Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Exocet video

  1. #1
    Senior Member xav's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Age
    31
    Posts
    12,556

    Default Exocet video

    Exocet MM38, MM40, AM39 et SM39

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9m0R6mQXm70

    (sorry, the video will not work when embed)

  2. #2
    fap, fap, fap, mousegiggle, fap, fap, fap toki's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    14,572

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Xav View Post
    Exocet MM38, MM40, AM39 et SM39

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9m0R6mQXm70

    (sorry, the video will not work when embed)
    I wonder why nobody replied. Very cool vid. Fired from any angle... Heli and Sub are great.

  3. #3
    Senior Member flanker7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    cyprus
    Age
    36
    Posts
    7,538

    Default

    Great video! CNG uses the MM40 for costal defense.

    Hellenic Armed Forces use MM40 from ships and coastal batteries, and AM39 from Mirage 2000 fighters. Also, still in use from FACs are older MM38

  4. #4
    Senior Member Dragunov's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Mexiko
    Age
    28
    Posts
    3,874

    Default

    I love this missile. A deadly one.

  5. #5
    Member stonecutter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Cowtown
    Posts
    957

    Default

    What defenses have ships evolved against sea-skimming missiles these days? Would a modern exocet still have as much of a chance against shipping as it once did? Very nice piece of hardware.

  6. #6
    Member Midn./Patriot's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    USA
    Age
    25
    Posts
    451

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by stonecutter View Post
    What defenses have ships evolved against sea-skimming missiles these days? Would a modern exocet still have as much of a chance against shipping as it once did? Very nice piece of hardware.
    Regular Merchant vessels still have no defense from an exocet or really any other kind of anti-ship weapon. Modern Navies now have Close In defense systems like CIWS Phalanx and the CIWS Goalkeeper. Both are radar controlled multi-barrel cannons. I think that the rolling airframe missile might also be able to knock out Exocet's from even greater ranges.

  7. #7
    Banned user artinist's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    I support the troops AND the mission
    Posts
    347

    Default

    i used to think exocet was actually XO-7 in french when i was a kid, lol

  8. #8
    filthy Lucre EsoognomEhT's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    7,002

    Default

    All the Exocet hits were a result of carelessness on my part, or carelessness on other people’s parts, or basically failure of our systems by the people involved including me”

  9. #9
    Senior Member Ivan le Fou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    4,250

    Default

    Cocorico!

  10. #10
    Member Muang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Guaulois.
    Age
    26
    Posts
    326

    Default

    Good missile !



    (si tu veux que plus de monde regarde ton topic, change de titre, tlm sait pas que un Exocet c'est un missile...)

  11. #11
    Senior Member name already taken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    45°35'1.69"N 73°39'7.35"W
    Posts
    1,515

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Muang View Post
    Good missile !



    (si tu veux que plus de monde regarde ton topic, change de titre, tlm sait pas que un Exocet c'est un missile...)
    Peut pas changer le titre une fois choisi...

  12. #12
    Senior Member name already taken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    45°35'1.69"N 73°39'7.35"W
    Posts
    1,515

    Default Ostie de bon video !

    Dangereux ces choses là ?J'en au vu de près à Montréal le 14 juillet il y a quelques années sur un petit navire équipé pour la guerre nucléaire (gicleurs pour nettoyer les poussiêres radioactives).

    Paraît que les Russes ont développé des Exocets voyageant a mach 3 et que le systême AEGIS ne peut rien y faire.

    Paraît qu'à cause de celà, les porte avions c'est chose du passé. L'avenir est aux sous marins.

    And all the carrier srtike forces sent to the Persian Gulf and waiting there...

    [translation]

    Dangerous stuff you got there? I've seen some in Montreal on a 14 of July a few years ago on a small ship equipped with a costly sprinkler system to wash out radioactive dust for nuclear warfare.

    Looks like the Russians developed a mach 3 version of this against which the AEGIS system can't do much about.

    Because of this, it seems the aircraft carrier will become something of the past and the future belongs to submarines.

    And all these carrier srtike forces sent to the Persian Gulf and waiting there...

  13. #13
    Senior Member khukuri's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    london, and a bit more
    Posts
    5,067

    Default

    Correct me If i am wrong, but every time I hear about the exocet it has failed.


    1: Argentine Vs british. Missile failes to explode
    2: Hezbullah versus israel. Iranian version of chinese version failes to explode


    Im might be wrong so plz correct if wrong.,..

  14. #14
    Senior Member name already taken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    45°35'1.69"N 73°39'7.35"W
    Posts
    1,515

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by khukuri View Post
    Correct me If i am wrong, but every time I hear about the exocet it has failed.


    1: Argentine Vs british. Missile failes to explode
    2: Hezbullah versus israel. Iranian version of chinese version failes to explode


    Im might be wrong so plz correct if wrong.,..
    Even if many fail to explode, they're still much cheaper to build than the ships they're used against.

    So it doesn't matter to send a few to sink such high value targets.

    About the Argentinians against the British in the Falklands, it was the first time a ship was sunk by an exocet in a war situation. The Argentinians wrote history.

    Their crews were not well trained and had not finished training with their french exocet teachers.

    As for the " Iranian version of chinese version " missile, I suspect these missiles were in their early uses during the Hezbollah/IDF conflict in Lebanon. This type of sophisticated equipment needs lots of adjustments drawn from actual war use to become effective.

  15. #15

    Default

    hmm, a video without musik would be cool. only with a sound...

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •