View Full Version : best equipped army in north
laskuvarjojääkäri
03-22-2004, 03:01 PM
There is couple of little armys in north. Who has the best equipment
RomanS
03-22-2004, 03:32 PM
Mexico
im not even voting on this one
and I also don't understand why you're not baned yet after your post about USA
Gringo
03-22-2004, 04:36 PM
Oh ****. Not this thing again.
If your looking for a straight answer, look for it yourself.
If this is another "who's better" thread, yer best renaming this "which is your favourite Scandinavian army?".
This is how flame wars get started.
ßå$tĮТHĻæš
03-22-2004, 06:56 PM
Beware those Brazillians...they hit the snow they go psycho...
0#256
03-22-2004, 08:30 PM
There is couple of little armys in north. Who has the best equipment
:bash: U SUCK! :bash:
Falco
03-22-2004, 08:37 PM
Papua New Guinea ... beware of the head hunters
MVSpartan117
03-22-2004, 08:51 PM
Laos has hidden stealth ninjas.......... watch out.......
Ngati Tumatauenga
03-23-2004, 01:30 AM
After the sheer stupidity of your first thread I doubt much if any of what you post will be taken seriously.
Micke
03-23-2004, 10:49 AM
Who cares who has best equipment? Its more about the soldiers than gucci kit, isnt it??
UkrainianAmerican
03-23-2004, 11:34 AM
The phillipinnes can take on all those three countrys. Phillipoines are tuff mofos.
Well its an well-known fact that Norway has the best personal equipment. Closely follwed by Sweden. Finland lacks in this area.
But thats personal equipment. If we are talking tanks, chopters, planes etc...Sweden clearly is the winner in that area.
Sweden has simply the largest spending on the defense among the nations up north.
By the way,whats the point with this question?
MapleLeafInfantry
03-24-2004, 04:07 AM
I hear that the icelandic army kicked the arse of the greenlandians in the battle of the to liberate antartica in 1983.
don't mess with reykjavik.
bloddyaxe
03-24-2004, 06:52 PM
There is no Icelandic army. But the Icelandic coast guard utterly slaughtered the British Navy in the Cod Wars.
And the "greenlandians" don't have an army either. Unless of course you count the four danish soldiers in Greenland an army...
Dalleer
03-24-2004, 06:55 PM
There is no Icelandic army. But the Icelandic coast guard utterly slaughtered the British Navy in the Cod Wars.
And the "greenlandians" don't have an army either. Unless of course you count the four danish soldiers in Greenland an army...
Come on, I consider myself "the ultimate one man's army" whenever Sundaymilitarizin' around...
martinexsquaddie
03-27-2004, 06:08 AM
playing bumper boats with old trawlers vs frigates is hardly a war :roll:
Germaine
03-31-2004, 01:38 AM
Personally I think Canada should be in there too because we have some very good winter kit. But I think it all comes down to the soldiers.
DANJANOU
03-31-2004, 01:18 PM
The phillipinnes can take on all those three countrys. Phillipoines are tuff mofos.
Don't laugh. I've seen Fillipinos doing basic winter indoc FTX.
However I agree this forum does not need another
"My army/dick/whatever is bigger/better than yours pissing contest."
bloddyaxe
03-31-2004, 06:15 PM
playing bumper boats with old trawlers vs frigates is hardly a war
If yer referring to the Cod Wars, then I advise you to read some more about them and look at some nice pictures of Leander class frigates big holes near the waterline.
And then, there were no trawlers rammed, with the exception of one of our Coast guard vessels which was a former trawler and had greater capacity to rip up British warships due to the considerably stronger aft end.
So the only other trawlers got either their nets cut off or they were shot into submission with a 45mm hand loaded cannon.
And to add, the British ships of the later two wars were exceptionally weak compared to the ones in the first one.
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.