PDA

View Full Version : Iran rebuffs UN atomic chief, refuses to halt nuclear drive



BlackRain
04-14-2006, 09:07 AM
Iran rebuffs UN atomic chief, refuses to halt nuclear drive

14 April 2006

Iran's hardline regime dismissed appeals from UN's atomic watchdog chief Mohamed ElBaradei to freeze its controversial nuclear program and calm suspicions it is seeking the bomb.

Speaking after talks with the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), top nuclear negotiator Ali Larijani brushed off the UN Security Council's demand for a halt in uranium enrichment by the end of the month as "not very important".

"We are cooperating in a constructive manner... and Mr ElBaradei is here and the inspectors and cameras are here, so such a proposal is not very important to solve the problem," Larijani told reporters.

Hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad also vowed there was "no room for defeat and retreat".

ElBaradei's 24-hour visit comes two days after Iran announced its scientists had successfully enriched uranium to make nuclear fuel.
The Islamic republic insists its program is a peaceful bid to generate electricity, but the enrichment process can be extended to make the fissile core of a nuclear warhead.

ElBaradei said his inspectors had taken samples to verify Iran's claim of a breakthrough in enrichment, and added that talks focusing on the demand for a suspension would continue.

"To build confidence we agreed that we will continue an intensive dialogue in the next few weeks with the aim of being able to move forward on this difficult and important issue," he said.


http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/pictures/06.04.13.MildWoolly-X.gif


He said the only other result of the talks was an Iranian promise to "accelerate its efforts to work with us in next couple of weeks to provide clarity to the issue that we need to clarify" -- the kind of assurance he has heard before.

The IAEA chief must give a report at the end of April on Iranian compliance with the Security Council deadline. After three years of investigations, the IAEA says it is still not in a position to say if Iran's ambitions are peaceful.

ElBaradei said "the picture is still hazy and not very clear".

In further diplomatic efforts, US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice said the United Nations should consider adopting a resolution against Iran's nuclear program under chapter seven of the UN charter, which could allow military action.

Chapter seven sets out specific actions that can be taken when there is a threat to international peace or an act of aggression.

"When the Security Council reconvenes, there will have to be some consequence for that action and that defiance and we will look at the full range of options available," Rice said in Washington.

For its part, China announced that its assistant foreign minister would travel to Iran and Russia to discuss Iran's announcement in a bid to calm the growing tensions.

"We are concerned about the announcement and are also worried about the possible development of the situation," Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Liu Jianchao told a regular press conference.

Representatives of the five permanent members of the Council plus Germany are to meet in Moscow next Tuesday to discuss the crisis, with the long-running stand-off looking set to enter a period of far more robust diplomacy.


The United States has been prodding the Security Council to take a tough stand against the Islamic republic, including possible sanctions, but it has run into opposition from veto-wielding members Russia and China.

But oil-rich Iran has vowed it can weather any sanctions and face off an attack, and instead of slamming the brakes on enrichment has vowed to accelerate the process and reach an industrial-scale fuel production capacity.

"The enemies think they can stop Iran's development with a psychological war, propaganda and political pressure. But they do not know the Iranian nation is standing solid like a mountain and there is no room for defeat and retreat," state television quoted Ahmadinejad as saying.

"Today Iran is a nuclear country and enjoys the position of a powerful country."

The breakthrough in making fuel was with 164 centrifuges at a pilot plant in Natanz, and a senior official said Iran wanted to install 3,000 centrifuges within the next year.

Ahmadinejad also said Iran was working on advanced P2 centrifuges -- highly efficient devices that can enrich far more effectively than the P1 technology currently in use in Iran.
"Our centrifuges are the P1 type, and the next step is the P2, which has a capacity four times greater and on which we are presently conducting research," the president was quoted as saying by IRNA.


http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20060413/wl_mideast_afp/irannuclearpolitics&printer=1;_ylt=Alik78Mgl.uhGn_FAqblBxObOrgF;_ylu=X3oDMTA3MXN1bHE0BHNlYwN0bWE-

EsoognomEhT
04-14-2006, 10:04 AM
Iran Could Produce Nuclear Bomb in 16 Days, U.S. Says (Update2)
April 12 (Bloomberg) -- Iran, defying United Nations Security Council demands to halt its nuclear program, may be capable of making a nuclear bomb within 16 days, a U.S. State Department official said.

Iran will move to ``industrial scale'' uranium enrichment involving 54,000 centrifuges at its Natanz plant, the Associated Press quoted deputy nuclear chief Mohammad Saeedi as telling state-run television today.



--

Hey, I hear Saddam can launch his WMD's in 45 minutes too!

cut
04-14-2006, 11:22 AM
Iran Could Produce Nuclear Bomb in 16 Days, U.S. Says (Update2)
April 12 (Bloomberg) -- Iran, defying United Nations Security Council demands to halt its nuclear program, may be capable of making a nuclear bomb within 16 days, a U.S. State Department official said.

Iran will move to ``industrial scale'' uranium enrichment involving 54,000 centrifuges at its Natanz plant, the Associated Press quoted deputy nuclear chief Mohammad Saeedi as telling state-run television today.



--

Hey, I hear Saddam can launch his WMD's in 45 minutes too!

roflrofl

...

2Sheds_Jackson
04-14-2006, 11:41 AM
Iran Could Produce Nuclear Bomb in 16 Days, U.S. Says (Update2)
April 12 (Bloomberg) -- Iran, defying United Nations Security Council demands to halt its nuclear program, may be capable of making a nuclear bomb within 16 days, a U.S. State Department official said.

Iran will move to ``industrial scale'' uranium enrichment involving 54,000 centrifuges at its Natanz plant, the Associated Press quoted deputy nuclear chief Mohammad Saeedi as telling state-run television today.



--

Hey, I hear Saddam can launch his WMD's in 45 minutes too!

Yeah, let's all proceed under the assumption that Iran is a liar like Saddam was. I'm sure everything will be OK.

EsoognomEhT
04-14-2006, 12:31 PM
Actually, I don't believe Saddam ever said anything like that. It was the intelligence organisations that came up with that one, hence people are somewhat sceptical of comments like this ;)

signatory
04-14-2006, 12:47 PM
Iran Could Produce Nuclear Bomb in 16 Days, U.S. Says (Update2)
April 12 (Bloomberg) -- Iran, defying United Nations Security Council demands to halt its nuclear program, may be capable of making a nuclear bomb within 16 days, a U.S. State Department official said.

--
16 days.. not 14, 15 or 17.. but 16.. OK.


April 13 (Bloomberg) -- Iran is ``some years away'' from developing a nuclear bomb, said Thomas Fingar, deputy U.S. director of national intelligence.

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&sid=aNoAAXkJyZTI&refer=top_world_news

BlackRain
04-14-2006, 01:57 PM
Actually, I don't believe Saddam ever said anything like that. It was the intelligence organisations that came up with that one, hence people are somewhat sceptical of comments like this ;)

You are in denial.

Saddam Hussein: In His Own Words:



"[O]ur striking arm will reach [America, Britain and Saudi Arabia] before they know what hit them."Al-Qadisiyah, October 6, 1994 (State-controlled newspaper)


"One chemical weapon fired in a moment of despair could cause the deaths of hundreds of thousands." Al-Quds al-Arabi, October 12, 1994 (State-controlled newspaper)


"[i]t is possible to turn to biological attack, where a small can, not bigger than the size of a hand, can be used to release viruses that affect everything..."
Babil, September 20, 2001 (State-controlled newspaper)


"If the attacks of September 11 cost the lives of 3,000 civilians, how much will the size of losses in 50 states within 100 cities if it were attacked in the same way in which New York and Washington were? What would happen if hundreds of planes attacked American cities?"
Al-Rafidayn, September 11, 2002 (State-controlled newspaper)

http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/iraq/sadquots.htm

2Sheds_Jackson
04-14-2006, 02:05 PM
Actually, I don't believe Saddam ever said anything like that. It was the intelligence organisations that came up with that one, hence people are somewhat sceptical of comments like this ;)

Remember that the "missing WMDs" were not a fiction. Iraq provided the numbers for X amount produced, and Y amount destroyed, leaving the difference of Z. They then proceeded to claim that the original amounts of X were a lie. The only recourse then was mandatory inspection - implemented courtesy of a war.

Also, Saddam had always told his generals that they had chemical and bio weapons to use, and it was not until a couple of weeks before the invasion that they were told the truth.

This is why we need inspections by competent adults. These half-assed nations are all over the place and act like impulsive children. But this is not a matter that the rest of the world takes so lightly. Thus, they wind up getting in trouble. So what's to be done? Do we trust them to be liars? What sense does that even make?

It's like that old episode of Star Trek. "Listen closely...everything I say is a lie...I am lying".

EsoognomEhT
04-14-2006, 02:20 PM
Blackrain, I'm talking about the 45 minute claim. I'm not in denial about anything. I say again, the intelligence community came up with that one.

2sheds; Again I think people are getting their wires crossed, perhaps I should have made it clearer

I don't doubt saddam had 'wmds', they might never be found..lot of sand in Iraq so I'm told.
But statements like "Iran may be capable of making a nuclear bomb within 16 days, a U.S. State Department official said" just sound all too familiar.

XShipRider
04-15-2006, 07:20 AM
14 April 2006

Iran's hardline regime ...

Should read "headline" not "hardline."