Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 33

Thread: US's Iraq oil grab is a done deal

  1. #1
    Senior Member Flavius22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,445

    Cool US's Iraq oil grab is a done deal

    By 2010 we will need [a further] 50 million barrels a day. The Middle East, with two-thirds of the oil and the lowest cost, is still where the prize lies." - US Vice President **** Cheney, then Halliburton chief executive officer, London, autumn 1999

    US President George W Bush and Vice President **** Cheney might as well declare the Iraq war over and out. As far as they - and the humongous energy interests they defend - are concerned,


    ...


    Big Oil is obviously ecstatic - not only ExxonMobil, but also ConocoPhillips, Chevron, BP and Shell (which have collected invaluable info on two of Iraq's biggest oilfields), TotalFinaElf, Lukoil from Russia and the Chinese majors. Iraq has as many as 70 undeveloped fields - "small" ones hold a minimum of a billion barrels. As desert western Iraq has not even been exploited, reserves may reach 300 billion barrels - way more than Saudi Arabia. Gargantuan profits under the PSA arrangement are in a class by themselves. Iraqi oil costs only US$1 a barrel to extract. With a barrel worth $60 and up, happy days are here again.

    more here (copy right)

    http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/IB28Ak01.html

  2. #2
    Senior Member Flavius22's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,445

    Default fyi

    if this is true, then all of the excess revenue collected by oil conglamorates should go towards the rehab of the 40-50k wounded members of the military coalition that secured that oil

  3. #3
    Banned user sferrin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,241

    Default

    ", Lukoil from Russia and the Chinese majors"

    Okay so the people who buy the most oil are interested in buying Iraq's oil. Where's the news in that? (Although it does make you wonder what Russia's interest is as I thought they were a net exporter.)

  4. #4
    Senior Member bugkill's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,578

    Default

    so what? what are you going to provide for the country? people make this big deal about oil, but they forget that it is a VERY important resource for our country. it appears that you are trying to make the argument that the war is all about oil and i ask "so f**king what!?".

    tell me, what do you and others that share this viewpoint provide for the country (or another country that you may be from)? it is easy for someone that is only a student, professor, mechanic, janitor, or shoe salesman to talk crap about those that run s**t, but what the hell do you actually bring to the table when it concerns helping the country? how many jobs do you provide for those in america? how much oil do you bring into our country to get us from A to B? what is it that you provide the country in order for us to truly listen to what you're trying to say?

  5. #5
    Banned user sferrin's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    2,241

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by bugkill View Post
    so what? what are you going to provide for the country? people make this big deal about oil, but they forget that it is a VERY important resource for our country.
    Uh, they're going to BUY your oil. You get money for it. What else do you want, blowjobs?

  6. #6
    Μολὼν λαβέ Hollis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Stuck in the rain and mud again.
    Posts
    19,276

    Default

    EXXON is Alaska Oil

  7. #7
    Banned user
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    8,830

    Default

    So we get to keep buying/pumping oil from the middle east for a few more decades?

    Why is this controversial?

  8. #8
    Senior Member Freibier's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Bayern, Europa
    Posts
    5,210

    Default

    Do you think all those oil contracts will hold after US troops leave?

  9. #9
    Loadmaster General Laworkerbee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    California Über Alles
    Age
    43
    Posts
    39,959

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Freibier View Post
    Do you think all those oil contracts will hold after US troops leave?
    In short....yes

  10. #10
    Μολὼν λαβέ Hollis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 1969
    Location
    Stuck in the rain and mud again.
    Posts
    19,276

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Freibier View Post
    Do you think all those oil contracts will hold after US troops leave?

    Greed is not limited to just one Capitalistic country in the west. Some of the greediest people are Commies and religious fanatics.

  11. #11

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by HOLLiS View Post
    EXXON is Alaska Oil
    EXXON are involved in the extraction of oil and gas on a global scale as either or an independent entity or through joint ventures with other oil and gas companies.

  12. #12
    Sapporo Snow Bunny budgie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Finally There
    Age
    39
    Posts
    6,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Flavius22 View Post
    if this is true, then all of the excess revenue collected by oil conglamorates should go towards the rehab of the 40-50k wounded members of the military coalition that secured that oil

    if this is true, it won't

  13. #13
    Sapporo Snow Bunny budgie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Finally There
    Age
    39
    Posts
    6,407

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jobu View Post
    So we get to keep buying/pumping oil from the middle east for a few more decades?

    Why is this controversial?

    Ohh, umm.. .the fact that it took a war to secure it?

  14. #14
    Senior Member mi35d's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Stateside
    Posts
    2,282

    Default

    And this would be different from other wars in the past, how? Wars are fought over resources whether it be land, minerals or oil.

  15. #15
    Senior Member akd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Fort Worth
    Posts
    1,833

    Default

    What a bunch of horsesh!t. Big surprise that after the Sunnis were toppled from power and decades of exploiting the Kurds and Shiites, the Kurds and Shiites end up with a favorable position in the post-Saddam oil market. And the sharing of the oil revenues is divided amongst the three groups because the Iraqis would not have it any other way.

    Furthermore, not once does the article provide any information regarding what share of oil revenues will go to Iraq, nor does it explain how the oil fields would be developed to the benefit of Iraq without the help of outside firms.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •