PDA

View Full Version : Norman Kember will not testify



Lazy Lob
11-08-2006, 07:21 AM
The Scotsman Wed 8 Nov 2006
'I won't testify against my captors unless it helps them'
RUSSELL JACKSON

NORMAN Kember, the British peace activist taken hostage in Iraq last year, does not want to testify against his captors, it emerged last night.

He was seized in November 2005 and held in Baghdad for four months by the Swords of Righteousness Brigade. He was freed in March in a multinational military operation involving the SAS.
Click to learn more...

Channel 4 News reported last night that Iraqi police had made arrests about a month ago over the kidnapping of Mr Kember, 74.

The programme said the men had been in custody for a month and Scotland Yard approached Mr Kember to give evidence at their trial. But the Briton said he would have a moral dilemma testifying against his kidnappers because of his strong opposition to the death sentence.

He told Channel 4: "I think that some of them had reasons for regarding us as their enemies. I feel that forgiveness is the most positive thing that we can do in this situation. I would rather they went free than they had a long prison sentence."

Mr Kember said he would consider testifying only if he believed it might mean further clemency for the accused.

He said he believed in restorative justice.

"I think that we in the West are implicated in the way that that problem arose," he said.

Mr Kember was freed with Canadians James Loney and Harmeet Singh Sooden. He said his fellow captives had also been approached to testify.

Scotland Yard told Mr Kember those accused were in custody and they were hoping to take them to trial next year.

Related topic

* Kidnappings in Iraq
http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=1204

This article: http://news.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=1652522006

Last updated: 08-Nov-06 01:52 GMT

a_very_ex_STAB
11-08-2006, 07:55 AM
The Scotsman Wed 8 Nov 2006
'I won't testify against my captors unless it helps them'
RUSSELL JACKSON

NORMAN Kember, the British peace activist taken hostage in Iraq last year, does not want to testify against his captors, it emerged last night.

He was seized in November 2005 and held in Baghdad for four months by the Swords of Righteousness Brigade. He was freed in March in a multinational military operation involving the SAS.
Click to learn more...

Channel 4 News reported last night that Iraqi police had made arrests about a month ago over the kidnapping of Mr Kember, 74.

The programme said the men had been in custody for a month and Scotland Yard approached Mr Kember to give evidence at their trial. But the Briton said he would have a moral dilemma testifying against his kidnappers because of his strong opposition to the death sentence.

He told Channel 4: "I think that some of them had reasons for regarding us as their enemies. I feel that forgiveness is the most positive thing that we can do in this situation. I would rather they went free than they had a long prison sentence."

Mr Kember said he would consider testifying only if he believed it might mean further clemency for the accused.

He said he believed in restorative justice.

"I think that we in the West are implicated in the way that that problem arose," he said.

Mr Kember was freed with Canadians James Loney and Harmeet Singh Sooden. He said his fellow captives had also been approached to testify.

Scotland Yard told Mr Kember those accused were in custody and they were hoping to take them to trial next year.

Related topic

* Kidnappings in Iraq
http://news.scotsman.com/topics.cfm?tid=1204

This article: http://news.scotsman.com/uk.cfm?id=1652522006

Last updated: 08-Nov-06 01:52 GMT

That guy is completely BARKING!

Hydro
11-08-2006, 07:57 AM
****ing nutcase.

Jobu
11-08-2006, 08:04 AM
Send him back.

dacanadianbomb
11-08-2006, 08:05 AM
What a tool.

oldsoak
11-08-2006, 08:12 AM
Absolute nutter - and we risked blokes lives for this nosher ?

Invisigoth
11-08-2006, 08:28 AM
Hm so by your logic: because he's against the death penalty he deserves to die? :) Iiiiiiiinteresting...

oldsoak
11-08-2006, 08:37 AM
Hm so by your logic: because he's against the death penalty he deserves to die? :) Iiiiiiiinteresting...

- and where did we say that ?

dj_1911
11-08-2006, 08:39 AM
Now I wonder if he had a chance to testify against the troops for something. . .

Lazy Lob
11-08-2006, 08:47 AM
Hm so by your logic: because he's against the death penalty he deserves to die? :) Iiiiiiiinteresting...

?????? where me specs?

Hydro
11-08-2006, 09:16 AM
Hm so by your logic: because he's against the death penalty he deserves to die? :) Iiiiiiiinteresting...



So by your reading comprehension skills, he's also married to a gay llama and eats marker pens? Iiiiinteresting....