Skaman
03-14-2004, 05:16 PM
With the wide and readily availability of Hollywood productions, it is not uncommon that one could find instances and scenes of collective behavior evident in film. The portrayal of collective behavior and its accurate representation is what should interest most who are engaged in this specific field of study. The film Black Hawk Down in particular encompassed many relevancies to collective behavior, and proves to be an excellent model in the display of this group activity.
With relevancy in mind, the film pertains to the study of sociology for some obvious reasons: Individuals within the film act as a cohesive and collective whole, adopting characteristics underlined as preliminary actions in groups of collective behavior Such actions include the applicative mentality of mobs, gangs, violence, protest, conflict, and political unrest. These members are acting in a manner to establish and satisfy what they conceive to be a social norm. Those witnessing such acts are among those classified in the ‘barricades”, and can thus present a viable interpretation and analysis of collective behavior in action. The portrayal of these events can be associated with criminality and or political radicalism. A thorough examination of the event from various participants allows for a concise documentation.
Examining collective behavior, one is often ****e too many variables and problems which can alter or skew ones interpretation of such events. With the inclusion of multiple viewing participants, including and airborne observation unit, issues such as the ‘waterhole’ problem or viewing scope are not affected. While the events unfold very rapidly, many eyes covering the area allow for a thorough documentation. With the inclusion of multiple elements viewing the outbreak of mass collective behavior, one is constantly aware of the dependant variables shaping the conflict. Communication is readily sent to and from each observation element regarding the conflict and its current status.
The film respectively encompasses details and stereotypes common among the collective behavior movement. This movement is in particular fuelled by a mentality of hate and destruction, with emphasis on lawlessness. The crowd stereotypes are apparent, and evidently valid. The group acts in a manner of emotionality and spontaneity, leaving a wake of devastation and death. The group acts in an irrational manner, not cognizant of the ramifications and implications of their destructive behavior and the immediate danger they have presented for themselves, and those around them. These members fit the stereotype of being lower or working class, and in actuality, are indeed third world citizens of the underclass.
The actions presented by the crowd follow pattern within the structure of collective behavioral acts we have discussed in class. The idea of de-individualization occurs where the group gathers strengths in numbers and loses any inherent individual responsibility. There is a mental unity among the crowd where an unconscious sub strain and radical thought propels the group forward, almost stepping back into a barbaric ‘state of nature’. What must be acknowledged however is that the ideals of morality and contemporary social norms are in stark contrast to our own which may suggest the excessive radicalism in dealing with political threats. Additionally, the group is controlled by a “blind obedience”. The massive congregation is impulsive, and extremely mobile. There is no cease in the effort to create havoc and death aside from daily call to prayer in accordance to Islamic creed.
The indications and catalysts for casing group behavior are present as there is the preliminary factor: a large set of numbers. As well, an initiation or agitation occurs, in this case it is a challenge to political authority and an attempt to remove militant leaders among a loyal urban sector. Together, these actions all incline one to label such conduct as collective behavior.
The film itself has historical relevance and is set in Somalia in 1993 during a massive famine and international crisis. International units under the jurisdiction of the UN attempted to stabilize the nation and bring civil order. The most powerful warlord, Mohammed Ferrah Aidid seized food shipments and his people face an epidemic of starvation. US forces attempt to weaken his leadership infrastructure by removing key political officials, in-turn, a massive appraisal among the Somali populous results, creating conflict and violent outbreaks amongst the streets. As a result of the engagements, thousands of Somali’s are killed including several American and UN forces.
Attention of the film is place on General Garrison, a key member of “operation restore hope” and the command leader during the incident covered in the film. Emphasis is also put on the American special forces- ‘Delta Force” The film is presented in a chronological timeframe detailing the factors leading up to the conflict, then the largest component of the film covers the conflict itself, which spanned a total of two days in the capital Mogadishu. One point of view would not successfully encompass all events taking place, therefore the film alternates among various individuals in the conflict.
The film itself is presented in an extremely graphic yet realistic portrayal which proves effective in realizing the veracity of combat. The scenes of collective behavior generally remain consistent and do not change as the crowd is static and behaves in a particular action all throughout the film. The film itself seems to present the complications of a ‘political war’ and the complexities in dealing with a nation plagued with civil war and unrest. Ultimately, one could call it an ‘anti-war’ film.
The film was relevant to the study of collective behavior as a whole, yet it can be examined in a more narrow fashion. The Contagion Theory appears to be the most applicable to the film and the actions presented by the Somali mob. In accordance with the Social Contagion theory, the group appeals to the most violent members. This is clearly unmistakable as the group is driven by hate and an urge to inflict death. When a solider is killed, the mob behaves in a fashion one could not mistake for utter jubilation and pleasure. The frenzy of violence moves through the crowd like a virus, just as the contagion theory specifies. The group acts spontaneously, and in respect to the least intelligent member of the mob. Lebon’s ideal is clearly applicable as the group acts without reason, drawing strength from numbers, driven to kill. The members of the mob act in agreement, all individualism is suppressed, and they act in accordance with the expectations and beliefs. Park’s idea of contagion theory is also applicable, where the crowd is affected by its members causing a circular reaction. In addition, Blummer’s ideal can also be applied. The group acts in a way they would not normally represent themselves, but act in unison with the group as they seek security, and power. Acting in this manner and on their own would surely single them out. However, not all members act in conformity with the crowd, and some do in-fact run for cover or hide during the engagement. Clearly individuals are cognizant of external actions, and by interpreting these actions they act in a rational manner reminiscent of Blumner’s interpretative interaction theory.
Watching the film, one gains insight into the nature of political radicalism, and the damage it can sustain. The implications of war and American foreign policy are made aware. Additionally, one can interpret the film in a new light, applying theological thought of collective behavior, allowing for a better conceptual understanding of the conflict and its catalysts. Black Hawk Down can be used as an important tool for sociologists in the applicative studies of collective behavior, viewing the nature of this conduct in a live visual fashion. Watching the film, one must still remain open minded and be aware that we cannot label the mob as ruthless or immoral; rather we must understand the social norms present in the cultural setting. Therefore, we can gain much from this film if we do not allow racial prejudice, bias, or false pre-conception to cloud our judgment.
This is a rough copy and there are some kinks and sources need to be checked. Some names may be spelled wrong. Offer any advice.
With relevancy in mind, the film pertains to the study of sociology for some obvious reasons: Individuals within the film act as a cohesive and collective whole, adopting characteristics underlined as preliminary actions in groups of collective behavior Such actions include the applicative mentality of mobs, gangs, violence, protest, conflict, and political unrest. These members are acting in a manner to establish and satisfy what they conceive to be a social norm. Those witnessing such acts are among those classified in the ‘barricades”, and can thus present a viable interpretation and analysis of collective behavior in action. The portrayal of these events can be associated with criminality and or political radicalism. A thorough examination of the event from various participants allows for a concise documentation.
Examining collective behavior, one is often ****e too many variables and problems which can alter or skew ones interpretation of such events. With the inclusion of multiple viewing participants, including and airborne observation unit, issues such as the ‘waterhole’ problem or viewing scope are not affected. While the events unfold very rapidly, many eyes covering the area allow for a thorough documentation. With the inclusion of multiple elements viewing the outbreak of mass collective behavior, one is constantly aware of the dependant variables shaping the conflict. Communication is readily sent to and from each observation element regarding the conflict and its current status.
The film respectively encompasses details and stereotypes common among the collective behavior movement. This movement is in particular fuelled by a mentality of hate and destruction, with emphasis on lawlessness. The crowd stereotypes are apparent, and evidently valid. The group acts in a manner of emotionality and spontaneity, leaving a wake of devastation and death. The group acts in an irrational manner, not cognizant of the ramifications and implications of their destructive behavior and the immediate danger they have presented for themselves, and those around them. These members fit the stereotype of being lower or working class, and in actuality, are indeed third world citizens of the underclass.
The actions presented by the crowd follow pattern within the structure of collective behavioral acts we have discussed in class. The idea of de-individualization occurs where the group gathers strengths in numbers and loses any inherent individual responsibility. There is a mental unity among the crowd where an unconscious sub strain and radical thought propels the group forward, almost stepping back into a barbaric ‘state of nature’. What must be acknowledged however is that the ideals of morality and contemporary social norms are in stark contrast to our own which may suggest the excessive radicalism in dealing with political threats. Additionally, the group is controlled by a “blind obedience”. The massive congregation is impulsive, and extremely mobile. There is no cease in the effort to create havoc and death aside from daily call to prayer in accordance to Islamic creed.
The indications and catalysts for casing group behavior are present as there is the preliminary factor: a large set of numbers. As well, an initiation or agitation occurs, in this case it is a challenge to political authority and an attempt to remove militant leaders among a loyal urban sector. Together, these actions all incline one to label such conduct as collective behavior.
The film itself has historical relevance and is set in Somalia in 1993 during a massive famine and international crisis. International units under the jurisdiction of the UN attempted to stabilize the nation and bring civil order. The most powerful warlord, Mohammed Ferrah Aidid seized food shipments and his people face an epidemic of starvation. US forces attempt to weaken his leadership infrastructure by removing key political officials, in-turn, a massive appraisal among the Somali populous results, creating conflict and violent outbreaks amongst the streets. As a result of the engagements, thousands of Somali’s are killed including several American and UN forces.
Attention of the film is place on General Garrison, a key member of “operation restore hope” and the command leader during the incident covered in the film. Emphasis is also put on the American special forces- ‘Delta Force” The film is presented in a chronological timeframe detailing the factors leading up to the conflict, then the largest component of the film covers the conflict itself, which spanned a total of two days in the capital Mogadishu. One point of view would not successfully encompass all events taking place, therefore the film alternates among various individuals in the conflict.
The film itself is presented in an extremely graphic yet realistic portrayal which proves effective in realizing the veracity of combat. The scenes of collective behavior generally remain consistent and do not change as the crowd is static and behaves in a particular action all throughout the film. The film itself seems to present the complications of a ‘political war’ and the complexities in dealing with a nation plagued with civil war and unrest. Ultimately, one could call it an ‘anti-war’ film.
The film was relevant to the study of collective behavior as a whole, yet it can be examined in a more narrow fashion. The Contagion Theory appears to be the most applicable to the film and the actions presented by the Somali mob. In accordance with the Social Contagion theory, the group appeals to the most violent members. This is clearly unmistakable as the group is driven by hate and an urge to inflict death. When a solider is killed, the mob behaves in a fashion one could not mistake for utter jubilation and pleasure. The frenzy of violence moves through the crowd like a virus, just as the contagion theory specifies. The group acts spontaneously, and in respect to the least intelligent member of the mob. Lebon’s ideal is clearly applicable as the group acts without reason, drawing strength from numbers, driven to kill. The members of the mob act in agreement, all individualism is suppressed, and they act in accordance with the expectations and beliefs. Park’s idea of contagion theory is also applicable, where the crowd is affected by its members causing a circular reaction. In addition, Blummer’s ideal can also be applied. The group acts in a way they would not normally represent themselves, but act in unison with the group as they seek security, and power. Acting in this manner and on their own would surely single them out. However, not all members act in conformity with the crowd, and some do in-fact run for cover or hide during the engagement. Clearly individuals are cognizant of external actions, and by interpreting these actions they act in a rational manner reminiscent of Blumner’s interpretative interaction theory.
Watching the film, one gains insight into the nature of political radicalism, and the damage it can sustain. The implications of war and American foreign policy are made aware. Additionally, one can interpret the film in a new light, applying theological thought of collective behavior, allowing for a better conceptual understanding of the conflict and its catalysts. Black Hawk Down can be used as an important tool for sociologists in the applicative studies of collective behavior, viewing the nature of this conduct in a live visual fashion. Watching the film, one must still remain open minded and be aware that we cannot label the mob as ruthless or immoral; rather we must understand the social norms present in the cultural setting. Therefore, we can gain much from this film if we do not allow racial prejudice, bias, or false pre-conception to cloud our judgment.
This is a rough copy and there are some kinks and sources need to be checked. Some names may be spelled wrong. Offer any advice.