View Full Version : Strike Iranian nuclear facilities.Or Face a stronger foe years from know
PersianPrince
08-31-2006, 06:06 PM
Actual quotes from clerical mullah leaders in Iran!.This is no joke people!
Here is an article.Iran 5 years away from getting a nuclear weapon http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20060831/pl_nm/nuclear_iran_pentagon_dc_1
""When the end finally comes for Israel, it will all be over in microseconds. Our missiles will approach Tel Aviv and Haifa at twice the speed of sound, detonating in blinding white
150 Kiloton flashes designed to instantly transform those animals into heat and light.”
"Israel must be wiped off the map"
It would be wise for any nation to take this tyranical regime down.Other wise years from know it will not be possible or if it is will result in alot of casualties in any noble nation who decides to take out the nuclear facilities.
http://www.youtube.com/v/Il6hace_New
take out the radical nuclear facilities know..or face a much toughened foe
http://www.youtube.com/v/ML7K8PQyTP0
this could spark more resistance to the Islamic State and possible topple them as the Freedom movements [backed by EU and US] spring into action.Democracy in Iran and the world will be secure from radicals with nuclear weapons.
CruddyLeper
08-31-2006, 06:12 PM
""When the end finally comes for Israel, it will all be over in microseconds. Our missiles will approach Tel Aviv and Haifa at twice the speed of sound, detonating in blinding white
150 Kiloton flashes designed to instantly transform those animals into heat and light.”
"Israel must be wiped off the map"
Except that Iran is fully aware of Israel's nuclear deterrance, and would be wiped off the face of the map within a couple of hours (cruise missiles aren't supersonic).
Thing is, if Israel confesses to owning nuclear weapons, they lose their US military aid (forbidden to give military aid to nuclear armed power).
I really can't see people who've just been contaminated by radioactive fallout flocking to anyone's cause. Let alone the people that caused the nuclear release.
zulu261
08-31-2006, 06:36 PM
The best way would be bombing away Irans nuclear capabilities but you cant simply do that without provoking a war.
Aw crap I dont want to die because of a Islam/Jewish conflict...
mailmannz
08-31-2006, 07:08 PM
Thing is, if Israel confesses to owning nuclear weapons, they lose their US military aid (forbidden to give military aid to nuclear armed power).
I think you have to be a special kind of dumb to think Israel doesnt have nukes :)
Also, the problem with the moolahs (I wont say ahmaj or what ever his name is as he is nothing more than the mouth piece of the men who put him in power) is they have no fear of mutual destruction. They want it, and they might just get it too?
Mailman
Laworkerbee
08-31-2006, 07:08 PM
Aw crap I dont want to die because of a Islam/Jewish conflict...
You won't but perhaps your child will be born with a third arm from all the fallout :roll:
pascalywood
08-31-2006, 07:39 PM
didnt nostradamus predicted that mankind would be whiped out by nuclear weapons or something like that? i dont see how a man who lived hundred years ago could predict things that dont even exist but i heard that some things he predicted happened
C.MAXIMUS
08-31-2006, 08:27 PM
I would go for a strike now ... but not before you exhausted political means ... Iran is a tough nut to crack p-)
CruddyLeper
08-31-2006, 08:37 PM
I think you have to be a special kind of dumb to think Israel doesnt have nukes :)
Then why does the aid still flow? There's a distinction between knowing and Israel saying, "By the way folks, Vanunu was spot on and we did lock him up for all the reasons known".
This "shadow deterrence" isn't helping the situation. It's keeping a lot of US and other arms manufacturers in the profit margin. I doubt if it's securing the State of Israel.
Also, the problem with the moolahs (I wont say ahmaj or what ever his name is as he is nothing more than the mouth piece of the men who put him in power) is they have no fear of mutual destruction. They want it, and they might just get it too?
Mailman
Once you have power, you'll do whatever it takes to keep it.
Martyrdom has never been high on the Iranian governments agenda.
What's your source?
wubanga101
09-01-2006, 01:52 AM
Then why does the aid still flow? There's a distinction between knowing and Israel saying, "By the way folks, Vanunu was spot on and we did lock him up for all the reasons known".
This "shadow deterrence" isn't helping the situation. It's keeping a lot of US and other arms manufacturers in the profit margin. I doubt if it's securing the State of Israel.
Once you have power, you'll do whatever it takes to keep it.
Martyrdom has never been high on the Iranian governments agenda.
What's your source? I agree even if hes a great muslim hes still a beurocrat.p-)
You can strike them now and pay for it with your pockets. If we do hit iran your talking about 4+ dollars per gallon on gas. sure u can F them and destroy what they have now but do u really ever think of the economic fallout? Also since our intelligence is so good and since saddam did have WMD's :roll:,what makes us so sure that iran doesnt have the bomb right now? Sure wouldnt want to risk it , they are radical and they might get desperate. People like that wouldnt care much about killing their own as long as they lick a couple hundred even thusand GI's. Not to mention contaminate the whole persian gulf and render the area uninhabitable or as polluted as chernobyl. Besides if they did have the bomb its to late. They have scuds that can reach israel and the U.S. forces in iraq. So any attempt to strike them would trigger a possible strike by whatever weapons they have in response to an american or israeli attack.
AmericanImperialist
09-01-2006, 03:58 AM
You can strike them now and pay for it with your pockets. If we do hit iran your talking about 4+ dollars per gallon on gas. sure u can F them and destroy what they have now but do u really ever think of the economic fallout? Also since our intelligence is so good and since saddam did have WMD's :roll:,what makes us so sure that iran doesnt have the bomb right now? Sure wouldnt want to risk it , they are radical and they might get desperate. People like that wouldnt care much about killing their own as long as they lick a couple hundred even thusand GI's. Not to mention contaminate the whole persian gulf and render the area uninhabitable or as polluted as chernobyl. Besides if they did have the bomb its to late. They have scuds that can reach israel and the U.S. forces in iraq. So any attempt to strike them would trigger a possible strike by whatever weapons they have in response to an american or israeli attack.
What? We shouldn't risk keeping Iran from the bomb because they might have it already?
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.