PDA

View Full Version : Zimbabwe photos



signatory
05-31-2006, 10:57 AM
http://img174.imageshack.us/img174/9845/portabefore310nc.jpg
Before


http://img174.imageshack.us/img174/1115/portaafter312up.jpg
After

Zimbabwe: Satellite images provide shocking evidence of the obliteration of a community

Amnesty International today released the first-ever satellite images of the wholesale destruction of a large community in Zimbabwe -- providing the clearest possible evidence to date of the devastating impact of the Zimbabwean government's policy of house demolitions.

"These satellite images are irrefutable evidence -- if further evidence is even needed -- that the Zimbabwean government has obliterated entire communities -- completely erased them from the map, as if they never existed," said Kolawole Olaniyan, Director of Amnesty International's Africa programme.

The organization commissioned the satellite images to demonstrate the complete destruction of Porta Farm -- a large, informal settlement that was established 16 years ago and had schools, a children's centre and a mosque. The organization also released graphic video footage showing the forced evictions taking place prior to the demolitions.

"The images and footage are a graphic indictment of the Zimbabwean government's policies. They show the horrifying transition of an area from a vibrant community to rubble and shrubs -- in the space of just ten months," said Kolawole Olaniyan.

On 27 June 2005, approximately one month after the start of Operation Murambatsvina ("Restore Order"), police officers came to Porta Farm and distributed fliers telling residents to pack up their property and leave their homes. The police told the residents they would be back the following morning, giving them less than 24 hours to comply.

Early in the morning of 28 June, a convoy of vehicles and police descended on Porta Farm. The police were heavily armed.

Residents watched helplessly as bulldozers and police officers in riot gear reduced their homes to rubble. Police officers reportedly threatened the residents, saying anyone who resisted eviction would be beaten. The destruction of Porta Farm went on all day -- only ending when darkness fell. Thousands of people were forced to sleep outside in the rubble in mid-winter.

The next day, the police returned to continue with the demolitions. They also began to forcibly remove people on the back of trucks.

The Porta Farm evictions took place while the UN Special Envoy, Mrs. Anna Tibaijuka, was in Zimbabwe. On 29 June members of the Special Envoy’s team visited Porta Farm and witnessed demolitions and forced removal of people in police and government trucks. The subsequent report of the UN Special Envoy describes how the team was "shocked by the brutality" of what they witnessed. Local human rights monitors reported that during the chaos several deaths occurred, including those of two children.

Background
In May 2005 the government of Zimbabwe embarked on Operation Murambatsvina (Restore Order), a programme of mass forced evictions and the demolition of homes and informal businesses. The operation, which was carried out in winter and against a backdrop of severe food shortages, targeted poor urban and peri-urban areas countrywide.

In a critical report released on 22 July 2005 the United Nations (UN) estimated that in the space of approximately six weeks some 700,000 people lost their homes, their livelihoods, or both.

The communities affected by Operation Murambatsvina were amongst the poorest and most vulnerable in Zimbabwe. In several cases, such as Porta Farm, they had been the victims of previous forced evictions carried out by the authorities. They were given almost no notice before their homes were demolished and no alternative accommodation was provided. The government stated publicly that the evictees should go back to the rural areas.

The satellite images released by Amnesty International were analysed by the American Association for the Advancement of Science, with funding from the MacArthur Foundation in the US.

2Sheds_Jackson
05-31-2006, 11:36 AM
Well that's pretty good proof right there - but of what? There's no denying that the community was moved - but communities do get moved all the time. The question is - was it fair and proper?

I may be wrong - but it looks to me like a 2nd lane of highway is being constructed in the "after" photo (it parallels the first, and descends from the upper right). It looks like the village could have been cleared to make way for this road?

I have no idea - I'm just wondering why they would go through so much trouble if all they wanted to do was brutalize people. Why bother removing all the structures? If you're going to beat and shoot people, and load them in trucks - why bother going through all the trouble of giving them notice at all - and/or plowing under their homes? This just doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me- but then events in Africa never make much sense to me.

signatory
05-31-2006, 11:55 AM
Well that's pretty good proof right there - but of what? There's no denying that the community was moved - but communities do get moved all the time. The question is - was it fair and proper?

I may be wrong - but it looks to me like a 2nd lane of highway is being constructed in the "after" photo (it parallels the first, and descends from the upper right). It looks like the village could have been cleared to make way for this road?

I have no idea - I'm just wondering why they would go through so much trouble if all they wanted to do was brutalize people. Why bother removing all the structures? If you're going to beat and shoot people, and load them in trucks - why bother going through all the trouble of giving them notice at all - and/or plowing under their homes? This just doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me- but then events in Africa never make much sense to me.

Neh the Zimbabwe gov doesn't deny it or anything, it was part of a land cleanup operation, not out to beat down some people just for the heck of it.

That can indeed happen elsewhere. What Amnesty object to is how it was handled and I seem to recall both the UN, UK and EU observers reported of ill treatment and cameras were banned and afaik some British TV team put in prison. I do remember seeing some hidden cam news reports from the action and it didn't look all that nice.

The photos look good in media and is obviously used to remind people of the brutality often used by the Mugabe regime.