PDA

View Full Version : Luring Commandos to the Dark Side



scoone
03-24-2004, 09:39 AM
by James Dunnigan
March 22, 2004

The U.S. Army is getting young men and women to join up in record numbers, and troops already in are staying in. The same thing is happening in the air force, navy and marines. But there are serious problems with some key personnel who are being attracted to higher paying, and less dangerous, jobs in the civilian world. Special Forces troops, helicopter pilots, linguists and computer specialists are among the key people who are being recruited heavily by civilian firms. Offers of higher pay, less dangerous working conditions, and less time overseas, are proving attractive.

The army won't release numbers, but the losses of Special Forces "operators" to civilian security firms has been serious enough that a special task force has been set up to determine what it would take to compete with the civilian recruiters. Right now, the army only has about 5,000 Special Forces soldiers, plus a few hundred in training positions and another two thousand in the reserves. The four hundred Delta Force troops are also at risk. The most vulnerable Special Forces troops are those with twenty years service, and thus eligible to retire on half pay. These troops make about $60,000 a year in pay and benefits, and it's common for civilian firms to offer double or triple that amount (for a guy who's often also collecting his military pension). This is not the first time the army has had to deal with this problem. When the draft ended in the early 1970s, the army also lost the medical doctors it had, for decades, been able to draft. So large bonuses and other benefits were offered to get newly minted doctors to join the army.

The army is considering extra pay, especially for overseas service, plus additional civilian education and higher rank to keep Special Forces troops in uniform. Another inducement is promotion. Over the last two decades, about ten percent of the enlisted Special Forces troops were promoted to Warrant Officer rank. The five levels of Warrant Officer ranks parallel the first five officer ranks (2nd Lieutenant through Lieutenant Colonel) in pay and benefits, but not authority. Warrant Officers are addressed as "Mister Smith" by officers and troops (rather than as "Warrant Officer Smith") and are treated as officers, although they are basically senior NCOs. Some armies simply call their senior rank of NCOs "Warrant Officer." It would require Congressional action to allow the army to add hundreds, or thousands, of new Warrant Officer positions for senior Special Forces troops. This move would increase the pay of senior Special Forces operators by about a third. Other bonuses could increase the bump to 50 or 100 percent. SOCOM commanders will have to calculate how much they can afford to pay. But given the fact that a Special Forces operator with twenty years service has cost the army several million dollars in pay and training expenses, and two decades of effort, there is an incentive to do a lot to hang onto these guys.

Helicopter pilots are in a similar situation. Most of these men and women are warrant officers, and the army only produces about 500 new ones a year (for a force of 4,500 pilots). It costs about a million dollars to just get a newly minted pilot (most of the cost is the expense of using real, and expensive, aircraft for training.) It takes another million dollars, and two or three years, to get a really skilled pilot. Once a pilot gets married and starts raising a family, the idea of getting twice the pay for staying in one place, and not getting shot at, seem very attractive. Right now, helicopter pilots spend a lot of time overseas in places like Korea, Iraq, Afghanistan and the Balkans. The army has paid annual bonuses of over $10,000 in the past to try and halt the outflow of experienced pilots. What with all the overseas duty army pilots have been seeing of late, more, and larger, bonuses are probably on the way.

Linguists, especially if they can speak much needed languages like Arabic and Pushto, are also in great demand by civilian firms. The army is looking into cash bonuses and warrant ranks to keep these specialists as well. A new, and growing problem, if keeping computer and network specialists. This has actually been a problem for over half a century, but it has become more critical with the growing importance of the battlefield Internet and the proliferation of computers throughout the army. There's a special problem with linguists and computer specialists, as many of the valuable ones are still young (in their twenties) when they are tempted to go for higher civilian pay, and less dangerous working conditions.

The brass know that these experienced and highly skilled people are critical in the recent successes of the army. It’s going to take some exceptional leadership to get the money, and additional warrant officer slots, out of Congress, and then apply these benefits in such a way that the losses to civilian careers will be significantly reduced. At the moment, the civilian recruiters are causing much higher losses for the army than are terrorists or Iraqis and Afghans with guns

Haiw
03-24-2004, 09:46 AM
Weird title for an article that's basically about losing personel to PMCs. :roll:

shrek
03-24-2004, 09:51 AM
Yeah, I don't get the "Dark Side" reference either. I think the competiton with private is good. Maybe it will get some of these guys some extra bene's!!

AFG
03-24-2004, 09:54 AM
hey anyone remember "Bones" from the SF pics in one of the galleries?


( :roll: that comment was very random)

Royal
03-24-2004, 12:13 PM
In the UK Int world, ImInt is 'the dark side'.

There have been similar headlines over here about SF. Aircrew retention has been seen as a problem (hence the massive payouts to Joint Harrier Force pilots, and the number of Porches bought as a result). SF isn't so much of a problem - 20 years is top whack for most anyway, after that knees, backs and the like are only up to training jobs and contracting.

The real crisis is with linguists, and the fault lies with MoD. We have been screaming for an increase in language training since 9/11. They won't fund it, so it continues on an ad-hoc basis and we stumble from drama to crisis (hence my recent sojourn on the field of blackbirds).

Until we recognise that it takes 18 months plus to produce a good linguist, and that we need enough for rotations, the few we have will continue to collapse with overwork and leave for other agencies or civilian employment.

TriggerPuller
03-24-2004, 02:03 PM
I believe that the lure of money is what he is calling the "Dark Side'. I for one am glad Iam on the dark side for once if this IS what he means.

TP

Tane Angle
03-24-2004, 03:14 PM
Hey, if the USG would simply pay the military folks what they deserve, there wouldn't be as much of a need for such companies. But they don't, so the companies are the current solution. It's not perfect, but the government hasn't tried much to fix the problem themselves. Stop loss is not a solution, it just pushes people away more.

Have a good one, and just some thoughts...

Flagg
03-24-2004, 08:03 PM
The real crisis is with linguists, and the fault lies with MoD. We have been screaming for an increase in language training since 9/11. They won't fund it, so it continues on an ad-hoc basis and we stumble from drama to crisis (hence my recent sojourn on the field of blackbirds).

Until we recognise that it takes 18 months plus to produce a good linguist, and that we need enough for rotations, the few we have will continue to collapse with overwork and leave for other agencies or civilian employment.

Royal, has the UK MOD ever attempted to recruit native speaking linguists from other Commonwealth countries directly?

Or does the often sensitive nature of a linguist's work make the recruit background vetting procedure too difficult?

ibstolidude
03-24-2004, 08:09 PM
Hey, if the USG would simply pay the military folks what they deserve, there wouldn't be as much of a need for such companies. But they don't, so the companies are the current solution. It's not perfect, but the government hasn't tried much to fix the problem themselves. Stop loss is not a solution, it just pushes people away more.

Have a good one, and just some thoughts...
COMPLETELY FREE EDUCATION!!!

simply give it away. - X of years = x number of dollars with XXMOS = Bonus.
No - repayment programs, no reimbursement crap - just X number of dollars paid directly to the institution of your choice. Just send Uncle Sam the bill for the school - and he pays X number of dollars.
No 10 years to use a MGI Bill - Just pay for their damn school...It really isn't, that much to ask.

Amazing all the flag waving politicians will do - yet how few will fork over the ?3? dollars a year it would take to impliment.

Tane Angle
03-24-2004, 10:05 PM
Now I know why I hang out with you! :D I had to write a thing on national service a while back for work, and free education was at the core of the idea. Exactly, for all our "supporting the troops," we kind of treat them horribly. Risk your life, never see your family, get in debt, what's not to like? Now the military is a hard life, and we can't change that entirely, but free education could make it so much better. I think it's the least we can do.

Romulus
03-24-2004, 10:17 PM
http://www.omelete.com.br/imagens/cinema/artigos/star_wars/vader.jpg

This Dark side?

Royal
03-25-2004, 03:13 AM
Royal, has the UK MOD ever attempted to recruit native speaking linguists from other Commonwealth countries directly?

Or does the often sensitive nature of a linguist's work make the recruit background vetting procedure too difficult?

Not really. In the recent past we havn't needed Commonwealth languages. Now we do, we (read the DVA) have an almost racist fear of brown people. The exception to this being the Gurkhas - Urdu, which most Gurkhas speak a bit of, being usable in the 'stan.