PDA

View Full Version : C.I.A. Employee Fired for Alleged Leak



hist2004
04-21-2006, 08:49 PM
April 21, 2006

C.I.A. Employee Fired for Alleged Leak

By DAVID JOHNSTON (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/j/david_johnston/index.html?inline=nyt-per)

WASHINGTON, April 21 — The Central Intelligence Agency (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/organizations/c/central_intelligence_agency/index.html?inline=nyt-org) has dismissed a senior career official who disclosed classified information to the Washington Post for its Pulitzer Prize-winning stories about the agency's secret prison network for high-ranking terror suspects, the agency announced today.
The identity of the leaker was not immediately disclosed, but several officials said they believed it was a veteran intelligence officer. The dismissal followed a long internal inquiry at the agency and was accompanied by a notification to the Justice Department.

But instead of asking for an immediate criminal inquiry, the C.I.A. asked to retain jurisdiction over the ongoing inquiry into the matter. Even so, government officials said it was possible, even likely, that the investigation could lead to criminal charges against the leaker.

The officer's departure sent another powerful jolt of apprehension through the C.I.A., battered in recent years for faulty prewar reporting in Iraq, waves of senior-echelon departures following the appointment of Porter J. Goss (http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/g/porter_j_goss/index.html?inline=nyt-per) as director and the diminished standing of the agency now that the nation's intelligence operations have been reorganized.

The Justice Department had opened an inquiry after The Post's publication of an article last fall which said that the intelligence agency was sending terror suspects to clandestine detention centers in Eastern Europe. The inquiry, which provoked protests among European allies and set off complaints among Democrats in Congress, also prompted an inquiry by the Justice Department which had failed to unearth a suspect.

The announcement today provided a fresh indication that the agency under Mr. Goss would aggressively hunt for leakers. He has said that unauthorized disclosures of national security information threaten to seriously undermine the administration's counterterrorism efforts.

Link to Article: (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/21/washington/21cnd-leak.html?hp&ex=1145678400&en=4e6f3228d760ab95&ei=5094&partner=homepage)

Hist2004

HomShaBom
04-21-2006, 08:53 PM
Political fall, there's always someone who takes one for the team..

usa320
04-21-2006, 09:09 PM
Sounds like to me some old timer who wasnt happy with the new management and wanted to ruin their careers. Good riddance.

Futile Talisman
04-21-2006, 09:19 PM
Political fall, there's always someone who takes one for the team..


Don't understand the above statement, it seems to be a case of violating national security.

How is this someone "taking one for the team."

Mary McCarthy was a senior officer in the Inspector General of the CIA's office. It appears according to published news reports that she admitted to unauthorized contact with reporters. Initial press reports are notorious for being wrong, so we will have to wait and see.

FT

Blarney
04-21-2006, 10:33 PM
woot woot, nothing better than to see any traitor of any kind get whats coming to them.

California Joe
04-21-2006, 10:38 PM
Too bad she wasn't named Libby, or Rove....then running your suck to the media wouldn't be as bad....

usmajunk
04-22-2006, 03:39 AM
hooray for the criminal charges.
will definitely discourage this stupid stuff in the future.

but what about the Post?
does it get off free for publishing restricted information?
i have just wondered about this for a while.

theclash
04-22-2006, 07:50 AM
but what about the Post?
does it get off free for publishing restricted information?
i have just wondered about this for a while.

The Press' job is to tell you, the private citizen, what your government is doing on your behalf. And sell newspapers doing it.

If you prefer to live in a nation where you're kept in the dark I'm sure you can arrange that yourself.

BlackRain
04-22-2006, 08:56 AM
Too bad she wasn't named Libby, or Rove....then running your suck to the media wouldn't be as bad....

This a Democrat Leaking Program.

Sandy Berger (Clinton Administration) appointed (http://www.fas.org/irp/news/1998/06/98061701_tpo.html) this unpatriotic leaker who happens to be a John Kerry (http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/22/washington/22leak.html?ei=5065&en=126c3f48aea48e3f&ex=1146283200&partner=MYWAY&pagewanted=print) supporter.

I wonder if this leaker, who actually damaged US national security, will be "frog-marched" into a jail cell?

AOCBravo2004
04-22-2006, 02:01 PM
Too bad she wasn't named Libby, or Rove....then running your suck to the media wouldn't be as bad....

You are talking about the information that was NOT classified? Or the releasing of the name of Valerie Plame, which again was NOT a violation of the laws on the books, even according to the original authors of the law.

Mastermind
04-22-2006, 11:16 PM
Yeah...I notice the Valerie Plame affair has taken a back seat even to the "Aruba missing white girl" and the "Duke University non-rape of the black srtipper" stories...Makes you just want to cry, does it not?

California Joe
04-22-2006, 11:30 PM
Anyone who leaks anything should get hammered. I never leaked anything to anyone, it wasn't that hard. My main gripe is with the semantics. Something could be normally considered classified when leaked but then with a wave of a magical exective branch wand, the conveniently leaked politically inflammatory information is suddenly not classified anymore. It's still leaking. It's still dirty politics. It just doesn't violate national security because the guy in charge says it doesn't. That's a bull**** argument a 9 year old makes when they want 4 outs in kickball..

praetorian6
04-22-2006, 11:55 PM
Something could be normally considered classified when leaked but then with a wave of a magical exective branch wand, the conveniently leaked politically inflammatory information... That's a bull**** argument a 9 year old makes when they want 4 outs in kickball..

You have some of the best posts. These are what makes this forum so much fun to read.