PDA

View Full Version : Gun owners accuse UN of July 4 conspiracy


BlackRain
06-22-2006, 09:45 AM
Gun owners accuse UN of July 4 conspiracy
By Irwin Arieff

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - Americans mistakenly worried the United Nations is plotting to take away their guns on July 4 -- U.S. Independence Day -- are flooding the world body with angry letters and postcards, the chairman of a U.N. conference on the illegal small arms trade said on Wednesday.

"I myself have received over 100,000 letters from the U.S. public, criticizing me personally, saying, 'You are having this conference on the 4th of July, you are not going to get our guns on that day,"' said Prasad Kariyawasam, Sri Lanka's U.N. ambassador.

"That is a total misconception as far as we are concerned," Kariyawasam told reporters ahead of the two-week meeting opening on Monday.

For one, July 4 is a holiday at U.N. headquarters and the world body's staff will be watching a fireworks display from the U.N. lawn rather than attending any meetings, he said.

For another, the U.N. conference will look only at illegal arms and "does not in any way address legal possession," a matter left to national governments to regulate rather than the United Nations, he added. (my comment -- this is contrary to their own published guide's own statement on civilian ownership of firearms -- so they are misrepresenting their intentions)

"Gun advocates have long spoken as if there were an international conspiracy to get rid of their guns. Perhaps it is time for advocates of restraint to become more as they are described." --Aaron Karp (http://pawss.hampshire.edu/topics/smallarms/un_efforts.html)

The campaign is largely the work of the U.S. National Rifle Association, whose executive vice president, Wayne LaPierre, warns on an NRA Web site (http://www.stopungunban.org/) of a July 4 plot "to finalize a U.N. treaty that would strip all citizens of all nations of their right to self-protection."

Kariyawasam said, "The U.N. conference will not negotiate any treaty to prohibit citizens of any country from possessing firearms or to interfere with the legal trade in small arms and light weapons."

U.N. CONSPIRACY -- OR STRONGER CONTROLS?

LaPierre, who also uses the site to pitch his new book, "The Global War on Your Guns," asks NRA members to send letters to Kariyawasam and U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan warning that "the American people will never let you take away the rights that our 4th of July holiday represents."

The group also asks members to write to John Bolton, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, urging him to "ensure the defeat of this treaty." Bolton's office confirmed he had received tens of thousands of cards from concerned Americans.

"We understand their concerns and will work during the conference to communicate their concerns," Bolton spokesman Richard Grenell said.

At the same time, 1 million people around the world -- symbolizing the number of people killed by guns since the last U.N. small arms conference in 2001 -- have signed a petition backing stronger controls on arms deals in a campaign organized by Oxfam International, Amnesty International and the International Action Network on Small Arms. (my commnet: all known for their support of civilian gun ownership -- we can trust them -- really)

The June 26-July 7 U.N. conference was called to review a 2001 U.N. action plan aimed at stemming the illegal global trade in small arms, which, as defined by the United Nations, range from pistols and grenades to mortars and shoulder-fired anti-aircraft and anti-tank missiles.

The action program set out broad guidelines for national and global measures to track arms sales, promote better management of government arms stockpiles and encourage the destruction of illicit arms.

http://cnn.netscape.cnn.com/news/story.jsp?idq=/ff/story/0002/20060621/1735824548.htm

BlackRain
06-22-2006, 10:09 AM
UN's Firearms Protocol in Regard to Civilian Ownership of Firearms.

National firearms legislation

Eight statements, including Mexico, China and Brazil, advocated controls over guns in the hands of civilians. Canada recommended that “National Regulation be included in the agenda for the Review Conference, with a view to further developing guidelines for action at the international, regional and national levels”, and acknowledged the suggestions in the paper circulated by Mexico on this issue.

South Africa added that although ‘civilian possession’ is a very broad term, national legislation is key, and already referred to in the PoA. It highlighted that possession by civilians of military-style small arms and light weapons is a “puzzling issue” if the purpose of private possession of firearms is self-defence, hunting or sports shooting.

Three statements rejected bringing up this issue in the PoA process (US, India, and Japan). The Kenyan representative, also speaking on behalf of the Regional Centre on Small Arms in the Great Lakes Region and in the Horn of Africa (RECSA), noted that the “Nairobi Protocol contains strong provisions to address guns in the hands of civilians. This is important as the Small Arms Survey tells us that 607 million of the world’s guns are in civilian hands. We are keen to see this issue discussed at the Review Conference as norms and standards are developing all over the world.”

In the general debate, the issue of guns in the hands of civilians was raised various times, including by Colombia on behalf of nine States, Brazil, Jamaica, Canada, Israel, Norway, and Indonesia.

The Mexican CRP, Importance of the Subject on Civilian Possession in the Combat Against the Illicit Trade of Small Arms And Light Weapons: Concept Paper (A/CONF.192/2006/PC/CRP.7) is available in English only at:
www.un.org/events/smallarms2006/pdf/CRP.7.pdf (http://www.un.org/events/smallarms2006/pdf/CRP.7.pdf)

Plastic_Yank
06-22-2006, 10:44 AM
"Mistaken"? Somehow, I don't see the U.N. encouraging the right to bear arms.

Canada recommended that “

National Regulation be included in the agenda for the Review Conference, with a view to further developing guidelines for action at the international, regional and national levels”, and acknowledged the suggestions in the paper circulated by Mexico on this issue.
And there's the Beloved Motherland for you again. :roll:

Geezah
06-22-2006, 11:53 AM
Hey, a few of those cards belong to me, Kofi should have got one as well.

I'm glad that Ambassador Bolton has heard the cry and will go with it, this is encouraging news for me.

remo williams
06-22-2006, 08:25 PM
I was under the impression that the constitution forbids a foreign body in making any laws or that any treaties made cannot nullify any portion or intent of constitutional amandments. Why on July fourth though and why would the US in light of the constitution even appear? Maybe all the gun owners shouldn't be home on holidaysp-)



puts on tinfoil hat....