PDA

View Full Version : We have rekord!



Troll
03-28-2004, 02:51 AM
X-43A reach the speed 7700 km/h (7 mach)!
It's sure information from NASA website.

George W. Bush
03-28-2004, 03:10 AM
Read 'em and weep, boys. :|

Troll
03-28-2004, 03:39 AM
???? :(

George W. Bush
03-28-2004, 03:44 AM
Wrong forum

Troll
03-28-2004, 03:50 AM
OK! OK! I'm going home... Bye! :backhand:

Shadow
03-28-2004, 05:24 AM
7700km/h are 6,48 Mach
Mach 7 is 8316 km/h

Troll
03-28-2004, 05:34 AM
Ok. Ok. As i said i'm going home. Sorry.

LJK
03-28-2004, 05:40 AM
:petting:

Chris O`Crooh
03-28-2004, 06:18 AM
7700km/h are 6,48 Mach
Mach 7 is 8316 km/h

Depends on altitude. While 1 Ma = 1224 km/h (333 m/s) at sea level, it decreases to 1008 km/h at 10 000 meters.

Chris O`Crooh
03-28-2004, 06:39 AM
7700km/h are 6,48 Mach
Mach 7 is 8316 km/h

Depends on altitude. While 1 Ma = 1224 km/h (333 m/s) at sea level, it decreases to 1008 km/h at 10 000 meters.

kinghk
03-28-2004, 06:45 AM
Where is the PICS?

Shadow
03-28-2004, 07:05 AM
No, it has nothing to do with altitude only with tempature and medium (Glas ,Water etc.). But not with air humidity and air pressure.

Air 330 m/s @ 0C°
Glas 5300 m/s @ 20C°

Air 349.23 m/s @ 30C°

Herrmannek
03-28-2004, 07:08 AM
No, it has nothing to do with altitude only with tempature and medium (Glas ,Water etc.). But not with air humidity and air pressure.

Air 330 m/s @ 20C°
Glas 5300 m/s @ 20C°

Air 349.23 m/s @ 30C°

And on high attiduides is 20C° :)

Shadow
03-28-2004, 07:13 AM
This was a typing fault.

Ichhabe
03-28-2004, 08:30 AM
Why do you quarrel over this? It is **** fast super quick however you look upon it. :D

Ghostwolf
03-28-2004, 10:35 PM
What are you trying to say, NASA scramjet is the fastest?
The Aussie scramjet reached Mach 7.6 in 2002 test, beat NASA by
0.6 Mach. Nice try NASA, but no world record for you.

http://www.mech.uq.edu.au/hyper/hyshot/

WolverineBlue
03-28-2004, 11:06 PM
That looks like a missile to me.

He219
03-28-2004, 11:40 PM
What are you trying to say, NASA scramjet is the fastest?
The Aussie scramjet reached Mach 7.6 in 2002 test, beat NASA by
0.6 Mach. Nice try NASA, but no world record for you.

http://www.mech.uq.edu.au/hyper/hyshot/

http://www.space.com/images/h_hyshot_020730c_02.jpg

Allan Paull of the University of Queensland in Australia is seen on launch day next to the tip of the HyShot vehicle.

The difference is that Australia's project (which is funded by many nations including USA) was just the engine. It was mounted on a rocket which boosted it up and then came down in a parabolic trajectory. However the test was successfull (it reached Mach 7.6 on it's way down).

The X-43 is an actual aircraft that had controlled horizontal flight. So it is the combination of the engine and airframe that makes this test unique and one step further along than Australia's.

http://cache.*****images.com/comp/3147182.jpg?x=x&dasite=MS_GINS&ef=2&ev=1&dareq=4D1AE4CF9327DDB824727AEC6FA9D526

EDWARDS AFB, UNITED STATES: Visitors examine the third supersonic X-43A research vehicle (without it's booster rocket) at it's hangar at NASA's Dryden Flight Research Center at Edwards Air Force Base in California's Mojave Desert, 27 March 2004, after the successful launch and test flight of the second X-43A research vehicle. This X-43A is scheduled to be tested this summer, with the aim at reaching Mach 10 (ten times the spend of sound). AFP PHOTO / Robyn BECK (Photo credit should read ROBYN BECK/AFP/***** Images)

budanski
03-28-2004, 11:40 PM
What are you trying to say, NASA scramjet is the fastest?
The Aussie scramjet reached Mach 7.6 in 2002 test, beat NASA by
0.6 Mach. Nice try NASA, but no world record for you.

http://www.mech.uq.edu.au/hyper/hyshot/


The work (HyShot) was limited, however, because the scramjet didn't provide thrust to propel an aircraft.
http://www.betterhumans.com/News/news.aspx?articleID=2004-03-25-4

Nonetheless, Go Aussies!

Rakki
03-28-2004, 11:51 PM
...the HyShot program however used a rocket to fire the scramjet up into near-space - in order to REACH hypersonic speeds on the way down. The scramjet aboard produced NO net thrust, and was intended only as a "proof of concept" and to gather data on air densities and such...

George W. Bush
03-29-2004, 12:00 AM
What are you trying to say, NASA scramjet is the fastest?

Technically, yes. rofl

Fintin
03-29-2004, 12:33 AM
face it our rocket has bigger balls

CannibalSquirel
03-29-2004, 12:41 AM
face it our rocket has bigger balls

Doesn´t that makes it heavier? rofl rofl rofl rofl

stuntman
03-29-2004, 01:05 AM
Read 'em and weep, boys. :|

Don't you mean Weep em man it's America! ? p-)