<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
	<channel>
		<title>Military Photos - Political Discussions and Rants</title>
		<link>http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/</link>
		<description><![CDATA[Post all non military-related political discussions and current events here, along with any crazy rants you can't hold in anymore.]]></description>
		<language>en</language>
		<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 00:02:21 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>vBulletin</generator>
		<ttl>60</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Donegal man charged with 1982 Hyde Park attack</title>
			<link>http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226798-Donegal-man-charged-with-1982-Hyde-Park-attack&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:02:53 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[
---Quote---
A 61-YEAR-OLD man from Donegal has been charged in relation to an attack in London’s Hyde Park that killed four soldiers in July 1982.
John Anthony Downey is due at Westminster Magistrates Court later this afternoon charged with the murder of Roy John Bright, Dennis Richard Anthony Daly, Simon Andrew Tipper and Geoffrey Vernon Young – all members of the Royal Household Cavalry who were travelling from their barracks to Buckingham Palace for the Changing of the Guard.
---End Quote---
Strange day for this news to come out, but reality doesn't take much notice of coincidence.

http://www.thejournal.ie/donegal-man-charged-with-1982-hyde-park-attack-920243-May2013/?utm_source=facebook_short
*(Graphic Warn)


*]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			A 61-YEAR-OLD man from Donegal has been charged in relation to an attack in London’s Hyde Park that killed four soldiers in July 1982.<br />
John Anthony Downey is due at Westminster Magistrates Court later this afternoon charged with the murder of Roy John Bright, Dennis Richard Anthony Daly, Simon Andrew Tipper and Geoffrey Vernon Young – all members of the Royal Household Cavalry who were travelling from their barracks to Buckingham Palace for the Changing of the Guard.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div>Strange day for this news to come out, but reality doesn't take much notice of coincidence.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.thejournal.ie/donegal-man-charged-with-1982-hyde-park-attack-920243-May2013/?utm_source=facebook_short" target="_blank">http://www.thejournal.ie/donegal-man...facebook_short</a><br />
<b>(Graphic Warn)<br />
<br />
<br />
</b></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?12-Political-Discussions-and-Rants">Political Discussions and Rants</category>
			<dc:creator>tea drinker</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226798-Donegal-man-charged-with-1982-Hyde-Park-attack</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Chicago Public Schools approves largest school closure in city's history]]></title>
			<link>http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226795-Chicago-Public-Schools-approves-largest-school-closure-in-city-s-history&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 21:26:06 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Noreen S. Ahmed-Ullah and John Chase, The Chicago                                                                                                                                                                         Tribune, May 22, 2013

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-chicago-school-closings-20130522,0,4746227.story


---Quote---
After hearing from aldermen, angry parents and community members in a  meeting interrupted several times by protesters, the Chicago Board of  Education today approved a plan to close 49 elementary schools and one  high school program.

The board voted 4-2 to close Von Humboldt  Elementary, then unanimously approved the rest of the closings in a  single vote. (Read a recap of the meeting on our blog HERE (http://media.apps.chicagotribune.com/layercake/uploads/chinews-chicago-school-closings-201305221459/index.html).)
 Before that, the board voted 6-0 to approve a last-minute  recommendation by the district to spare four elementary schools:  Manierre Elementary on the Near North Side, Mahalia Jackson and Garvey  on the South Side and Ericson on the West Side.

After more than  two hours of public comments, Chicago Public Schools CEO Barbara  Byrd-Bennett and board members defended the plan to close the highest  number of schools the city has ever shut down in a single year.

“We  can no longer embrace the status quo because the status quo is not  working for all Chicago school children,” Byrd-Bennett said before the  vote was taken. “It is imperative that you take the difficult decision  but essential steps.”

The district says it needs to close schools to address a looming $1 billion deficit and declining enrollment. 

Board  President David Vitale, in his remarks before the vote, said that while  closing schools is difficult “ultimately it is our responsibility to  choose.” 

“Today's reality requires change,” he said.
---End Quote---
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Noreen S. Ahmed-Ullah and John Chase, <i>The Chicago                                                                                                                                                                         </i><i>Tribune</i>, May 22, 2013<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/breaking/chi-chicago-school-closings-20130522,0,4746227.story" target="_blank">http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l...,4746227.story</a><br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			After hearing from aldermen, angry parents and community members in a  meeting interrupted several times by protesters, the Chicago Board of  Education today approved a plan to close 49 elementary schools and one  high school program.<br />
<br />
The board voted 4-2 to close Von Humboldt  Elementary, then unanimously approved the rest of the closings in a  single vote. (Read a recap of the meeting on our blog <a href="http://media.apps.chicagotribune.com/layercake/uploads/chinews-chicago-school-closings-201305221459/index.html" target="_blank">HERE</a>.)<br />
 Before that, the board voted 6-0 to approve a last-minute  recommendation by the district to spare four elementary schools:  Manierre Elementary on the Near North Side, Mahalia Jackson and Garvey  on the South Side and Ericson on the West Side.<br />
<br />
After more than  two hours of public comments, Chicago Public Schools CEO Barbara  Byrd-Bennett and board members defended the plan to close the highest  number of schools the city has ever shut down in a single year.<br />
<br />
“We  can no longer embrace the status quo because the status quo is not  working for all Chicago school children,” Byrd-Bennett said before the  vote was taken. “It is imperative that you take the difficult decision  but essential steps.”<br />
<br />
The district says it needs to close schools to address a looming $1 billion deficit and declining enrollment. <br />
<br />
Board  President David Vitale, in his remarks before the vote, said that while  closing schools is difficult “ultimately it is our responsibility to  choose.” <br />
<br />
“Today's reality requires change,” he said.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?12-Political-Discussions-and-Rants">Political Discussions and Rants</category>
			<dc:creator>Ought Six</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226795-Chicago-Public-Schools-approves-largest-school-closure-in-city-s-history</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Thomas Jefferson: “We Failed”</title>
			<link>http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226791-Thomas-Jefferson-“We-Failed”&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 20:29:02 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Paul Rosenberg, Free Man's Perspective blog, May 14th, 2013

http://www.freemansperspective.com/thomas-jefferson-failed/


---Quote---
Thomas Jefferson &#8211; one of my long-time heroes &#8211; was convinced that he  and his friends blew the chance they had to establish true freedom in  America. I know that a hundred thousand self-praising textbooks,  speeches, pundits and songs claim that Jefferson and the rest established freedom, but that&#8217;s NOT what Jefferson thought, and that is NOT what he said. (You can choose who to believe for yourself.) 

Nearly fifty years after the declaration of independence, he was of  the opinion that the founders did not fully live up to the moment  presented to them.
---End Quote---
Read the rest of the piece at the linked page.

I think that human systems of governance always fail in the end due to human nature itself.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Paul Rosenberg, <i>Free Man's Perspective</i> blog, May 14th, 2013<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.freemansperspective.com/thomas-jefferson-failed/" target="_blank">http://www.freemansperspective.com/t...ferson-failed/</a><br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			Thomas Jefferson &#8211; one of my long-time heroes &#8211; was convinced that he  and his friends blew the chance they had to establish true freedom in  America. I know that a hundred thousand self-praising textbooks,  speeches, pundits and songs claim that Jefferson and the rest <i>established</i> freedom, but that&#8217;s NOT what Jefferson thought, and that is NOT what he said. (You can choose who to believe for yourself.) <br />
<br />
Nearly fifty years after the declaration of independence, he was of  the opinion that the founders did not fully live up to the moment  presented to them.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div><i>Read the rest of the piece at the linked page.</i><br />
<br />
I think that human systems of governance always fail in the end due to human nature itself.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?12-Political-Discussions-and-Rants">Political Discussions and Rants</category>
			<dc:creator>Ought Six</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226791-Thomas-Jefferson-“We-Failed”</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Immigration reform bill clears key Senate hurdle</title>
			<link>http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226772-Immigration-reform-bill-clears-key-Senate-hurdle&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 00:37:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[
---Quote---
*Washington (CNN)* -- The Senate Judiciary Committee  approved the bipartisan "Gang of Eight" immigration reform bill on  Tuesday, sending the measure to the Senate floor for further  consideration and giving the bill's backers their first major  legislative victory.

 Members of the Democratic-controlled panel voted 13-5 in favor of the measure.
 If enacted, the plan would constitute the first overhaul of the nation's immigration policy since 1986.

 The committee's ten  Democrats were joined in supporting the bill by three Republicans:  Arizona's Jeff Flake, South Carolina's Lindsey Graham, and Utah's Orrin  Hatch.

 Flake and Graham are two of the bill's four Republican authors.
 Both party leaders in the  Senate appeared supportive of the effort, a positive sign for backers  hoping to win a solid majority in the full chamber.

 "I think the 'Gang of  Eight' has made a substantial contribution to moving the issue forward,"  said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky. "I'm hopeful  we'll be able to get a bill that we can pass here in the Senate."

 Senate Majority Leader  Harry Reid, D-Nevada, praised the "masterful" job of Judiciary Committee  Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, in navigating roughly 300 proposed  amendments and advancing the 844-page bill to the floor.

 The measure will create a 13-year path to citizenship for most of the country's 11 million undocumented immigrants.
---End Quote---
Source (http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/21/politics/senate-immigration-bill/index.html)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			<b>Washington (CNN)</b> -- The Senate Judiciary Committee  approved the bipartisan &quot;Gang of Eight&quot; immigration reform bill on  Tuesday, sending the measure to the Senate floor for further  consideration and giving the bill's backers their first major  legislative victory.<br />
<br />
 Members of the Democratic-controlled panel voted 13-5 in favor of the measure.<br />
 If enacted, the plan would constitute the first overhaul of the nation's immigration policy since 1986.<br />
<br />
 The committee's ten  Democrats were joined in supporting the bill by three Republicans:  Arizona's Jeff Flake, South Carolina's Lindsey Graham, and Utah's Orrin  Hatch.<br />
<br />
 Flake and Graham are two of the bill's four Republican authors.<br />
 Both party leaders in the  Senate appeared supportive of the effort, a positive sign for backers  hoping to win a solid majority in the full chamber.<br />
<br />
 &quot;I think the 'Gang of  Eight' has made a substantial contribution to moving the issue forward,&quot;  said Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Kentucky. &quot;I'm hopeful  we'll be able to get a bill that we can pass here in the Senate.&quot;<br />
<br />
 Senate Majority Leader  Harry Reid, D-Nevada, praised the &quot;masterful&quot; job of Judiciary Committee  Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vermont, in navigating roughly 300 proposed  amendments and advancing the 844-page bill to the floor.<br />
<br />
 The measure will create a 13-year path to citizenship for most of the country's 11 million undocumented immigrants.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2013/05/21/politics/senate-immigration-bill/index.html" target="_blank">Source</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?12-Political-Discussions-and-Rants">Political Discussions and Rants</category>
			<dc:creator>beNder</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226772-Immigration-reform-bill-clears-key-Senate-hurdle</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Obama's "Deficit Reduction" Budget Is Almost All Tax Hikes]]></title>
			<link>http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226769-Obama-s-quot-Deficit-Reduction-quot-Budget-Is-Almost-All-Tax-Hikes&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:59:28 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Kevin Glass, Townhall, May 20, 2013

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/kevinglass/2013/05/20/obamas-deficit-reduction-budget-is-almost-all-tax-hikes-n1601907


---Quote---
It went largely unnoticed at the end of last week due to the Obama  scandalpalooza, but the Congressional Budget Office's score of President  Obama's budget was released on Friday afternoon. The short summary is  that a combination of tax hikes and spending cuts would decrease the  budget deficit over the next four years, but the Obama budget does very  little on entitlement reform and the coming tsunami of entitlement  spending pushes the government ever more into the red.  

The Associated Press' summary (http://townhall.com/news/politics-elections/2013/05/17/cbo-obama-budget-cuts-deficits-11t-by-2023-n1599809) led with "Obama budget cuts deficits by $1.1 trillion" but, as Nick Gillespie points out (http://reason.com/blog/2013/05/20/obamas-balanced-approach-to-deficit-redu?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reason%2FHitandRun+%28Reason+Online+-+Hit+%26+Run+Blog%29),  delving down into the actual numbers yields some worrying results. The  short-term deficit is larger than the CBO's baseline, and the long-term  budget only cuts the deficit relative to the baseline by - you guessed  it - massive tax hikes. 

  Chiefly because of spending increases his budget proposes, Obama's  fiscal plan would make next year's deficit $115 billion higher than the  $560 billion shortfall that the budget office estimates for 2014 without  the president's policies. Republicans criticized that and contrasted  the $542 billion deficit Obama's budget would leave in 2023 with the  spending plan approved by the GOP-run House, which relies on deep  spending cuts to achieve balance by that year.  The congressional report said to achieve his $1.1 trillion in savings  over the next decade, Obama relies on $974 billion in higher revenue and  $172 billion in spending cuts. That is nearly a 6-1 ratio. 
 
Obama's major revenue-raising proposals include limiting some deductions  and exclusions for some higher-earning taxpayers, raising $493 billion  over the decade; boosting tobacco taxes by $83 billion; and raising  estate and gift taxes by $77 billion, the budget office said. 


Moreover, the largest spending cut in President Obama's budget comes  from winding down overseas contingency operations in Iraq and  Afghanistan. A quirk of the federal budget causes the CBO to assume that  OCOs would never cease. So President Obama uses the over $600  billion in budget "savings" from winding down overseas wars and puts it  towards more spending programs. In total, as the AP reported, there's  $172 billion in spending cuts - which means that most of that war  draw-down "savings" are put towards more spending. 
 
President Obama's budget is pretty typical for what we know about his  economic philosophy. He's a Keynesian, which means the short-term  deficit reduction makes sense. He also doesn't think that America's  long-term entitlement problems are actually problems that need  addressing - so his failure to address them, and then allow budget  deficits and debt to rise in the medium- and long-term, also makes  sense. While you may have read that President Obama's budget gets the  deficit under control, it's mostly a one-time occasion that is  predicated by an economic recovery and President Obama's tax hikes.
---End Quote---
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Kevin Glass, <i>Townhall</i>, May 20, 2013<br />
<br />
<a href="http://townhall.com/tipsheet/kevinglass/2013/05/20/obamas-deficit-reduction-budget-is-almost-all-tax-hikes-n1601907" target="_blank">http://townhall.com/tipsheet/kevingl...hikes-n1601907</a><br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			It went largely unnoticed at the end of last week due to the Obama  scandalpalooza, but the Congressional Budget Office's score of President  Obama's budget was released on Friday afternoon. The short summary is  that a combination of tax hikes and spending cuts would decrease the  budget deficit over the next four years, but the Obama budget does very  little on entitlement reform and the coming tsunami of entitlement  spending pushes the government ever more into the red.  <br />
<br />
The Associated Press' <a href="http://townhall.com/news/politics-elections/2013/05/17/cbo-obama-budget-cuts-deficits-11t-by-2023-n1599809" target="_blank">summary</a> led with &quot;Obama budget cuts deficits by $1.1 trillion&quot; but, as Nick Gillespie <a href="http://reason.com/blog/2013/05/20/obamas-balanced-approach-to-deficit-redu?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+reason%2FHitandRun+%28Reason+Online+-+Hit+%26+Run+Blog%29" target="_blank">points out</a>,  delving down into the actual numbers yields some worrying results. The  short-term deficit is larger than the CBO's baseline, and the long-term  budget only cuts the deficit relative to the baseline by - you guessed  it - massive tax hikes. <br />
<br />
 <div style="margin-left:40px"> Chiefly because of spending increases his budget proposes, Obama's  fiscal plan would make next year's deficit $115 billion higher than the  $560 billion shortfall that the budget office estimates for 2014 without  the president's policies. Republicans criticized that and contrasted  the $542 billion deficit Obama's budget would leave in 2023 with the  spending plan approved by the GOP-run House, which relies on deep  spending cuts to achieve balance by that year.  The congressional report said to achieve his $1.1 trillion in savings  over the next decade, Obama relies on $974 billion in higher revenue and  $172 billion in spending cuts. That is nearly a 6-1 ratio. <br />
 <br />
Obama's major revenue-raising proposals include limiting some deductions  and exclusions for some higher-earning taxpayers, raising $493 billion  over the decade; boosting tobacco taxes by $83 billion; and raising  estate and gift taxes by $77 billion, the budget office said. </div><br />
<br />
Moreover, the largest spending cut in President Obama's budget comes  from winding down overseas contingency operations in Iraq and  Afghanistan. A quirk of the federal budget causes the CBO to assume that  OCOs would <i>never</i> cease. So President Obama uses the over $600  billion in budget &quot;savings&quot; from winding down overseas wars and puts it  towards more spending programs. In total, as the AP reported, there's  $172 billion in spending cuts - which means that most of that war  draw-down &quot;savings&quot; are put towards more spending. <br />
 <br />
President Obama's budget is pretty typical for what we know about his  economic philosophy. He's a Keynesian, which means the short-term  deficit reduction makes sense. He also doesn't think that America's  long-term entitlement problems are actually problems that need  addressing - so his failure to address them, and then allow budget  deficits and debt to rise in the medium- and long-term, also makes  sense. While you may have read that President Obama's budget gets the  deficit under control, it's mostly a one-time occasion that is  predicated by an economic recovery and President Obama's tax hikes.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?12-Political-Discussions-and-Rants">Political Discussions and Rants</category>
			<dc:creator>Ought Six</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226769-Obama-s-quot-Deficit-Reduction-quot-Budget-Is-Almost-All-Tax-Hikes</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[White House claim that Repubs 'doctored emails to smear the President' are false]]></title>
			<link>http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226768-White-House-claim-that-Repubs-doctored-emails-to-smear-the-President-are-false&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 20:14:01 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>*The White House claim of ‘doctored e-mails... to smear the president’*

Glenn Kessler, The WaPo, 05/21/2013

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/the-white-house-claim-of-doctored-e-mails-to-smear-the-president/2013/05/20/a23343b6-c19e-11e2-8bd8-2788030e6b44_blog.html


---Quote---
It has long been part of the Washington game for officials to  discredit a news story by playing up errors in a relatively small part  of it. Pfeiffer gives the impression that GOP operatives deliberately  tried to “smear the president” with false, doctored e-mails.

But  the reporters involved have indicated they were told by their sources  that these were summaries, taken from notes of e-mails that could not be  kept. The fact that slightly different versions of the e-mails were  reported by different journalists suggests there were different  note-takers as well.

Indeed, Republicans would have been foolish  to seriously doctor e-mails that the White House at any moment could  have released (and eventually did). Clearly, of course, Republicans  would put their own spin on what the e-mails meant, as they did in the  House report. Given that the e-mails were almost certain to leak once  they were sent to Capitol Hill, it’s a wonder the White House did not  proactively release them earlier. 

The burden of proof lies with  the accuser. Despite Pfeiffer’s claim of political skullduggery, we see  little evidence that much was at play here besides imprecise  wordsmithing or editing errors by journalists.

*Three Pinocchios*

Image: http://i.imgur.com/ewlVyyW.jpg 
---End Quote---
Read the rest of the article at the linked page.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><b>The White House claim of ‘doctored e-mails... to smear the president’</b><br />
<br />
Glenn Kessler, <i>The WaPo</i>, 05/21/2013<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/the-white-house-claim-of-doctored-e-mails-to-smear-the-president/2013/05/20/a23343b6-c19e-11e2-8bd8-2788030e6b44_blog.html" target="_blank">http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...6b44_blog.html</a><br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			It has long been part of the Washington game for officials to  discredit a news story by playing up errors in a relatively small part  of it. Pfeiffer gives the impression that GOP operatives deliberately  tried to “smear the president” with false, doctored e-mails.<br />
<br />
But  the reporters involved have indicated they were told by their sources  that these were summaries, taken from notes of e-mails that could not be  kept. The fact that slightly different versions of the e-mails were  reported by different journalists suggests there were different  note-takers as well.<br />
<br />
Indeed, Republicans would have been foolish  to seriously doctor e-mails that the White House at any moment could  have released (and eventually did). Clearly, of course, Republicans  would put their own spin on what the e-mails meant, as they did in the  House report. Given that the e-mails were almost certain to leak once  they were sent to Capitol Hill, it’s a wonder the White House did not  proactively release them earlier. <br />
<br />
The burden of proof lies with  the accuser. Despite Pfeiffer’s claim of political skullduggery, we see  little evidence that much was at play here besides imprecise  wordsmithing or editing errors by journalists.<br />
<br />
<b>Three Pinocchios</b><br />
<br />
<img src="http://i.imgur.com/ewlVyyW.jpg" border="0" alt="" />
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div><i>Read the rest of the article at the linked page.</i></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?12-Political-Discussions-and-Rants">Political Discussions and Rants</category>
			<dc:creator>Ought Six</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226768-White-House-claim-that-Repubs-doctored-emails-to-smear-the-President-are-false</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[A Scottish MSP's  Arab Spring Anology]]></title>
			<link>http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226765-A-Scottish-MSP-s-Arab-Spring-Anology&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 19:27:50 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Some of you seem have the view that George Galloway speaks some shyte but  MSP take's it to the next level you can't make this up !! 


roflNot even Galloway would say that !! . 

http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/top-stories/scottish-independence-msp-makes-arab-spring-analogy-1-2938468



OPPOSITION parties have criticised Scotland’s external affairs  minister Humza Yousaf, claiming he has drawn “crass” and “irresponsible”  comparisons between the Arab Spring and Scotland’s own constitutional  journey.
                                                  				 				                 Mr Yousaf was today addressing the Doha Forum, which  hosts discussions on democracy, development and free trade in the Middle  East, during a visit to Qatar to promote links with Scotland.
Although  the minister said the political situation in Scotland cannot be  directly compared with that of the Arab Spring countries, the  Conservatives and Liberal Democrats were quick to condemn his remarks.
In  his address, Mr Yousaf said: “We cannot directly compare the situation  in Scotland or the UK today with the situation in new democracies in the  Middle East. However, I think that there are lessons that we can learn  to mutual benefit.
“In Scotland we need to do more to increase participation, especially of young people, in our politics.
“We  need to learn more about how we can use digital media as a means of  consulting with the youth, to make young people feel more engaged.
“The challenges for the new democracies are many and varied.
“However,  in our experience, a framework that is respectful of the views of  others and respects social and political freedoms can help frame the  environment in which peaceful transition can take place.
“More importantly than anything it must be inclusive of women, young people, minorities and even of our opponents.
“It  is this approach that led to the historic Edinburgh Agreement between  the Scottish and UK government to hold a referendum on Scottish  independence in 2014, and a commitment to work together in the best  interests of the people regardless of the result.”
Responding to  the speech, Conservative deputy leader Jackson Carlaw said: “Comparing  the drive for democracy which inspired the Arab Spring to the  possibility of a separate Scotland is irresponsible and simply  ludicrous.
“Inexperienced junior ministers, trying to draw  similarities such as this, makes the Yes campaign look even more flaky  and desperate than it already is.”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Some of you seem have the view that George Galloway speaks some shyte but  MSP take's it to the next level you can't make this up !! <br />
<br />
<br />
roflNot even Galloway would say that !! . <br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.scotsman.com/news/politics/top-stories/scottish-independence-msp-makes-arab-spring-analogy-1-2938468" target="_blank">http://www.scotsman.com/news/politic...logy-1-2938468</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
OPPOSITION parties have criticised Scotland’s external affairs  minister Humza Yousaf, claiming he has drawn “crass” and “irresponsible”  comparisons between the Arab Spring and Scotland’s own constitutional  journey.<br />
                                                  				 				                 Mr Yousaf was today addressing the Doha Forum, which  hosts discussions on democracy, development and free trade in the Middle  East, during a visit to Qatar to promote links with Scotland.<br />
Although  the minister said the political situation in Scotland cannot be  directly compared with that of the Arab Spring countries, the  Conservatives and Liberal Democrats were quick to condemn his remarks.<br />
In  his address, Mr Yousaf said: “We cannot directly compare the situation  in Scotland or the UK today with the situation in new democracies in the  Middle East. However, I think that there are lessons that we can learn  to mutual benefit.<br />
“In Scotland we need to do more to increase participation, especially of young people, in our politics.<br />
“We  need to learn more about how we can use digital media as a means of  consulting with the youth, to make young people feel more engaged.<br />
“The challenges for the new democracies are many and varied.<br />
“However,  in our experience, a framework that is respectful of the views of  others and respects social and political freedoms can help frame the  environment in which peaceful transition can take place.<br />
“More importantly than anything it must be inclusive of women, young people, minorities and even of our opponents.<br />
“It  is this approach that led to the historic Edinburgh Agreement between  the Scottish and UK government to hold a referendum on Scottish  independence in 2014, and a commitment to work together in the best  interests of the people regardless of the result.”<br />
Responding to  the speech, Conservative deputy leader Jackson Carlaw said: “Comparing  the drive for democracy which inspired the Arab Spring to the  possibility of a separate Scotland is irresponsible and simply  ludicrous.<br />
“Inexperienced junior ministers, trying to draw  similarities such as this, makes the Yes campaign look even more flaky  and desperate than it already is.”</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?12-Political-Discussions-and-Rants">Political Discussions and Rants</category>
			<dc:creator>timetraveller</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226765-A-Scottish-MSP-s-Arab-Spring-Anology</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>How Hope and Change Gave Way to Spying on the Press</title>
			<link>http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226755-How-Hope-and-Change-Gave-Way-to-Spying-on-the-Press&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:17:04 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA["First they came for Fox News, and they did not speak out—because they were not Fox News. Then they came for government whistleblowers, and they did not speak out—because they were not government whistleblowers. Then they came for the maker of a YouTube video, and—okay, we know how this story ends. But how did we get here?

Turns out it’s a fairly swift sojourn from a president pushing to “delegitimize” a news organization to threatening criminal prosecution for journalistic activity by a Fox News reporter, James Rosen, to spying on Associated Press reporters. In between, the Obama administration found time to relentlessly persecute government whistleblowers and publicly harass and condemn a private American citizen for expressing his constitutionally protected speech in the form of an anti-Islam YouTube video.
Where were the media when all this began happening? With a few exceptions, they were acting as quiet enablers.

It’s instructive to go back to the dawn of Hope and Change. It was 2009, and the new administration decided it was appropriate to use the prestige of the White House to viciously attack a news organization—Fox News—and the journalists who work there. Remember, President Obama had barely been in office and had enjoyed the most laudatory press of any new president in modern history. Yet even one outlet that allowed dissent or criticism of the president was one too many. This should have been a red flag to everyone, regardless of what they thought of Fox News. The math was simple: if the administration would abuse its power to try and intimidate one media outlet, what made anyone think they weren’t next?

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/05/21/how-hope-and-change-gave-way-to-spying-on-the-press.html]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>&quot;First they came for Fox News, and they did not speak out—because they were not Fox News. Then they came for government whistleblowers, and they did not speak out—because they were not government whistleblowers. Then they came for the maker of a YouTube video, and—okay, we know how this story ends. But how did we get here?<br />
<br />
Turns out it’s a fairly swift sojourn from a president pushing to “delegitimize” a news organization to threatening criminal prosecution for journalistic activity by a Fox News reporter, James Rosen, to spying on Associated Press reporters. In between, the Obama administration found time to relentlessly persecute government whistleblowers and publicly harass and condemn a private American citizen for expressing his constitutionally protected speech in the form of an anti-Islam YouTube video.<br />
Where were the media when all this began happening? With a few exceptions, they were acting as quiet enablers.<br />
<br />
It’s instructive to go back to the dawn of Hope and Change. It was 2009, and the new administration decided it was appropriate to use the prestige of the White House to viciously attack a news organization—Fox News—and the journalists who work there. Remember, President Obama had barely been in office and had enjoyed the most laudatory press of any new president in modern history. Yet even one outlet that allowed dissent or criticism of the president was one too many. This should have been a red flag to everyone, regardless of what they thought of Fox News. The math was simple: if the administration would abuse its power to try and intimidate one media outlet, what made anyone think they weren’t next?<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2013/05/21/how-hope-and-change-gave-way-to-spying-on-the-press.html" target="_blank">http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...the-press.html</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?12-Political-Discussions-and-Rants">Political Discussions and Rants</category>
			<dc:creator>C.Puffs</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226755-How-Hope-and-Change-Gave-Way-to-Spying-on-the-Press</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Apple’s Web of Tax Shelters Saved It Billions, Panel Finds</title>
			<link>http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226749-Apple’s-Web-of-Tax-Shelters-Saved-It-Billions-Panel-Finds&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:57:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[NELSON D. SCHWARTZ and CHARLES DUHIGG, The New York Times, May 20, 2013

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/21/business/apple-avoided-billions-in-taxes-congressional-panel-says.html?pagewanted=all


---Quote---
WASHINGTON &#8212; Even as Apple became the nation&#8217;s most profitable technology company, it avoided billions in taxes in the United States and around the world through a web of subsidiaries so complex it spanned continents and went beyond anything most experts had ever seen, Congressional investigators disclosed on Monday. 

 The investigation is expected to set up a potentially explosive confrontation between a bipartisan group of lawmakers and Timothy D. Cook, Apple&#8217;s chief executive, at a public hearing on Tuesday. 

 Congressional investigators found that some of Apple&#8217;s subsidiaries had no employees and were largely run by top officials from the company&#8217;s headquarters in Cupertino, Calif. But by officially locating them in places like Ireland, Apple was able to, in effect, make them stateless &#8212; exempt from taxes, record-keeping laws and the need for the subsidiaries to even file tax returns anywhere in the world. 

 &#8220;Apple wasn&#8217;t satisfied with shifting its profits to a low-tax offshore tax haven,&#8221; said Senator Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat who is chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations that is holding the public hearing Tuesday into Apple&#8217;s use of tax havens. &#8220;Apple successfully sought the holy grail of tax avoidance. It has created offshore entities holding tens of billions of dollars while claiming to be tax resident nowhere.&#8221; 

 Thanks to what lawmakers called &#8220;gimmicks&#8221; and &#8220;schemes,&#8221; Apple was able to largely sidestep taxes on tens of billions of dollars it earned outside the United States in recent years. Last year, international operations accounted for 61 percent of Apple&#8217;s total revenue. 

 Investigators have not accused Apple of breaking any laws and the company is hardly the only American multinational to face scrutiny for using complex corporate structures and tax havens to sidestep taxes. In recent months, revelations from European authorities about the tax avoidance strategies used by Google, Starbucks and Amazon have all stirred public anger and spurred several European governments, as well as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, a Paris-based research organization for the world&#8217;s richest countries, to discuss measures to close the loopholes. 

 Still, the findings about Apple were remarkable both for the enormous amount of money involved and the audaciousness of the company&#8217;s assertion that its subsidiaries are beyond the reach of any taxing authority. 

 &#8220;There is a technical term economists like to use for behavior like this,&#8221; said Edward Kleinbard, a law professor at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles and a former staff director at the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation. &#8220;Unbelievable chutzpah.&#8221;
---End Quote---
Read the rest of the article at the linked page.

Watching hipster heads explode as Apple is revealed to be the evil, greedy, tax-avoiding multinational corp it is. :lol:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>NELSON D. SCHWARTZ and CHARLES DUHIGG, <i>The New York Times</i>, May 20, 2013<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/21/business/apple-avoided-billions-in-taxes-congressional-panel-says.html?pagewanted=all" target="_blank">http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/21/bu...pagewanted=all</a><br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			WASHINGTON &#8212; Even as Apple became the nation&#8217;s most profitable technology company, it avoided billions in taxes in the United States and around the world through a web of subsidiaries so complex it spanned continents and went beyond anything most experts had ever seen, Congressional investigators disclosed on Monday. <br />
<br />
 The investigation is expected to set up a potentially explosive confrontation between a bipartisan group of lawmakers and Timothy D. Cook, Apple&#8217;s chief executive, at a public hearing on Tuesday. <br />
<br />
 Congressional investigators found that some of Apple&#8217;s subsidiaries had no employees and were largely run by top officials from the company&#8217;s headquarters in Cupertino, Calif. But by officially locating them in places like Ireland, Apple was able to, in effect, make them stateless &#8212; exempt from taxes, record-keeping laws and the need for the subsidiaries to even file tax returns anywhere in the world. <br />
<br />
 &#8220;Apple wasn&#8217;t satisfied with shifting its profits to a low-tax offshore tax haven,&#8221; said Senator Carl Levin, a Michigan Democrat who is chairman of the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations that is holding the public hearing Tuesday into Apple&#8217;s use of tax havens. &#8220;Apple successfully sought the holy grail of tax avoidance. It has created offshore entities holding tens of billions of dollars while claiming to be tax resident nowhere.&#8221; <br />
<br />
 Thanks to what lawmakers called &#8220;gimmicks&#8221; and &#8220;schemes,&#8221; Apple was able to largely sidestep taxes on tens of billions of dollars it earned outside the United States in recent years. Last year, international operations accounted for 61 percent of Apple&#8217;s total revenue. <br />
<br />
 Investigators have not accused Apple of breaking any laws and the company is hardly the only American multinational to face scrutiny for using complex corporate structures and tax havens to sidestep taxes. In recent months, revelations from European authorities about the tax avoidance strategies used by Google, Starbucks and Amazon have all stirred public anger and spurred several European governments, as well as the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, a Paris-based research organization for the world&#8217;s richest countries, to discuss measures to close the loopholes. <br />
<br />
 Still, the findings about Apple were remarkable both for the enormous amount of money involved and the audaciousness of the company&#8217;s assertion that its subsidiaries are beyond the reach of any taxing authority. <br />
<br />
 &#8220;There is a technical term economists like to use for behavior like this,&#8221; said Edward Kleinbard, a law professor at the University of Southern California in Los Angeles and a former staff director at the Congressional Joint Committee on Taxation. &#8220;Unbelievable chutzpah.&#8221;
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div><i>Read the rest of the article at the linked page.</i><br />
<br />
Watching hipster heads explode as Apple is revealed to be the evil, greedy, tax-avoiding multinational corp it is. :lol:</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?12-Political-Discussions-and-Rants">Political Discussions and Rants</category>
			<dc:creator>Ought Six</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226749-Apple’s-Web-of-Tax-Shelters-Saved-It-Billions-Panel-Finds</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>U.S. Treasury Takes Extra Steps to Stay Under Federal Debt Limit</title>
			<link>http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226746-U-S-Treasury-Takes-Extra-Steps-to-Stay-Under-Federal-Debt-Limit&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 02:27:05 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>Meera Louis, Bloomberg News, May 20, 2013

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-21/u-s-treasury-takes-extra-steps-to-stay-under-federal-debt-limit.html


---Quote---
The Treasury Department announced further steps to keep funding the government without going over the nation’s debt limit, amid a stalemate between Congress and the Obama administration on approving an increase in the ceiling. 

The U.S. declared a “debt-issuance suspension period” under the statute governing the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund. That allows the U.S. to redeem existing Treasury securities held by the fund as investments, and suspend new investment. Each month a debt-issuance suspension period lasts frees up about $6.4 billion, according to the Treasury. 

During this period, civil service benefit payments will continue to be paid and won’t be affected by the action. However, once all of the so-called extraordinary measures it has at its disposal to avoid breaching the limit have been exhausted, the U.S. government will be limited in its ability to make payments across the government, the Treasury says.
---End Quote---
Read the rest of the article at the linked page.</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Meera Louis, <i>Bloomberg News</i>, May 20, 2013<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-05-21/u-s-treasury-takes-extra-steps-to-stay-under-federal-debt-limit.html" target="_blank">http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-0...ebt-limit.html</a><br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			The Treasury Department announced further steps to keep funding the government without going over the nation’s debt limit, amid a stalemate between Congress and the Obama administration on approving an increase in the ceiling. <br />
<br />
The U.S. declared a “debt-issuance suspension period” under the statute governing the Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund. That allows the U.S. to redeem existing Treasury securities held by the fund as investments, and suspend new investment. Each month a debt-issuance suspension period lasts frees up about $6.4 billion, according to the Treasury. <br />
<br />
During this period, civil service benefit payments will continue to be paid and won’t be affected by the action. However, once all of the so-called extraordinary measures it has at its disposal to avoid breaching the limit have been exhausted, the U.S. government will be limited in its ability to make payments across the government, the Treasury says.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div><i>Read the rest of the article at the linked page.</i></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?12-Political-Discussions-and-Rants">Political Discussions and Rants</category>
			<dc:creator>Ought Six</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226746-U-S-Treasury-Takes-Extra-Steps-to-Stay-Under-Federal-Debt-Limit</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>New Stolen Valor Act passes the House 390-3</title>
			<link>http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226745-New-Stolen-Valor-Act-passes-the-House-390-3&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 00:50:55 GMT</pubDate>
			<description>
---Quote (Originally by Huffington Post)---
WASHINGTON -- People who falsely claim they have received a military medal in order to obtain money or government benefits could face up to a year in jail under legislation that easily passed the House Monday.The Stolen Valor Act, sponsored by Nevada Republican Joe Heck, is a second attempt by the House to revive a law on fraudulent claims to medals that was struck down by the Supreme Court in June last year. The legislation is identical to a measure that passed the House overwhelmingly last September but saw no Senate action before the last session of Congress ended. The vote Monday was 390-3.
---End Quote---


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/20/stolen-valor-act_n_3309361.html (http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/20/stolen-valor-act_n_3309361.html)</description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			<div>
				Originally Posted by <strong>Huffington Post</strong>
				
			</div>
			<div class="message"><div style="text-align: left;"><font color="#333333"><span style="font-family: Georgia">WASHINGTON -- People who falsely claim they have received a military medal in order to obtain money or government benefits could face up to a year in jail under legislation that easily passed the House Monday.</span></font><font color="#333333"><span style="font-family: Georgia">The Stolen Valor Act, sponsored by Nevada Republican Joe Heck, is a second attempt by the House to revive a law on fraudulent claims to medals that was struck down by the Supreme Court in June last year. The legislation is identical to a measure that passed the House overwhelmingly last September but saw no Senate action before the last session of Congress ended. The vote Monday was 390-3.</span></font></div></div>
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div><a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/20/stolen-valor-act_n_3309361.html" target="_blank"><br />
<br />
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/20/stolen-valor-act_n_3309361.html</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?12-Political-Discussions-and-Rants">Political Discussions and Rants</category>
			<dc:creator>Soldat_Américain</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226745-New-Stolen-Valor-Act-passes-the-House-390-3</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Meda awardedl for teacher for thwarting off shooter</title>
			<link>http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226737-Meda-awardedl-for-teacher-for-thwarting-off-shooter&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 21:09:00 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[
---Quote---
Math teacher Tommi Kuusisto was in life threatening situation in March of last year, when school shooter was aiming hunting rifle at him. 

City of Orivesi and parent union of local school applied him for lifesaving medal, President Sauli Niinistö approved it yesterday.


Incident started when 22-year old man tried to enter the classroom during school day. Earlier he had shot a father of his ex-girlfriend with a flare gun. And now he was in search of the girl. 


Teacher heard a knock and opened a door, he was face to face with a man who was aiming a hunting rifle at his chest and demanded for him to pass. 


When the teacher did not comply the perpetrator tried to fire the rifle, but the rifle jammed. The teacher then managed to shove him back to the hallway and was able to lock the door. After that the perpetrator shot five times through the door.


Despite the life threatening situation the teacher was able to call the police and inform them of the situation. He told students to go by the wall and stay behind desks. He kept his calm and doing so was able to calm the students down. 


- I was thinking of what would happen if he managed to open the door. 


Incident took place in Friday and he was back at work on Monday. 


- I thought it's better if I just faced my workplace as soon as possible and continued working. 


The perpetrator was charged with three attempted murders and one attempted manslaughter. Because of his mental state the charges were dropped and he was put on involuntary mental care (pretty much a life sentence in mental hospital).
---End Quote---
http://www.iltalehti.fi/uutiset/2013052017032324_uu.shtml

It's nice that it sometimes ends this way.

EDIT: Can't always succeed with topics.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			Math teacher Tommi Kuusisto was in life threatening situation in March of last year, when school shooter was aiming hunting rifle at him. <br />
<br />
City of Orivesi and parent union of local school applied him for lifesaving medal, President Sauli Niinistö approved it yesterday.<br />
<br />
<br />
Incident started when 22-year old man tried to enter the classroom during school day. Earlier he had shot a father of his ex-girlfriend with a flare gun. And now he was in search of the girl. <br />
<br />
<br />
Teacher heard a knock and opened a door, he was face to face with a man who was aiming a hunting rifle at his chest and demanded for him to pass. <br />
<br />
<br />
When the teacher did not comply the perpetrator tried to fire the rifle, but the rifle jammed. The teacher then managed to shove him back to the hallway and was able to lock the door. After that the perpetrator shot five times through the door.<br />
<br />
<br />
Despite the life threatening situation the teacher was able to call the police and inform them of the situation. He told students to go by the wall and stay behind desks. He kept his calm and doing so was able to calm the students down. <br />
<br />
<br />
- I was thinking of what would happen if he managed to open the door. <br />
<br />
<br />
Incident took place in Friday and he was back at work on Monday. <br />
<br />
<br />
- I thought it's better if I just faced my workplace as soon as possible and continued working. <br />
<br />
<br />
The perpetrator was charged with three attempted murders and one attempted manslaughter. Because of his mental state the charges were dropped and he was put on involuntary mental care (pretty much a life sentence in mental hospital).
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div><a href="http://www.iltalehti.fi/uutiset/2013052017032324_uu.shtml" target="_blank">http://www.iltalehti.fi/uutiset/2013...32324_uu.shtml</a><br />
<br />
It's nice that it sometimes ends this way.<br />
<br />
EDIT: Can't always succeed with topics.</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?12-Political-Discussions-and-Rants">Political Discussions and Rants</category>
			<dc:creator>PEMM</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226737-Meda-awardedl-for-teacher-for-thwarting-off-shooter</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Mr Irrelevant hits the Sunday Talk Shows</title>
			<link>http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226735-Mr-Irrelevant-hits-the-Sunday-Talk-Shows&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 20:49:25 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[Dan Pfeiffer, Senior White House Advisor?  Really?   Anyway here basically parrotting Jay Carney's claim that there are no scandals, this is all sort of, well, irrelevant.

http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2013/05/20/dan-pfeiffer-mr-irrelevant/



---Quote---
*Dan Pfeiffer – Mr. Irrelevant*

*POSTED AT 10:45 AM ON MAY 20, 2013 BY DUANE PATTERSON (http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/author/generalissimo/)*


I realize the gang here was all over all the relevant irrelevance spouted by Dan Pfeiffer, addressed mainly by subject. But it’s worth noting that for the first time in American culture, we now have two reigning men that are Mr. Irrelevant. And I don’t think Dan Pfeiffer played much football.
In an annual tradition that began in 1976 by former player, businessman and part-time actor Paul Salata, the very last person picked in the NFL draft each year, sometimes 450 selections after the draft commences, hosts a week long golf tournament, regatta, roast, and presents Mr. Irrelevant with the Lowsman Trophy, which is of course the opposite of the Heisman Trophy. The trophy itself strikes the same pose as the Heisman, except with the player fumbling the ball.
Until yesterday, Mr. Irrelevant lived only in the hearts of minds of only the most loyal followers of the draft. Thanks to his stunning performance on the Sunday show circuit yesterday, Mr. Irrelevant should now forever be linked to Obama special assistant Dan Pfeiffer, who saw the law, the Benghazi talking points, and where Obama was the night of the attack last September 11th on our consulate, all as being irrelevant.
Now if only we could undo the damange of Obamacare and make the rest of the administration just as irrelevant. The country would be far better off.
---End Quote---
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>Dan Pfeiffer, Senior White House <i>Advisor?  </i>Really?   Anyway here basically parrotting Jay Carney's claim that there are no scandals, this is all sort of, well, irrelevant.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/2013/05/20/dan-pfeiffer-mr-irrelevant/" target="_blank">http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives...mr-irrelevant/</a><br />
<br />
<br />
<div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			<b>Dan Pfeiffer – Mr. Irrelevant</b><br />
<br />
<b>POSTED AT 10:45 AM ON MAY 20, 2013 BY <a href="http://hotair.com/greenroom/archives/author/generalissimo/" target="_blank">DUANE PATTERSON</a></b><br />
<br />
<font color="#000000"><span style="font-family: georgia"><br />
  <br />
</span></font><br />
<font color="#000000"><span style="font-family: georgia">I realize the gang here was all over all the relevant irrelevance spouted by Dan Pfeiffer, addressed mainly by subject. But it’s worth noting that for the first time in American culture, we now have two reigning men that are Mr. Irrelevant. And I don’t think Dan Pfeiffer played much football.</span></font><br />
<font color="#000000"><span style="font-family: georgia">In an annual tradition that began in 1976 by former player, businessman and part-time actor Paul Salata, the very last person picked in the NFL draft each year, sometimes 450 selections after the draft commences, hosts a week long golf tournament, regatta, roast, and presents Mr. Irrelevant with the Lowsman Trophy, which is of course the opposite of the Heisman Trophy. The trophy itself strikes the same pose as the Heisman, except with the player fumbling the ball.</span></font><br />
<font color="#000000"><span style="font-family: georgia">Until yesterday, Mr. Irrelevant lived only in the hearts of minds of only the most loyal followers of the draft. Thanks to his stunning performance on the Sunday show circuit yesterday, Mr. Irrelevant should now forever be linked to Obama special assistant Dan Pfeiffer, who saw the law, the Benghazi talking points, and where Obama was the night of the attack last September 11th on our consulate, all as being irrelevant.</span></font><br />
<font color="#000000"><span style="font-family: georgia">Now if only we could undo the damange of Obamacare and make the rest of the administration just as irrelevant. The country would be far better off.</span></font><br />
<br />
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?12-Political-Discussions-and-Rants">Political Discussions and Rants</category>
			<dc:creator>riderboy</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226735-Mr-Irrelevant-hits-the-Sunday-Talk-Shows</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[Slovenian philospher Zizek proposes 'gulag' for those who do not support SYRIZA]]></title>
			<link>http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226730-Slovenian-philospher-Zizek-proposes-gulag-for-those-who-do-not-support-SYRIZA&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 18:34:46 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[
---Quote---
Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek has caused controversy in Greece  by suggesting that he would send anyone who does not support SYRIZA to a  “gulag”.


Zizek met with SYRIZA leader Alexis Tsipras in Croatia  last week when the pair were taking part in the Subversive Festival.  Tsipras also met US director Oliver Stone there.


During a panel  discussion with Tsipras, Zizek expressed his appreciation for SYRIZA.  The academic had appeared alongside Tsipras in Athens ahead of last  summer’s national elections as well.
“SYRIZA is one of the bright lights in Europe today,” Zizek told the audience in Zagreb.
However,  it was his comments regarding those who do not support SYRIZA that  attracted criticism in Greece on Monday, when the video drew attention  on social media.
“If they don’t support SYRIZA then, in my vision  of the democratic future, all these people will get from me a first  class one-way ticket to [a] gulag,” he said.
---End Quote---
http://www.ekathimerini.com/4dcgi/_w_articles_wsite1_1_20/05/2013_499789]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			Slovenian philosopher Slavoj Zizek has caused controversy in Greece  by suggesting that he would send anyone who does not support SYRIZA to a  “gulag”.<br />
<br />
<br />
Zizek met with SYRIZA leader Alexis Tsipras in Croatia  last week when the pair were taking part in the Subversive Festival.  Tsipras also met US director Oliver Stone there.<br />
<br />
<br />
During a panel  discussion with Tsipras, Zizek expressed his appreciation for SYRIZA.  The academic had appeared alongside Tsipras in Athens ahead of last  summer’s national elections as well.<br />
“SYRIZA is one of the bright lights in Europe today,” Zizek told the audience in Zagreb.<br />
However,  it was his comments regarding those who do not support SYRIZA that  attracted criticism in Greece on Monday, when the video drew attention  on social media.<br />
“If they don’t support SYRIZA then, in my vision  of the democratic future, all these people will get from me a first  class one-way ticket to [a] gulag,” he said.
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div><a href="http://www.ekathimerini.com/4dcgi/_w_articles_wsite1_1_20/05/2013_499789" target="_blank">http://www.ekathimerini.com/4dcgi/_w...05/2013_499789</a></div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?12-Political-Discussions-and-Rants">Political Discussions and Rants</category>
			<dc:creator>WINCHPRE64</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226730-Slovenian-philospher-Zizek-proposes-gulag-for-those-who-do-not-support-SYRIZA</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title><![CDATA[France: 8000 'rich' households taxed more than they earned in 2012]]></title>
			<link>http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226723-France-8000-rich-households-taxed-more-than-they-earned-in-2012&amp;goto=newpost</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 14:20:15 GMT</pubDate>
			<description><![CDATA[
---Quote---
Link (http://www.*******.com/article/2013/05/18/us-france-tax-idUSBRE94H0AX20130518)
*More than 8,000  French households' tax bills topped 100 percent of their income last  year,* the business newspaper Les Echos reported on Saturday, citing  Finance Ministry data.

 The newspaper said that the  exceptionally high level of taxation was due to a one-off levy last year  on 2011 incomes for households with assets of more than 1.3 million  euros ($1.67 million).
President  Francois Hollande's Socialist government imposed the tax surcharge last  year, shortly after taking office, to offset the impact of a rebate  scheme created by its conservative predecessor to cap an individual's  overall taxation at 50 percent of income.
The government has been forced to redraft a proposed bill to levy a temporary 75 percent tax on earnings (http://www.*******.com/finance/earnings) over 1 million euros, which had been one of Hollande's campaign pledges.
The  Constitutional Council has judged such a high rate of taxation to be  unfair, leaving the government to rehash it to hit companies rather than  individuals.

Since then, a top  administrative court has determined that a marginal tax rate higher than  66.66 percent on a single household risked being considered as  confiscatory by the council.
Les  Echos reported that nearly 12,000 households paid taxes last year worth  more than 75 percent of their 2011 revenues due to the exceptional levy.
---End Quote---
There's a word for this kind of action: robbery. 
:cantbeli:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div><div class="bbcode_container">
	<div class="bbcode_description">Quote:</div>
	<div class="bbcode_quote printable">
		<hr />
		
			<a href="http://www.*******.com/article/2013/05/18/us-france-tax-idUSBRE94H0AX20130518" target="_blank">Link</a><br />
<b>More than 8,000  French households' tax bills topped 100 percent of their income last  year,</b> the business newspaper Les Echos reported on Saturday, citing  Finance Ministry data.<br />
<br />
 The newspaper said that the  exceptionally high level of taxation was due to a one-off levy last year  on 2011 incomes for households with assets of more than 1.3 million  euros ($1.67 million).<br />
President  Francois Hollande's Socialist government imposed the tax surcharge last  year, shortly after taking office, to offset the impact of a rebate  scheme created by its conservative predecessor to cap an individual's  overall taxation at 50 percent of income.<br />
The government has been forced to redraft a proposed bill to levy a temporary 75 percent tax on <a href="http://www.*******.com/finance/earnings" target="_blank">earnings</a> over 1 million euros, which had been one of Hollande's campaign pledges.<br />
The  Constitutional Council has judged such a high rate of taxation to be  unfair, leaving the government to rehash it to hit companies rather than  individuals.<br />
<br />
Since then, a top  administrative court has determined that a marginal tax rate higher than  66.66 percent on a single household risked being considered as  confiscatory by the council.<br />
Les  Echos reported that nearly 12,000 households paid taxes last year worth  more than 75 percent of their 2011 revenues due to the exceptional levy.  <br />
			
		<hr />
	</div>
</div>There's a word for this kind of action: robbery. <br />
:cantbeli:</div>

]]></content:encoded>
			<category domain="http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/forumdisplay.php?12-Political-Discussions-and-Rants">Political Discussions and Rants</category>
			<dc:creator>muck</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?226723-France-8000-rich-households-taxed-more-than-they-earned-in-2012</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
