PDA

View Full Version : Bush pays tribute to Asia's contribution in anti-terror figh



ogukuo72
03-19-2004, 08:21 PM
WASHINGTON : US President George W. Bush hailed Asia's contribution to the US fight against terrorism as he marked the first year of the invasion of Iraq by paying tribute particularly to Japan and South Korea.

Speaking to diplomats from 84 countries that backed the US-led campaign against terror, he said "our coalition is sending an unmistakable message to the terrorists: These killers will be tracked down and found, they will face their day of justice."

He said many Asian states had "sacrificed" in both Iraq and Afghanistan as part of the effort to eliminate terrorism, but cited Japan and South Korea for their "historic commitments" of troops, particularly to rebuild Iraq from the ashes of the war.

Japan has pledged five billion dollars to rebuild Iraq, the biggest donor after the United States, and has passed a bill allowing the dispatch of troops there, breaking a taboo which has kept the country's troops out of war zones since 1945.

The dispatch of troops, although only for humanitarian reasons, has caused controversy at home because of Japan's pacifist constitution.

It has so far deployed some 430 ground troops in the southern Iraqi city of Samawa as part of an eventual 550-strong mission.

South Korea has sent 400 non-combatants, including medics and engineers to the war-ravaged country.

And Seoul had agreed last month to dispatch another 3,000-odd troops to northern Iraq in phases, starting from next month, but on Friday put the plan on hold due to deteriorating security.

US State Department spokesman Adam Ereli downplayed the move as "a logistical issue," telling a Friday briefing Washington was discussing with Seoul the details of its new deployment, which reports say could now begin in June.

If the plan is implemented, the South Korean contingent would be the third-largest in the war-torn state after those of the United States and Britain.

"In this contest of will and purpose, not every nation joins every mission, or participates in the same way," Bush said.

"Yet, every nation makes a vital contribution, and America is proud to stand with all of you as we pursue a broad strategy in the war against terror."

Bush particularly referred to the tragic death of Katsuhiko Oku, one of two Japanese diplomats killed in a highway attack north of Baghdad last year, saying Oku "believed in our cause" to liberate Iraq and win freedom for its people.

Bush said that the 45-year-old Oku, who was Japan's representative at the US-led Coalition Provisional Authority, had in his diary described his pride in working in Iraq.

"The free people of Iraq," Oku wrote, "are now making steady progress in reconstructing their country -- while also fighting against the threat of terrorism," Bush said, reading excerpts from the journal.

"This is also our fight to defend freedom," said Oku, who would post letters from his mission in Iraq onto the Japanese foreign ministry website hoping to spark more interest among his compatriots.

The two diplomats were the first Japanese to be killed in Iraq since the invasion, and their deaths drew much sympathy at home and had initially threatened to disrupt Tokyo's deployment.

Bush took pains to mention the other countries whose citizens perished in Iraq and Afghanistan and the efforts being undertaken to stem the terrorist problems in Pakistan, Indonesia and the Philippines -- the "frontline" states in Asia.

- AFP


Finally! It's about time that the US realise that its real allies are over here in Asia. If someone attacked an Asian country before an election, you can bet that the people of that country won't vote to cut and run.

Lobo
03-19-2004, 08:24 PM
Oh, yeah... World is safer thanks those WMD found in Irak won't harm anyone, and Al Qaeda terrorists won't be trained anymore in those camps around Baghdad. :P

He219
03-19-2004, 08:33 PM
Ahem, those Palestinian Terrorists families won't be subsidized by Saddam anymore. Abu Abbas won't be harming anyone anymore either. Abu Musaab Al-Zarqawi must not be a terrorist in your book ...


We still don't have an accounting of UNMOVIC (www.unmovic.org)'s missing WMD inventories and concurrently discovered that Iran and Lybia were developing Atomic Weapon's Programs to our 'big suprise' .....


Are you willing to bet that WMD never existed in Iraq or that they were completely 'destroyed' without any evidence whatsoever (verification being the intrinsic requirement of UNSCOM (http://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/) and GW1 Peace Terms)?
;)


ogukuo72, I appreciate your sentiments. However, I do believe both East and West are allied together (One no less than the other) in the fight against global terrorism and religious fanaticism - whenever they set aside political squabbling ...

Whistler
03-19-2004, 09:14 PM
Oh, yeah... World is safer thanks those WMD found in Irak won't harm anyone, and Al Qaeda terrorists won't be trained anymore in those camps around Baghdad. :P

You're name wouldn't happen to be Zapatero would it?

ogukuo72
03-19-2004, 09:31 PM
Ahem, those Palestinian Terrorists families won't be subsidized by Saddam anymore. Abu Abbas won't be harming anyone anymore either. Abu Musaab Al-Zarqawi must not be a terrorist in your book ...


We still don't have an accounting of UNMOVIC (www.unmovic.org)'s missing WMD inventories and concurrently discovered that Iran and Lybia were developing Atomic Weapon's Programs to our 'big suprise' .....


Are you willing to bet that WMD never existed in Iraq or that they were completely 'destroyed' without any evidence whatsoever (verification being the intrinsic requirement of UNSCOM (http://www.un.org/Depts/unscom/) and GW1 Peace Terms)?
;)


ogukuo72, I appreciate your sentiments. However, I do believe both East and West are allied together (One no less than the other) in the fight against global terrorism and religious fanaticism - whenever they set aside political squabbling ...

OK, maybe I put things a bit too strongly, but I am angered by European weakness. We are all front-line states in the war on terrorism. Any sign of weakness on the part of any ally will expose the rest of us to danger. When one succombs to 'pressure' by terrorists, then the terrorists would be tempted to apply 'pressure' on the rest of us. Our strength lies in a common front.

Back in 2001, a terrorist plot by an Al-Qaeda affiliate group was uncovered to bomb Mass Rapid Transit (subway) stations and embassies here in Singapore. It was targetted at US diplomatic and military personnel getting off work, but at rush hour, bombs going off at these places would have killed dozens, if not hundreds of Singaporeans. It would probably have been a precursor of Madrid.

What did a small country like us do? Surely the safer route would be to give in to the terrorists, and ask the Americans to leave. But that's not the way. We don't give in to terrorists. We rounded them up. Those who escaped overseas were tracked down with the help of our neighbours and arrested.

This is not about East or West. It's about strength and will vs weakness. We have demonstrated our commitment and will in the face of danger, but from my perspective here, we're being let down very badly by the Europeans, who have shown much weakness.

Whistler
03-19-2004, 09:33 PM
GREAT POST OGUKUO!

AK-Lover
03-19-2004, 09:57 PM
I want to **** Paris Hilton!

Lobo
03-19-2004, 11:22 PM
Bla, bla, bla...

You haven't understood anything about what happend last Sunday in Spanish elections. Read my previous posts explaining (with figures and facts) what happened in Spain since the terrorist attacks took place until the election day.
Here

http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=10386&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=140

And here:

http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=10386&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=160

:bash:

Update:

Look what El Mundo reported yesterday about the European summit:
http://www.elmundo.es/elmundo/2004/03/19/enespecial/1079720914.html
Don't you know El Mundo? Don't you minister Acebes? Don't you what happened with the CNI reports? Don't you know why people was so angry last Saturday evening? Ah.. It happens you aren't Spaniard and you don't speak Spanish...

So shut the **** up, and stop talking about the inner politics of countries you even can't point in a map. :fork:

Lobo
03-19-2004, 11:41 PM
He219, all that wasn't about you.

About Irak's WMD
I read Scott Ritter's book on WMD in Irak, and I found his point quite
reasonable. The matter is that Irak didn't use any WMD in GW3 (GW1 was Iran-Irak) so...

a) they never existed
b) they existed but Saddam wasnt' "dare" enough to use them against US forces.

If b) was true, what's the point of fearing Saddam's WMD?

Did you read Col. David Hackworth comments?
http://www.sftt.org/cgi-bin/csNews/csNews.cgi?database=Hacks%20Target.db&command=viewone&op=t&id=57&rnd=505.79698984455

There were reasons to think before the war that those weapons didn't existe anymore.

About connections between Saddam's Irak and Al Qaeda. Are you talking about those links CIA deny before the war?

In case Irak war wasn't about the two previous points, explain me please what's the position of GWB administration on one of the main "Global Yihad" sponsor (Saudi Arabia) and one confesed nuclear technology "spreader" (Pakistan) [sorry, for weird word]. Maybe as a poor pant ****ting crying Spaniard international politics result hard to understand.

Well, if you consider all this a war against all kind of terrorism, Spaniards have a lot of complain about how we fought alone against ETA while other countries have given asilum to terrorists, deny help to Spanish goverment (like the USA in the early 80s), and media, like CNN, still reported about that "Basque separatist group". :cantbeli:

Ratamacue
03-19-2004, 11:57 PM
About Irak's WMD
I read Scott Ritter's book on WMD in Irak, and I found his point quite
reasonable. The matter is that Irak didn't use any WMD in GW3 (GW1 was Iran-Irak) so...

a) they never existed
b) they existed but Saddam wasnt' "dare" enough to use them against US forces.

If b) was true, what's the point of fearing Saddam's WMD?

Aside from whether they existed or not (because none of us actually know whether they did or not), if he did have weapons at the time of the war, Saddam knew that if he used them, any and all support or indifference for him or Iraq in the world would instantly turn against him.

I think that he was sane enough to know that he was screwed from day one of the war, so I think his objective was to find ways to create international support for Iraq and against the coalition in order to either prolong the war or end it entirely. Using WMD's against coalition forces would basically have screwed himself ten times over.