon .
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y239/moje_slike/DSC03523.jpg
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y239/moje_slike/DSC03521.jpg
http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y239/moje_slike/DSC03516.jpg
sorry for the low res
Upfrontreporting
03-10-2006, 03:35 AM
Arachne,
Those pics looks like they are from a videoclip? If so do have that videoclip?
regards
arachne
03-10-2006, 03:43 AM
the photos are from a magazine , but I saw it on CNN also so there is a video though I do not have it .
PaulClift
03-10-2006, 04:51 AM
It looks like a pretty new weapon, and in to much of a good condition to belong to the average local peasant.
Scyth
03-10-2006, 04:55 AM
Maybe he felt safer with a 7.62 mm rather than a 5.56 mm. Longer range, better penetration etc...
Justin
03-10-2006, 05:59 AM
Yea, maybe they prefer the stopping power of the 7.62mm, instead of the 5.56mm.
Icarus1
03-10-2006, 07:22 AM
I'll agree with the guys carrying AK47, but the ppsh-41... ?
http://www.kmike.com/KWjpg/ppsh41A.jpg
Caliber: 7.62x25mm Soviet auto
Length: 33 in ( 838mm)
Weight (unloaded): 8 lb (3.64kg)
Barrel: 10.5 in (266mm), 4 groove, right-hand twist
Magazine: 35 round detachable box or 71 round drum
Ammunition: Type P1; 86 gr bullet, 8 gr charge (1.35in)
Type P-41; 74 gr bullet, 8 gr charge , AP/Incdy (1.36in)
Rate of Fire: 900rpm
Muzzle Velocity: 1500 fps P1; 1600 fps P-41
A little bit heavy for what it is... also a little bit... hmm... how do I say... old?
AnniHilatoR
03-10-2006, 07:31 AM
Yea, maybe they prefer the stopping power of the 7.62mm, instead of the 5.56mm.
Indeed. Although the AK is less accurate, it would be more effective than an M4 at CQC.
conscript
03-10-2006, 07:39 AM
my comrade saw an ING (iraqi national guard) with pps-41 on his prewious tour in iraq! but US soldier with it its really interesting?!
JVeld
03-10-2006, 07:48 AM
He appears to indeed be using that AK, if you notice the way he is holding it ! ... I heard that Aks are used by some of our guys there, they like the range and firepower although is not as accurate as the M4/16, but it is pretty good for close fire fights.
arachne
03-10-2006, 10:16 AM
I'll agree with the guys carrying AK47, but the ppsh-41... ?
http://www.kmike.com/KWjpg/ppsh41A.jpg
Caliber: 7.62x25mm Soviet auto
Length: 33 in ( 838mm)
Weight (unloaded): 8 lb (3.64kg)
Barrel: 10.5 in (266mm), 4 groove, right-hand twist
Magazine: 35 round detachable box or 71 round drum
Ammunition: Type P1; 86 gr bullet, 8 gr charge (1.35in)
Type P-41; 74 gr bullet, 8 gr charge , AP/Incdy (1.36in)
Rate of Fire: 900rpm
Muzzle Velocity: 1500 fps P1; 1600 fps P-41
A little bit heavy for what it is... also a little bit... hmm... how do I say... old?
71 round drum
that is the main reason , you can spray a bunch of bullets when entering a hostile house
Seraphim
03-10-2006, 11:34 AM
Earlier on in the war, it was reported that the troops used AKs because of ammo shortages. And it was a devastating psychological effect to use the enemys weapon on them.
daktari
03-10-2006, 11:34 AM
71rds drum & high reliability
can fire buried in sand p-)
and the 7,65x25 is some hi-power thing, very good ammo
a bit to powerfull for automatic pistols
Raptus_regaliter
03-10-2006, 11:41 AM
71rds drum & high reliability
can fire buried in sand p-)
and the 7,65x25 is some hi-power *censored**censored**censored**censored*, very good ammo
a bit to powerfull for automatic pistols
It actually has a very poor reputation for stopping power... but in full-auto at close range it's hard to argue with.
Lupin
03-10-2006, 11:57 AM
I'll agree with the guys carrying AK47, but the ppsh-41... ?
http://www.kmike.com/KWjpg/ppsh41A.jpg
Caliber: 7.62x25mm Soviet auto
Length: 33 in ( 838mm)
Weight (unloaded): 8 lb (3.64kg)
Barrel: 10.5 in (266mm), 4 groove, right-hand twist
Magazine: 35 round detachable box or 71 round drum
Ammunition: Type P1; 86 gr bullet, 8 gr charge (1.35in)
Type P-41; 74 gr bullet, 8 gr charge , AP/Incdy (1.36in)
Rate of Fire: 900rpm
Muzzle Velocity: 1500 fps P1; 1600 fps P-41
A little bit heavy for what it is... also a little bit... hmm... how do I say... old?
old but lethal...
Sebastian
03-10-2006, 12:13 PM
71rds drum & high reliability
can fire buried in sand p-)
and the 7,65x25 is some hi-power *censored**censored**censored**censored*, very good ammo
a bit to powerfull for automatic pistols
I wouldn't say high reliability, it wasn't that reliable mainly due to the drum magazine. Thats why the Soviets deisgned a curved magazine so jaming wasn't as frequent. They may have introduced better drum magazines later on don't know. But, still a effective weapon otherwise.
JVeld
03-10-2006, 12:43 PM
71 round drum
that is the main reason , you can spray a bunch of bullets when entering a hostile house
So can the AK-47 ....
Bombtrack
03-10-2006, 12:58 PM
Im pretty sure this was already talked about on this site (re the Ppsh41) his weapon became NS for reasons I forget and picked that up and kept going
Scyth
03-10-2006, 01:01 PM
And it was a devastating psychological effect to use the enemys weapon on them.
How can it be devastating on people who got fired upon with AK-47s almost all their lives?
7.62 mm has some advantages during anti-guerilla warfare. You can pick your targets on longer ranges, especially in a terrain like A-stan where you have wide valleys, rolling hills and no thick woodlands, and the wound you inflict is so ugly that it has a certain psychological effect. You tend to aim first and fire in single shots, hence better accuracy, instead of firing away, because automatic fire with a 7.62mm can be quite a brain-shaking experience.
However, one advantage of the 5.56mm is that you tend to wound your opponent instead of blowing him away on the spot. Then you can pick his buddies who'll rush to rescue him one by one.
Sebastian
03-10-2006, 01:05 PM
So can the AK-47 ....
Yeah, but those variantions of the AK-47 arn't very common in the first place. 30 round clip will serve better because generally speaking drum magazines arn't very reliable. That clip might serve better, but it looks very silly indeed. Hey, whatever works.
daktari
03-10-2006, 02:00 PM
you can also pick russian ammo on ennemies
no supplies problems:)
Resurrection
03-10-2006, 02:11 PM
Clip:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v83/tehswede/clip.jpg
Magazine:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v83/tehswede/30RoundPre-BandMagazine.jpg
Raptus_regaliter
03-10-2006, 02:13 PM
I was waiting for someone to point that out.
ed316
03-10-2006, 02:15 PM
He probably meant if you were using the AK not the M4/16
JoeBlack23
03-10-2006, 02:31 PM
71 round drum
that is the main reason , you can spray a bunch of bullets when entering a hostile house
Thats what i would say too....you can pepper the enemy with that mp...further in close combat such as urban comabt the range of a weapon and the caliber arent too important( obviously they shouldnt be too small). If your in a house with your enemy..comabt ranges are only a few meters..
iGrooCk
03-10-2006, 02:32 PM
why wats wrong with PPSH? spray and you will sure to get a kill in CQC
AFJROTC55
03-10-2006, 02:36 PM
maybe i just didnt read it but i thought that the "burp" used different ammo than an ak, i wonder how hard it is to get ammo for the thing if you use it on a regular basis?
1*
ed316
03-10-2006, 02:38 PM
isn't AK 7.62x39 and the pphh is 7.62x25
tuercas
03-10-2006, 02:44 PM
isn't AK 7.62x39 and the pphh is 7.62x25
yes it is, 7.62X25mm, same as the tokarev tt33 pistol, it is still a readily available calibre all over the world, even new production, mostly because of how many tt33 are still in use.
Bombtrack
03-10-2006, 03:29 PM
Im pretty sure this was already talked about on this site (re the Ppsh41) his weapon became NS for reasons I forget and picked that up and kept going
any one? any one? Buehller?
wormie
03-10-2006, 04:54 PM
This Is A Very Intaresting Thread And I Approve And Give Three Thumbs Up Yes I Do
HoboWithAK
03-10-2006, 05:34 PM
Indeed. Although the AK is less accurate, it would be more effective than an M4 at CQC.
And this comes from your infinite knowledge of things you read on the internet?
ed316
03-10-2006, 05:35 PM
And this comes from your infinite knowledge of things you read on the internet?
rofl rofl rofl rofl
M4 lenght=Overall length: 838 mm (stock extended); 757 mm (stock fully collapsed)
AK length=Overall length: 870 mm
http://world.guns.ru/assault/as01-e.htm
dobrodan
03-10-2006, 07:31 PM
How can it be devastating on people who got fired upon with AK-47s almost all their lives?
7.62 mm has some advantages during anti-guerilla warfare. You can pick your targets on longer ranges, especially in a terrain like A-stan where you have wide valleys, rolling hills and no thick woodlands, and the wound you inflict is so ugly that it has a certain psychological effect. You tend to aim first and fire in single shots, hence better accuracy, instead of firing away, because automatic fire with a 7.62mm can be quite a brain-shaking experience.
However, one advantage of the 5.56mm is that you tend to wound your opponent instead of blowing him away on the spot. Then you can pick his buddies who'll rush to rescue him one by one.
You are probably mixing 7.62x39 with 7.62x51 NATO or 7.62x54R...
I doubt that 7.62x39 has any more range than 5.56... I also doubt that standard 7.62x39 necessarily inflicts any uglier wounds than standard 5.56. Especially not at short ranges, where 5.56 tends to fragment, while 7.62x39 donīt.
7.62x39 is a breeze to fire, only recoiling slightly more than 5.56.
However, 7.62x51 NATO recoils quite harshly in comparison. Especially in full automatic out of a G3-rifle. An AK or a M4/16 is no problem to control when firing automatic, while the G3 is quite brutal.
Canuck Farrier
03-10-2006, 07:34 PM
ppsh 41 was also quick and easy to manufacture and performed well on the russian frontp-)
Dronetek
03-10-2006, 08:15 PM
Maybe it was his best weapon in Call of Duty 2 or Battlefield 1942 and it transfered to real life? :)
Canuck Farrier
03-10-2006, 09:28 PM
Hey dont forget Vietcong Purple Haze:)
Seraphim
03-10-2006, 10:14 PM
How can it be devastating on people who got fired upon with AK-47s almost all their lives?
7.62 mm has some advantages during anti-guerilla warfare. You can pick your targets on longer ranges, especially in a terrain like A-stan where you have wide valleys, rolling hills and no thick woodlands, and the wound you inflict is so ugly that it has a certain psychological effect. You tend to aim first and fire in single shots, hence better accuracy, instead of firing away, because automatic fire with a 7.62mm can be quite a brain-shaking experience.
However, one advantage of the 5.56mm is that you tend to wound your opponent instead of blowing him away on the spot. Then you can pick his buddies who'll rush to rescue him one by one.
Dont blame the messenger.
Chops
03-10-2006, 10:23 PM
If that grunt took the PPSH from a cache, I'd be worried about jarking...but of course we don't do that do we... ;-)
C
You are probably mixing 7.62x39 with 7.62x51 NATO or 7.62x54R...
x2
I was just going to say that
JoeBlack23
03-11-2006, 06:52 AM
My uncle used it on the eastern front...had a higher rate of fire than the mp 40 and a much greater ammo capacity....he liked it
If that grunt took the PPSH from a cache, I'd be worried about jarking...but of course we don't do that do we... ;-)
C
Could prove to be an interesting afternoon if that is the case... ;)
Certainly no tea and medals to be handed out...
Warrior(Spain)
03-11-2006, 07:07 AM
With Dragunov
http://img48.imageshack.us/img48/6231/1irakdragunov431693376wecgggph.jpg (http://imageshack.us)
Scyth
03-11-2006, 10:38 AM
You are probably mixing 7.62x39 with 7.62x51 NATO or 7.62x54R...
I doubt that 7.62x39 has any more range than 5.56... I also doubt that standard 7.62x39 necessarily inflicts any uglier wounds than standard 5.56. Especially not at short ranges, where 5.56 tends to fragment, while 7.62x39 donīt.
7.62x39 is a breeze to fire, only recoiling slightly more than 5.56.
However, 7.62x51 NATO recoils quite harshly in comparison. Especially in full automatic out of a G3-rifle. An AK or a M4/16 is no problem to control when firing automatic, while the G3 is quite brutal.
Actually I had the G-3 in mind. Thanks for clarification.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.