308,000 new jobs under Bush

[M1A2U2]

there have been 308,000 new jobs reported from last month under bush. We have aslo had the biggest quarter economy growth in 20 years and the unemployemnt average is lower than it was in the 70s, 80s, and 90s. I guess cutting taxes doesnt work huh? Lets vote for kerry and screw it all up. Any political party that hopes the economy fails and the war on terror fails isnt gonna be my party.

[Ratamacue]

Any political party that hopes the economy fails and the war on terror fails isnt gonna be my party.

Wow, you're so enlightened. Will you be my hero?

[Fox2]

I'll decide that. :P

[wholagun]

what kind of jobs were created? Mcjobs? Economist keep saying that jobs can be created but what kind of jobs are those minimum wage, no futgure kind of jobs. If you can that success then all power to you.

[Romulus]

there have been 308,000 new jobs reported from last month under bush.

Most of these jobs included the recent supermarket workers that were on strike in California. None the less, It is an improvement. woot

[George W. Bush]

Wow, I can see that the majority of members here are red diaper baby pinko commie liberal left democrats. I spit on your face.

[Haiw]

Wow, I can see that the majority of members here are red diaper baby pinko commie liberal left democrats. I spit on your face.
:cantbeli:

Anyway...ever heard of 'long-term-effects'? Economies aren't just the present, it's also about the future.

[Gringo]

Anybody who gets rid of George Bush (the real one, and the forum troll) will make the world a better place.

[Seoulstriker]

Most of these jobs included the recent supermarket workers that were on strike in California. None the less, It is an improvement. woot


SOME of these jobs are from the supermarket strike (perhaps 30,000-50,000).




Wow, you're so enlightened. Will you be my hero?

ratamacue, you are one of the worse liberals i know. :) i think the point is that this announcement of MORE jobs is bad news for democrats and good news for republicans. it's a little more broad than that, though: bad news for america is good news for democrats.
:|

[Seoulstriker]

Anybody who gets rid of George Bush (the real one, and the forum troll) will make the world a better place.

oh, really? how so? oh wait, i think i know: george bush is strong against terrorism, and terrorists want to destroy america. you want america to be destroyed, so you agree with the terrorists and don't like what bush is doing to prevent the terrorists from winning.

:|

[cut]

**** bush, unless you're Seoul or midtown

[Haiw]

Anybody who gets rid of George Bush (the real one, and the forum troll) will make the world a better place.

oh, really? how so? oh wait, i think i know: george bush is strong against terrorism, and terrorists want to destroy america. you want america to be destroyed, so you agree with the terrorists and don't like what bush is doing to prevent the terrorists from winning.

:|
1st...Bush isn't strong against terrorists
2nd..the only thing Bush is strong at is making your country more and more hated on a global scale... which is not exactely a way to prevent terrorism.

[Seoulstriker]

1st...Bush isn't strong against terrorists
2nd..the only thing Bush is strong at is making your country more and more hated on a global scale... which is not exactely a way to prevent terrorism.


bush isn't strong against terrorists? http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/confused.gif


the world hates us? how about the Islamic terrorists? what about them? (oh, and you can't forget france, germany, and russia)

[Haiw]

1st...Bush isn't strong against terrorists
2nd..the only thing Bush is strong at is making your country more and more hated on a global scale... which is not exactely a way to prevent terrorism.


bush isn't strong against terrorists? http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/confused.gif


the world hates us? how about the Islamic terrorists? what about them? (oh, and you can't forget france, germany, and russia)
What's Bush doing against terrorists? He's cutting off heads of the dragon that only grow back somewhere else. Second, the whole Iraq bussiness had nothing to do with the war on terror in the first place.

Second... the PEOPLE of the world are on a good way to hate you more and more. Most of the governments are still 'acting nice' but that's just diplomacy. Fact is that by starting the war in Iraq for....dubious reason he basically confirmed lots of people's thoughts that 'the US does whatever they want in their interest'. In case you haven't noticed, the US has lost a lot of credibility in the eyes of a lot of people lately...

[cut]

1st...Bush isn't strong against terrorists
2nd..the only thing Bush is strong at is making your country more and more hated on a global scale... which is not exactely a way to prevent terrorism.


bush isn't strong against terrorists? http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/confused.gif


the world hates us? how about the Islamic terrorists? what about them? (oh, and you can't forget france, germany, and russia)

this goes back to the arguement about the war in iraq, the view of most people around the world (increasingly including americans) is that it aggrevated the problem of terrorism regardless of the Saddam Hussein issue. But then I'm sure the people that do think the war in Iraq was against terrorism are much better educated and infinately more intelligent then the rest of us.

[Jack Mehoff]

Anybody who gets rid of George Bush (the real one, and the forum troll) will make the world a better place.

oh, really? how so? oh wait, i think i know: george bush is strong against terrorism, and terrorists want to destroy america. you want america to be destroyed, so you agree with the terrorists and don't like what bush is doing to prevent the terrorists from winning.

:|
1st...Bush isn't strong against terrorists
2nd..the only thing Bush is strong at is making your country more and more hated on a global scale... which is not exactely a way to prevent terrorism.
Like how Clinton Administration dealt with terrorism, then BOOM 9/11


bahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh :roll:

[Haiw]

Saying Bush wasn't strong against terrorists doesn't mean I think Clinton was strong against them... besides, it wasn't like Bush was really concerned about terrorism before 9/11 either.

[Jack Mehoff]

308,000 new jobs in march, greatest monthly job growth since Clinton's economic slowdown began in April of 2000.

Bad news for Democrats :D

[Jack Mehoff]

Saying Bush wasn't strong against terrorists doesn't mean I think Clinton was strong against them... besides, it wasn't like Bush was really concerned about terrorism before 9/11 either.

Check your history, Bush became President one year before 9/11. One year in the office isn't going to clean up all the messes Clinton Adminsitration created for the last 8 years. :roll:

p.s. I got a pay raise $100 weekly increase ($5200/year)

Thanks Mr President

[cut]

read what he wrote jack

[Jack Mehoff]

Sure


1st...Bush isn't strong against terrorists

[Jack Mehoff]

The unemployment rate —- measured through a different survey of households - inched up to 5.7 percent from 5.6 percent in February, as the household survey recorded a slight decline of 3,000 jobs against a 179,000 increase in the civilian labor force. The employment to population ratio declined slightly from 62.2 percent to 62.1 percent.



The Labor Department also revised upwards its estimate of jobs added in January and February to 205,000, almost double its previous estimate of 118,000.

The revisions pushed the average job growth in the first quarter to 171,000 per month, the most vigorous rate of expansion since the second quarter of 2000, shortly after the bursting of the Internet-fuelled stock market bubble.


http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/02/business/02CND-JOBS.html?ex=1081573200&en=dae189dd35676f2d&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE

As I said before, the February numbers also went up (Jan. too it seems) and it is the greatest job monthly growth since Clinton's economic slowdown in April of 2000.



Bad, bad news for Democrats. Good news for the country.

[Seoulstriker]

1st...Bush isn't strong against terrorists
2nd..the only thing Bush is strong at is making your country more and more hated on a global scale... which is not exactely a way to prevent terrorism.


bush isn't strong against terrorists? http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/confused.gif


the world hates us? how about the Islamic terrorists? what about them? (oh, and you can't forget france, germany, and russia)

this goes back to the arguement about the war in iraq, the view of most people around the world (increasingly including americans) is that it aggrevated the problem of terrorism regardless of the Saddam Hussein issue. But then I'm sure the people that do think the war in Iraq was against terrorism are much better educated and infinately more intelligent then the rest of us.


YOU think that it aggravated the problem of terrorism. oh wait, he financed Hamas, he financed Ansar Al-Islam, he trained terrorists in the art of hijacking airplanes. hmmmmm. getting rid of him was a bad idea?

[Fox2]

Don't you understand, Seoulstriker?

When we declare a war on terror, we can't go after the people who terrorize! We have to follow a strict guideline set by the UN that includes making sure the country isn't buying equipment from France or lining Kofi Annan's pockets. :P

[Seoulstriker]

Don't you understand, Seoulstriker?

When we declare a war on terror, we can't go after the people who terrorize! We have to follow a strict guideline set by the UN that includes making sure the country isn't buying equipment from France or lining Kofi Annan's pockets. :P


hehehehe.

i would understand when someone says Bush is too strong against terrorism (like a cowboy), but too weak?

[cut]

1st...Bush isn't strong against terrorists
2nd..the only thing Bush is strong at is making your country more and more hated on a global scale... which is not exactely a way to prevent terrorism.


bush isn't strong against terrorists? http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/confused.gif


the world hates us? how about the Islamic terrorists? what about them? (oh, and you can't forget france, germany, and russia)

this goes back to the arguement about the war in iraq, the view of most people around the world (increasingly including americans) is that it aggrevated the problem of terrorism regardless of the Saddam Hussein issue. But then I'm sure the people that do think the war in Iraq was against terrorism are much better educated and infinately more intelligent then the rest of us.


YOU think that it aggravated the problem of terrorism. oh wait, he financed Hamas, he financed Ansar Al-Islam, he trained terrorists in the art of hijacking airplanes. hmmmmm. getting rid of him was a bad idea?

Every single person in my seminar agreed with that point when I made it, with people from all over the world in it, I can safely say, I'm not in the minority.

Did saddam finance Al-quaida? NO! Was this war fought for Israel? no! Did I say that getting rid of him was a bad idea? Did I say I was against the war? So WTF are you on about?

[Haiw]

Don't you understand, Seoulstriker?

When we declare a war on terror, we can't go after the people who terrorize! We have to follow a strict guideline set by the UN that includes making sure the country isn't buying equipment from France or lining Kofi Annan's pockets. :P


hehehehe.

i would understand when someone says Bush is too strong against terrorism (like a cowboy), but too weak?
Sure he's playing though cowboy, but whatever he's doing, it doesn't do jack **** to reduce terrorism!

[Fox2]

Sure he's playing though cowboy, but whatever he's doing, it doesn't do jack **** to reduce terrorism!

Has there been a successful terrorist attack on US soil since 2001? I assure you there have been many attempts.

[cut]

Sure he's playing though cowboy, but whatever he's doing, it doesn't do jack **** to reduce terrorism!

Has there been a successful terrorist attack on US soil since 2001? I assure you there have been many attempts.

anthrax

but it takes a while to do one 9/11 was about 10 years in the making.

[Chasseur_Alpin]

9/11 isn't the fault of Bush, CIA is guilty.
like the mass destruction weapons... :roll: :lol:

[Trigger]

rofl
You guys!
All these Europeans (oh and a 16 year old kid) crying about Bush rofl
Why don't you vote him out?
rofl
Because you can't.
How about you guys worry about your own little countries and leave mine alone.

[Fox2]

Has there been a successful terrorist attack on US soil since 2001? I assure you there have been many attempts.

anthrax

but it takes a while to do one 9/11 was about 10 years in the making.

That is debatable, whether or not it was terrorism. Even if it was an attack, obviously it was not an attack of huge magnitude, as it was quickly quelled.

My point is, Bush has improved the readiness of our nation to combat terrorism. The restructuring of intelligence assets like the CIA and FBI, all the way to the local law enforcement agencies cracking down on terrorism and preventing another attack on our country.

Ask yourselves one question, where would we be if 9/11 happened during Clinton's term? Personally, I'm glad we will never find out for sure.

[cut]

Because you can't.
How about you guys worry about your own little countries and leave mine alone.

because the US president effects all our lives, if we suffer from new terrorism because of an american president we can't vote him out. Enough americans on this board had something to say about the socialists getting elected in Spain, it goes both ways.

[Jack Mehoff]

Because you can't.
How about you guys worry about your own little countries and leave mine alone.

because the US president effects all our lives, if we suffer from new terrorism because of an american president we can't vote him out. Enough americans on this board had something to say about the socialists getting elected in Spain, it goes both ways.

I didn't know Great Britain is U.S. 51st state :roll: What is your next lame ass excuse?

[Trigger]

Because you can't.
How about you guys worry about your own little countries and leave mine alone.

because the US president effects all our lives, if we suffer from new terrorism because of an american president we can't vote him out. Enough americans on this board had something to say about the socialists getting elected in Spain, it goes both ways.
What? If you suffer from new terrorism it's not GWB's fault. Stop trying to blame your problems on us.
Americans very well may have had some opinions on Spain at the time of their elections, but you guys have had nothing but bashing for our President from the very beginning, and it continues to this very day.

[cut]

Has there been a successful terrorist attack on US soil since 2001? I assure you there have been many attempts.

anthrax

but it takes a while to do one 9/11 was about 10 years in the making.

That is debatable, whether or not it was terrorism. Even if it was an attack, obviously it was not an attack of huge magnitude, as it was quickly quelled.


terrorism is something that incites terror in the population, people in the US and other countries were worried people were terrified to open their mail, and postal workers would panic when they saw sand leaking from a parcel.


My point is, Bush has improved the readiness of our nation to combat terrorism. The restructuring of intelligence assets like the CIA and FBI, all the way to the local law enforcement agencies cracking down on terrorism and preventing another attack on our country.

Yes, but those are the obvious things that even an incompetent administration could do. The question that american media and the rest of the world's media are asking is that the war on terrorism was necessary/obvious would of happened with the most centrist president, but did the war in Iraq aggrevate the situation?

Sure Saddam was a pain in the arse and we were going to get rid of him sooner or later but it was not necessary to have the war, there was no immidiate threat being posed, the war in Iraq was the right thing at the wrong time because no Osama and his friends can say "see we told you this was a war against Islam not a war against us, come join our jihad!"

Now maybe the Bush administration is trying to be clever, because if they had waited until after the war on terror had finished to deal with Iraq, anti-american terrorism might have flared up again. So killing two birds with one stone. But I think that wasn't the case, they would have pointed that out when the accusations of an Iraq fixation surfaced recently.


Ask yourselves one question, where would we be if 9/11 happened during Clinton's term? Personally, I'm glad we will never find out for sure.[/quote]

[cut]

Because you can't.
How about you guys worry about your own little countries and leave mine alone.

because the US president effects all our lives, if we suffer from new terrorism because of an american president we can't vote him out. Enough americans on this board had something to say about the socialists getting elected in Spain, it goes both ways.
What? If you suffer from new terrorism it's not GWB's fault. Stop trying to blame your problems on us.
Americans very well may have had some opinions on Spain at the time of their elections, but you guys have had nothing but bashing for our President from the very beginning, and it continues to this very day.

I'm not balming you, I'd be blaming GWB, but I'm talking of the smaller countries that had no real choice.

[Gringo]

We bash your President because he's an idiot, any Brit's watch 2DTV?

[cut]

Because you can't.
How about you guys worry about your own little countries and leave mine alone.

because the US president effects all our lives, if we suffer from new terrorism because of an american president we can't vote him out. Enough americans on this board had something to say about the socialists getting elected in Spain, it goes both ways.

I didn't know Great Britain is U.S. 51st state :roll: What is your next lame ass excuse?
:roll: :roll:

If you don't understand don't comment p-) or at least ask me to explain

[Trigger]

We bash your President because he's an idiot, any Brit's watch 2DTV?
Really?
Do you personally know the man?
Ever met him?
Ever seen an IQ test of his?
Any source on your data except the empty head stuffed up your ass?

If this is all you have to say. Don't.
It's stale, it's untrue, and people are sick of hearing it.

[Gringo]

From what I see, yes, yes he is

[cut]

We bash your President because he's an idiot, any Brit's watch 2DTV?

2dtv is genius, but you shouldn't mention it here, the americans whinged about it when they made a music video.

[Gringo]

U mean the George Michael one?

[Trigger]

"Those who can, do. Those who can't, criticize." :roll:

[Gringo]

Maybe I should ask u the same questions?

Do you personally know the man?
Ever met him?
Ever seen an IQ test of his?
Any source on your data except the empty head stuffed up your ass?


And, there is no need to insult me personally.

[Jack Mehoff]

Because you can't.
How about you guys worry about your own little countries and leave mine alone.

because the US president effects all our lives, if we suffer from new terrorism because of an american president we can't vote him out. Enough americans on this board had something to say about the socialists getting elected in Spain, it goes both ways.

I didn't know Great Britain is U.S. 51st state :roll: What is your next lame ass excuse?
:roll: :roll:

If you don't understand don't comment p-) or at least ask me to explain

You have your head so far up your ass, hey? You had no real choice? WTF? Please tell me when did Great Britain became US's 51st state? Yes, please explain.


I'm not balming you, I'd be blaming GWB, but I'm talking of the smaller countries that had no real choice.

[cut]

We bash your President because he's an idiot, any Brit's watch 2DTV?
Really?
Do you personally know the man?
Ever met him?
Ever seen an IQ test of his?
Any source on your data except the empty head stuffed up your ass?

If this is all you have to say. Don't.
It's stale, it's untrue, and people are sick of hearing it.

I have actually seen a program that was following GWB around the country when he was running for president, he did come across as a nice guy and an decent guy, but in europe we expect our leaders to be very skilled politicians, as much as people may bash Blair in the UK, you have to respect him, he became PM after a comparetively very short amount of time in parliament, 14 years, if you've ever seen Blair in Parliament you will understand why we take a dim view of dubya and his "law qualifications". Even Chirac has been in the french parliament for 40 odd years, even creating his own party and leading them to success. We expect leaders to earn their position, not buy it.

[Trigger]

Maybe I should ask u the same questions?

Do you personally know the man?
Ever met him?
Ever seen an IQ test of his?
Any source on your data except the empty head stuffed up your ass?


And, there is no need to insult me personally.
No
No
No
I presented no data other than the fact that I wouldn't make such a rude statement about someone whom I don't even know much less interact with on a regular basis.

Forgive the insult, but I'm sick and tired of the constant Bush bashing by you and others.
We get it. You don't like him. You may or may not be happy after the next election. But for f**k's sake ENOUGH!

[Gringo]

"He knows nothing and thinks that he knows everything. That points to a political career."

George Bernard Shaw

[Gringo]

Maybe I should ask u the same questions?

Do you personally know the man?
Ever met him?
Ever seen an IQ test of his?
Any source on your data except the empty head stuffed up your ass?


And, there is no need to insult me personally.
No
No
No
I presented no data other than the fact that I wouldn't make such a rude statement about someone whom I don't even know much less interact with on a regular basis.

Forgive the insult, but I'm sick and tired of the constant Bush bashing by you and others.
We get it. You don't like him. You may or may not be happy after the next election. But for f**k's sake ENOUGH!

Ok, I'll stop. But if it makes u feel any better, feel free to bash Blair and all his little minions. I hate him just as much

[cut]

Because you can't.
How about you guys worry about your own little countries and leave mine alone.

because the US president effects all our lives, if we suffer from new terrorism because of an american president we can't vote him out. Enough americans on this board had something to say about the socialists getting elected in Spain, it goes both ways.

I didn't know Great Britain is U.S. 51st state :roll: What is your next lame ass excuse?
:roll: :roll:

If you don't understand don't comment p-) or at least ask me to explain

You have your head so far up your ass, hey? You had no real choice? WTF? Please tell me when did Great Britain became US's 51st state? Yes, please explain.


I'm not balming you, I'd be blaming GWB, but I'm talking of the smaller countries that had no real choice.


Well if you are offended, it's only because I was mimicking your response.

I'm not talking as a Brit when I say the choice of US president effects us, I'm talking as a non-american. There's no denying the president of the US is the most powerful man in the world, his decision have an effect on everyone not just americans, if he tinkers with the economy and f*cks up we all suffer, just like the problems in Japan had a global effect. If the president has a particular dislike for France, the whole bloody country follows suit, and boycotts french products. We don't care if he's liberal or conservative, we just would prefer someone who knows what he's doing. The only reason John Kerry is favoured is because he has more experience, stupidly enough in the US that works against him because you can go back over his politcal carreer and pick and mix the bits where he's changed, but everyone does that, even dubya, just his weren't recorded.

[Jack Mehoff]

Excuses are like assholes, everybody got one and they all stink.


p.s. can you take a picture of your facial expression when GWB re-elect this year for another term?

[Gringo]

"I remain just one thing and one thing only - and that is a clown. It places me on a far higher plane than any politician."

Charlie Chaplin

[Gringo]

And what would your excuse be, Jack?

[Jack Mehoff]

And what would your excuse be, Jack?


Excuse of what? Be specific

OK, what's my excuse for posting up here in a beautiful Saturday morning?

[Gringo]

You must have one, Jack. You even said so yourself.


Excuses are like assholes, everybody got one and they all stink.

[cut]

Excuses are like assholes, everybody got one and they all stink.


p.s. can you take a picture of your facial expression when GWB re-elect this year for another term?

ok if you take one without hiding your eyes when Kerry gets voted, fairly.

[Jack Mehoff]

OK, what's my excuse for posting up here in a beautiful Saturday morning?

My lady is out shopping with her g/f. That's my excuse for being here.

[Jack Mehoff]

Excuses are like assholes, everybody got one and they all stink.


p.s. can you take a picture of your facial expression when GWB re-elect this year for another term?

ok if you take one without hiding your eyes when Kerry gets voted, fairly.

Too bad your opinion doesn't mean squat in this year's election. :oops:

[Gringo]

Fair enough.

[Gringo]

Excuses are like assholes, everybody got one and they all stink.


p.s. can you take a picture of your facial expression when GWB re-elect this year for another term?

ok if you take one without hiding your eyes when Kerry gets voted, fairly.

Too bad your opinion doesn't mean squat in this year's election. :oops:

or any election in America. Unless I become an American citizen.

[cut]

Excuses are like assholes, everybody got one and they all stink.


p.s. can you take a picture of your facial expression when GWB re-elect this year for another term?

ok if you take one without hiding your eyes when Kerry gets voted, fairly.

Too bad your opinion doesn't mean squat in this year's election. :oops:

That's cool it's not life or death, after all I don't get to pick our head of state either :P

[Gringo]

Excuses are like assholes, everybody got one and they all stink.


p.s. can you take a picture of your facial expression when GWB re-elect this year for another term?

ok if you take one without hiding your eyes when Kerry gets voted, fairly.

Too bad your opinion doesn't mean squat in this year's election. :oops:

That's cool it's not life or death, after all I don't get to pick our head of state either :P

That's because they're all crap. Like the qoutes say.

[cut]

no because queen is the head of state.

[Gringo]

Oh, yes. Sorry, I thought we were talking about Prime Ministers. OH well my bad.

[HELEX]

I think most of the new "jobs" are in the Military or Law Enforcement sector... :roll:

[Beowulf]

I think most of the new "jobs" are in the Military or Law Enforcement sector... :roll:

Few here care what you think. Averaging 15 posts a day and you're here for the photos...B.S.

If you don't know for sure then keep your man strokers off the keyboard.

Argue with me today.

[Haiw]

Can I argue with you Beowulf? Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaase? ;)

[Beowulf]

Can I argue with you Beowulf? Pleeeeeeeeeeeeeaaaaase? ;)

you can if you bring some cheese and beer

edit: throw in some wooden shoes too, those look kinda cool.

[Haiw]

What?! Bring my own beer? Geez, talk about 'American hospitality'... :roll:
;)

[Ratamacue]

What?! Bring my own beer? Geez, talk about 'American hospitality'... :roll:
;)

What, you actually want Budweiser!?

[M1A2U2]

I see this post has been bombed. I was just posting a fact and i see you liberals still find ways to dispute that

[Ratamacue]

I see this post has been bombed. I was just posting a fact and i see you liberals still find ways to dispute that

So you made this thread just to post a fact, nothing else? I wonder why I doubt that...

[rob]

From what I see, yes, yes he is

but it is hard to see with your head in your ass.







sorry couldn't help myself

[Haiw]

What?! Bring my own beer? Geez, talk about 'American hospitality'... :roll:
;)

What, you actually want Budweiser!?
Well no...but don't they have foreign beer in the US that Beowulf could have bought for me? :P

[Ratamacue]

What?! Bring my own beer? Geez, talk about 'American hospitality'... :roll:
;)

What, you actually want Budweiser!?
Well no...but don't they have foreign beer in the US that Beowulf could have bought for me? :P

Americans don't drink anything foreign. Foreign people are all pinko commie liberals, so we refuse to support them. :P

Anyway...

[Haiw]

And that's why Heineken is so popular in the US? ;)

[Ratamacue]

And that's why Heineken is so popular in the US? ;)

Stop speaking lies, commie.

Seriously though, we have some good beer in the US, it's just that most of it is from local microbreweries or are ales. Sam Adams, Fat Tire, Laughing Lab, those are all pretty good.

[Haiw]

Your imperial country's propaganda has blinded you from the truth! Now join the good cause or die, capitalist pig!

[cut]

rofl told!

[Ratamacue]

Your imperial country's propaganda has blinded you from the truth! Now join the good cause or die, capitalist pig!

We saved your ass during World War I and II.

[cut]

and the french secured your independance, because you could deal with the prussian mercenaries yourself. rofl

[Beowulf]

What?! Bring my own beer? Geez, talk about 'American hospitality'... :roll:
;)

What, you actually want Budweiser!?
Well no...but don't they have foreign beer in the US that Beowulf could have bought for me? :P

I wonder if we import Carlsberg? Prolly not.

We have Shiner Bock..born and brewed in Texas, thats pretty good. Fat Tire is good, I like Sam Adams' line as well.

Course there's always Keystone (let's get stoned), Milwaukee Best (Milw. Beast), and Natural Lite (Nasty Lite) if you wanna party like a college student. woot

[cut]

you must import carlsberg, I'm sure even Pilsner Urqwell is imported to america in some quantity.

[Haiw]

Your imperial country's propaganda has blinded you from the truth! Now join the good cause or die, capitalist pig!

We saved your ass during World War I and II.
Thanks for saving our.....neutral....ass in WWI. :P

[Haiw]

What?! Bring my own beer? Geez, talk about 'American hospitality'... :roll:
;)

What, you actually want Budweiser!?
Well no...but don't they have foreign beer in the US that Beowulf could have bought for me? :P

I wonder if we import Carlsberg? Prolly not.

We have Shiner Bock..born and brewed in Texas, thats pretty good. Fat Tire is good, I like Sam Adams' line as well.

Course there's always Keystone (let's get stoned), Milwaukee Best (Milw. Beast), and Natural Lite (Nasty Lite) if you wanna party like a college student. woot
Don't you have like...any German, Dutch or Belgian beer?

[Beowulf]

you must import carlsberg, I'm sure even Pilsner Urqwell is imported to america in some quantity.

I just had some Pilsner urquell night before last. It's popular enough to be on tap.

@Haiw, you can find just about anything here if you look hard enough.

[Truthsayer]

Since the original post was put in the humor-section and didn't contain a link I took it for what it is. A nice joke.

[Seoulstriker]

Since the original post was put in the humor-section and didn't contain a link I took it for what it is. A nice joke.


it's actually an 'off-topic' topic because it's not related to international politics.

[NcDeuce]

1st...Bush isn't strong against terrorists
2nd..the only thing Bush is strong at is making your country more and more hated on a global scale... which is not exactely a way to prevent terrorism.


bush isn't strong against terrorists? http://www.sharkyforums.com/ubb/confused.gif


the world hates us? how about the Islamic terrorists? what about them? (oh, and you can't forget france, germany, and russia)
What's Bush doing against terrorists? He's cutting off heads of the dragon that only grow back somewhere else. Second, the whole Iraq bussiness had nothing to do with the war on terror in the first place.

Second... the PEOPLE of the world are on a good way to hate you more and more. Most of the governments are still 'acting nice' but that's just diplomacy. Fact is that by starting the war in Iraq for....dubious reason he basically confirmed lots of people's thoughts that 'the US does whatever they want in their interest'. In case you haven't noticed, the US has lost a lot of credibility in the eyes of a lot of people lately...

By golly, we have an Alan Greenspan on the forum! Quick, someone call up NYU because this guy will blow the economic adviser away! Show me facts, opinions don't mean anything.

And concerning terrorism: Sitting around with our thumbs in our asses...or your intern's for that matter...will not accomplish anything.


there have been 308,000 new jobs reported from last month under bush. We have aslo had the biggest quarter economy growth in 20 years and the unemployemnt average is lower than it was in the 70s, 80s, and 90s.

[Gringo]

From what I see, yes, yes he is

but it is hard to see with your head in your ass.







sorry couldn't help myself

You better watch what your f***ing saying, lad. Trust u to start the **** up again.
I haven't insulted u or anyone else personally, only your President. I stopped, because it was only going to lead to a flame war.
I said u could take the piss out of Blair (I and many others hate him just as much). But u had to didn't u? Hmm? Little comments (or words) like that can lead to a lot of ****.

Like the word 'Crusade'. I'll leave it at that, as I'm sure some of u wouldn't like it.

[rob]

honestly im not even sure what you too where arguing about i just know he said something about u havving your head in your ass and i thought the comment just worked.

sorry i was in a "funny" mood at the time.