View Full Version : Jimmy Carter called Anti-semite on CSPAN by caller
Histy
12-03-2006, 10:24 PM
http://hotair.com/archives/2006/12/03/video-carter-called-racist-anti-semite-by-c-span-caller/
annihilation
12-03-2006, 10:30 PM
The world "anti-semite" gets tossed out like candy (much like "hitler") these days, means very little.
Danik
12-04-2006, 12:22 AM
The world "anti-semite" gets tossed out like candy (much like "hitler") these days, means very little.
Oh Absolutely! I don’t go a day without hearing it at least 47 times. Dolboyob.
PS There are only so many possible scenarios to explain Carter's statements and actions.
Case A (assuming he’s out of mind) - Crazy old man going rable rable rable for no purpose other than he’s an attention whore.
Case B (perfectly sane) - He is a piece of work. This is the same man that believes all peace deals have been accepted unconditionally by the Arabs and rejected by the Jews. I think he has come down with Arabianitis, a slight mental condition that incapacitates your mind's ability to reason or comprehend real world events as they unfold, causing you to slip into a "happy place" where what you want is always right and you are the superpower having to unjustly cater to the demands of infidels.
Bottom line: Either he is trying to get "in". Or (more likely) he is an old attention whore with to much time on his hands, who commands the media with a unhealthy and unfounded respect for his "opinions", “Opinions” which equate to that vomit that comes up after a 50 minute splurge at the Vodka Room on Ruski Standart.
Money
Histy
12-04-2006, 01:01 AM
He comes across to me as someone who believes everything the Arabs say.
loganinkosovo
12-04-2006, 02:47 AM
Ol' Peanut Pecker Claims that Thugo got re-elected legally.........
That alone shows he's a brick shy of a load and a danger to freedom and democracy.
No wonder he got a nobel prize since he is a prize idiot and an anti-semite!
Two of the best prerequsites for a European award for peace.
roflroflrofl
dimasorokine
12-04-2006, 03:00 AM
The world "anti-semite" gets tossed out like candy (much like "hitler") these days, means very little.
While there are many examples of genuine "anti-Semetism", I have to agree with you that the term is way too over used.
Some other over used terms include: "Terrorists/Terrorism" , "Freedom" , "Demacracy" etc.
-Dima
Jimmy Carter's achievements:
-blackmailed by Egypt
-blackmailed by North Korea
-Allowed the kidnapping of the American embassy personnel by the Iranian regime go unpunished.
Oh yea, this guy's opinion means a lot to me. :roll:
Vraltupp
12-04-2006, 03:35 AM
Bomb Iran or be labeled anti-semite
Friendly Fire
12-04-2006, 04:14 AM
Jimmy Carter's achievements:
-blackmailed by Egypt
-blackmailed by North Korea
-Allowed the kidnapping of the American embassy personnel by the Iranian regime go unpunished.
Oh yea, this guy's opinion means a lot to me. :roll:
Iran-Contra any one? I had a nice picture about Mister STFU but I feel you've already caught my drift.
Mr. JOSHUA
12-04-2006, 11:17 AM
Whatever it was he had built recently for him, ( The Carter Center or Carter Library), I can't remember, was funded almost entirely by wealthy arabs who hate? ANYONE? ANYONE? Jimmy Carter came out recently as saying Israel was the aggressor and oppressor against the Palestenian people. He also recently said that it would be OK if the the State of Israel no longer existed. Now, imagine a white man saying it is the blacks who oppress and who are aggressive and it would be OK if Africa no longer existed. Would you say, man this guys got it in for blacks. Would you call him a racist? Or would you say, I think racist is a term that has been over used, which it has, but if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck......... Well, you get the picture.
Hollis
12-04-2006, 11:40 AM
On anti semitism, seems the ones who whine about it's usage are the ones who tend to be antisemitic. Yes it is over used, but read who is whinning about it and about it being used.
Read the Comment that Mr. Joshua made about Carter's anti-Israeli remarks.
Look at the global population 6.5 Billion people, 14 Million are Jews. Look at the disproportionate attacks on Jews and Israel.
One report compared Jews to incidents of hate crimes like a canary the miners would take in to the mines with them. They are the first to feel the deadly effects of methane gas.
Today's antisemite will say they don't hate Jews only Zionist. So what is the difference? NONE.
Friendly Fire
12-04-2006, 11:43 AM
Whatever it was he had built recently for him, ( The Carter Center or Carter Library), I can't remember, was funded almost entirely by wealthy arabs who hate? ANYONE? ANYONE? Jimmy Carter came out recently as saying Israel was the aggressor and oppressor against the Palestenian people. He also recently said that it would be OK if the the State of Israel no longer existed. Now, imagine a white man saying it is the blacks who oppress and who are aggressive and it would be OK if Africa no longer existed. Would you say, man this guys got it in for blacks. Would you call him a racist? Or would you say, I think racist is a term that has been over used, which it has, but if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck......... Well, you get the picture.
Provide source...and even though had he told that...that would make him an Anti-Sionist and not an Anti-Semite. Off course Israelis would overwhelm me with their exactly opposite opinion. What ever.
seraosha
12-04-2006, 11:53 AM
With all due respect to one of our former Presidents, I wish he would take up golf and leave what's left of his tattered reputation intact.
Mr. Carter, dude...get a hobby and leave the politics to those that can actually do it.
Mr. JOSHUA
12-04-2006, 12:01 PM
Do a search on the internet for video of it, i'm pretty sure the Communist news network has it, they were interviewing him practically everyday last week. It was just a week or two ago that he said that. Jimmy Carter has done many things to undermine the Israelis and Americans and even the honest Venezuelan. There is plenty out of materials out there to paint the Anti-semitic, Anti-American - Jimmy Carter Portrait.
Friendly Fire
12-04-2006, 12:59 PM
Do a search on the internet for video of it, i'm pretty sure the Communist news network has it, they were interviewing him practically everyday last week. It was just a week or two ago that he said that. Jimmy Carter has done many things to undermine the Israelis and Americans and even the honest Venezuelan. There is plenty out of materials out there to paint the Anti-semitic, Anti-American - Jimmy Carter Portrait.
Hum Nice way of swaying your parole...you brought this up, please provide the link. The ADL seems not to have seen anything of the supposed anti-sionism you accuse him of!
Last day I checked, there were, according to your definition, only 38% of honest venezuelas.
loganinkosovo
12-04-2006, 01:06 PM
With all due respect to one of our former Presidents, I wish he would take up golf and leave what's left of his tattered reputation intact.
Mr. Carter, dude...get a hobby and leave the politics to those that can actually do it.
You just hit the nail on the head.
All Previous Ex-Presidents knew that their time in the limelight was over and had the class and dignity to remove themselves from the world stage.......
All except for this A$$clown and his A$$hat partner in Crimes against Democracy Clinton.
No Class, No dignity, No Morals.
The world would be a better place if he would just confine himself to pounding nails for the useless......
Friendly Fire
12-04-2006, 01:12 PM
You just hit the nail on the head.
All Previous Ex-Presidents knew that their time in the limelight was over and had the class and dignity to remove themselves from the world stage.......
All except for this A$$clown and his A$$hat partner in Crimes against Democracy Clinton.
No Class, No dignity, No Morals.
The world would be a better place if he would just confine himself to pounding nails for the useless......
Ehem you seem very young ... a lot of your "ex" kept opening up for no good in the past times.
Mr. JOSHUA
12-04-2006, 02:55 PM
CNN.com/FOX.com/Newsbusters.org/Frontpagemag.com/MichaelSavage.com
These are all reliable websites to look on your own time.
Putting everything in someones hand is socialism, and I don't believe in that.
Check out those websites archives so you can read the rubbish that comes out of Carters mouth and to see how the honest Venezuelan vote was suppressed, disenfranchised and ultimately canceled out the HONEST VENEZEULAN VOTE, by at the last minute, legalizing over 20,000 illegal aliens so that they could vote for Mr. Chavez.
The, something-something amnesty act.
I'm not talking about the election that just took place, I'm talking about the previous one.
How about the fact that Mr. Chavez is building up his own military wing to prevent from him being ousted in any way. Whether it be the coup or democratic way. They answer to him and only him, Thanx alot Mr. Carter.
Iran-Contra any one? I had a nice picture about Mister STFU but I feel you've already caught my drift.
How does that change what Carter did?
The man was a complete failure as President and was a complete failure when Clinton sent him to North Korea.
He has no credibility.
Hollis
12-04-2006, 03:45 PM
How does that change what Carter did?
The man was a complete failure as President and was a complete failure when Clinton sent him to North Korea.
He has no credibility.
He should just retire in dignity, maybe cuddle up to a Playboy magazine and reflect on his lost youth.
annihilation
12-04-2006, 09:42 PM
On anti semitism, seems the ones who whine about it's usage are the ones who tend to be antisemitic. Yes it is over used, but read who is whinning about it and about it being used.
Read the Comment that Mr. Joshua made about Carter's anti-Israeli remarks.
Look at the global population 6.5 Billion people, 14 Million are Jews. Look at the disproportionate attacks on Jews and Israel.
One report compared Jews to incidents of hate crimes like a canary the miners would take in to the mines with them. They are the first to feel the deadly effects of methane gas.
Today's antisemite will say they don't hate Jews only Zionist. So what is the difference? NONE.
But you can be opposed to the actions of Israel and still not be considered antisemitism? I've been call a few times an anti-semiti just because I opposed the Israeli government and their actions. Im not saying there are not antisemitism, but ive seen it where if you are against the government you are labeled an antisemitism.
annihilation
12-04-2006, 09:42 PM
He should just retire in dignity, maybe cuddle up to a Playboy magazine and reflect on his lost youth.
I agree as the years go one, he seems to start to loose it. He should stick to building homes on his spare time.
Hollis
12-04-2006, 10:23 PM
But you can be opposed to the actions of Israel and still not be considered antisemitism? I've been call a few times an anti-semiti just because I opposed the Israeli government and their actions. Im not saying there are not antisemitism, but ive seen it where if you are against the government you are labeled an antisemitism.
yes that is like any other insult, plenty on this forum, Like "moron" etc. Sometimes there is no basis.
Histy
12-04-2006, 11:54 PM
Ehem you seem very young ... a lot of your "ex" kept opening up for no good in the past times.
Who? You seem to be an American History Expert
sethen
12-05-2006, 12:00 AM
Jimmy Carter is a great big Christian turd!!!!!!!!
Histy
12-05-2006, 12:02 AM
What does him being a Christian have anything to do with this?
sethen
12-05-2006, 12:05 AM
What does him being a Christian have anything to do with this?
It is reflection on his character!!!!!!
Histy
12-05-2006, 12:45 AM
It is reflection on his character!!!!!!
How specifically? I don't see him with any similar Character traits to many Christians I know.
Friendly Fire
12-05-2006, 03:26 AM
CNN.com/FOX.com/Newsbusters.org/Frontpagemag.com/MichaelSavage.com
These are all reliable websites to look on your own time.
Putting everything in someones hand is socialism, and I don't believe in that.
Check out those websites archives so you can read the rubbish that comes out of Carters mouth and to see how the honest Venezuelan vote was suppressed, disenfranchised and ultimately canceled out the HONEST VENEZEULAN VOTE, by at the last minute, legalizing over 20,000 illegal aliens so that they could vote for Mr. Chavez.
The, something-something amnesty act.
I'm not talking about the election that just took place, I'm talking about the previous one.
How about the fact that Mr. Chavez is building up his own military wing to prevent from him being ousted in any way. Whether it be the coup or democratic way. They answer to him and only him, Thanx alot Mr. Carter.
And Chavez won by a marin of 20 000 votes? Joshua please ...
Socialism...well teh last time I checked socialism was quite different from Absolutism of Divine Right. Yeah you're always talking about the previous one.
How about the fact your Military budget has been inflating in such a dramatic manner it has exceeded the GDP of couple of countries! And what about "controversial" elections. "The Previous one"...
But still provide me the anti-sionistic phrase of Mr. Carter.
Hollis, ehem I think we've hit the bottom. Anti-Sionism is not Anti-semitism (those who intertwine both problems have been trying hard for decades to "purify Israel from it's Goyim's") and I'd be glad to provide you numerous examples of jews that oppose Israel with judaism (yes I know self-hating jews bla bla bla).
Jimmy Carter is a great big Christian turd!!!!!!!!
He may be a Bible thumper but he sure didnt run his office like one.
BTW i hope that thing isnt tattooed on your body, that looks like ****.
techrep
12-05-2006, 04:23 PM
While I don't think old presidents should just quietly fade away, I do think Carter stepped over the line when on asked on a TV interview recently, what he thought history would make of the US decision to go into Iraq. He said something like it will go down as one of the worst global foreign policy decisions ever. He then did go on with some very good and compelling reasons why he thought this. He was very diplomatic in how he said this.
Bottomline for me, Carter got clipped by some bad timing and actions when he was President but he is miles ahead of either Bush and has done some real good on this Earth. The only thing Dubya has on Carter is he managed to get re-elected.
And Carter served - being a Nuke in the Navy is something to be proud of.
annihilation
12-05-2006, 04:28 PM
While I don't think old presidents should just quietly fade away, I do think Carter stepped over the line when on asked on a TV interview recently, what he thought history would make of the US decision to go into Iraq. He said something like it will go down as one of the worst global foreign policy decisions ever. He then did go on with some very good and compelling reasons why he thought this. He was very diplomatic in how he said this.
Bottomline for me, Carter got clipped by some bad timing and actions when he was President but he is miles ahead of either Bush and has done some real good on this Earth. The only thing Dubya has on Carter is he managed to get re-elected.
And Carter served - being a Nuke in the Navy is something to be proud of.
Carter was too king to be president, his diplomacy was a bit weak on that. Did things that were right more than did things that were right for America (panama canal).
Mr. JOSHUA
12-06-2006, 12:30 PM
Carter is nothing more than a treasonous bastard. He brought us the current Iran regime, unleashed a tick called welfare on America and undermines us and Israel every chance he gets. He's anti American. He gets his funding from wahhabbis, loves Hugo Chavez, I think he needs to mimick Kurt Cobain rather than play golf.
Mr Gently Benevolent
12-06-2006, 01:32 PM
Carter is nothing more than a treasonous bastard. He gets his funding from wahhabbis, loves Hugo Chavez, I think he needs to mimick Kurt Cobain rather than play golf.http://fumier.typepad.com/fumier/images/bush_and_boyfriend_4.jpg
I got news for you bright spark they all suck Saudi sausage.
Friendly Fire
12-06-2006, 02:19 PM
Carter is nothing more than a treasonous bastard. He brought us the current Iran regime, unleashed a tick called welfare on America and undermines us and Israel every chance he gets. He's anti American. He gets his funding from wahhabbis, loves Hugo Chavez, I think he needs to mimick Kurt Cobain rather than play golf.
No what brought the current Iranian regime was Khomeiny and the Iranian People. Guess to you that's only a detail...however you should brace yourself from spitting this kind of BS!
And as B stated it...all US president ate the Wahabbi di..ehem sausage.
Mr. JOSHUA
12-06-2006, 02:31 PM
Well I got news for you all, I never said I loved Bush.
Khomeini had the red carpet rolled out for him by Carter.
Carter was behind the overthrow of the Shah of Iran, who by the way was our ally.
Know your history commies!
Friendly Fire
12-06-2006, 02:54 PM
Well I got news for you all, I never said I loved Bush.
Khomeini had the red carpet rolled out for him by Carter.
Carter was behind the overthrow of the Shah of Iran, who by the way was our ally.
Know your history commies!
Eheheh fun, So the "White Revolution" has never existed? Carter planned the overthrowing of a guy that was already a liability since Nixon? How come? Dude you're a good one.
Mr. JOSHUA
12-06-2006, 02:59 PM
A liability how?
I don't recall the Shah threatning to wipe Israel off the map.
I don't recall the Shah threatning America.
I don't recall the Shah threatning the west to convert to Islam or else.
Please explain how the Shah was a liability and how it is better to have the current Iranian regime versus the Shahs' regime.
Mastermind
12-06-2006, 03:42 PM
Jimmah...gotta love that old Racist commie rat...gave away the Panama Canal, hugged all them mooslums, tried to sink Israel....and bashed the hell outta that "Wascwally Wabbit" that tried to attack his fishin' boat.
And that is all he will ever be remembered for.MM
techrep
12-06-2006, 06:03 PM
Please explain how the Shah was a liability and how it is better to have the current Iranian regime versus the Shahs' regime.
I obviously don't know this first or even second hand but the way it was explained to me, if the US had not backed the Shah and helped him modernize/westernize Iran, the fundamentalist/extremist Islamic sects would not have gotten their springboard into prominence.
I see this happening over and over, some part of the US government figures "hey, let's set this dude up and he'll owe us and we'll get cheap secure oil
(or various other raw materials, bananas, etc.) Didn't the US help put Saddam (and the Baathist Party) into power like 30 years ago? So actually we are cleaning up prior US meddling and doing one heck of a sad job.
And, because people in other countries actually hate outside meddlers just as much as we do and are just as brave as we are, they fight back. We get bit in the butt and end up paying more for oil and bananas - especially if you figure in the cost of all that military hardware. And when you figure the dead and wounded, it absolutely is not worth it. All this waste for hypocritical pipedreams.
And yeah, I know there are evil people who need to be taken down.
alexz
12-06-2006, 07:17 PM
Carter is nothing more than a treasonous bastard. He brought us the current Iran regime, unleashed a tick called welfare on America and undermines us and Israel every chance he gets. He's anti American. He gets his funding from wahhabbis, loves Hugo Chavez, I think he needs to mimick Kurt Cobain rather than play golf.
You forgot his role in creating the Mujahedin.
Many people don't know that Carter hates Israel and Israelis not because he is a classical Anti semite but because (as he said to Golda Mair) as a strongly religious man he deeply
disappointed that Israelis are mostly secular and only a minority are devout followers of god.
Histy
12-06-2006, 09:23 PM
No what brought the current Iranian regime was Khomeiny and the Iranian People. Guess to you that's only a detail...however you should brace yourself from spitting this kind of BS!
And as B stated it...all US president ate the Wahabbi di..ehem sausage.
you think Carter did not have anything to do with it?
Mr. JOSHUA
12-07-2006, 10:44 AM
I obviously don't know this first or even second hand but the way it was explained to me, if the US had not backed the Shah and helped him modernize/westernize Iran, the fundamentalist/extremist Islamic sects would not have gotten their springboard into prominence.
I see this happening over and over, some part of the US government figures "hey, let's set this dude up and he'll owe us and we'll get cheap secure oil
(or various other raw materials, bananas, etc.) Didn't the US help put Saddam (and the Baathist Party) into power like 30 years ago? So actually we are cleaning up prior US meddling and doing one heck of a sad job.
And, because people in other countries actually hate outside meddlers just as much as we do and are just as brave as we are, they fight back. We get bit in the butt and end up paying more for oil and bananas - especially if you figure in the cost of all that military hardware. And when you figure the dead and wounded, it absolutely is not worth it. All this waste for hypocritical pipedreams.
And yeah, I know there are evil people who need to be taken down.
You are not too far from the truth there techrep. It is true the US gov. was helping Saddam and the Shah, but to understand why, you have to understand the Shia and the Sunni. They are much like the Republican and Democrat only the Shia and Sunni have way more extreme views. The Shah, back in the day, was a counter to hostile Sunni majority nations. The Shah was western friendly, but still ruled his country with an iron fist and he certainly wasn't afraid to throw the first punch if he felt threatned, so in a way he and his mililtary struck a balance in that particular region. Then Carter waddled along and screwed that thing up, we all know that and what came about that.
Now, guess who was the counter to Khomeini then, and would've been the counter to Amjadinijead or however you spell it. Saddam. Now, many Republicans will gasp when you say we should have left him in power, and it is true that many other nations provided intel that suggested he was a very real threat, but, I think the gov. should have weighed the two options. Amjad. has said he would like to bring back the old persia which I think consisted of Iran, Syria, Jordan and Iraq. Who's to stop him there.
Thats why it pisses me off to see that picture of the king of Saudi Arabia and Bush holding hands, not because someones trying to one-up me, but because Bush, the fool that he is, lets them tell him, and he believes it, that we need them more than they need us.
Bull.
Iran takes over Iraq and you will see Hitler Jr. licking his chops over Saudi Arabia. The only difference between Saudi Arabia and Iran is that SA does have a good economy and people have a pretty good life because the government let people(men) actually have jobs and they actually pay them decent wages.
Iran on the other hand, spends all the money on their military, terrorism and nuclear technology. Thats why its so important not to let them get the bomb, they won't have to threaten their neighbors with military force, they will threaten them with the bomb, and once he gets what he wants from them, he's gonna move on like Hitler.
Mastermind
12-07-2006, 11:22 AM
ummmmm... Wisely said, Mr. Joshua. Wisely said.<MM
Friendly Fire
12-07-2006, 11:55 AM
You are not too far from the truth there techrep. It is true the US gov. was helping Saddam and the Shah, but to understand why, you have to understand the Shia and the Sunni. They are much like the Republican and Democrat only the Shia and Sunni have way more extreme views. The Shah, back in the day, was a counter to hostile Sunni majority nations. The Shah was western friendly, but still ruled his country with an iron fist and he certainly wasn't afraid to throw the first punch if he felt threatned, so in a way he and his mililtary struck a balance in that particular region. Then Carter waddled along and screwed that thing up, we all know that and what came about that.
Now, guess who was the counter to Khomeini then, and would've been the counter to Amjadinijead or however you spell it. Saddam. Now, many Republicans will gasp when you say we should have left him in power, and it is true that many other nations provided intel that suggested he was a very real threat, but, I think the gov. should have weighed the two options. Amjad. has said he would like to bring back the old persia which I think consisted of Iran, Syria, Jordan and Iraq. Who's to stop him there.
Thats why it pisses me off to see that picture of the king of Saudi Arabia and Bush holding hands, not because someones trying to one-up me, but because Bush, the fool that he is, lets them tell him, and he believes it, that we need them more than they need us.
Bull.
Iran takes over Iraq and you will see Hitler Jr. licking his chops over Saudi Arabia. The only difference between Saudi Arabia and Iran is that SA does have a good economy and people have a pretty good life because the government let people(men) actually have jobs and they actually pay them decent wages.
Iran on the other hand, spends all the money on their military, terrorism and nuclear technology. Thats why its so important not to let them get the bomb, they won't have to threaten their neighbors with military force, they will threaten them with the bomb, and once he gets what he wants from them, he's gonna move on like Hitler.
What in the ...aaaaah come on. Do you klnow what you're talking about? The average worker in Saudi Arabia, is foreign illegal and payed (when payed) around 5 USD a day! He works 16 hours with three breaks of 7min 30 seconds (sic).
The Shah wasn't seeking for any Shia-Sunni battle (damn the guy was comming from a Cossack family) he was there just because he had been put there to counter the Soviet Views and the Non-US friendly line of Musadiq/Mossadegh.
You deserve to be shot in the public place for what you just you said.
Better you deserve the DA of the week title.
Damn where is this going into.
You deserve to be shot in the public place for what you just you said.
Calm down, Stalin.
Friendly Fire
12-07-2006, 12:08 PM
Calm down, Stalin.
Meh I was clam, but the Indian worker that would have crossed MP.net at that very moment is surely preparing a Human IED vest and buying his ticket to USA to visit Josh.
But you won't tell me that his words weren't heavily loaded with anal mixture.
Edit: Oh that's all what you retained from my post?
Mr. JOSHUA
12-07-2006, 12:22 PM
Commies are wierd.
Obviously this person has only recieved his education from the socialist media. Saudi Arabians don't get payed well? I hate to say this because I love America but Saudi Arabia is almost like America in terms of economic productivity. They have the wealthy, the middle class and the poor class, which most wahhabbis come from.
You sound like the typical Al Sharpton or Jessie Jackson arguing that this person is poor, he only makes $5 bucks a day.
The people who make $5 bucks a day are illegals, much like another trait here in America.
This is racism, even though he's from the same race.
Well, this isn't the point I was getting at, but leave it to the this guy to take your attention off the main point and down the path of social topics.
Friendly Fire
12-07-2006, 12:29 PM
Commies are wierd.
Obviously this person has only recieved his education from the socialist media. Saudi Arabians don't get payed well? I hate to say this because I love America but Saudi Arabia is almost like America in terms of economic productivity. They have the wealthy, the middle class and the poor class, which most wahhabbis come from.
You sound like the typical Al Sharpton or Jessie Jackson arguing that this person is poor, he only makes $5 bucks a day.
The people who make $5 bucks a day are illegals, much like another trait here in America.
This is racism, even though he's from the same race.
Well, this isn't the point I was getting at, but leave it to the this guy to take your attention off the main point and down the path of social topics.
OMG!
Have you looked at an SA report ever? 15 % of their males are unemployed (officially) 60% (40% officially) of their effective workforce is foreign and payed peanuts! They have the GDP/Capita of Poland and this while PPP is involved.
Dude you need medication.
Mr. JOSHUA
12-07-2006, 12:34 PM
Have you looked at an SA report ever?
No, I've never looked at an SA report, holmes.
Orale SA, Vatos Locos 4 EVER holmes............
ORALE SA, ORALE SA.............
NimDod
12-07-2006, 12:39 PM
http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives/06.02.24.PeaceLoveGeno-X.gif
Mr. JOSHUA
12-07-2006, 12:40 PM
Do your research on wahhabism, you'll find out where it originates from and how it has spread from Saudi Arabia and Yemen.
You'll also learn about the different economic classes and why Saudi Arabian ghettos are the hot beds of wahhabism.
You'll also be astonished to find out about how Saudi Arabia has malls(like ours only without the *** appeal) retail stores, expensive car dealerships, regular car dealerships, restraunts, grocery stores, hospitals, schools, airports......
Maybe you misunderstood me, I wasn't talking about Afghanistan.
Dronetek
12-07-2006, 12:54 PM
Carter has basiclly accepted the Jihadist viewpoint on Israel, so I dont think its a strech to say he dosn't like jews.
Friendly Fire
12-07-2006, 01:02 PM
Do your research on wahhabism, you'll find out where it originates from and how it has spread from Saudi Arabia and Yemen.
You'll also learn about the different economic classes and why Saudi Arabian ghettos are the hot beds of wahhabism.
You'll also be astonished to find out about how Saudi Arabia has malls(like ours only without the *** appeal) retail stores, expensive car dealerships, regular car dealerships, restraunts, grocery stores, hospitals, schools, airports......
Maybe you misunderstood me, I wasn't talking about Afghanistan.
What malls have to do with the Saudi Society...I mean there are nowhere never the USA.
Wahabism was started by the same reigning familiy that is in power today. Saudi Arabia is the only country named after it's ruling Dynasty...they have a freaking gap of productivity in their economy and i wouldn't like to recall me the Gini value of SA.
Have you seen the GDP proportions of SA: Well do a fast check and the compare with the ROW. you'd be surprised.
Mr. JOSHUA
12-07-2006, 01:05 PM
Carter has basiclly accepted the Jihadist viewpoint on Israel, so I dont think its a strech to say he dosn't like jews.
A stretch, not at all. He also accepts Johnny's money and in return, is their spokesmouth or puppet for them.
techrep
12-07-2006, 01:46 PM
http://fumier.typepad.com/fumier/images/bush_and_boyfriend_4.jpg
When pictures like this hit the media, I would image a "thought bubble" coming from Bush "Man, this is gonna cost me. Leno, Letterman, all dem late night pukes are gonna have a field day with this. Hey, maybe if I push for some stronger anti-gay laws..."
Mr. JOSHUA
12-07-2006, 02:18 PM
OK, first off, if you are not going to make any sense friendlyfire, then I'm gonna stop replying to you.
Second. No malls? Are you insane? Even the MSM has done stories on how in someways Saudi Arabia is stepping into the 21st century and in someways still is not.
I suppose the UAE has none of these things either.
Or Kuwait.
Or even Iraq.
These countries, even Iraq, if it could get its act together, are very wealthy countries.
Maybe the Democrat party of Saudi Arabia is giving you your information.
Seeing as how they like to distort economic data.
Mr. JOSHUA
12-07-2006, 02:20 PM
Hey, maybe if I push for some stronger anti-gay laws..."
techrep, you're ANTI-GAY? Rosie O'Donnel is gonna call you out!
Paul in Saudi2
12-07-2006, 10:31 PM
Obviously this person has only recieved his education from the socialist media. Saudi Arabians don't get payed well? I hate to say this because I love America but Saudi Arabia is almost like America in terms of economic productivity.
In a word, nope.
The local GDP/Captia is about the same as Slovakia. Using the PPP figures that is US$15K/year (#46 in the league standings) v. Slovakia's USD$16K (#45).
The same figure for the US is US$41K/year (#3, behind Norway and Luxembourg).
More alarming is that you can do a fair job of calculating the local GDP/Captia by just taking the oil revenues and dividing by the population. There is almost no value added by the local workforce.
Figures are here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_%28PPP%29_per_capita
Friendly Fire
12-08-2006, 02:47 AM
In a word, nope.
The local GDP/Captia is about the same as Slovakia. Using the PPP figures that is US$15K/year (#46 in the league standings) v. Slovakia's USD$16K (#45).
The same figure for the US is US$41K/year (#3, behind Norway and Luxembourg).
More alarming is that you can do a fair job of calculating the local GDP/Captia by just taking the oil revenues and dividing by the population. There is almost no value added by the local workforce.
Figures are here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_GDP_%28PPP%29_per_capita
they have a freaking gap of productivity in their economy and i wouldn't like to recall me the Gini value of SA.
From a post above.
Paul why are you trying to reason him? What's the purpose of it?
Friendly Fire
12-08-2006, 02:49 AM
OK, first off, if you are not going to make any sense friendlyfire, then I'm gonna stop replying to you.
Second. No malls? Are you insane? Even the MSM has done stories on how in someways Saudi Arabia is stepping into the 21st century and in someways still is not.
I suppose the UAE has none of these things either.
Or Kuwait.
Or even Iraq.
These countries, even Iraq, if it could get its act together, are very wealthy countries.
Maybe the Democrat party of Saudi Arabia is giving you your information.
Seeing as how they like to distort economic data.
Dude even In Trasndniestria there are malls! ........But the existnce of MALLS is IRRELEVANT TO JUDGE THE ECONOMY OF A COUNTRY! In RDC there are no malls any more. Yet the RDC
Ditsorted economic data: Well these are IMF/CIA cross checked data...
Mr. JOSHUA
12-08-2006, 10:45 AM
So wait a minute, wait a minute, everyone who is driving around over there in Mercedez Benz's and BMW's and Land Rovers is outright impoverished.
And everyone who lives in a modern house with electricity, running water, satellite dishes in the back of the house, sending their children to universties in Saudi Arabia, Europe and the United States is impoverished.
I guess everyone who owns these things works in the government.
I guess Osama Bin Laden worked in the government, or maybe he was royalty.
loganinkosovo
12-08-2006, 05:52 PM
The Old C@ckS@cker is finally showing his true colours......
He's an Anti-Semite, a Liar and a Plagiarist
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,235283,00.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,235422,00.html
Mr.Flint
12-08-2006, 06:17 PM
That moron also thinks that Palis have it worse than Rwanda:cantbeli:
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.1.10 Copyright © 2012 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.