Some ideas for bumperstickers

[loganinkosovo]

I'm not software wizard....couldn't photoshop good enough to even get a gig at ******* but I have a few Ideas for bumperstickers/posters.

Please see if you can do a better job on these than I did. :)

Remember.....it's all in fun.

Try out your shoppin skills.

[loganinkosovo]

Heres two more......:)

[Cedan]

who the hell would want those on their bumpers?

and how can you see a link between Hezbolla, Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez
and the democratic party?

[DK415191]

who the hell would want those on their bumpers?

and how can you see a link between Hezbolla, Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez
and the democratic party?

Right....!

.....and this is "militaryphoto.net" what has bumperstickers to do with military...?

:fork:

[Hiroshima]

It's just Logan getting it on with his tin foil hat...

Remeber folks:

http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a89/hiromoon/tinfoil.jpg

[Cedan]

Right....!

.....and this is "militaryphoto.net" what has bumperstickers to do with military...?

:fork:

quit sending me these crazy images

http://static.flickr.com/40/74328934_54aa742af0_m.jpg

[Hiroshima]

Not until:
http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a89/hiromoon/hell_freeze.jpg

[loganinkosovo]

who the hell would want those on their bumpers?

and how can you see a link between Hezbolla, Fidel Castro, Hugo Chavez
and the democratic party?

1. All people the left in America loves.

2. All people who would do much better with a Democrat Congress and Whitehouse.

:)

[dangerclose]

"Forget Mecca, nuke Berkeley."

[Dasein]

2. All people who would do much better with a Democrat Congress and Whitehouse.

Hard to imagine since they're all doing pretty well with Bush in the White House right now. What policies would the Democrats enact that would specifically aid these people?

[AquaSol]

Hard to imagine since they're all doing pretty well with Bush in the White House right now. What policies would the Democrats enact that would specifically aid these people?


They would and have been doing things to weaken America for years.

Kennedy Offered to Help Soviets Thwart U.S. Policies, KGB Papers Show
By Kevin Mooney
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
November 02, 2006

(CNSNews.com) - While Soviet troops occupied Afghanistan in 1980, Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) worked in close concert with high level Kremlin officials to alter the direction of U.S. policy, according to documents made available through a KGB defector.

Details concerning Kennedy's correspondence with KGB agents are included in the writings of the late Vasiliy Mitrokhin who defected to Britain in 1992. The Mitrokhin papers highlight a meeting that took place at the behest of Kennedy between former Sen. John Tunney (D-Calif.) and KGB agents in Moscow on March 5, 1980.

The exchange of information between Tunney and the KGB is included as part of a report Mitrokhin filed with the Cold War International History Project of the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington D.C. The former KGB man continued to work with British intelligence until the time of his death.

Noted Cold War author and researcher Herbert Romerstein told Cybercast News Service Mitrokhin was a "highly credible source" with vast knowledge of the now-closed KGB archives.

Prior to his defection, Mitrokhin made meticulous copies of KGB documents by hand, explained Romerstein, who headed the U.S. government's Office to Counter Soviet Disinformation and Active Measures during the 1980s.

The KGB defector smuggled out six cases of notes that formed the basis of his reporting.

The KGB files Mitrokhin retrieved indicate that Kennedy fixed the blame for heightened international tensions on the Carter White House, not on the Kremlin. Kennedy at the time was challenging incumbent Carter for the Democratic nomination for president.

Tunney told his KGB counterparts that Kennedy was impressed by the foreign policy statements made by then General Secretary Leonid Brezhnev. Kennedy saw in Brezhnev a leader who was firmly committed to the policy of "détente," the report said.

But, in Kennedy's estimation, the Carter administration had assumed an overly belligerent posture toward the Soviet Union after the invasion of Afghanistan, Mitrokhin wrote.

In Kennedy's view, "the atmosphere of tension and hostility towards the whole Soviet people was being fuelled by Carter" as well as by some key advisors, the Pentagon and the U.S. military industrial complex, the Mitrokhin report states.

Throughout the meeting Tunney remained focused on the separation between Kennedy's proposals and the official stance of the Carter White House. While official U.S. policy called for the withdrawal of Soviet forces from Afghanistan, Kennedy avoided "touching the question of the legality of the presence of Soviet troops," Mitrokhin reported.

Instead, Kennedy relayed through his envoy, Tunney, his support for a withdrawal of Soviet forces that would be coupled with policy directives that "guaranteed non-interference" by competing foreign powers in the internal affairs of Afghanistan.

Since there was intense disagreement between Kennedy and the administration on policy toward the Soviets, Tunney told the KGB that the Massachusetts senator had concluded "it was his duty to take action himself, which could force the Carter administration to act to de-escalate the crisis," Mitrokhin wrote.

In 1980 Kennedy lost to Carter in the Democratic primary, and the incumbent in turn lost to Ronald Reagan in the general election.

As was previously reported by the Cybercast News Service Kennedy also subsequently made overtures to Soviet officials aimed at thwarting Reagan's military buildup in the 1980s.

Kennedy had offered to help the Soviets organize a public relations campaign in the U.S. that would dilute support for Reagan's policies. Once again, it was Tunney who traveled to Moscow on Kennedy's behalf to relay the senator's proposals.

The particulars of Kennedy's proposals are discussed in a letter dated May 14, 1983, that was sent from the head of the KGB to Yuri Andropov, who was then general secretary. Romerstein acquired a copy of the letter from a contact in Moscow who had access to the Kremlin archives.

"The letter speaks to the degree of opposition and the lack of understanding liberals like Kennedy had toward Reagan's policies," said Lee Edwards, a distinguished fellow at the Heritage Foundation.

"Reagan knew we had to build up our armed forces before we could apply pressure to the Soviets." The notion of fighting to win the Cold War was an alien concept to liberals like Kennedy, Edwards added, because they had grown accustomed to the policies of containment.

A copy of the letter is reproduced in a new book entitled "The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism." The author, Paul Kengor is a professor of political science at Grove City College.

The pattern of behavior should concern members of both political parties, Kengor said, because it shows Kennedy was willing to work against American foreign policy, regardless of who occupied the White House.

In his book, Kengor points out that Tunney acknowledged making 15 separate trips to the Soviet Union where he acted as an intermediary not only for Kennedy but for other U.S. senators.

'Clear violation'

Charles Dunn, dean of the Robertson School of Government at Regent University, told Cybercast News Service Kennedy's activities were in "clear violation of the U.S. Constitution and at the expense of presidential authority."

The secret overtures to the KGB during the Reagan years were particularly insidious, Dunn said, because Tunney and Kennedy were working to undermine what ultimately proved to be a very successful policy that brought an end to the Cold War.

"If another country gets the idea that it can deal outside of official channels then that undermines presidential leadership," he said.

For his part, Romerstein said that Kennedy, and other senators, may have violated the Logan Act, which has been on the books since 1799, but is rarely enforced. The law prohibits American citizens from engaging in private diplomacy with a foreign government with the intention of influencing public policy.

At the same time, however, Romerstein cautions against viewing Kennedy as an agent for the Soviets. Instead, he said, it is appropriate to label him a "collaborationist" who sought out Soviet contacts to advance his own interests, not theirs.

When Kennedy spoke highly of Soviet leaders like Brezhnev and Andropov, he may have been "pretending," in an attempt to curry favor, Romerstein said.

"He [Kennedy] was no more loyal to the Soviets than he was to the United States.," Romerstein said.

Kennedy's office was contacted but declined to comment on the communication the senator had with the KGB, as reported in the Mitrokhin papers.

[dangerclose]

Thank you.

"For while Communists make full use of liberals and their solicitudes, and sometimes flatter them to their faces, in private they treat them with that sneering contempt that the strong and predatory almost invariably feel for victims who volunteer to help in their own victimization."

-Whittaker Chambers (former member of the american communist underground and soviet intelligence.)


Substitute Communists for "Jihadists" and it would still apply.

[Hiroshima]

Uh-huh.. :roll:

[Dasein]

And Nixon provided the Chinese with huge amounts of US intel on the Soviets.

However, that still doesn't answer the question about what specific policies the Democrats would enact to assist these people, and how they'd fare better under a Democrat adminsitration than they have under the Bush administration.

[kaspur_eh]

These bumper stickers would never sell, for whatever reason, only liberals feel it necessary to plaster their ideology all over their 89 suby wagons.

[Hunterhr]

These bumper stickers would never sell, for whatever reason, only liberals feel it necessary to plaster their ideology all over their 89 suby wagons.

Shave the whales.

[dangerclose]

These bumper stickers would never sell, for whatever reason, only liberals feel it necessary to plaster their ideology all over their 89 suby wagons.


because we all care where they stand on the issues.

[dj_1911]

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52747



“Of course Americans should vote Democrat,” Jihad Jaara, a senior member of the Al Aqsa Martyrs Brigades terror group and the infamous leader of the 2002 siege of Bethlehem’s Church of the Nativity, told WND.
“This is why American Muslims will support the Democrats, because there is an atmosphere in America that encourages those who want to withdraw from Iraq. It is time that the American people support those who want to take them out of this Iraqi mud,” said Jaara, speaking to WND from exile in Ireland, where he was sent as part of an internationally brokered deal that ended the church siege.
Jaara was the chief in Bethlehem of the Brigades, the declared “military wing” of Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas’ Fatah party. Together with the Islamic Jihad terror group, the Brigades has taken responsibility for every suicide bombing inside Israel the past two years, including an attack in Tel Aviv in April that killed American teenager Daniel Wultz and nine Israelis.
Muhammad Saadi, a senior leader of Islamic Jihad in the northern West Bank town of Jenin, said the Democrats’ talk of withdrawal from Iraq makes him feel “proud.”
“As Arabs and Muslims we feel proud of this talk,” he told WND. “Very proud from the great successes of the Iraqi resistance. This success that brought the big superpower of the world to discuss a possible withdrawal.”
Abu Abdullah, a leader of Hamas’ military wing in the Gaza Strip, said the policy of withdrawal “proves the strategy of the resistance is the right strategy against the occupation.”

[Hiroshima]

Actually, the "conservatives" would buy them... Maybe not Dangerclose, but I know a few who take the time to plaster their ideology all over their vehicles. Same with the silly fish on the back of the car...

[dangerclose]

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52747

Thank you. I was looking for that story. The democrats have widespread support abroad.

[dj_1911]

Thank you. I was looking for that story. The democrats have widespread support abroad.

And from the most tolerant and compassionate people.

[Hiroshima]

Hmm.... World News Daily? Sure, I'll believe that.. and while we're at it, if they were interviewing those guys, why not let the IDF know their addresses?

[dj_1911]

Yeah, cuz we all know the media is on the side of the IDF. rofl

[WARPIG]

My brother made a bumper sticker back in 2004 that said "Give War a Chance."

[WARPIG]

Oh.. and just to keep this thread from being locked and making me go SWAT again..

You turds better get this thread on subject (political bumper stickers I believe) and take your idiotspeak somewhere else.

[Hiroshima]

http://www.gwennies.com/bumperstickers_small.jpg

http://www.best2win.com/assets/images/autogen/a_bumper_stickers02.jpg

Something like this, Warpig?

[dj_1911]

Oh.. and just to keep this thread from being locked and making me go SWAT again..

You turds better get this thread on subject (political bumper stickers I believe) and take your idiotspeak somewhere else.

Back on topíc:
http://www.stickergiant.com/Merchant2/imgs/250/zbs385.gif

http://www.stickergiant.com/Merchant2/imgs/250/vp22.gif

http://www.stickergiant.com/Merchant2/imgs/250/vm56.gif

http://www.stickergiant.com/Merchant2/imgs/250/vm12.gif

http://www.stickergiant.com/Merchant2/imgs/250/xrg077.gif

http://www.stickergiant.com/Merchant2/imgs/250/xrg739.gif

http://www.stickergiant.com/Merchant2/imgs/250/vp27.gif

http://www.stickergiant.com/Merchant2/imgs/250/xrg417.gif

[Hiroshima]

http://www.stickergiant.com/Merchant2/imgs/b5767.gif

http://www.stickergiant.com/Merchant2/imgs/fvote.gif

http://www.stickergiant.com/Merchant2/imgs/b5803.gif

http://www.stickergiant.com/Merchant2/imgs/felected.gif

http://www.peacesupplies.org/images/annoystickerlarge.gif

[dj_1911]

http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/imaomil600.jpg

http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/imaoun500.gif

http://www.thoseshirts.com/images/imaoter-back600.jpg

[Hiroshima]

:lol: Those Last three are great!


[edit]
http://www.greatgads.com/images/stickers/republican_democrat_bumperstik.JPG

[dj_1911]

That last one, lol. rofl

http://logo.cafepress.com/8/356074.2016178.jpg

http://logo.cafepress.com/6/356074.1985886.jpg

http://logo.cafepress.com/1/356074.1957421.jpg

http://logo.cafepress.com/6/356074.1819976.jpg

http://logo.cafepress.com/9/356074.1819879.jpg

http://logo.cafepress.com/9/356074.1819209.jpg

http://logo.cafepress.com/6/356074.1796336.jpg

http://logo.cafepress.com/8/356074.1796088.jpg

http://logo.cafepress.com/1/356074.1768771.jpg

http://logo.cafepress.com/5/356074.1751525.jpg

http://logo.cafepress.com/4/356074.1657704.jpg

http://logo.cafepress.com/1/356074.1516491.jpg

http://logo.cafepress.com/3/356074.1423613.jpg

http://logo.cafepress.com/4/356074.1195594.jpg

[WARPIG]

http://www.greatgads.com/images/stickers/republican_democrat_bumperstik.JPG
This one I get..

http://www.peacesupplies.org/images/annoystickerlarge.gif

This one I don't. Join the military to annoy Republicans?

[WARPIG]

"Halp us Jon Kary, we R stuck n Irak" would make a good sticker for both sides. Democrats could put an image of George Bush on it.

[Hiroshima]

Umm.. I believe it deals with the perceived threats to personal privacy and some consitutional violations.... In other words, push for the withdraw of the patriot act and an heavy crack down on the lack of checks and balances.

[WARPIG]

Umm.. I believe it deals with the perceived threats to personal privacy and some consitutional violations.... In other words, push for the withdraw of the patriot act and an heavy crack down on the lack of checks and balances.
OK.. is it me or does the sticker not really work? Now that I get it.. it's not that good.

[dj_1911]

Yes, I know what your talking about. This is one of the things I find very hard to form an opinion on. Until what point should you give up personal freedoms for security. It's not just Republicans though. Democrats have done a large deal to harm our 1st and 2nd ammendment rights.

[Fargin]

Constitution vs. Security
Vote Bush/Cheney '08

You like?

[dj_1911]

Constitution? Like they give a rat's arse about the constitution. :cantbeli:

[Hiroshima]

It really comes down to what you personally believe in. I believe in a government that supposed to help people, seeing as it's a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. And Dj brings up a good point... and I'm reminded of a Benjamin Franklin quote:


Any society that would give up a little liberty to gain a little security will deserve neither and lose both.

http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a89/hiromoon/overgrownmilitary.jpg
Political Bumperstickers always nitpick...


Now Military bumper stickers..
http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a89/hiromoon/marine_corps_bumper_stickers.jpg

[Fargin]

Don't make me explain it.

[dj_1911]

@ Hiroshima : Great post p-)

@ Fargin : Oh, please do

[WARPIG]

@ Hiroshima : Great post p-)

@ Fargin : Oh, please do

Uh.. no.. let's not get into the pissing contest again.

Bumper stickers making fun of either side.. try and keep the debating to a minimum.

[dangerclose]

http://img296.imageshack.us/img296/8338/bd110ahk5.jpg

[loganinkosovo]

This one I get..

http://www.peacesupplies.org/images/annoystickerlarge.gif

This one I don't. Join the military to annoy Republicans?

Actually it should say "Try to rewrite the Constitution". :)